Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jun 16, 2025 9:24 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 65 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: R17: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Sun Jul 22, 2012 10:55 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16950
Location: Melbourne
King Kenny wrote:
Gibbs on Griffin will never work, Griffin is a gut runner with pace, wins his own ball. Pick the right target, or better yet don't give Gibbs a tagging role at all and use him to his strengths so he can influence the result (2nd half as most have said)


The flaw in this argument is the simple question of 'Where did Griffin go in the 2nd half'.

Gibbs has done similar jobs before but he was just plain poor in the 1st half. Gave Griffin to much latitude and was ball watching at times allowing Griffin to get goal side past him into space.

The matchup was fine, the execution by BG was poor. Sure Gibbs had a good 2nd half but If Griffin had continued his form from the 1st half the result might have been different.

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R17: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Sun Jul 22, 2012 11:13 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 12:17 am
Posts: 1053
Location: Deutschland
King Kenny wrote:
Coaching Cons:

Carrots on Boyd



Didn't have a problem with this at all. Boyd consistently gets 35 possies and Carrots kept him to 25. Boyd had little influence.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: R17: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Sun Jul 22, 2012 12:27 pm 
Offline
formerly King Kenny
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:35 pm
Posts: 20076
Cazzesman wrote:
King Kenny wrote:
Gibbs on Griffin will never work, Griffin is a gut runner with pace, wins his own ball. Pick the right target, or better yet don't give Gibbs a tagging role at all and use him to his strengths so he can influence the result (2nd half as most have said)


The flaw in this argument is the simple question of 'Where did Griffin go in the 2nd half'.

Gibbs has done similar jobs before but he was just plain poor in the 1st half. Gave Griffin to much latitude and was ball watching at times allowing Griffin to get goal side past him into space.

The matchup was fine, the execution by BG was poor. Sure Gibbs had a good 2nd half but If Griffin had continued his form from the 1st half the result might have been different.

Regards Cazzesman


Gibbs was moved off Griffin in the 2nd half.

The execution is why I'm saying it was a poor match-up. Gibbs in his current mindset isn't suited to the hard running types IMO. The Scott Watters article on Goddard sums it up.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R17: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Sun Jul 22, 2012 1:10 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
King Kenny wrote:
Cazzesman wrote:
King Kenny wrote:
Gibbs on Griffin will never work, Griffin is a gut runner with pace, wins his own ball. Pick the right target, or better yet don't give Gibbs a tagging role at all and use him to his strengths so he can influence the result (2nd half as most have said)


The flaw in this argument is the simple question of 'Where did Griffin go in the 2nd half'.

Gibbs has done similar jobs before but he was just plain poor in the 1st half. Gave Griffin to much latitude and was ball watching at times allowing Griffin to get goal side past him into space.

The matchup was fine, the execution by BG was poor. Sure Gibbs had a good 2nd half but If Griffin had continued his form from the 1st half the result might have been different.

Regards Cazzesman


Gibbs was moved off Griffin in the 2nd half.

The execution is why I'm saying it was a poor match-up. Gibbs in his current mindset isn't suited to the hard running types IMO. The Scott Watters article on Goddard sums it up.



So with Griffen out of the game the dogs were rubbish and be beat them well from that point. Proves the coaching panel had it right that if we shut him out they are done. Gibbs was a good option just played poorly in a role we all know he can play.
Twisting that to be the coaches fault is a little wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R17: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Sun Jul 22, 2012 1:38 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
club, when you're obsessed with getting rid of the coach, its not enough to discuss the things he's responsible for, you have to look at everything as a reason to shitcan the coach.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R17: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Sun Jul 22, 2012 1:40 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
TruBlueBrad wrote:
club, when you're obsessed with getting rid of the coach, its not enough to discuss the things he's responsible for, you have to look at everything as a reason to shitcan the coach.

Ok so youre for keeping Ratten another year minimum.. ok good to know..
glad to see some people rate him as a great coach for us...

Good stUFF!!1

You do!!!... nice...

thats the thing about footy.. we get all sides... and we do know some people rate Ratts as a great coach to take us forward.. :thumbsup:

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R17: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Sun Jul 22, 2012 1:44 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:55 pm
Posts: 2952
Location: Balwyn
Lurker Blue wrote:
Con: only because injuries forced us to, not because of planned player development
You're ignoring that the debutants were injured for long time this year and not ready to step up anyway?
Smells like a witch hunt.

_________________
Bawditawaba


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R17: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Sun Jul 22, 2012 1:45 pm 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
club29 wrote:

So with Griffen out of the game the dogs were rubbish and be beat them well from that point. Proves the coaching panel had it right that if we shut him out they are done. Gibbs was a good option just played poorly in a role we all know he can play.
Twisting that to be the coaches fault is a little wrong.


Curnow actually went onto Griffen. We also started to win more of the ball at the stoppages. Gibbs when released was good as an offensive runners. Kicked goals and created.

