Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jun 17, 2025 1:10 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 322 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 9:10 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21541
Location: North of the border
This year is turning into the most depressing year of them all
If you ask me

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 9:14 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:17 am
Posts: 18652
Location: threeohfivethree
Sydney Blue wrote:
This year is turning into the most depressing year of them all
If you ask me


@#$%&! I hate it when I agree with you... :lol:

I have two very close friends (one deceased) who are/were Pies supporters. They've lived through a bit of heartache in their time.

They occasionally argued about where the club was at but the one thing they definitely agreed upon was that losing wasn't actually so bad - it's the hope that kills you...

_________________
“When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become a king. The palace turns into a circus.”
Turkish Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 9:31 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21541
Location: North of the border
GWS wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
This year is turning into the most depressing year of them all
If you ask me


!@#$%& I hate it when I agree with you... :lol:

I have two very close friends (one deceased) who are/were Pies supporters. They've lived through a bit of heartache in their time.

They occasionally argued about where the club was at but the one thing they definitely agreed upon was that losing wasn't actually so bad - it's the hope that kills you...


I could handle when I knew we were rubbish but I seriously thought this year was it
Bloody terrible watching this junk every week and you cant see it ending any time soon

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 10:14 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24635
Location: Kaloyasena
GWS wrote:
Sydney Blue wrote:
This year is turning into the most depressing year of them all
If you ask me


!@#$%& I hate it when I agree with you... :lol:

I have two very close friends (one deceased) who are/were Pies supporters. They've lived through a bit of heartache in their time.

They occasionally argued about where the club was at but the one thing they definitely agreed upon was that losing wasn't actually so bad - it's the hope that kills you...



And the hope you have instilled in your children who really only remember the 1995 Grand Final because they have played the DVD on high rotation. :sad:

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 10:32 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 7:01 pm
Posts: 1030
Blue Vain wrote:
Blue Boys wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:

The AJ free kick was a free every day of the week. If you dive on the ball, it is your responsibility to get it out. He didn't.
If he had half a brain, he would have rushed the point.


Sorry I disagree. He may have dived on it, but it is quite clear by the footage that ball was in fact out. He did not have possession of the ball.

It was a completely wrong decision.


Having possession is irrelevant. If you dive on it, you are responsible for clearing it out of the congestion. AJ may not have had his hands on the ball but Jamo was holding it into him.
The interpretation is simple and all the players should know it.


I'm sorry - how can possession be irrelevant when you're discussing a holding the ball decision? I'm really not a Joseph fan but he clearly moved the ball on, it passed through a WCE players hands and ended up with Jamison. Saying that he's responsible for what happens to it when he's no longer in possession of it is bizarre.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 10:57 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
AK43 wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Having possession is irrelevant. If you dive on it, you are responsible for clearing it out of the congestion. AJ may not have had his hands on the ball but Jamo was holding it into him.
The interpretation is simple and all the players should know it.


I'm sorry - how can possession be irrelevant when you're discussing a holding the ball decision? I'm really not a Joseph fan but he clearly moved the ball on, it passed through a WCE players hands and ended up with Jamison. Saying that he's responsible for what happens to it when he's no longer in possession of it is bizarre.


The ball wasn't even touching Joseph when the free was paid, the umpire was on the other side of the contest and guessed.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 11:12 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:26 am
Posts: 14730
Location: Comparing orange boners with Hirdy
Wojee wrote:
the umpire was on the other side of the contest and guessed.

I reckon you could offer this explanation for many of the many poor decisions you see, and it would be fairly accurate

_________________
Greg Swann wrote:
Essendon* cheated, simple as that


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 7:22 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18024
AK43 wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Blue Boys wrote:
Sorry I disagree. He may have dived on it, but it is quite clear by the footage that ball was in fact out. He did not have possession of the ball.

It was a completely wrong decision.


Having possession is irrelevant. If you dive on it, you are responsible for clearing it out of the congestion. AJ may not have had his hands on the ball but Jamo was holding it into him.
The interpretation is simple and all the players should know it.


I'm sorry - how can possession be irrelevant when you're discussing a holding the ball decision? I'm really not a Joseph fan but he clearly moved the ball on, it passed through a WCE players hands and ended up with Jamison. Saying that he's responsible for what happens to it when he's no longer in possession of it is bizarre.


I'm not saying its fair, I'm telling you thats the interpretation the umpires are instructed to adjudicate on.

