Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Wed Jun 18, 2025 4:56 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 469 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 ... 24  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 2:09 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 2646
It's easy we play like two bob millionaire, lazy, selfish and stupid football.
I cannot understand our game plan. We lose the ball from the contest and we all give up.
Are we that confident that a turn over will occur that we don’t chase or do we think that someone up the ground will stop the onslaught.
We struggle to have shots on goal and go out to the pocket and they have and open free for all forward line with shots at will.
Does the Brains trust somehow think this is working? or haven’t they have got any other ideas?
Seriously you can swap and change during the game it’s not illegal.
Do we think that football is a non contact sport?
I think that martial artist they’ve got down there should start bitch slapping some players to get them use to a bit of physicality.
The whole team and MC should really re-evaluate their goals for the rest of the season or change their strategies and work ethic as to not become another St Kilda of the 10’s.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 2:11 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
I'm sorry.

Beau Wilkes in your side SHOULD automatically scratch any side from flag contention.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 2:19 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane

Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 9:39 am
Posts: 209
LETS FACE IT...

We are coached by a former great and from all accounts a really decent bloke but with a clear inability grasp the fundamental structures and game plans required to consistently win football games.

1. Simple fact is the game has moved on from the full forward 80 press as teams have become more accustomed to working through it. This press (which came across from Collingwood via Brown last year) is yesterday's tactics. Time to move on !!!
2. Our coaching group have not worked that out….and hence the players are forced to continually bang their heads against a brick wall (while Rats blames poor forward entries and a lack of intensity- which is absolute rubbish!!!)
3. St Kilda flooded the stoppages and even our defensive 50 making it difficult for us to score when going forward always having a +1/2 behind our last forward
4. In contrast, we push all the way up the ground leaving acres of space for your forwards/midfielders to run into when you got the ball out and over the zone.

People go on about Rats’ positional moves (eg. Joseph as a back pocket – which is a joke) and his inability to make moves during a game (eg. Waite to the backline when he was clearly having a shocker – due largely to the points above)...but this is not the fundamental issue.

The biggest problem is that he lacks a basic awareness of how to structure a winning game plan…Essendon* beat us exactly the same way as St Kilda did.

Don’t tell me for one second that Saad, Milera & Milne are much better than Walker, Betts and Garlett….they are just provided with a game plan and structure that allowed them to play in a way that maximises their strengths and opportunities.

Now unlike ‘others’, I am not jumping on this bandwagon in a johnny come lately fashion. I have been telling anyone that cares to listen for nearly two years that Ratten is simply not capable to fulfil his duties of getting the best of the list at his disposal !

In a perverse sort of way, our finials win against Essendon* last year was a curse …


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 2:37 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:39 pm
Posts: 15848
Wojee wrote:
Navy Blue Horse wrote:
It's OK everyone, just relax.

St Kilda, it seems, are the real deal. We lost to a genuine flag threat by just 4 goals.

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/s ... 1yo7a.html

Quote:
Henderson said last night's loss reflected more on where St Kilda were in their development under Watters than any major chinks in Carlton's armoury


Really?


Happy to have him talk the opposition up as long as that's not what is said when the team reviews the match.



The St Kilda focussed comments don’t sit well with me at all. I want to hear what the players think they did wrong, and what they plan to do to rectify it.

_________________
"I had to eat"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 2:43 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
Navy Blue Horse wrote:
Wojee wrote:
Happy to have him talk the opposition up as long as that's not what is said when the team reviews the match.



The St Kilda focussed comments don’t sit well with me at all. I want to hear what the players think they did wrong, and what they plan to do to rectify it.


I'd rather them simply say they were beaten then go back and begin preparations for next week. All the tosh in the media about how we were going to counter Hreewoldt etc was silly at the time, and even sillier now that we were smashed everywhere else in the contest.

Don't say, do!!!

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 2:43 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 3502
Location: looking for a good bloke to have a beer with
Navy Blue Horse wrote:
Wojee wrote:
Navy Blue Horse wrote:
It's OK everyone, just relax.

St Kilda, it seems, are the real deal. We lost to a genuine flag threat by just 4 goals.

http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/s ... 1yo7a.html

Henderson said last night's loss reflected more on where St Kilda were in their development under Watters than any major chinks in Carlton's armoury
Really?

Happy to have him talk the opposition up as long as that's not what is said when the team reviews the match.



The St Kilda focussed comments don’t sit well with me at all. I want to hear what the players think they did wrong, and what they plan to do to rectify it.


Totally agree with this - why are we just brushing it off on the public record as being "Oh well they are a good team"? We should be saying wqe expected to win, didn't work hard enough in areas x, y and z, the players are filthy with themselves and have vowed to improve areas x, y and z on Sunday to put the season back on track.

_________________
I'm shocked to be sitting here


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 3:13 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:12 pm
Posts: 4426
livolover wrote:
LETS FACE IT...

