Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Tue Jun 17, 2025 3:58 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 47 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: R9: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 11:10 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24635
Location: Kaloyasena
Princes Park Whistler wrote:
We have about 5 players in career worst form at the moment, including Gibbs who is becoming the Ian Baker Finch of football. (sorry Club).He could do with a mentor such as Peter Dean, Adrian Hickmont or Dean Rice.


Gibbs' shots for goal have taken on an Ian Baker-Finch like quality over recent times. :razz:

If he starts snap hooking them like Simon Beaumont then we are in big trouble.

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R9: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 11:21 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 11:55 pm
Posts: 12544
Location: Brisbane
Princes Park Whistler wrote:
He could do with a mentor such as Peter Dean, Adrian Hickmont or Dean Rice.


Hickmont. Any relation to Ricky Mont?

_________________
THEY LIKE TO SEND UP!!!!!!!!

Until each team plays each other the same number of times, the AFL, as a fair dinkum competition, cannot be taken seriously.

He (Mr Swann) said the honour and pride associated with the club's traditional navy blue jumper was priceless.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R9: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 11:26 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:36 am
Posts: 8163
Pros:

Robbo, Warnock, McLean, Ellard and Judd around the contest.
Hammer continues to take forward 50 marks. Although he kicked poorly.
Tuohy's best game for a while.
Bootsma again showed some real talent.
Walker and Betts.
Decent percentage boost in the end.

Cons:

Seemed to butcher a lot of pretty gettable opportunities up forward.
Seemed to concede unnecessarily easy opportunties for goal to the opposition (most of which they butchered).
Garlett and Gibbs still struggling for form.
Kreuzer was a little better, but still only looked our 3rd most damaging big man out there.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R9: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2012 11:37 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 3:02 am
Posts: 39
Pros

Winning
Robbo - 100% effort, all game, every contest (Gibbs should look no further)
Hampson - clunking marks - great for his confidence
Brock - good effort. He really is slow, noticeably IMO, and he can't kick over 45m but he's what we needed today. Clearances, blocking, grunt work...well done.
Bootsma - thought he showed some good signs. Sure he made mistakes, and but with these young guys, all I want to see are signs that they can play at this level. Boots has poise , doesn't panic, and tries to do the team things. Get another 15 kgs on that frame and he'll be great.

Cons
Just the team as a whole seems to be playing without cohesion at the moment. There is just no flow in the team. Hopefully we can get our mojo back soon. Missing some key players, so once we start getting them back, hopefully that improves.

Jeffy - he's been struggling for a few weeks now.

I know he's getting a lot of flak at the moment, but Bryce Gibbs really needs a rocket. Sure he still gets his possessions, chooses nice safe low risk kicks (absolutely no left foot though...twice today he tried to kick on the outside of his right and missed targets when a simple left foot kick would have hit the target) but the thing that is really unforgivable is his lack of intensity. I don't want to say his soft... He tackles and spoils when he has too. But as someone said earlier, he just jogs around at 75%....let him play hbf, but absolutely bust your gut running to break lines and create!!!! He leaves plenty in the tank at the end of the game IMO, while other elite mids and even flankers are completely knackered! It's like watching Ryan houlahan mark2.0

Bit of a rant but it's just really frustrating me.

Bring on the power, knock them off and then let's smash the cats, who arent what they used to be!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: R9: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2012 12:15 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
Pro:
First live game this year.
Robbo.
McLean.
Bootsma looks like he'll be a fine player.
The crowd were pretty good where we were sitting, no bagging out of Carlton players and good natured.


Con:
Still a handful of players desperately out of form.
Forward entries being wasted.
Terrible spectacle.


WTF:
The Carlton fan who struck up a conversation on the way in who asked if I thought "Warnoff" would play OK. I thought I'd misheard but he then said "Warnoff" 3-4 more times.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R9: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2012 12:22 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 11:55 pm
Posts: 12544
Location: Brisbane
Wojee wrote:

WTF:
The Carlton fan who struck up a conversation on the way in who asked if I thought "Warnoff" would play OK. I thought I'd misheard but he then said "Warnoff" 3-4 more times.



