Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jul 07, 2025 4:17 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 340 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 17  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2012 8:37 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
If you say so. :lol: :lol:

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2012 8:38 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 6:11 pm
Posts: 15060
Pretty average game, had our chances but again didnt make the most of our inside 50's. It seemed every time the Swans went forward they converted. Terrible turnovers very costly. Our forward structure seemed non existent, Waite leads too wide.
Some players simply not up to it, names have already been mentioned. Umpires were terrible especially in the first half.
Bit of a nothing game, shame about Jamo.
Wasnt expecting to win and were alot closer than i thought we would be.
Only 4 games to go.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2012 8:40 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 1:47 pm
Posts: 33
Location: Macedon
I've given up on Gibbs - slow, soft and lazy. I prefer watching the next batch of kids.

_________________
Simmo - the true spirit of Carlton


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2012 8:42 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34555
Location: The Brown Wedge
BlueGuru wrote:
I've given up on Gibbs - slow, soft and lazy. I prefer watching the next batch of kids.


I hate it when people blame the coach for a players game....but I'm gonna do it tonight. I reckon Ratts has [REDACTED] up his game.

_________________
end of message


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2012 8:46 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10624
It's going to be interesting to see how Gibbs goes with a new coach next year and how people react to that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2012 8:46 pm 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
GWS wrote:

"We're all mates here..."


:clap: very clever!

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2012 8:49 pm 
Offline
Rod McGregor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 11:24 pm
Posts: 194
Location: South of the Yarra
At the end of the day ball usage was the difference.

We have too many players who cannot kick well or make poor decisions in our back line.

Tbird would have played if the forward coach had his way.

_________________
Life is made up of 3 things: Pre-Season, Post Season & Footy Season.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2012 8:50 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 11:00 am
Posts: 449
In the end they were just too good.
We were flogged around the stoppages, they were so mechanical with their extraction with the footy.
We tried our heart out but just couldn't get near them. Everytime we scored a goal or two, they had an answer.
One thing that I noticed, was bad umpiring, so many trivial free kicks paid against us, didn't have the rub of the green today with them.
23 scoring shots to 21, not bad and if it had of been us converting goals instead of points, then it could of been a different story.
Missed Judd, Hendo, Walker, Laidler, Robinson & Hammer ... could have had T-Bird and Duigan in the side, but lets now concentrate of flogging Brisbane next week.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2012 8:52 pm 
Offline
formerly King Kenny
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:35 pm
Posts: 20076
TruBlueBrad wrote:
King Kenny wrote:
TruBlueBrad wrote:
[quote="King Kenny"]Brad, love your focus on anything positive, but reality is obvious sometimes.


You don't get it.

Its not about seeing everything as positive.

The way you guys carry on and blame the coach for everything is embarassing.


Maybe that's because the coach manages the team who make the moves. Pretty simple really.


Exactly. You look at it far too simplistically.[/quote]

Some like to over complicate things ;-)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2012 8:53 pm 
Offline
formerly King Kenny
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:35 pm
Posts: 20076
The Duke wrote:
BlueGuru wrote:
I've given up on Gibbs - slow, soft and lazy. I prefer watching the next batch of kids.


I hate it when people blame the coach for a players game....but I'm gonna do it tonight. I reckon Ratts has !@#$%& up his game.


Can't be true

@Carlton_FC: "We moved Bryce into the middle because we felt the game was getting away from us."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2012 8:53 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 6:27 pm
Posts: 4129
I thinks a game looks very different on TV compared to being there. Being present, what stood out for me was that the Swans always seemed to have more people around the contest and more options when moving the ball. We often stopped when getting the ball because there was no one to play to. It does not help that our delivery by foot was really bad.

What was the defining difference was that the Swans worked far harder off the ball. They ran harder and created the options. We did not and Murphy without the ball was disappointing and so were others. Our work rate was better the last 2 games and by not working hard by spreading or staying with your opponent made it so easy for them to control the game.

It was very frustrating to watch the non-ball carriers when Swans turned it over or we were playing out of defense. On the opposite scenario you have 4-5 Swans running hard leaving their opponents behind and opening us up like soft butter. They should have won by 10 goals but relaxed in the last qtr.

_________________
TC suffers from the social media illness - the death of respect and constructive discourse by keyboard.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2012 8:56 pm 
Offline
Bob Chitty

Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 9:46 pm
Posts: 832
You know Duke, I agree with you a 100% there and I don't think he's the only one thats suffered under Ratt's coaching.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2012 8:56 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34555
Location: The Brown Wedge
mikkey wrote:
I thinks a game looks very different on TV compared to being there. Being present, what stood out for me was that the Swans always seemed to have more people around the contest and more options when moving the ball. We often stopped when getting the ball because there was no one to play to. It does not help that our delivery by foot was really bad.

What was the defining difference was that the Swans worked far harder off the ball. They ran harder and created the options. We did not and Murphy without the ball was disappointing and so were others. Our work rate was better the last 2 games and by not working hard by spreading or staying with your opponent made it so easy for them to control the game.