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R17: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Sun Jul 22, 2012 1:48 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
isdonis.george wrote:
Lurker Blue wrote:
Con: only because injuries forced us to, not because of planned player development
You're ignoring that the debutants were injured for long time this year and not ready to step up anyway?
Smells like a witch hunt.

We didnt win that game because of Casboults 5 tap outs and 2 marks for the game...

We won it cos we had less in jured players on the ground...

We could have done that anytime this year... just right now it was forced upon us.

If Kreuzer was inured ALL year we didnt rest him when we had 3Ruckmen.. we rested him when his body was totally shot....

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R17: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Sun Jul 22, 2012 1:51 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
ThePsychologist wrote:
club29 wrote:

So with Griffen out of the game the dogs were rubbish and be beat them well from that point. Proves the coaching panel had it right that if we shut him out they are done. Gibbs was a good option just played poorly in a role we all know he can play.
Twisting that to be the coaches fault is a little wrong.


Curnow actually went onto Griffen. We also started to win more of the ball at the stoppages. Gibbs when released was good as an offensive runners. Kicked goals and created.


yes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: R17: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Sun Jul 22, 2012 2:07 pm 
Offline
formerly King Kenny
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:35 pm
Posts: 20076
club29 wrote:
King Kenny wrote:
Cazzesman wrote:
[quote="King Kenny"]
Gibbs on Griffin will never work, Griffin is a gut runner with pace, wins his own ball. Pick the right target, or better yet don't give Gibbs a tagging role at all and use him to his strengths so he can influence the result (2nd half as most have said)


The flaw in this argument is the simple question of 'Where did Griffin go in the 2nd half'.

Gibbs has done similar jobs before but he was just plain poor in the 1st half. Gave Griffin to much latitude and was ball watching at times allowing Griffin to get goal side past him into space.

The matchup was fine, the execution by BG was poor. Sure Gibbs had a good 2nd half but If Griffin had continued his form from the 1st half the result might have been different.

Regards Cazzesman


Gibbs was moved off Griffin in the 2nd half.

The execution is why I'm saying it was a poor match-up. Gibbs in his current mindset isn't suited to the hard running types IMO. The Scott Watters article on Goddard sums it up.



So with Griffen out of the game the dogs were rubbish and be beat them well from that point. Proves the coaching panel had it right that if we shut him out they are done. Gibbs was a good option just played poorly in a role we all know he can play.
Twisting that to be the coaches fault is a little wrong.[/quote]

Not really. Was proven to be a poor decision, in saying that Ratts recognized this and made the change before it was too late, maybe you missed that in my pros?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R17: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Sun Jul 22, 2012 2:13 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 12:22 pm
Posts: 6272
Location: Lurking
isdonis.george wrote:
Lurker Blue wrote:
Con: only because injuries forced us to, not because of planned player development
You're ignoring that the debutants were injured for long time this year and not ready to step up anyway?

You're focusing only on the debutantes from last night, I'm talking about getting games into as many younger players as reasonably possible.

One or two a week, a few games at a time. Give them a taste, to see what's required at the next level.

isdonis.george wrote:
Smells like a witch hunt.

:lol: WTF are you talking about? :confused:

_________________
I AM DISENFRANCHISED


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R17: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Sun Jul 22, 2012 2:16 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:55 pm
Posts: 2952
Location: Balwyn
Quote:
We didnt win that game because of Casboults 5 tap outs and 2 marks for the game...

LB's complaint is on something else – why weren't Casboult and Bell selected earlier in the year.



Synners IMO Casboult and Bell brought something last night that you can't measure with statistics.

_________________
Bawditawaba


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R17: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Sun Jul 22, 2012 2:19 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
King Kenny wrote:

Not really. Was proven to be a poor decision, in saying that Ratts recognized this and made the change before it was too late, maybe you missed that in my pros?


No I read it. I just dont think it was bad tactic to try. Far from diabolical. The only thing that stuffed up was the player played poorly in the role that he has been known to be very good in. I would hope in his game review that Gibbs will be disappointed with his first half.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R17: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Sun Jul 22, 2012 2:27 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
club29 wrote:
King Kenny wrote:

Not really. Was proven to be a poor decision, in saying that Ratts recognized this and made the change before it was too late, maybe you missed that in my pros?


No I read it. I just dont think it was bad tactic to try. Far from diabolical. The only thing that stuffed up was the player played poorly in the role that he has been known to be very good in. I would hope in his game review that Gibbs will be disappointed with his first half.

Thats ludicrous.. you and the MC thin k Gibbs is a one trick pony.

Why would u get a guy that should be deliv ering matches to the club to play a shut down role for SIX years???

He may have won us the game doing something totally different....

You dont use your best players to negate... you use your lesser players to negate and get your better player to win the game for you...

