ThePsychologist wrote:
Its not about the players, we have the players if we use the game style that suits.
Why Walker isn't in the forward line astounds me.
Play Henderson as at the hardworking lead up forward and have Walker and Betts leading up from the square. The resting ruck man can stay in the square.
When under pressure you go long to the square where the ruck man make a contest other wise control the ball, wait for created space and allow more mobile players to lead into space. This will also allow for a much better defensive forward set up.
The problem with this free flowing, faced paced style of play the balls comes in from anywhere at any pace and its a lottery allowing good defences to structure up and run the ball out.
You can't tell me a forward line of:
HF: Gibbs Henderson Garlett
F: Betts Walker Kruezer
couldn't kick enough goals if used properly?
Most were worried that that forward line wouldnt cut it come finals time when teams that win seem to have big mothers inside 50 as pushing the ball forward to contests in finals heat is the go.
We used Walker as one of the talls last year during the season but the MC would have been worried that wouldnt stand up in finals.
For the first 3 rounds we got away with Walker not being there so they thought we could use him higher up the ground. Then midfielders went down, Simpson started getting tagged out of games and we lacked onballers for rotations so the decision to play Walker up the ground had merit.