Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Wed Jun 18, 2025 12:24 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 464 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 ... 24  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2012 7:20 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21541
Location: North of the border
Bit more hardness in the side at the moment with a lot of players who can rotate in the middle
Thornton very unlucky but you couldnt drop Bower after last week

Duigan very lucky

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2012 7:22 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
Hornet wrote:
Siegfried wrote:
Hornet wrote:
Lucas WTF :screwy:


When Ratten said after last week's game that he was disappointed that some on the periphery didn't grab their chance, Lucas was the first that came to my mind. He started reasonably well, but faded after quarter time.

It was the perfect opportunity for him to get 20-25 possessions and impact a game over 4 quarters, and he didn't take it. Not surprised (but disappointed he's been dropped.

Many were terrible last week and for me it was Ellard & Joseph that I thought Ratts was referring to... but they must have laid a tackle or something.

Not sure we can play those two with Curnow coming back.


How does Joseph relate to Curnow? He is in to play on Milne.

I guess having Ellard and Curnow is similar to Curnow and Carazzo. Ellard replacing Carazzo. The lack of pace with Curnow and Ellard does concern me but hopefully the stats/ gps data prove that is not a concern. Small ground and surround them with pace and we should be ok.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2012 7:29 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:36 am
Posts: 8163
club29 wrote:
How does Joseph relate to Curnow? He is in to play on Milne.


I hope he does a better job than the same game last year. Milne torched him.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2012 7:29 pm 
Offline
Rod McGregor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2009 11:24 pm
Posts: 194
Location: South of the Yarra
I agree that Bower played well last week but he really played on no one of any note. If Ratts continues to expect the third tall defender to swing at both ends of the ground then Thornton is more suited to that role. Thornton would have been able to stretch the Saints in defence as well as go back and play on Kozi. Baffling selection!!!

_________________
Life is made up of 3 things: Pre-Season, Post Season & Footy Season.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2012 7:35 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 10:07 pm
Posts: 1984
Can Eater wrote:
I agree that Bower played well last week but he really played on no one of any note. If Ratts continues to expect the third tall defender to swing at both ends of the ground then Thornton is more suited to that role. Thornton would have been able to stretch the Saints in defence as well as go back and play on Kozi. Baffling selection!!!


When the whole team was playing like crap last week and kicking points, Bower took it upon himself to put us 10 points up at half time, and then set up the first 2 goals of the third quarter.
Ratts gave him 4 votes. It's hardly baffling.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2012 8:14 pm 
Offline
formerly King Kenny
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:35 pm
Posts: 20076
Stefchook wrote:
club29 wrote:
How does Joseph relate to Curnow? He is in to play on Milne.


I hope he does a better job than the same game last year. Milne torched him.


is that the game we went home at half time to prepare for Essendon*?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2012 8:28 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
Thornton is officially Ratten's new whipping boy. His first omission earlier this year was a joke. Look forward to seeing the MC show consistency with poor form when other players play poorly. Bet they'll be given more opportunities than BT.

The player most deserving of a blowtorch up his arse is Gibbs. Was supposed to be his breakout year. Still see him picking up cheap possies across HB. Is one year behind Murph but is light years behind him as far as importance to our structures and impact on games.

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2012 8:47 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 3:30 pm
Posts: 255
99prelim wrote:
Thornton is officially Ratten's new whipping boy. His first omission earlier this year was a joke. Look forward to seeing the MC show consistency with poor form when other players play poorly. Bet they'll be given more opportunities than BT.

The player most deserving of a blowtorch up his arse is Gibbs. Was supposed to be his breakout year. Still see him picking up cheap possies across HB. Is one year behind Murph but is light years behind him as far as importance to our structures and impact on games.


That's very harsh on Gibber!

When was the last time Gibber lost out against any opponent he's had the job on?? I'd go as far as saying he's our best one on one defender we have & he's reading of the game is light years ahead of most!

