Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jun 16, 2025 7:05 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 90 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Questions for Ratts
PostPosted: Mon Jul 16, 2012 6:44 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 1:06 pm
Posts: 3995
Location: Steven Seagal's Martial Arts Academy
ThePsychologist wrote:
Sorry Mikkey this is actually what was written before marketing got it

After Friday night's game I asked the players to stop bitching and arguing about what had happened and tell me whether they give a crap. I also told them that the crap they dished up again did not meet the expectations of our football club and would not be tolerated under any circumstances and as such some will pay the price , no matter who they are. Sticks agrees

Not long before the first bounce at the MCG or Etihad Stadium (can't remember which) on Friday night, I made a comment to one of the assistant coaches that I have no idea what Im doing in footy. The remark came after the game threw up its latest challenge in the form of Zach Tuohy. Zach had battled a back complaint all week and said he couldn't play. While we were all mindful of it, he I told him I needed him to save my job and as such offered to fly his parents out if he played. I said to him I don't care if you become a cripple I need you tonight. Unfortunatley Zac could not run up the race, so I dropped him for an emergency. I think his name is Kane and is a young key forward with potential.

With Zach's late unavailability we completed a hasty reshuffle, only to lose the very moody Andrew Walker – an endurance athlete capable of playing small or tall in case no one knew – who hurt his calf and was subbed out early. We then lost Aaron Joseph (a player in the first half who is probably leading our B&F because i love him) with concussion and from then on we really fell away. Sticks agrees.

Of course our structures were not altered just because of injury, although its the excuse I like to use, as does Sticks and Gleeson. Drew Petrie's four first quarter goals on a useless Jamison (who's instructions were to stop Petrie kicking goals) forced me against the wishes of the other coaching staff to send Lachie Henderson back to help stem the flow in our back half and this required more changes all over the ground. Who or where I don't know but I like moving the magnets and it looks good on TV. Its a tactic I picked up in my valuable time at Norwood.

These changes do not excuse for what was a very disappointing night, firstly someone forgot my lollies (I think it was Thornton again) and secondly Andy made me sit next to him in the box again. Though we matched the opposition in the warm up, pre match press conferences and in terms of getting the football into THEIR forward line, it was the North players' ability to listen to and follow their coaches instructions, coupled with our repeated lack of effort and care, that really told against us. Definitely wasn't my fault. They also smashed us at the stoppages and posted 11 goals straight as a consequence, whereas we just didn't give a crap. Thinking back on it the umpiring really let us down.

I have to say that the performance of our captain Chris Judd to apply a new style chicken wing was unbelievable. He virtually tore the arm from the players shoulder had it not been for his sheer brilliance the final margin would have been even greater.

I also thought Eddie had a great game at FF and Jeffy at CHF. Couldn't ask anymore from them. Watto also looked a Natural ruckman and when Hampson, Warnock are back we can look seriously at playing 4 ruckman.

In the wake of this defeat we're going to have a real hard look at where we're going (I thinks its Etihad) and which players are actually available because Justin hides the injury reports from me and if it wasn't for injuries we would be undefeated. Marc Murphy and Lachie Henderson have to be commended in their ability to play in positions they don't want to and still look interested. I though Marc's decision to use my barber made a real difference to his run and carry.

This week Jarrad Waite will play because Im desperate and he is the best key forward in the league and my wife is a great fan of WAG Nation.

Kind Regards and I off to get my cheque and lunch with Sticks to negotiate and extension to my contract and to interview school teachers for the Northern Blues job

Go Demons

:lol:


Classic !
:grin:
:clap:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Questions for Ratts
PostPosted: Mon Jul 16, 2012 9:20 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 5:32 pm
Posts: 1392
Location: Hobart
muzza wrote:
Jack Donaghy wrote:
Blue Tongue wrote:
Q. Is there one player on our list of 42 that can take a contested overhead mark? If so please provide his name and jumper number. Thanks.


the bloke that wears #31


Ron Barrassi


barassi - only one "r"

_________________
one you knock back is one you never have


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Questions for Ratts
PostPosted: Mon Jul 16, 2012 9:23 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 5:32 pm
Posts: 1392
Location: Hobart
mikkey wrote:
Here is Ratten's Monday email. Read and weep:


After Friday night's game I asked the players to think about what had happened and the taste it leaves in your mouth. I also reminded them of their responsibilities to maintain the expectations of our football club and that none of them could shy away from them, no matter who they are.

