Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jul 07, 2025 8:52 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 340 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 ... 17  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 4:42 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19566
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
aerodyte wrote:
Effes wrote:
The club know that if Ratten is retained there will be a 30% drop off in membership.


Where did the club locate a crystal ball and where can I find one?


That's what I've heard - it's the same reason they'll try to appoint a big name (MM) instead of someone who is untried but who may be better - they are worried about the drop in membership.

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 5:26 pm 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 1:52 pm
Posts: 194
Effes wrote:
aerodyte wrote:
Effes wrote:
The club know that if Ratten is retained there will be a 30% drop off in membership.


Where did the club locate a crystal ball and where can I find one?


That's what I've heard - it's the same reason they'll try to appoint a big name (MM) instead of someone who is untried but who may be better - they are worried about the drop in membership.



That would have to be the single dumbest reason anyone could concoct to drop the coach.

If Ratten goes for this reason then we are more of a basket case than I realized.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 5:31 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 5:29 pm
Posts: 327
wish i could link but waite eyes top 4 article 2013 in heraldsun lol


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 5:31 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:39 pm
Posts: 15848
aerodyte wrote:
I rarely post but I feel inclined after reading this thread and nearly pulling my hair out.

Posters calling for Ratten's head after an undermanned loss to the ladder leaders have rocks in their head.



It's not that we lost, it's the manner of the loss. Totally inept, as it often does with Sydney, the scoreboard flattered us. Poor systems and structure - no forward line, players turning inboard and expecting a teammate there and finding nobody, etc, etc.

_________________
"I had to eat"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 5:37 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19566
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
aerodyte wrote:
Effes wrote:
That's what I've heard - it's the same reason they'll try to appoint a big name (MM) instead of someone who is untried but who may be better - they are worried about the drop in membership.



That would have to be the single dumbest reason anyone could concoct to drop the coach.

If Ratten goes for this reason then we are more of a basket case than I realized.


You think it would be for that reason alone? I thought our performances and player development (amongst other things) would contribute to the decision.

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 5:41 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:44 am
Posts: 3136
Effes wrote:
The club know that if Ratten is retained there will be a 30% drop off in membership.

Hmm... Sounds familier...

Reminds me of posters claiming a 10-15k drop in membership if ever Fev got traded :lol: - see viewtopic.php?f=35&t=26301&hilit=fevola+keep+membership&start=72


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 5:41 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:12 pm
Posts: 4426
aerodyte wrote:
Effes wrote:
aerodyte wrote:

Where did the club locate a crystal ball and where can I find one?


That's what I've heard - it's the same reason they'll try to appoint a big name (MM) instead of someone who is untried but who may be better - they are worried about the drop in membership.



That would have to be the single dumbest reason anyone could concoct to drop the coach.

If Ratten goes for this reason then we are more of a basket case than I realized.

So why do you think we are a basket case?

_________________
"Truth, for the tyrants, is the most terrible and cruel of all bindings; it is like an incandescent iron falling across their chests. And it is even more agonizing than hot iron, for that only burns the flesh, while truth burns its way into the soul"     — Lauro Aguirre


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 5:43 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:27 am
Posts: 2345
Effes wrote:
That's what I've heard - it's the same reason they'll try to appoint a big name (MM) instead of someone who is untried but who may be better - they are worried about the drop in membership.


Yep. Very simple and is of perfect sense whether we like it or not.
8 weeks ago I would have been surprised if Ratten had have got sacked and now I'd be shocked if he wasn't.

The performance on Saturday didn't do Ratten any favours either.
It was not for the fact we lost but for the lack of structure all over the ground. Not looking good.


Last edited by harker on Mon Aug 06, 2012 5:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 5:44 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 7:36 pm
Posts: 323
Location: WAGGA WAGGA
Navy Blue Horse wrote:
aerodyte wrote:
I rarely post but I feel inclined after reading this thread and nearly pulling my hair out.

Posters calling for Ratten's head after an undermanned loss to the ladder leaders have rocks in their head.



It's not that we lost, it's the manner of the loss. Totally inept, as it often does with Sydney, the scoreboard flattered us. Poor systems and structure - no forward line, players turning inboard and expecting a teammate there and finding nobody, etc, etc.