He can play anywhere & on anyone.

_________________
'The Carlton people are spirited & I'm the same as them, they have life in them, they have humor, they're arrogant, they're cocky & they're proud. And that's what I want my team to be.'


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2012 8:58 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:39 pm
Posts: 15848
99prelim wrote:
Thornton is officially Ratten's new whipping boy. His first omission earlier this year was a joke. Look forward to seeing the MC show consistency with poor form when other players play poorly. Bet they'll be given more opportunities than BT.

The player most deserving of a blowtorch up his arse is Gibbs. Was supposed to be his breakout year. Still see him picking up cheap possies across HB. Is one year behind Murph but is light years behind him as far as importance to our structures and impact on games.


If Gibbs had spent the last 4 years in the midfield while Murphy played fwd pocket.....
Not Gibbs fault what role he's given

_________________
"I had to eat"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2012 9:01 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
Figer wrote:
99prelim wrote:
Thornton is officially Ratten's new whipping boy. His first omission earlier this year was a joke. Look forward to seeing the MC show consistency with poor form when other players play poorly. Bet they'll be given more opportunities than BT.

The player most deserving of a blowtorch up his arse is Gibbs. Was supposed to be his breakout year. Still see him picking up cheap possies across HB. Is one year behind Murph but is light years behind him as far as importance to our structures and impact on games.


That's very harsh on Gibber!

When was the last time Gibber lost out against any opponent he's had the job on?? I'd go as far as saying he's our best one on one defender we have & he's reading of the game is light years ahead of most!

He can play anywhere & on anyone.


I agree. There are no cheap possies off HB anymore. He is not like 2003 Campo sheep dogging it for easy numbers. He playing a legitimate role back behind the ball because he reads the play better than anyone in our team and his delivery out of the back half and his delivery into the forward 50 is top notch. You can tell when he is not there. Id love to see the stats for how many score involvements and inside 50 involvements. It would be close to the top of the team id imagine.

Gibbs is have a fantastic season only letting himself down against Essendon* and perhaps the first half last week when trialled onball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2012 9:06 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 10:07 pm
Posts: 1984
99prelim wrote:
Thornton is officially Ratten's new whipping boy. His first omission earlier this year was a joke. Look forward to seeing the MC show consistency with poor form when other players play poorly. Bet they'll be given more opportunities than BT.

The player most deserving of a blowtorch up his arse is Gibbs. Was supposed to be his breakout year. Still see him picking up cheap possies across HB. Is one year behind Murph but is light years behind him as far as importance to our structures and impact on games.


:roll: This is a ridiculous post.

Waite back in means a tall out. He was a bit unlucky, but who would you drop instead of Thornton? Kreuzer? Hampson? Jamison? Henderson? Bower?
Note that Bower played his best game in 2 and a half years last week, and was given 4 well deserved votes by Ratts. He did a hell of a lot more than T-bird.
Having a good team means that good players miss out each week.

As for Gibbs, he does his job, even though it is not his most suited position. He's been pretty solid in all but ht Essendon* game, when the whole team was down.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2012 9:17 pm 
Offline
formerly Virgin Blue

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 10:40 am
Posts: 1628
Gibbs plays HB bec he's not naturally hard enough to play onball, so comparing him to MM is valid. Dont get me wrong, as a defender he is just about elite, but he has not become the midfielder we all expected when we used pick one on him. Robinson has gone past him as an onball option because he gets Down n Dirty. Gibbs was played onball in the first half last week against GWS n didn't impose himself at all then was sent back. Look bottom line is he doesn't go in hard, doesn't throw himself into packs etc.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2012 9:18 pm 
Offline
formerly Virgin Blue

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 10:40 am
Posts: 1628
Gibbs plays HB bec he's not naturally hard enough to play onball, so comparing him to MM is valid. Dont get me wrong, as a defender he is just about elite, but he has not become the midfielder we all expected when we used pick one on him. Robinson has gone past him as an onball option because he gets Down n Dirty. Gibbs was played onball in the first half last week against GWS n didn't impose himself at all then was sent back. Look bottom line is he doesn't go in hard, doesn't throw himself into packs etc.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2012 9:19 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 11:48 am
Posts: 2891
nightcrawler wrote:
With 4 top 4 rivals playing each other this round, and the Swans away to Richmond (who are better than their record) this would be a horrible game to drop.