15.2.5 Diving on Top of the Football
Where a Player is in possession of the football by reason of
diving on top of or dragging the football underneath their body,
the field Umpire shall award a Free Kick against that Player
if they do not immediately knock the football clear or Correctly
Dispose of the football when Correctly Tackled.


Did he knock the ball clear or dispose of it correctly? ie. kick/handball? No.
The rule was introduced to stop all the stoppages and keep a continual flowing game which is what the fans are after. The players should know the rules. Its their bloody job!

As I said, I disagree with the rule but I understand why it was introduced and I wont excuse the players for not knowing it.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 9:37 am 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2012 8:38 pm
Posts: 37
I'm sorry - how can possession be irrelevant when you're discussing a holding the ball decision? I'm really not a Joseph fan but he clearly moved the ball on, it passed through a WCE players hands and ended up with Jamison. Saying that he's responsible for what happens to it when he's no longer in possession of it is bizarre.[/quote]

I'm not saying its fair, I'm telling you thats the interpretation the umpires are instructed to adjudicate on.

15.2.5 Diving on Top of the Football
Where a Player is in possession of the football by reason of
diving on top of or dragging the football underneath their body,
the field Umpire shall award a Free Kick against that Player
if they do not immediately knock the football clear or Correctly
Dispose of the football when Correctly Tackled.


Did he knock the ball clear or dispose of it correctly? ie. kick/handball? No.
The rule was introduced to stop all the stoppages and keep a continual flowing game which is what the fans are after. The players should know the rules. Its their bloody job!

As I said, I disagree with the rule but I understand why it was introduced and I wont excuse the players for not knowing it.[/quote]



Was he correctly tackled?

wasnt there a rule introduced a year or 2 ago that was to penalise the 3rd or 4th body in the contest for trapping the ball in, rather than the poor bugger on the bottom of the pack?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 9:50 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21541
Location: North of the border
Jamo was the one that licked it in

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 10:59 am 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 7:39 pm
Posts: 46
As Riewoldt said this morning on "Game Day" maybe it is time for some accountability amongst the umpires. Players tweet in disgust and they are made accountable. Unfortunately those at the root of the problem are never accountable. Sure they need some protection, but not when they are coming off such a substandard performance.

The decision against Joseph was clearly wrong. Even if he did pull the ball in or dived on it ( he did neither, merely took possession of the ball) the incorrect decision was made. Rule 15.2.5 does not come in to this decision as it is applied when the ball is dived on or pulled in. Even if this rule was applied in this situation Joseph actually does dispose of the ball immediately anyway and should never have been pinged.

The umpire made an assumption here as he was on the blind side. Put simply, imagine being done for speeding and the cop has not actually seen you but made the assumption you were speeding just because it looked like it!

This was clearly an umpiring error and I have to disagree with those insinuating otherwise here. The umpiring was as bad as I have seen and this decision is indicative of how the night was umpired.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 11:03 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Were losing the plot when we focus on the umpiring.
Players can tweet all they like.. but they live in glass houses and they shouldnt be throwing stones.

The umpires are not the reason why were struggling.
Its a nice deflection though.

Focus should be on our players , coaches and organisation.

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 11:05 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
macka04 wrote:
As Riewoldt said this morning on "Game Day" maybe it is time for some accountability amongst the umpires. Players tweet in disgust and they are made accountable. Unfortunately those at the root of the problem are never accountable. Sure they need some protection, but not when they are coming off such a substandard performance.

The decision against Joseph was clearly wrong. Even if he did pull the ball in or dived on it ( he did neither, merely took possession of the ball) the incorrect decision was made. Rule 15.2.5 does not come in to this decision as it is applied when the ball is dived on or pulled in. Even if this rule was applied in this situation Joseph actually does dispose of the ball immediately anyway and should never have been pinged.

The umpire made an assumption here as he was on the blind side. Put simply, imagine being done for speeding and the cop has not actually seen you but made the assumption you were speeding just because it looked like it!

This was clearly an umpiring error and I have to disagree with those insinuating otherwise here. The umpiring was as bad as I have seen and this decision is indicative of how the night was umpired.


:thumbsup:

No diving or pulling the ball under occurred. Rule was incorrectly applied.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 11:06 am 
Offline
John Nicholls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 9603
Location: Beijing
Synbad wrote:
Were losing the plot when we focus on the umpiring.
Players can tweet all they like.. but they live in glass houses and they shouldnt be throwing stones.

The umpires are not the reason why were struggling.
Its a nice deflection though.

Focus should be on our players , coaches and organisation.


+1

_________________
"our electorate seeks less to be informed and more to be validated." Sad times.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 11:15 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
Synbad wrote:
Were losing the plot when we focus on the umpiring.
Players can tweet all they like.. but they live in glass houses and they shouldnt be throwing stones.

The umpires are not the reason why were struggling.
Its a nice deflection though.

Focus should be on our players , coaches and organisation.


This is just a sideshow to the terrible situation we're in, nobody is saying the umpires are the reason why we're sliding downhill.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 12:02 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 8:58 pm
Posts: 394
Location: Melton
Blue Vain wrote:
gerry atric wrote:
One thing, forget the umps. Yes we had a raw deal, the AJ one followed by an identical one not paid ag wce and also judd's 50 followed by what should have been a 50 ag wce for a carlton goal (when wce player handed the ball to the guy on the mark not the blues player) made me angry. But that wasn't what cost us the game. And we do a get less of the 50/50s over there but WCE and Freeo travel every second week and get less of the 50/50s here every second week.

Umps annoy me when the blues play, but I rarely notice them when I am watching a game where I don't care about the result. Focus on what you can control, be in front, be first to the ball. The excuses of umps and injuries only mask more serious deficiencies.



The AJ free kick was a free every day of the week. If you dive on the ball, it is your responsibility to get it out. He didn't.
If he had half a brain, he would have rushed the point.


BV the free was actually paid against Jamo, why it was paid has me stuffed as Jamo came in with the WC players, ball up IMO, but I must admit the HTB rule has me completely confused and I have only watched/played the game for 40 years, I can understand the tweets.

_________________
We are the maybe blues


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 12:12 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 8:58 pm
Posts: 394
Location: Melton
Stefchook wrote:
We’ve gone from looking like a good side not really trying to an average side that is really trying. We’re a side that has lost confidence and belief. If the game’s close, I expect us to lose.

Terrific game and effort from Carrots. Real leader of the club. Probably should be captain.
Some wonderful defensive spoiling from Jamison.
Duigan’s form has been good the last 2 weeks.
Robbo had a terrific 2nd half. But not quite at the same level this year, after his break out season last year.
Enjoying Tuohy’s ongoing development. I reckon he’ll have a terrific career for us.
After a few good weeks, McLean didn’t really get near it.
Really happy that we’re getting games into Watson. He’s got some limitations. But doing well. And he also has some real weapons. His kicking is incredible. Nice that he can sit back inside 50 and be a distributor. Hopefully that means we can be a bit more attacking with players like Gibbs.
Not quite sure why we would be playing Joseph ahead of Bootsma. Bootsma’s form has been better. And surely we must be in development mode for the future.


Stef, the only reason I can see for AJ getting a game over Bootsma was body size, I am thinking that they thought AJ would be able to handle the Physical pressure a bit more and had more chance of getting contested possessions and creating stoppages, it is also the only reason I can come up with as to why he gets a game over Lucas, unless Lucas is doing something that makes the MC think he is not worthy of a senior game.

BTW I would have played Bootsma over AJ on Thursday night.

_________________
We are the maybe blues


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 2:42 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 5:15 pm
Posts: 7360
Synbad wrote:
Were losing the plot when we focus on the umpiring.
Players can tweet all they like.. but they live in glass houses and they shouldnt be throwing stones.

The umpires are not the reason why were struggling.
Its a nice deflection though.

Focus should be on our players , coaches and organisation.

Victory coach, Ange Pusticoglou this morning on ABC Offsiders had an interesting view re. scrutiny of officials (all sports) as opposed to players and coach's.

His comments were discussing thugby league SOO but the Blues were also mentioned.

He claimed, we demand apologies and reviews when umpires/referees make mistakes but to a much lesser degree for players and coaching staff.


Anything to distract from our very own incompetence I suppose... people that dwell on AJ's holding the ball as opposed to his turnover (to Jamo) need a dose of reality.

_________________
“I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned.” ― Richard Feynman


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 2:53 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
And soccer is a much easier game to referee than footy.
The rules in footy are such that the umpire must be a mind reader too!!!

I hate it when people bring up umpires all the time. Its such a soft cock mentality

Everyone has his day with the umpires.
I laugh sometimes at what Juddy gets away with.

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 3:18 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2005 12:18 pm
Posts: 9800
Location: Australia
Stefchook wrote:
We’ve gone from looking like a good side not really trying to an average side that is really trying. We’re a side that has lost confidence and belief. If the game’s close, I expect us to lose.


This!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 322 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 45 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group