It was very frustrating to watch the non-ball carriers when Swans turned it over or we were playing out of defense. On the opposite scenario you have 4-5 Swans running hard leaving their opponents behind and opening us up like soft butter. They should have won by 10 goals but relaxed in the last qtr.


I agree. Seems to me that Zac Tuohy and Simmo are two of the only players who have the foresight to lay a shepherd to help a team mate. Why aren't they coached in these basic skills?

_________________
end of message


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2012 8:57 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 4:18 pm
Posts: 283
Gibb's should be our Goddard, he has skills and strength.

Today 3rd tackles, clearances, marks, topped disposals and importantly kicks.

One of our best players today IMO, workmanlike though.

He doesn't have the confidence? Imagination? to try something special or to breakout of his role.

Why not?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2012 8:58 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
The Duke wrote:
mikkey wrote:
I thinks a game looks very different on TV compared to being there. Being present, what stood out for me was that the Swans always seemed to have more people around the contest and more options when moving the ball. We often stopped when getting the ball because there was no one to play to. It does not help that our delivery by foot was really bad.

What was the defining difference was that the Swans worked far harder off the ball. They ran harder and created the options. We did not and Murphy without the ball was disappointing and so were others. Our work rate was better the last 2 games and by not working hard by spreading or staying with your opponent made it so easy for them to control the game.

It was very frustrating to watch the non-ball carriers when Swans turned it over or we were playing out of defense. On the opposite scenario you have 4-5 Swans running hard leaving their opponents behind and opening us up like soft butter. They should have won by 10 goals but relaxed in the last qtr.


I agree. Seems to me that Zac Tuohy and Simmo are two of the only players who have the foresight to lay a shepherd to help a team mate. Why aren't they coached in these basic skills?


Yep, and it was nice of Carrotts and the other Carlton bloke (Scotland) to give him the hot potato and then didn't keep the Swans players away.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2012 9:01 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2011 10:17 pm
Posts: 2078
The Duke wrote:
BlueGuru wrote:
I've given up on Gibbs - slow, soft and lazy. I prefer watching the next batch of kids.


I hate it when people blame the coach for a players game....but I'm gonna do it tonight. I reckon Ratts has !@#$%& up his game.


Agree, I don't think we have helped his game. The negative roles in developing certain players is rubbish. Pagan started it and unfortunately it has created a player who does not have much impact on games, who seems to lack intensity and timid. At times he can look like a match winner, but this rarely occurs and unfortunately is simply a good 'foot soldier'. Our early draft picks were meant to be our saviours and help deliver that premiership we are patiently waiting for. Unfortunately, it doesn't work this way. I would like to see how he performs under a different coach before I totally give up on him. It's not looking good at the moment.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2012 9:03 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9115
Location: Nth Fitzroy
mikkey wrote:
They should have won by 10 goals but relaxed in the last qtr.


Both teams relaxed in the last quarter. It was as though the captains shook hands and agreed it was over. One of the most boring last quarters ever seen.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2012 9:06 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9115
Location: Nth Fitzroy
mots wrote:
You know Duke, I agree with you a 100% there and I don't think he's the only one thats suffered under Ratt's coaching.


Are you sure you are not just blaming the coach because you can't believe that your heroes are not what you dreamed they would be when drafted?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2012 9:07 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19566
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
Same issues as usual when we come against a well drilled team.

Sydney's back 7 have all played together for a number of seasons and it showed again today. They all knew how we'd move the ball forward and it was a piece of cake for them to pick off the long bombs. Grundy or Mattner or Richards would peel off and mark/spoil. Uncontested marks on a lot of entries with Waite and Casboult up on the wing or at half back. On so many occasions we had players leading inside 50 but never actually leading out of 50 towards the ball carrier. Such a poor 'system'.

Casboult as others have mentioned took some good marks but it is incredible how he can have such a poor kicking action. Not sure he can make it with such a flawed technique.

The clearances stats evened up a little in junk time but when the game was up for grabs they monstered us around there with big bodied mids - these inside mids are also pretty good kicks too...a great combination from a drafting perspective (Jack, Hannebery, Kennedy, McVeigh, Parker).

They say flags are built around defensive groups and Sydney's is up there with the best.

Kreuzer was dominated in the ruck and in the air, once again showing very little as a forward.

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2012 9:09 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48555
Location: Prison Island
what a shit game

can anyone explain what the @#$%&! we were trying to do out there?

our game plan? our forward structure? our clearance setups? what the @#$%&! was going on?

we fought it out - credit to the guys - we absorbed pressure and in turn applied pressure

but for nothing - because going forward we had no @#$%&! idea what to do

coming out of defence we had no @#$%&! idea what to do

stoppages we had no @#$%&! idea what to do

defending on transition we had no @#$%&! idea what to do

its like watching an under 12s game

simply awful and disheartening.

bring on next year and a lot of change

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 340 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 17  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 39 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group