And to think he was actually a leggy.
:grin:

_________________
THEY LIKE TO SEND UP!!!!!!!!

Until each team plays each other the same number of times, the AFL, as a fair dinkum competition, cannot be taken seriously.

He (Mr Swann) said the honour and pride associated with the club's traditional navy blue jumper was priceless.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R9: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2012 12:22 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 10:48 pm
Posts: 4450
Location: Perth
I watched the first 10 mins before heading off to the derby. Frankly, we looked shot, so more than happy to get the points. Even against melb.

Having just watched the replay, my thoughts.

Pros

Robbo
Ellard
Brock
206
Walker in the middle
Bootsma showed a bit I reckon
Hopefully we take some confidence out of the last quarter.

Cons

The first three quarters. We are lucky we only played melb today.
The start. Seriously wtf was that. IMHO a sign of how low our confidence is right now. As I said above, we looked shot.
Have a few terribly out of form such as jeffy, kreuz and Gibbs.
Our mojo still appears way off returning. Very little cohesiveness though perhaps this can be partly mitigated by the change in personnel.

_________________
We are on our way back...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R9: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2012 12:48 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
Pklz wrote:
Con: Our dead beat supporters who show up to games and abuse certain Carlton players as if they have a target on their back.

Sick of this shit, makes me hate sitting in the members section. You could actually see Paul Bowers confidence in his own ability completely disappear after a few tough minutes of football for him all because the Carlton 'faithful' were giving it to him.

Absolute filth supporters can go support Essendon*.


Richmond supporters > Carlton supporters

Sadly this place is indicitive of how far we've fallen.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R9: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2012 7:06 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Pklz wrote:
Con: Our dead beat supporters who show up to games and abuse certain Carlton players as if they have a target on their back.

Sick of this shit, makes me hate sitting in the members section. You could actually see Paul Bowers confidence in his own ability completely disappear after a few tough minutes of football for him all because the Carlton 'faithful' were giving it to him.

Absolute filth supporters can go support Essendon*.


Richmond supporters > Carlton supporters

Sadly this place is indicitive of how far we've fallen.

spewing bile and abuse is now part of Aussie culture - people have been conditioned to do it


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R9: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2012 7:35 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 35883
Location: Half back flank
bluedog wrote:
Wojee wrote:

WTF:
The Carlton fan who struck up a conversation on the way in who asked if I thought "Warnoff" would play OK. I thought I'd misheard but he then said "Warnoff" 3-4 more times.



And to think he was actually a leggy.
:grin:




:clap:

_________________
#DonTheStash


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R9: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2012 9:06 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:22 pm
Posts: 4678
Location: Melbourne
PRO's:-

- ROBBO
Brilliant and gutsy effort from him today. He has been asked to step up and he took leaps rather than steps. Inspiring stuff.
- WARNOCK
Could very well be our #1 ruckman if he plays like that! Loved his clearance work too.
- McLEAN
Did ok. Not great but OK. Still don't like him, but you gotta give credit when somebody tries hard like that. I have no problem when players put in 'effort'.
- WINNING...........
Without Murphy / Yazz / Hendo / Waite / Carazzo / Laidler.


CON's

- Crap game. Geez those first 3qtrs were boring!
- Easybeats. Melbourne are woefull. A win's a win, but let's not get ahead of ourselves.
- Jeff.........what were you thinking? Will he get a week for that?
- Flooding. Again we pushed to many numbers up the ground. It pisses me off when I see players like Eddie Betts taking marks in the defending 50. He shouldn't be there!!!

_________________
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit"
- Aristotle


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R9: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2012 10:26 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 11:40 am
Posts: 4088
Location: Reclining always
MPH78 wrote:

Our mojo still appears way off returning. Very little cohesiveness though perhaps this can be partly mitigated by the change in personnel.


Once there was a bit of feeling about the game, especially from Robbo, it fired up the whole team and lit the proverbial rocket up their bums. If that's what it takes, then that's what it takes. Didn't work against the Saints where there was plenty of feeling too, but we were pretty limp wristed then.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R9: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2012 10:29 am 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Pklz wrote:
Con: Our dead beat supporters who show up to games and abuse certain Carlton players as if they have a target on their back.