We are coached by a former great and from all accounts a really decent bloke but with a clear inability grasp the fundamental structures and game plans required to consistently win football games.

1. Simple fact is the game has moved on from the full forward 80 press as teams have become more accustomed to working through it. This press (which came across from Collingwood via Brown last year) is yesterday's tactics. Time to move on !!!
2. Our coaching group have not worked that out….and hence the players are forced to continually bang their heads against a brick wall (while Rats blames poor forward entries and a lack of intensity- which is absolute rubbish!!!)
3. St Kilda flooded the stoppages and even our defensive 50 making it difficult for us to score when going forward always having a +1/2 behind our last forward
4. In contrast, we push all the way up the ground leaving acres of space for your forwards/midfielders to run into when you got the ball out and over the zone.

People go on about Rats’ positional moves (eg. Joseph as a back pocket – which is a joke) and his inability to make moves during a game (eg. Waite to the backline when he was clearly having a shocker – due largely to the points above)...but this is not the fundamental issue.

The biggest problem is that he lacks a basic awareness of how to structure a winning game plan…Essendon* beat us exactly the same way as St Kilda did.

Don’t tell me for one second that Saad, Milera & Milne are much better than Walker, Betts and Garlett….they are just provided with a game plan and structure that allowed them to play in a way that maximises their strengths and opportunities.

Now unlike ‘others’, I am not jumping on this bandwagon in a johnny come lately fashion. I have been telling anyone that cares to listen for nearly two years that Ratten is simply not capable to fulfil his duties of getting the best of the list at his disposal !

In a perverse sort of way, our finials win against Essendon* last year was a curse …

Dont waste your time dude....it's got nothing to do with the coach....it's a mental thing....

_________________
"Truth, for the tyrants, is the most terrible and cruel of all bindings; it is like an incandescent iron falling across their chests. And it is even more agonizing than hot iron, for that only burns the flesh, while truth burns its way into the soul"     — Lauro Aguirre


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 3:19 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 3:49 pm
Posts: 27793
Location: Southbank.
Italian Blue wrote:
Can someone please shed some light as to why everytime there is expectation on us, eg playing for top spot tonight, it seems we crap ourselves...

Oh by the way, great call Recruiting department on not recruiting A. Saad.... :banghead: :banghead: :mad: :mad:


I suggested in the drafting threads last year that we should grab Saad from the Bullants; and I recall that Heavs asked ''how could we?''......well....St.Kilda drafted him; and we saw his talents last night.

_________________
No ones listening till you make a mistake.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 3:26 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 23921
Possibly we didn't because we have talented small forwards already, but then,
can you ever have enough?
It's just so disappointing tha we didn't match the hardness and intensity at the ball of the Saints.
I'm sure we have before. It's the uncertainty that haunts you when you realise your side cannot yet play consistently strong footy.
It seems to be a hunger thng, but...I wonder for instance, if it was also that Mitch and Jammo weren't quite right? When Mitch is firing, most things are possible, even when a couple of our midfielders are being tagged, but that didn't happen. The ball just got choked down all the time. A horrible experience last nite, and I hope wholeheartedly, that the boys are capable of a lot more fight when the heat is on.

_________________
That’s not a political statement — it’s a harsh reality, and we must act,” she said. “He is a clear and present danger to the things that keep us strong and free. I support impeachment.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 3:38 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 12:30 pm
Posts: 4183
I hope your lucky socks have been turfed bg.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 3:52 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 4:14 pm
Posts: 911
Location: Canberra
I am always disappointed in the aunts games because it seems we turn up to play football and the brogans turn up to play a game of intimidation. Same as the hawks. I can only assume that there is a school of thought out there that carlton are a bunch of fast little boys that crumple when given a bump.

_________________
hands up if you're a sycophant!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 4:01 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:18 pm
Posts: 3411
Location: East Perth, WA
livolover wrote:
LETS FACE IT...

We are coached by a former great and from all accounts a really decent bloke but with a clear inability grasp the fundamental structures and game plans required to consistently win football games.

1. Simple fact is the game has moved on from the full forward 80 press as teams have become more accustomed to working through it. This press (which came across from Collingwood via Brown last year) is yesterday's tactics. Time to move on !!!
2. Our coaching group have not worked that out….and hence the players are forced to continually bang their heads against a brick wall (while Rats blames poor forward entries and a lack of intensity- which is absolute rubbish!!!)
3. St Kilda flooded the stoppages and even our defensive 50 making it difficult for us to score when going forward always having a +1/2 behind our last forward
4. In contrast, we push all the way up the ground leaving acres of space for your forwards/midfielders to run into when you got the ball out and over the zone.

People go on about Rats’ positional moves (eg. Joseph as a back pocket – which is a joke) and his inability to make moves during a game (eg. Waite to the backline when he was clearly having a shocker – due largely to the points above)...but this is not the fundamental issue.

The biggest problem is that he lacks a basic awareness of how to structure a winning game plan…Essendon* beat us exactly the same way as St Kilda did.