Not long before the first bounce at Etihad Stadium on Friday night, I made a comment to one of the assistant coaches that there's never a dull moment in footy. The remark came after the game threw up its latest challenge in the form of Zach Tuohy. Zach had battled a back complaint all week and while we were all mindful of it, he had responded well and thought he would be right for the North Melbourne match.

Unfortunately Zach's condition deteriorated in the pre-match build-up, and, to his credit he put his hand up and said he was unable to play which was a tough decision for him. As a consequence of his late withdrawal our plan to go with him on Lindsay Thomas went out the door.

With Zach's late unavailability we completed a hasty reshuffle, only to lose the high-leaping Andrew Walker – an endurance athlete capable of playing small or tall – who broke down with a calf injury and was subbed out early. We then lost Aaron Joseph (an influential player in the first half) with concussion and from then on we really fell away.

Of course our structures were not altered just because of injury. Drew Petrie's four first quarter goals forced us to send Lachie Henderson back to help stem the flow in our back half and this required more changes all over the ground.

These changes do not excuse for what was a very disappointing night. Though we matched the opposition in terms of getting the football into our forward line, it was the North players' ability to use the footy better than ours, coupled with our repeated turnovers, that really told against us. They also smashed us at the stoppages and posted 11 goals straight as a consequence, whereas we just couldn't get any traction.

I have to say that the performance of our captain Chris Judd was unbelievable. He virtually played a lone hand in the game and had it not been for his sheer brilliance the final margin would have been even greater.

In the wake of this defeat we're going to have a real hard look at where we're going and which players are actually available. Marc Murphy and Lachie Henderson have to be commended in their ability to play with limited preparations. This week Jarrad Waite will more than likely be available although he has not played a lot of footy so that will be an important decision later in the week.

Kind Regards


he has watched "groundhog day" too many times .....too many times.....too many times.......
sorry but i thought it was funny

_________________
one you knock back is one you never have


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Questions for Ratts
PostPosted: Mon Jul 16, 2012 9:34 pm 
Offline
formerly King Kenny
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:35 pm
Posts: 20076
So all I read is injuries are an excuse.

Players not available? how about the following?

Casboult
Mitchell
McCarthy
Russell
Bower
Dale
Ellard
Thornton
Buckley
Bootsma
Davies
Kerr
O'Keefe
White


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Questions for Ratts
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 12:19 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:12 pm
Posts: 4426
King Kenny wrote:
So all I read is injuries are an excuse.

Players not available? how about the following?

Casboult
Mitchell
McCarthy
Russell
Bower
Dale
Ellard
Thornton
Buckley
Bootsma
Davies
Kerr
O'Keefe
White


These guys aren't ready for the big time yet....and we all know Davies only plays in September....who else you got?.... :wink:

_________________
"Truth, for the tyrants, is the most terrible and cruel of all bindings; it is like an incandescent iron falling across their chests. And it is even more agonizing than hot iron, for that only burns the flesh, while truth burns its way into the soul"     — Lauro Aguirre


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Questions for Ratts
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 1:00 am 
Offline
Trevor Keogh

Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:37 am
Posts: 770
Bluey44 wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
Sorry Mikkey this is actually what was written before marketing got it

After Friday night's game I asked the players to stop bitching and arguing about what had happened and tell me whether they give a crap. I also told them that the crap they dished up again did not meet the expectations of our football club and would not be tolerated under any circumstances and as such some will pay the price , no matter who they are. Sticks agrees

Not long before the first bounce at the MCG or Etihad Stadium (can't remember which) on Friday night, I made a comment to one of the assistant coaches that I have no idea what Im doing in footy. The remark came after the game threw up its latest challenge in the form of Zach Tuohy. Zach had battled a back complaint all week and said he couldn't play. While we were all mindful of it, he I told him I needed him to save my job and as such offered to fly his parents out if he played. I said to him I don't care if you become a cripple I need you tonight. Unfortunatley Zac could not run up the race, so I dropped him for an emergency. I think his name is Kane and is a young key forward with potential.

With Zach's late unavailability we completed a hasty reshuffle, only to lose the very moody Andrew Walker – an endurance athlete capable of playing small or tall in case no one knew – who hurt his calf and was subbed out early. We then lost Aaron Joseph (a player in the first half who is probably leading our B&F because i love him) with concussion and from then on we really fell away. Sticks agrees.

