TalkingCarlton • View topic

Board index » TalkingCarlton » TalkingCarlton

All times are UTC + 10 hours

1864 or 1865?

Page 2 of 2

[ 23 posts ]

Go to page Previous 1, 2

Print view

Previous topic | Next topic

Author

Message

Warby

Post subject: Re: 1864 or 1865?

Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 1:15 pm

Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 3:49 pm
Posts: 27793
Location: Southbank.

_________________
No ones listening till you make a mistake.

Top

woof

Post subject: Re: 1864 or 1865?

Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 1:31 pm

Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:51 am
Posts: 4919

AGRO wrote:

I know that the study of history is an always evolving process as new evidence comes to light - however there would need to be something really compelling to change our foundation date from 1864 to 1865.

How about a leap year?

Top

jimmae

Post subject: Re: 1864 or 1865?

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2012 2:41 pm

Bruce Doull

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality

Notches.

White, not baby blue or silver.

No no wait... 1864. Sorry, got confused. :thumbsup:

In all seriousness, I can reveal that the delay is actually due to a series of unique scheduling issues.

In an unlikely turn of events, Kate Ceberano is currently booked solid for 3 years. @#$%&! channel 9.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.

Top

Page 2 of 2

[ 23 posts ]

Go to page Previous 1, 2

Board index » TalkingCarlton » TalkingCarlton

All times are UTC + 10 hours

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ByteDanceSpider, Google [Bot], GreatEx, harker, harmsey, Mickstar and 26 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum