Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jul 07, 2025 10:10 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1018 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 ... 51  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Judd incident Vs NM
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 10:00 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:57 pm
Posts: 4320
Location: Strathmore
camelboy wrote:
bosman wrote:
The references that judd did a chicken wing tackle sh1t me. Judd didn't tackle at all.
All Judd did was grab his arm.


Exactly, after the tackle was complete. Which makes it all the more WTF! :eek:

We/he/the club need to suck up the media hype and whatever the tribunal hands down.

There is no possible explanation for his actions.

Did anyone else see Cyril's tackle on Warnock highlighted by On the couch last night. Not quite as graphic as Judd on Adams, but equally as deliberate.


Yeah I saw that on the couch last night. Warnock was left on the ground with his arm behind his back...

Hopefully the wookie can upload it..

_________________
31-3-2015 - R.I.P AFL, corrupted lying pricks
12-5-2015 - Go WADA
18-8-2015 - Suffer Hird* u lying flower
12-1-2016 - CAS goes bang, happy new year.. Drugcheats forever..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Judd incident Vs NM
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 10:03 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 9:02 pm
Posts: 13506
Location: Melbourne
And Cyril wasn't cited I take it?

I'm sorry but I disagree we need to suck up the media hype - it is completely over the top. How the head of the MRP can make those comments before it has even gone to tribunal is farcical.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Judd incident Vs NM
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 10:05 am 
Offline
Garry Crane
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 3:30 pm
Posts: 255
Have I missed something??? Did Judd murder someone?? FMD

_________________
'The Carlton people are spirited & I'm the same as them, they have life in them, they have humor, they're arrogant, they're cocky & they're proud. And that's what I want my team to be.'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Judd incident Vs NM
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 10:15 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
If Judd gets more than 3 weeks (2 with an extra week for loading) then the AFL is [REDACTED] and obviously beholden to the media. They've elected to try it under "misconduct" as that allows them to apply any penalty they pull out of their arse to appease the slavering morons calling for 6-8 weeks.

The media circus surrounding it has been embarrassing to be completely honest.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Judd incident Vs NM
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 10:15 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17235
missnaut wrote:
And Cyril wasn't cited I take it?

I'm sorry but I disagree we need to suck up the media hype - it is completely over the top. How the head of the MRP can make those comments before it has even gone to tribunal is farcical.


Agree. Not taking away that it was a silly thing for Judd to do, but this is trial by media. And the majority of the football media are no better than the reporters on Today Tonight. Tabloid flower. It's ridiculous the levels this has gotten to. Anyone who'd just arrived in the country would think that he'd done a Barry Hall-Brent Staker job on Leigh Adams...some journalists (and talkback morons) calling for 6 weeks? Hall got 7 for the aforementioned act that could have killed Staker.

If it's anything greater than 3 (and even that is pushing it) - and if I was the CEO or President of Carlton - I'd tell the AFL to shove it. Tell them the coach and players will not be doing any media for the remainder of the season. Want to fine us? Go ahead.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Judd incident Vs NM
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 10:18 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
DocSherrin wrote:
missnaut wrote:
And Cyril wasn't cited I take it?

I'm sorry but I disagree we need to suck up the media hype - it is completely over the top. How the head of the MRP can make those comments before it has even gone to tribunal is farcical.


Agree. Not taking away that it was a silly thing for Judd to do, but this is trial by media. And the majority of the football media are no better than the reporters on Today Tonight. Tabloid flower. It's ridiculous the levels this has gotten to. Anyone who'd just arrived in the country would think that he'd done a Barry Hall-Brent Staker job on Leigh Adams...some journalists (and talkback morons) calling for 6 weeks? Hall got 7 for the aforementioned act that could have killed Staker.

If it's anything greater than 3 (and even that is pushing it) - and if I was the CEO or President of Carlton - I'd tell the AFL to shove it. Tell them the coach and players will not be doing any media for the remainder of the season. Want to fine us? Go ahead.


Exactly.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Judd incident Vs NM
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 10:20 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17235
Quote:
The medical report submitted by the Kangaroos to the MRP reportedly cited Judd's grapple as the cause of the latest dislocation to Adams' shoulder.


North sent him back on the ground. It was the incidental collision with Andy Collins that dislocated his shoulder. Either way, North Melbourne have a case to answer. What's the bet this doesn't even see the light of day.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Judd incident Vs NM
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 10:27 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 9:02 pm
Posts: 13506
Location: Melbourne
That bothers me too.

They sent him back on - they thought he was OK. How can they then turn around and say it was the first incident which caused the dislocation when he was involved in two? If it was the first, why did he go back on?

It's not clear-cut enough for them to make a decision regarding the outcome.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Judd incident Vs NM
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 10:27 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:57 pm
Posts: 4320
Location: Strathmore
DocSherrin wrote:
Quote:
The medical report submitted by the Kangaroos to the MRP reportedly cited Judd's grapple as the cause of the latest dislocation to Adams' shoulder.


North sent him back on the ground. It was the incidental collision with Andy Collins that dislocated his shoulder. Either way, North Melbourne have a case to answer. What's the bet this doesn't even see the light of day.


So the doctors are admitting they sent an injured player back onto the ground. Where is the duty of care, sack the doctors and lose their license.

SEN are talking about the cyril tackle on SEN.. Cyril does it all the time they are saying.

_________________
31-3-2015 - R.I.P AFL, corrupted lying pricks
12-5-2015 - Go WADA
18-8-2015 - Suffer Hird* u lying flower
12-1-2016 - CAS goes bang, happy new year.. Drugcheats forever..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Judd incident Vs NM
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 10:32 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
DocSherrin wrote:
Quote:
The medical report submitted by the Kangaroos to the MRP reportedly cited Judd's grapple as the cause of the latest dislocation to Adams' shoulder.