Of course our structures were not altered just because of injury, although its the excuse I like to use, as does Sticks and Gleeson. Drew Petrie's four first quarter goals on a useless Jamison (who's instructions were to stop Petrie kicking goals) forced me against the wishes of the other coaching staff to send Lachie Henderson back to help stem the flow in our back half and this required more changes all over the ground. Who or where I don't know but I like moving the magnets and it looks good on TV. Its a tactic I picked up in my valuable time at Norwood.

These changes do not excuse for what was a very disappointing night, firstly someone forgot my lollies (I think it was Thornton again) and secondly Andy made me sit next to him in the box again. Though we matched the opposition in the warm up, pre match press conferences and in terms of getting the football into THEIR forward line, it was the North players' ability to listen to and follow their coaches instructions, coupled with our repeated lack of effort and care, that really told against us. Definitely wasn't my fault. They also smashed us at the stoppages and posted 11 goals straight as a consequence, whereas we just didn't give a crap. Thinking back on it the umpiring really let us down.

I have to say that the performance of our captain Chris Judd to apply a new style chicken wing was unbelievable. He virtually tore the arm from the players shoulder had it not been for his sheer brilliance the final margin would have been even greater.

I also thought Eddie had a great game at FF and Jeffy at CHF. Couldn't ask anymore from them. Watto also looked a Natural ruckman and when Hampson, Warnock are back we can look seriously at playing 4 ruckman.

In the wake of this defeat we're going to have a real hard look at where we're going (I thinks its Etihad) and which players are actually available because Justin hides the injury reports from me and if it wasn't for injuries we would be undefeated. Marc Murphy and Lachie Henderson have to be commended in their ability to play in positions they don't want to and still look interested. I though Marc's decision to use my barber made a real difference to his run and carry.

This week Jarrad Waite will play because Im desperate and he is the best key forward in the league and my wife is a great fan of WAG Nation.

Kind Regards and I off to get my cheque and lunch with Sticks to negotiate and extension to my contract and to interview school teachers for the Northern Blues job

Go Demons

:lol:


Classic !
:grin:
:clap:



:lol: :lol: funniest EVER


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Questions for Ratts
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 1:25 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:44 am
Posts: 3136
King Kenny wrote:
So all I read is injuries are an excuse.

Players not available? how about the following?

Casboult <- missed most of season with a knee. Has played 2 games back - 1 in VFL, one in ants reserves)
Mitchell <- missed most of season with shoulder - been back in the ants for around a mth and still building fitness
McCarthy <- skinny, project player, not ready yet
Russell <- given games at start of year, dropped due to poor form
Bower <- given games at start of year, dropped due to poor form
Dale <- been close a few times. WIll probably get games before end of year
Ellard <- given games at start of year, dropped due to poor form
Thornton <- given games at start of year, got injured, for whatever reason hasn't been recalled yet
Buckley <- not quite ready yet. Missed 2+ mths with a torn finger ligaments
Bootsma <- played a few games, dropped b/c he was struggling with physicality. Not physically ready yet
Davies <- missed most of season with shoulder - has played 1, maybe 2 games since coming back
Kerr <- hasn't done enough
O'Keefe <- missed 2+ mths with foot injuries (til mid may). Still building back up fitness/performances
White <- missed most of season with knee - has played 1, maybe 2 games since coming back


In effect,
- 6/14 players listed have missed 2+ mths of football each and are all building back their fitness/conditioning/touch (casboult, mitchell, buckley, ROK, davies, white). You can add Rowe to that list as well.
- 4/14 have played 6+ games each (russell, thornton, bower, ellard) - most lost their places due to poor form and haven't done enough to earn a recall yet (thornton the exception, though there were reports on this board that his fitness was quite low)
- 2/14 aren't physically ready yet (bootsma/mccarthy) - bootsma was given a few games until he got monstered by the hawks

That leaves Kerr and Dale as the other 2 that have been available. Dale has been close and will get games before the end of the season. Kerr hasn't done enough and from most reports is likely to run out of time to impress.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Questions for Ratts
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:24 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
4thchicken wrote:
King Kenny wrote:
So all I read is injuries are an excuse.

Players not available? how about the following?