I really hope we bring it against the Saints.


Bump.

Please, please, please bury these flowers on Monday.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2012 9:20 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48543
Location: Prison Island
only we way we lose this is mentally

mentally getting ahead of ourselves and the opportunity of taking top spot

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2012 9:21 pm 
Offline
formerly Virgin Blue

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 10:40 am
Posts: 1628
Navy Blue Horse wrote:
99prelim wrote:
Thornton is officially Ratten's new whipping boy. His first omission earlier this year was a joke. Look forward to seeing the MC show consistency with poor form when other players play poorly. Bet they'll be given more opportunities than BT.

The player most deserving of a blowtorch up his arse is Gibbs. Was supposed to be his breakout year. Still see him picking up cheap possies across HB. Is one year behind Murph but is light years behind him as far as importance to our structures and impact on games.


If Gibbs had spent the last 4 years in the midfield while Murphy played fwd pocket.....
Not Gibbs fault what role he's given


There's a reason MM has spent the last four years onball n Gibbs hasn't. It's all about hardness. If Gibbs was good enough, trust me he'd be playing onball for us, but he isn't.
It's pretty bloody simple really. You just don't want tO see it


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2012 9:30 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
Sugarcane wrote:
Gibbs plays HB bec he's not naturally hard enough to play onball, so comparing him to MM is valid. Dont get me wrong, as a defender he is just about elite, but he has not become the midfielder we all expected when we used pick one on him. Robinson has gone past him as an onball option because he gets Down n Dirty. Gibbs was played onball in the first half last week against GWS n didn't impose himself at all then was sent back. Look bottom line is he doesn't go in hard, doesn't throw himself into packs etc.


That is only because some people expected an onballer. Cant judge him on fans expectations. Gibbs is no onballer. Not the right type. Not zippy enough, the skills he is blessed with are not utilised when in the congested bubble onballers have to play in. Forget about him as an onballer. He is a gun attacking defender who is rarely beaten, an occasional run with onballer who is rarely beaten and a handy forward who is rarely beaten.

Please rewatch the games he has played this season. Round 1 against the tigers he was outstanding, brisbane another good game, a fantastic game against the pies, rubbish game against the dons, a great game against freo where he completely domintated the first half, and a good game against GWS once he was moved away from attempting to play onball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2012 9:39 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
I don't care what they recruited him as he's damned near perfect as our sweeper, cleaner uperer, attacking defende r.

If he'd played in Perth fina last year we'd have won it's that simple..

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2012 9:54 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:12 pm
Posts: 4426
cimm1979 wrote:
I don't care what they recruited him as he's damned near perfect as our sweeper, cleaner uperer, attacking defende r.

If he'd played in Perth fina last year we'd have won it's that simple..

Yep true....we were lacking that one extra bit of class....

_________________
"Truth, for the tyrants, is the most terrible and cruel of all bindings; it is like an incandescent iron falling across their chests. And it is even more agonizing than hot iron, for that only burns the flesh, while truth burns its way into the soul"     — Lauro Aguirre


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2012 9:59 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 23921
There's more bitching in here than among a bunch of WAGS out at a nightclub.
Why is it so hard to just trust the match selection comittee?
We're doing alright aren't we?

_________________
That’s not a political statement — it’s a harsh reality, and we must act,” she said. “He is a clear and present danger to the things that keep us strong and free. I support impeachment.”


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 464 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 ... 24  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 58 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group