This has to be our coaching staff fault im sure we have enough talent in our squad.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 5:47 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 7348
Yeah the fact we were promised top 4 and look like finishing top 12 is pretty damning for Ratts.

Membership is everything. Advertising, sponsors and endorsement deals are made on the back of membership numbers. It's the most crucial aspect to any club's front office.

It's plenty of reason to hire and fire anyone because of perceived failure.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 5:48 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
blueboys101 wrote:
wish i could link but waite eyes top 4 article 2013 in heraldsun lol

Blues eye top four in 2013
Quote:
CARLTON comeback forward Jarrad Waite says finals are out of reach but the Blues are already eyeing a top-four finish next season.

Waite, who returned from a 12-week injury absence to kick three goals in Sunday's loss to Sydney, conceded there was no more than a glimmer of finals hope for the 11th-placed Blues.

"We really needed the win to sort of keep our season alive," he said today.

Despite Carlton declaring pre-season they would make the top four, Waite said, given constant injuries to their big men this year, the season shouldn't be regarded as a complete failure.

"(It is) a little bit, but a lot of things were out of our control," Waite said.

"You look at Hawthorn a couple of years ago, they lost all their big men, they didn't make the finals.

"They come out a couple of years later and they're dominating.

"We can take those signs out of it.

"We (aimed) high, we wanted to finish top four, it didn't go our way, but we're confident going into next year that it's still a massive chance."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 5:49 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48555
Location: Prison Island
ridiculous

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 5:50 pm 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 1:52 pm
Posts: 194
Navy Blue Horse wrote:
aerodyte wrote:
I rarely post but I feel inclined after reading this thread and nearly pulling my hair out.

Posters calling for Ratten's head after an undermanned loss to the ladder leaders have rocks in their head.



It's not that we lost, it's the manner of the loss. Totally inept, as it often does with Sydney, the scoreboard flattered us. Poor systems and structure - no forward line, players turning inboard and expecting a teammate there and finding nobody, etc, etc.



How can you expect cohesion from a team that has barely played together?
9 of the 22 were basically NB players, a few of our best 22 are back from long layoffs, a stack of players haven't made 50 games yet, and the majority of those are hardly in double figures for AFL games!
And can I remind you that we weren't playing bloody GWS but the team that is currently the best in the competition
They're in ripping form and we're not the only side they've humbled this year.
Jesus Christ.


And for me the manner in which we lost wasn't so bad.
There was effort and intensity and that's what you'd ask for given the situation.
The organization will come with another preseason and the return of experienced players.


I should mention now however that if people are unhappy with John Barker they may have a case.
When he came over quite a few Hawthorn people were saying good riddance. It could be a coincidence, but Hawthorns forward line woes seem to have turned around since he left. Meanwhile at Carlton we've been plagued with a lack of structure up forward for the past two years.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 5:52 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 7348
harker wrote:

The performance on Saturday didn't do Ratten any favours either.
It was not for the fact we lost but for the lack of structure all over the ground. Not looking good.



Yes, even before the injury rot set in, when we lost we were absolutely pulled apart and molested. There's losses, and then there's losses. 98% of our losses have been of the really bad, not even put up a fight or have any idea what we're meant to be doing kind.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 5:58 pm 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 1:52 pm
Posts: 194
Braithy wrote:
harker wrote:

The performance on Saturday didn't do Ratten any favours either.
It was not for the fact we lost but for the lack of structure all over the ground. Not looking good.



Yes, even before the injury rot set in, when we lost we were absolutely pulled apart and molested. There's losses, and then there's losses. 98% of our losses have been of the really bad, not even put up a fight or have any idea what we're meant to be doing kind.



How did you rate 2011?
Did we have systems and put up a fight?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 6:09 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
aerodyte wrote:
Braithy wrote:
harker wrote:

The performance on Saturday didn't do Ratten any favours either.
It was not for the fact we lost but for the lack of structure all over the ground. Not looking good.



Yes, even before the injury rot set in, when we lost we were absolutely pulled apart and molested. There's losses, and then there's losses. 98% of our losses have been of the really bad, not even put up a fight or have any idea what we're meant to be doing kind.


Look at the last 10 weeks of last year too...

We wernt anything special.

Actually we were nudged out of the four by the previous years wooden spooner.


How did you rate 2011?
Did we have systems and put up a fight?