Casboult <- missed most of season with a knee. Has played 2 games back - 1 in VFL, one in ants reserves)
Mitchell <- missed most of season with shoulder - been back in the ants for around a mth and still building fitness
McCarthy <- skinny, project player, not ready yet
Russell <- given games at start of year, dropped due to poor form
Bower <- given games at start of year, dropped due to poor form
Dale <- been close a few times. WIll probably get games before end of year
Ellard <- given games at start of year, dropped due to poor form
Thornton <- given games at start of year, got injured, for whatever reason hasn't been recalled yet
Buckley <- not quite ready yet. Missed 2+ mths with a torn finger ligaments
Bootsma <- played a few games, dropped b/c he was struggling with physicality. Not physically ready yet
Davies <- missed most of season with shoulder - has played 1, maybe 2 games since coming back
Kerr <- hasn't done enough
O'Keefe <- missed 2+ mths with foot injuries (til mid may). Still building back up fitness/performances
White <- missed most of season with knee - has played 1, maybe 2 games since coming back


In effect,
- 6/14 players listed have missed 2+ mths of football each and are all building back their fitness/conditioning/touch (casboult, mitchell, buckley, ROK, davies, white). You can add Rowe to that list as well.
- 4/14 have played 6+ games each (russell, thornton, bower, ellard) - most lost their places due to poor form and haven't done enough to earn a recall yet (thornton the exception, though there were reports on this board that his fitness was quite low)
- 2/14 aren't physically ready yet (bootsma/mccarthy) - bootsma was given a few games until he got monstered by the hawks

That leaves Kerr and Dale as the other 2 that have been available. Dale has been close and will get games before the end of the season. Kerr hasn't done enough and from most reports is likely to run out of time to impress.



WOW!!!...

"- 4/14 have played 6+ games each (russell, thornton, bower, ellard) - most lost their places due to poor form and haven't done enough to earn a recall yet (thornton the exception, though there were reports on this board that his fitness was quite low)"

When did Ellard play a poor game???
before last week Collins was the sacrificial lamb..
Russell is a an ex runner up in the best and fairest... why is he poor???
Bower Ratts himself told me will be an All Australian....
Thornton isnt fit but Kreuzer is......

Then some bodys are underdeveloped but you use the least developed body of all on another thread as an out due to an early injury.... Buckley...!!!

Look 4 chickens just get some fair dinkum about yourself.....

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Questions for Ratts
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 9:59 am 
Offline
Bert Deacon
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 12:28 pm
Posts: 572
To solely blame injuries for our poor performances this year is short sighted. Have we been impacted by injuries to first choice players ? Absolutely yes. Have we managed to mitigate the impact by smart list management, quality player development, and tactical flexibility and innovation ? NO.

_________________
Scott, things aren't as happy as they used to be down here at the unemployment office. Joblessness is no longer just for Philosophy majors - useful people are starting to feel the pinch.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Questions for Ratts
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 10:04 am 
Offline
Trevor Keogh
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 12:03 pm
Posts: 765
my two cents wrote:
To solely blame injuries for our poor performances this year is short sighted. Have we been impacted by injuries to first choice players ? Absolutely yes. Have we managed to mitigate the impact by smart list management, quality player development, and tactical flexibility and innovation ? NO.


Well said.

_________________
1945 - End of round 3 Carlton was last.

Last round Carlton made the final four for the first time.

Eventual premiers.

That's what I'm talking about!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Questions for Ratts
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 11:54 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
i want to ALSO know why so many players have hit a brick wall.

Ratts said Bower will be AA and so will Russell.

And now theyre gone.......

Gibbs is a number 1 pick.
Kreuzer has been run into the ground.

Where is our list management???

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Questions for Ratts
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 12:14 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 11:44 am
Posts: 2000
Synbad wrote:
i want to ALSO know why so many players have hit a brick wall.

Ratts said Bower will be AA and so will Russell.

And now theyre gone.......

Gibbs is a number 1 pick.
Kreuzer has been run into the ground.

Where is our list management???