Sick of this shit, makes me hate sitting in the members section. You could actually see Paul Bowers confidence in his own ability completely disappear after a few tough minutes of football for him all because the Carlton 'faithful' were giving it to him.

Absolute filth supporters can go support Essendon*.


Richmond supporters > Carlton supporters

Sadly this place is indicitive of how far we've fallen.


How people think that is going to help a player I will never know. Sad bastards. Save your energy for the opposition.

I stand well away from people in some of the worse places to watch the game just to avoid that rubbish.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R9: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2012 10:39 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:35 am
Posts: 2125
PROS
A win
Warnock was good but raises our issue of having three guys who's best possie is first ruck.
Mitch is a beauty
Good to see Collins get a run , and Bootsma is a talent, just needs another 20 kgs
McLean showed character to be on the discard heap and then take his chance when it came. History suggests he is not the answer, but he will at least get a clear run for the next few weeks

CONS
Melbourne tried hard but were horrible, their skills were reminiscent of the blues circa 2003
COuldn't imagine us beating anyone in the top half of the ladder with that side and that performance. Need to really improve


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R9: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2012 10:45 am 
Offline
Serge Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 10:36 am
Posts: 983
Kouta wrote:
Pklz wrote:
Con: Our dead beat supporters who show up to games and abuse certain Carlton players as if they have a target on their back.

Sick of this shit, makes me hate sitting in the members section. You could actually see Paul Bowers confidence in his own ability completely disappear after a few tough minutes of football for him all because the Carlton 'faithful' were giving it to him.

Absolute filth supporters can go support Essendon*.

At least they're braver than those who choose to do it anonymously on here...
out of harmes' way wrote:
Cons
Lucas-pea heart
Gibbs-pea heart

Nothing brave about either. Both responses are equally piss poor.

_________________
i don't wanna spend my life explaining myself. Either you get it, or you don't- Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R9: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2012 10:47 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:20 pm
Posts: 6923
No better than everyone suddenly jumping on the Brock bandwagon after being aboard arguably the easiest bandwagon in football in mercilessly bagging him out for the past 2 and a half years....

Most of which will jump off as soon as Carrazzo comes back, or Curnow starts finding form..

_________________
BLUES 2010: PAV AND JUDD = FLAGS. DOING IT FOR THE LOVE OF DICK PRATT.

HAVE YOU SIGNED UP FOR TALKINGCARLTON SUPERCOACH 2009 YET?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R9: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2012 10:51 am 
Offline
formerly BlueRob
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 12:45 pm
Posts: 3073
PRO:

Brock: We don't need anymore pace (the pace of Brock is not the issue) ... we need someone who can get their hands on the ball ... Well done.
Warnock: So much up side to his game ... Must somehow be re-signed.

CON:

We are a long way behind the top sides (until we get players back).

_________________
I am as mad as hell and I'm not going to take it any more!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R9: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2012 11:46 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21541
Location: North of the border
Pro
Brock - now keep him there
Robbo responded well to the challenge
Three rucks- I thought it worked albeit Hammer was a forward
Bootsma - looks promising lovely long kick of the football not afraid to tackle either
Warnock - very good against one of the competitions best

Con
Too many points accuracy in front of goal is woeful it the same story nearly every week more points than goals

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R9: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2012 12:04 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
The Rhino wrote:
No better than everyone suddenly jumping on the Brock bandwagon after being aboard arguably the easiest bandwagon in football in mercilessly bagging him out for the past 2 and a half years....

Most of which will jump off as soon as Carrazzo comes back, or Curnow starts finding form..


Not sure any are jumping on a bandwagon, just praising a guy who played a good game.

You are right though, he probably won't be given much slack if he plays poorly next week, haha.

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R9: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Mon May 28, 2012 12:06 pm 
Offline
Trevor Keogh

Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2012 8:49 am
Posts: 765
Pro: Bootsma hurting the opposition in his second game.. he will play 300 games.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 47 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 63 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group