North sent him back on the ground. It was the incidental collision with Andy Collins that dislocated his shoulder. Either way, North Melbourne have a case to answer. What's the bet this doesn't even see the light of day.


This should work in Judd's favour, obviously Adams' shoulder is that loose that it pops out and back in easily enough for it to allow him to play out a match.

The AFL will ignore that though.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Judd incident Vs NM
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 10:32 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34555
Location: The Brown Wedge
Figer wrote:
Have I missed something??? Did Judd murder someone?? FMD


I'm pretty sure he did. I saw the headline "Football Player Charged With Murder" on Monday morning and thought 'Well, that bloody-well serves Juddy right!'

_________________
end of message


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Judd incident Vs NM
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 10:40 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 5:52 pm
Posts: 2289
Location: Geelong
DocSherrin wrote:
missnaut wrote:
And Cyril wasn't cited I take it?

I'm sorry but I disagree we need to suck up the media hype - it is completely over the top. How the head of the MRP can make those comments before it has even gone to tribunal is farcical.


Agree. Not taking away that it was a silly thing for Judd to do, but this is trial by media. And the majority of the football media are no better than the reporters on Today Tonight. Tabloid flower. It's ridiculous the levels this has gotten to. Anyone who'd just arrived in the country would think that he'd done a Barry Hall-Brent Staker job on Leigh Adams...some journalists (and talkback morons) calling for 6 weeks? Hall got 7 for the aforementioned act that could have killed Staker.

If it's anything greater than 3 (and even that is pushing it) - and if I was the CEO or President of Carlton - I'd tell the AFL to shove it. Tell them the coach and players will not be doing any media for the remainder of the season. Want to fine us? Go ahead.


Agree with the sentiment Doc, but it's very reactive and "after the fact". I've said it before and I'll say again : we should've got Judd and Ratten out there talking the talk no later than Sunday to head all this off before the hysteria got out of control.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Judd incident Vs NM
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 10:40 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:18 pm
Posts: 3411
Location: East Perth, WA
We should get the best lawyers we can and go in there and expose the AFL for the hypocrites they are. There would be numerous examples of similar incidents that didn't even get cited, Cyril's being one of them.

Also, the head of the MRP making comments like that would be considered contempt of court in the real legal system, which the tribunal has been set up to mimic.

I hope Judd gets off on a technicality just to see the reaction of other supporters and the media.

_________________
when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth

Feelgood Hit of the Winter - GHRP-2, GHRP-6, CJC-1295, AOD-9604, Humanofort and Hexarelin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Judd incident Vs NM
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 10:41 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
yibbida wrote:
There would be numerous examples of similar incidents that didn't even get cited, Cyril's being one of them.


Does anyone know where I can see this?

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Judd incident Vs NM
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 10:45 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19566
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
Fyfe, JK and Porplyzia all have been sent back on after having the shoulder dislocate.

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Judd incident Vs NM
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 10:48 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48555
Location: Prison Island
wheres that love of football waning thread?

what a farce this is

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Judd incident Vs NM
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 10:49 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24655
Location: Kaloyasena
DocSherrin wrote:
Quote:
The medical report submitted by the Kangaroos to the MRP reportedly cited Judd's grapple as the cause of the latest dislocation to Adams' shoulder.


North sent him back on the ground. It was the incidental collision with Andy Collins that dislocated his shoulder. Either way, North Melbourne have a case to answer. What's the bet this doesn't even see the light of day.



The North Melbourne Medical/Sports Science Team are held in very poor light by the rest of the AFL world - their Sports Science guy is almost in the "Slapping Fishes Together" territory - they can go and flower themselves as far as I am concerned.

I was of the opinion that what Judd did was dumb and a result of 200+ games of being scragged and tagged from pillar to post. So 3 or 4 times he has had a brain fade/snap as a result of not being allowed to play the game fairly, okay I get it the AFL has and always will punish the retaliator (hard but fair I know).

But as far as I am concerned the media have completely lost the plot as far as this is incident is concerned. They have condemned, tried and executed Judd and it flowering stinks.

So I hope Judd does get off (but I doubt it) and the media can spend the rest of the flowering season taking the high moral outraged ground. :roll:

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Judd incident Vs NM
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 10:53 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17235
Effes wrote:
Fyfe, JK and Porplyzia all have been sent back on after having the shoulder dislocate.


Maybe so...but I bet after the game in the rooms they are first to see the physio. Leigh Adams was fine in the rooms post-match. No ice on the shoulder, nothing...why would you let him do media?

[youtube]tvX8L77b-kY[/youtube]


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Judd incident Vs NM
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 10:58 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
AGRO wrote:
But as far as I am concerned the media have completely lost the plot as far as this is incident is concerned. They have condemned, tried and executed Judd and it flowering stinks.

So I hope Judd does get off (but I doubt it) and the media can spend the rest of the flowering season taking the high moral outraged ground. :roll:


If Judd gets anything like the ridiculous penalties being called for by the slobbering media pack I'm done with footy and the AFL this year.
That bloke from the tribunal saying they're gonna throw the book at Judd can @#$%&! off too.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Judd incident Vs NM
PostPosted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 11:14 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 2:06 pm
Posts: 1098
Take a look at todays HUN. On the front page there is a small photo of the incident that shows another version of it. Judd has hold of Adams' right arm BEFORE he goes to ground. It looks like he is trying to handball. When the player goes to ground Judd would still have hold of his arm and of course it would go up further.
This witch hunt has gone beyond a joke, Mark Frasers comments were totally out of line, who does this average footballer and failed umpire think he is?
Interesting that paper is now saying he can plead guilty and get a reduced sentence, which is it.?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1018 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 ... 51  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group