Well jump on Blue Print and ask one of your boys club members today if your so interested

_________________
Go BLues


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Questions for Ratts
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 12:30 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
buzzaaaah wrote:
Before the game I said you can't play the same trick 2 weeks in a row. Duigan up forward worked because it was fresh. he's not a forward, at best a pinch hitter. If someone like me knows that, i fear for our team.
We don't like being hunted, we only play well when hunting. To me that says we are not well prepared and we are not ready to be a top 4 team.
I am sick that the misery of 2002-7 was for nought


To my untrained eye the move of Duigan to the forward line against Collingwood worked so well because its a was a pre-determined role to try and make the loose Collingwood defenders accountable. Kicking three goals was a bonus that made it clear the role was successful. That is, (I hope) he was never moved into to the F50 for shits and giggles.

So my question to Ratten would be, what were Duigan's instructions against the Kangaroos and why was he taken away from his proven role as a defender?

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Questions for Ratts
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 1:24 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
camelboy wrote:
buzzaaaah wrote:
Before the game I said you can't play the same trick 2 weeks in a row. Duigan up forward worked because it was fresh. he's not a forward, at best a pinch hitter. If someone like me knows that, i fear for our team.
We don't like being hunted, we only play well when hunting. To me that says we are not well prepared and we are not ready to be a top 4 team.
I am sick that the misery of 2002-7 was for nought


To my untrained eye the move of Duigan to the forward line against Collingwood worked so well because its a was a pre-determined role to try and make the loose Collingwood defenders accountable. Kicking three goals was a bonus that made it clear the role was successful. That is, (I hope) he was never moved into to the F50 for shits and giggles.

So my question to Ratten would be, what were Duigan's instructions against the Kangaroos and why was he taken away from his proven role as a defender?


Still we had no forwards available so Ratts went with the one that got the best results in recent times. It was either him or Thornton and if he went Thornton id imagine there would be a few questions in here about that choice.

My questions for Ratts are:-

After 5 years why do we still have a flaky team that folds so easily ?
Do you think we should have weeded out the culprits by now?
Are we soft because we drafted too many nice players and nice blokes?
Why can't our players bring a ruthless attitude week in week out. Year in year out?
What have we done over the last 3 years to address this short coming in attitude?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Questions for Ratts
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 1:34 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
club29 wrote:
camelboy wrote:
buzzaaaah wrote:
Before the game I said you can't play the same trick 2 weeks in a row. Duigan up forward worked because it was fresh. he's not a forward, at best a pinch hitter. If someone like me knows that, i fear for our team.
We don't like being hunted, we only play well when hunting. To me that says we are not well prepared and we are not ready to be a top 4 team.
I am sick that the misery of 2002-7 was for nought


To my untrained eye the move of Duigan to the forward line against Collingwood worked so well because its a was a pre-determined role to try and make the loose Collingwood defenders accountable. Kicking three goals was a bonus that made it clear the role was successful. That is, (I hope) he was never moved into to the F50 for shits and giggles.

So my question to Ratten would be, what were Duigan's instructions against the Kangaroos and why was he taken away from his proven role as a defender?


Still we had no forwards available so Ratts went with the one that got the best results in recent times. It was either him or Thornton and if he went Thornton id imagine there would be a few questions in here about that choice.

My questions for Ratts are:-

After 5 years why do we still have a flaky team that folds so easily ?
Do you think we should have weeded out the culprits by now?
Are we soft because we drafted too many nice players and nice blokes?
Why can't our players bring a ruthless attitude week in week out. Year in year out?
What have we done over the last 3 years to address this short coming in attitude?

Should he weed out Gibbs too club?

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Questions for Ratts
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 1:46 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 2:01 pm
Posts: 2099
4thchicken wrote:
King Kenny wrote:
So all I read is injuries are an excuse.

Players not available? how about the following?

Casboult <- missed most of season with a knee. Has played 2 games back - 1 in VFL, one in ants reserves)
Mitchell <- missed most of season with shoulder - been back in the ants for around a mth and still building fitness
McCarthy <- skinny, project player, not ready yet
Russell <- given games at start of year, dropped due to poor form
Bower <- given games at start of year, dropped due to poor form
Dale <- been close a few times. WIll probably get games before end of year
Ellard <- given games at start of year, dropped due to poor form
Thornton <- given games at start of year, got injured, for whatever reason hasn't been recalled yet
Buckley <- not quite ready yet. Missed 2+ mths with a torn finger ligaments
Bootsma <- played a few games, dropped b/c he was struggling with physicality. Not physically ready yet
Davies <- missed most of season with shoulder - has played 1, maybe 2 games since coming back
Kerr <- hasn't done enough
O'Keefe <- missed 2+ mths with foot injuries (til mid may). Still building back up fitness/performances
White <- missed most of season with knee - has played 1, maybe 2 games since coming back