Don’t tell me for one second that Saad, Milera & Milne are much better than Walker, Betts and Garlett….they are just provided with a game plan and structure that allowed them to play in a way that maximises their strengths and opportunities.

Now unlike ‘others’, I am not jumping on this bandwagon in a johnny come lately fashion. I have been telling anyone that cares to listen for nearly two years that Ratten is simply not capable to fulfil his duties of getting the best of the list at his disposal !

In a perverse sort of way, our finials win against Essendon* last year was a curse …


Should we just adopt the Bombers/Saints gameplan then?

_________________
when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth

Feelgood Hit of the Winter - GHRP-2, GHRP-6, CJC-1295, AOD-9604, Humanofort and Hexarelin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 4:01 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:39 pm
Posts: 15848
Warby wrote:
Italian Blue wrote:
Can someone please shed some light as to why everytime there is expectation on us, eg playing for top spot tonight, it seems we crap ourselves...

Oh by the way, great call Recruiting department on not recruiting A. Saad.... :banghead: :banghead: :mad: :mad:


I suggested in the drafting threads last year that we should grab Saad from the Bullants; and I recall that Heavs asked ''how could we?''......well....St.Kilda drafted him; and we saw his talents last night.



Yet had he played, we still would have been smashed at the stoppages

_________________
"I had to eat"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 4:05 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 3:49 pm
Posts: 27793
Location: Southbank.
Why didn't Ratts swap Henderson and Waite around....wasn't it worth a try?

Hendo came to us as a forward; and we had no one to kick to last night except Waite, who always leads out to the boundary line.....so predictable.

To me; Gibbs is not worth his place in the side; and is far too casual in his approach....Lenny Hayes and DalSanto showed us how to play last night.....hard and relentless.

St.Kilda played us like a practice match......it was embarrassing.

_________________
No ones listening till you make a mistake.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 4:07 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
Warby wrote:
St.Kilda played us like a practice match......it was embarrassing.


Carlton played like it was a practice match, St Kilda played with intent and committment.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 4:22 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 35888
Location: Half back flank
Ponkstar wrote:
Our game play is so dependent on (a) first use of the ball and (b) precise use of the ball and there is no apparent strategy for retrieving possession once it is loss apart from hoping the opposition stuff it up.




Similar to the Bulldogs under Eade. Too much reliance on clean movement.

_________________
#DonTheStash


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 4:34 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
CK95 wrote:
Ponkstar wrote:
Our game play is so dependent on (a) first use of the ball and (b) precise use of the ball and there is no apparent strategy for retrieving possession once it is loss apart from hoping the opposition stuff it up.




Similar to the Bulldogs under Eade. Too much reliance on clean movement.


You wouldnt think it if you watched last nights game but we are very low on the scores against this year. We must be doing something right.

...but yes teams are cutting us off at the source and we are lost without that clean exciting ball movement away from stoppages.

I reckon we got worked up trying to get that going that we took too many risks and the ball came out of packs on their terms far too easy. That was something that didnt happen in rounds 1-3.
We need to tighten our defence in those stoppages.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 4:38 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
kingkerna wrote:
I mentioned before the game that we have dropped Thornton twice for two losses, nobody backed me up then. Bring him back and watch the difference it makes to our forward line.


I've disagreed with you in the past KK but I totally agree. And I'll even re-state what I've said before, fearing no derision or mock - In a strange way, Thornton is one of our most important players.
Plays back and forward quite well
Good kick
Good contested mark

And on another issue, Gibbs needs to be played as a permanent HF-mid. Give him 10 possessions and you can guarantee 3-4 goals/goal assists. If he's getting tagged, drag his opp to the square, if his opponebt drags him out of f50, have a predetermined swap(s) ready
Do it Ratts Gibbs to HF

One last issue - Have we f%^&ed up on Watson or am I being too impatient. Doesn't look like he's even close

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 4:44 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 23921
Juanita Jones wrote:
I hope your lucky socks have been turfed bg.

Please refer to TBBWWR post late last nite for your answer JJ. :thumbsup:

_________________
That’s not a political statement — it’s a harsh reality, and we must act,” she said. “He is a clear and present danger to the things that keep us strong and free. I support impeachment.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 4:49 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 12:20 pm
Posts: 1086
Shizen performance last night to say the least. We've become too predictable and are too reliant on perfect unaccountable football. Sure it looks exciting when we get going but teams have worked us out and just congest the space around a stoppage. The coaching staff have to have a secondary plan when things dont go our way. We're not proactive enough and when we do react, the games already lost.

IMO, we're atleast one grunt inside midfielder (lewis, hayes, selwood) type, and definately need to rejig our forward line. The amount of times the ball went in to only rebound right out was terrible.

_________________
"You're not gonna believe this. The guy killed 16 czechoslovakians. He was an interior decorator."

"His house looked like shit!"


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 469 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 ... 24  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group