Look at the last 10 weeks of last year too...

We wernt anything special.

Actually we were nudged out of the four by the previous years wooden spooner.

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 6:17 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9115
Location: Nth Fitzroy
Braithy wrote:
harker wrote:

The performance on Saturday didn't do Ratten any favours either.
It was not for the fact we lost but for the lack of structure all over the ground. Not looking good.



Yes, even before the injury rot set in, when we lost we were absolutely pulled apart and molested. There's losses, and then there's losses. 98% of our losses have been of the really bad, not even put up a fight or have any idea what we're meant to be doing kind.


Werent we 3 nil before the bombers game? Then lost 3 guys in the first 10 mins and from then we started getting pulled apart and molested and it got worse as the more guns were added to the injury list?

Anyway, Its all about results. We were silly to put our faith in the list we had. Too many fragile bodies and minds. We will need to do something about that now as it is obvious that our current list and best 22 will not take us deep into sept.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 6:18 pm 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
aerodyte wrote:
Braithy wrote:
harker wrote:

The performance on Saturday didn't do Ratten any favours either.
It was not for the fact we lost but for the lack of structure all over the ground. Not looking good.



Yes, even before the injury rot set in, when we lost we were absolutely pulled apart and molested. There's losses, and then there's losses. 98% of our losses have been of the really bad, not even put up a fight or have any idea what we're meant to be doing kind.



How did you rate 2011?
Did we have systems and put up a fight?


2011, okay but fell away.

We don't have any systems relevant to modern football, our development was non existent until injuries, any side in the top 8 picks us apart.

We do put up a fight which is some ways shows how bad we are playing.

As far as I am concerned the games against Essendon*, St Kilda, Adelaide, GWS and North were the most damning of Ratten's coaching this year.

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 6:21 pm 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 1:52 pm
Posts: 194
blueboys101 wrote:
wish i could link but waite eyes top 4 article 2013 in heraldsun lol



Why is this so crazy?
By the start of next season I think we can be in an even better position than were were this year, when just about everyone on TC was crying out to just give us the cup.


-Cut the fat off the list. Russell & Bower spring to mind, but there are plenty I'm sure everyone has their favorites. ROK, Kerr, Davies. Whoever the club decides won't cut it. Do a big clean-out.
-Draft heavily with the extra list space. There is reputedly some very good talent in the top 12. We'll have a pick well within that range. Ready made mid anyone? And need anyone be reminded how 2nd and 3rd rounders + rookies can come good a lot faster than anyone anticipates.
-Trade. Lucas I'm sure would attract some interest. Hell, maybe even Duigan. He was good for us in 2010 but might be useful to a side like Port back in his home town. Get used to more frequent player movement, there's a new era coming.
-Manage injuries now. Anyone with niggles or in need of surgery gets wrapped up now the season is done, should be fine to start duties in November and be right for the season proper. How many of our best 22 were either missing or underdone coming into this year?
-Develop youngsters like Bell and McInnes, Tuohy, Casboult & Collins, and maybe someone can breakout a little like Mitchell, Carter, Buckley or Dale


Suddenly 2013 might be looking bright for the Blues. Also take note that shamefully uneven fixture favours teams who struggled the year before. Perhaps we'll be gifted a solid 5 wins against Melb, GWS & GCS the way Adelaide were this year and boom, we're on our way to finals already.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 06, 2012 6:22 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:42 pm
Posts: 7348
aerodyte wrote:


How did you rate 2011?
Did we have systems and put up a fight?



When we lost we were properly rolled. Similar issues to now. Kickouts, pressing, hand & foot skills failing under pressure were our achilles then, and are now. In 2011 we struggled against the well drilled, hard at the ball teams like Geelong, Hawthorn, Swans etc But now not only do we struggle against them, teams like Essendon*, WCE & the Saints can beat us by hard tagging Judd & murphy out of the game.

Our forward structure was better in 2011. Injuries have a role there. Walker, Betts and Garlett played in one game I can remember and that was when we thumped the pies and they looked lively.

I got no idea where we head to from here. I'm on the fence about Ratts. imo Barker the forward coach, our stoppage coach and our strength and fitness department all need to be replaced/ upgraded.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 340 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 ... 17  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Blue4ever, MPH78, thehalford and 32 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group