In effect,
- 6/14 players listed have missed 2+ mths of football each and are all building back their fitness/conditioning/touch (casboult, mitchell, buckley, ROK, davies, white). You can add Rowe to that list as well.
- 4/14 have played 6+ games each (russell, thornton, bower, ellard) - most lost their places due to poor form and haven't done enough to earn a recall yet (thornton the exception, though there were reports on this board that his fitness was quite low)
- 2/14 aren't physically ready yet (bootsma/mccarthy) - bootsma was given a few games until he got monstered by the hawks

That leaves Kerr and Dale as the other 2 that have been available. Dale has been close and will get games before the end of the season. Kerr hasn't done enough and from most reports is likely to run out of time to impress.


Good post 4th, just a pity that the likes of JR & Bower haven't recaptured their previous form, who knows why.

Though, Ellard was very stiff to be axed for Pies game, it wasn't so much "poor form", but Curnow playing pretty good footy in the magoos to the point he could be ignored no longer. The problem now for Ellard is that he has Bell now showing a bit, so he'll have to work extra hard to get back in from here.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Questions for Ratts
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 2:05 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
Synbad wrote:
club29 wrote:



My questions for Ratts are:-

After 5 years why do we still have a flaky team that folds so easily ?
Do you think we should have weeded out the culprits by now?
Are we soft because we drafted too many nice players and nice blokes?
Why can't our players bring a ruthless attitude week in week out. Year in year out?
What have we done over the last 3 years to address this short coming in attitude?

Should he weed out Gibbs too club?


Well that is the thing.

I don't mind Gibbs. He is a nice backman and classy. Amongst too many other nice players his value drops. He survives IMO although this year in particular he has folded more than i would have hoped.

I am not phased he went at pick 1. That was not his fault and that was years ago and IMO the game has changed in a way that does not allow us to get the best out of him as a midfielder. He has found his home in the backline and should be left to be a good 200 game defender.

I think we still suffer from the tanking and Fev party days. I would have hoped Ratts would have beat that out of them by now but he has failed miserably at that. Still to easy to for them to walk off losers and twitter it up all night.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Questions for Ratts
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 2:22 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
club29 wrote:
camelboy wrote:
buzzaaaah wrote:
Before the game I said you can't play the same trick 2 weeks in a row. Duigan up forward worked because it was fresh. he's not a forward, at best a pinch hitter. If someone like me knows that, i fear for our team.
We don't like being hunted, we only play well when hunting. To me that says we are not well prepared and we are not ready to be a top 4 team.
I am sick that the misery of 2002-7 was for nought


To my untrained eye the move of Duigan to the forward line against Collingwood worked so well because its a was a pre-determined role to try and make the loose Collingwood defenders accountable. Kicking three goals was a bonus that made it clear the role was successful. That is, (I hope) he was never moved into to the F50 for shits and giggles.

So my question to Ratten would be, what were Duigan's instructions against the Kangaroos and why was he taken away from his proven role as a defender?


Still we had no forwards available so Ratts went with the one that got the best results in recent times. It was either him or Thornton and if he went Thornton id imagine there would be a few questions in here about that choice.


All well and good, but he had a crap night and was largely ineffectual. So why persist with something that isn't working. At the very least Duigan could have taken on AJ's role after he got injured.

Aside from the fact it appears T-bird isn't deserving of a spot at the moment, I'd have preferred him in to play a forward role than Duigan, who didn't actually play a forward role against Collingwood, he just happened to be in the forward line. I think that makes sense, haha.

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Questions for Ratts
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 2:24 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
baz_baz wrote:
Synbad wrote:
i want to ALSO know why so many players have hit a brick wall.

Ratts said Bower will be AA and so will Russell.

And now theyre gone.......

Gibbs is a number 1 pick.
Kreuzer has been run into the ground.

Where is our list management???


Well jump on Blue Print and ask one of your boys club members today if your so interested


im pretty sure i dont need to ask that its a given.....

the question is how will it be answered???

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Questions for Ratts
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 2:26 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
club and whats the go with Russell pick 6 and Hartlett pick 20 and Austin pick 30 and Grigg pick 19 and HAmpson pick 17 and Lucas pick 12?

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 90 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], sinbagger and 33 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group