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R17: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Sun Jul 22, 2012 2:58 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
Synbad wrote:
TruBlueBrad wrote:
club, when you're obsessed with getting rid of the coach, its not enough to discuss the things he's responsible for, you have to look at everything as a reason to shitcan the coach.

Ok so youre for keeping Ratten another year minimum.. ok good to know..
glad to see some people rate him as a great coach for us...

Good stUFF!!1

You do!!!... nice...

thats the thing about footy.. we get all sides... and we do know some people rate Ratts as a great coach to take us forward.. :thumbsup:


Oh, the other thing club, if you're not shitcanning the coach at every opportunity then you're for keeping him another year minimum.

It's all or nothing. You're wither with us, or you're against us.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R17: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Sun Jul 22, 2012 3:09 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Synbad wrote:
TruBlueBrad wrote:
club, when you're obsessed with getting rid of the coach, its not enough to discuss the things he's responsible for, you have to look at everything as a reason to shitcan the coach.

Ok so youre for keeping Ratten another year minimum.. ok good to know..
glad to see some people rate him as a great coach for us...

Good stUFF!!1

You do!!!... nice...

thats the thing about footy.. we get all sides... and we do know some people rate Ratts as a great coach to take us forward.. :thumbsup:


Oh, the other thing club, if you're not shitcanning the coach at every opportunity then you're for keeping him another year minimum.

It's all or nothing. You're wither with us, or you're against us.


Synbad putting words in other posters mouth is nothing new.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R17: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Sun Jul 22, 2012 3:26 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
Synbad wrote:
club29 wrote:
King Kenny wrote:

Not really. Was proven to be a poor decision, in saying that Ratts recognized this and made the change before it was too late, maybe you missed that in my pros?


No I read it. I just dont think it was bad tactic to try. Far from diabolical. The only thing that stuffed up was the player played poorly in the role that he has been known to be very good in. I would hope in his game review that Gibbs will be disappointed with his first half.

Thats ludicrous.. you and the MC thin k Gibbs is a one trick pony.

Why would u get a guy that should be deliv ering matches to the club to play a shut down role for SIX years???

He may have won us the game doing something totally different....

You dont use your best players to negate... you use your lesser players to negate and get your better player to win the game for you...


Rubbish .

Why is Gibbs a player that should be delivering matches?

Shutting down Griffen would have delivered the win. As it turned out it did in the second half.

It wasnt diabolical coaching. It was move that had merit that failed due to the player not playing the role as he has in the past.

Most posters think its time to give another coach a turn at out club. That is fair enough but some are going to great lengths to find holes in his coaching to the point where they are being unrealistic.

I hope those in charge of the coaching situation have a more clear mindset.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R17: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Sun Jul 22, 2012 3:32 pm 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
club29 wrote:
Rubbish .

Why is Gibbs a player that should be delivering matches?

Shutting down Griffen would have delivered the win. As it turned out it did in the second half.

It wasnt diabolical coaching. It was move that had merit that failed due to the player not playing the role as he has in the past.

Most posters think its time to give another coach a turn at out club. That is fair enough but some are going to great lengths to find holes in his coaching to the point where they are being unrealistic.

I hope those in charge of the coaching situation have a more clear mindset.


Cant agree with that at all.

Gibbs was drafted as a ball winning midfielder. A matchwinner. You don't waste a No.1 pick on a tagger.

It is debatable whether it was right to tag Griffen but why not with someone who we will not lose as much offensively?

Armfield, Russell, Curnow, AJ could of all tagged Griffen and we wouldnt have lost so much going the other way. Even more important with Judd and Robinson out.

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R17: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Sun Jul 22, 2012 3:53 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
ThePsychologist wrote:
club29 wrote:
Rubbish .

Why is Gibbs a player that should be delivering matches?

Shutting down Griffen would have delivered the win. As it turned out it did in the second half.

It wasnt diabolical coaching. It was move that had merit that failed due to the player not playing the role as he has in the past.

Most posters think its time to give another coach a turn at out club. That is fair enough but some are going to great lengths to find holes in his coaching to the point where they are being unrealistic.

I hope those in charge of the coaching situation have a more clear mindset.


Cant agree with that at all.

Gibbs was drafted as a ball winning midfielder. A matchwinner. You don't waste a No.1 pick on a tagger.

It is debatable whether it was right to tag Griffen but why not with someone who we will not lose as much offensively?

Armfield, Russell, Curnow, AJ could of all tagged Griffen and we wouldnt have lost so much going the other way. Even more important with Judd and Robinson out.



Come on ThePsychologist you are smart enough to know that that was 6 years ago and means next to nothing now. Ling was drafted as a full forward (match winner). Lucky to play more than 3 games there.

You are right that it is debatable about shutting Griffen down being importants. Not diabolical. It wasnt an out and out shocking coaching move. It was move some would do and other wouldnt.

The move had merit but the Gibbs was not up to it on this occasion. He should be disappointed. If he isn't then we have a problem.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 65 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: dadadadada, Dieselkernahan, Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 18 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group