Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun Jun 15, 2025 4:28 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 128 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 10:52 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 2:30 pm
Posts: 4584
Location: Blisstonia.
I think the only reason Kane's name comes up is the rumours of him being homesick and that West Coast are in to him in a big way.

_________________
"They're [REDACTED]'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 11:02 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
jim wrote:
Like it!

I laughed so much only because it's all so true.That sums up 80% of posters from all clubs and all forums.


Huh? :? Have I missed some rather terse irony, or something?

Watson for Dawes? Now that's ironic! We do have good trade bait this year, so good that there should be no need to blow most of it in one destructive moment of blustering desperation.

I would hate to think we'd sell out on our strengths just so we can become more like last year's model. As CM himself says, the game changes. We want to be able to build on and compliment our strengths not simply try and become something that more closely resembles a premiership side in a conventional sense.

Good sides are constantly developing, not making a desperate bid to fix something that they think is broken.

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Last edited by Pafloyul on Tue Sep 20, 2011 11:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Tue Sep 20, 2011 11:09 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 7:24 pm
Posts: 5537
Location: Bridge, Starship Enterprise
Blueboy74 wrote:
I think the only reason Kane's name comes up is the rumours of him being homesick and that West Coast are in to him in a big way.


Ahhhh ..........

Kane Lucas for Josh Kennedy. And to be serious throw in Paul Bower.

_________________
"Get ready, Teddy - you're on": Ron Barassi half time 1970 Grand Final


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Wed Sep 21, 2011 12:10 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 11:51 am
Posts: 1291
The Spornstar wrote:
ColourMan wrote:

A recruiter from another Melbourne based club made it clear that there wasn't much love from other clubs for Watson pre-draft because Watson had no idea/interest in defending and lacked the necessary mobility. The recruiter also founded it amusing that it was very obvious that Carlton were going to recruit Watson with their first rounder anyway (primarily because he was big and could kick)!!

Let's hope he develops otherwise that will be two consecutive first rounders we would have wasted!!



Well I'll counter your story. A recruiter from a Victorian based club thought Watson would become a gun over time, and if his club had a pick high enough they would have taken him with their first pick.


As Cazzesman rightly pointed out it's all about opinions; clearly with Matthew they vary in a big way which is usually not the case with early selections. Once again, let's hope we got it right!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Wed Sep 21, 2011 6:48 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:27 am
Posts: 33188
Location: In the box.
Cazzesman wrote:
Synbad wrote:
the modern game is about runners mobility and agility.
watson lacks the prerequisites to be successful go the modern game.
when the ball is bobbing around at his feet he searches for it like a blind man.
he can't close on a forward and gets turned inside out because his turning circle is wide.
I hope he can do it but very sceptical


The modern games changes every 2-3 years. It is constantly evolving. Pagans Paddock, Flood, Uber Flood, Forward press etc, etc.

Early call on a 19yr old Watson after half a pre-season and 1 year in the system but each to their own I guess.

In their first few years many said Dawes was a not up to it and Josh Kennedy (WCE) couldn't catch it in a sack. Now they would give their first born for either. Footy is funny like that.

Regards Cazzesman

one thing about the game changing is its not getting slower its getting faster .

yes and others said Maxwell and o'brien were terrible gets.
also Riley dunne was going to be a star.
or Eddie was too short
it is all about opinions I guess, one thing is for sure. watson has to find pace a turning circle some stamina mobility both lateral and below his knees and some desperation and if proves a lot of people wrong.

_________________
Due to recent budget cuts and the rising cost of electricity, gas, and oil....... the Light at the End of the Tunnel has been turned off. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Wed Sep 21, 2011 8:09 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10573
We cannot afford to lose Lucas.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Wed Sep 21, 2011 4:14 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 3:17 pm
Posts: 2645
Hey fellers, I've thanks: been a long time reader but I was compelled to finally write in and share some of my thoughts after all the recent comments after the lose to WC.
I personly beleive we have the talent to go close to the mark for the few or so year. the club shouldn't over react with the so called piece of the puzzel to give players/draft picks away for a so called big forward/inside mid, I believe we have what we need, all we need is for our coach's to fast track development of our big guys (Watson, Mcartney, Casboult ). I think they all have great attributes and some will obviously take more time than another but if you lose them/trade or delist you won't get them back. Don't forget our big guys (Waite, Kruz and Hammer) were out for a big chunck of the final part of the season. Imagine what it would be like for our smalls crumbing with these big men, all they would have to do is compete and at the very least get the ball to ground.
The next issue is an in and under mid, we have afew who could do this job rotating (Thouy, Curnow, Ellard, Robinson, even maybe Russell )
Our backline was great this year, great job Ratt's (credit were its due )this was without a big chunk of the year with Jamo, Russell, Bower which I am a great fan of all.
What i honestly beleive is more important is to keep our list intact (Hampson, Bower, Russell and Lucas (who I see has great potential from the first time I saw him play ). :fight:
This is how you instill pride and belonging to our already great football club. :thanks:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Wed Sep 21, 2011 4:19 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10573
Nice entry Redback!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Wed Sep 21, 2011 4:37 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21075
Location: Missing Kouta
Synbad wrote:
Cazzesman wrote:
Synbad wrote:
the modern game is about runners mobility and agility.
watson lacks the prerequisites to be successful go the modern game.
when the ball is bobbing around at his feet he searches for it like a blind man.
he can't close on a forward and gets turned inside out because his turning circle is wide.
I hope he can do it but very sceptical


The modern games changes every 2-3 years. It is constantly evolving. Pagans Paddock, Flood, Uber Flood, Forward press etc, etc.

Early call on a 19yr old Watson after half a pre-season and 1 year in the system but each to their own I guess.

In their first few years many said Dawes was a not up to it and Josh Kennedy (WCE) couldn't catch it in a sack. Now they would give their first born for either. Footy is funny like that.

Regards Cazzesman

one thing about the game changing is its not getting slower its getting faster .

yes and others said Maxwell and o'brien were terrible gets.
also Riley dunne was going to be a star.
or Eddie was too short
it is all about opinions I guess, one thing is for sure. watson has to find pace a turning circle some stamina mobility both lateral and below his knees and some desperation and if proves a lot of people wrong.

Travis Cloke used to be a plodder who couldn't kick. Bower used to burn off Cloke in 2009, but would be smashed if they lined up on each other next week. Cloke is now an AA player and the best pack mark in the game.

Petrie couldn't beat Henderson for pace, but the former is still a first time AA player.

Leigh Brown was on the scrap heap three years ago.

Matthew Richardson and Carlton supporters wrote off Henderson as a forward and a player in spite of hip surgery destroying hispre-season.

In 2009, Ben Reid had to go back to the VFL before he had a break out season as a defender in 2010.

AA.

Love how talls are written off early.

Watson doesn't look too bad below his knees for someone who is 196 cms...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oG4JgzpZ ... age#t=648s

Showed OK speed in the pre-season against the Pies, but has tired due to his fitness base needing work.

Yarran couldn't run out of sight in his first two seasons. :thumbsup:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2011 1:16 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 4:18 pm
Posts: 283
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/m ... 6143984302

Warnock's brother any good?
If he can't make melbourne team he can't be too good.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2011 2:45 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 4:27 pm
Posts: 22
Synbad bagging a first year player...I know you like to bag our own, but even this is a new low for you. Lay off the kid!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Fri Sep 23, 2011 3:08 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 5:52 pm
Posts: 2289
Location: Geelong
Gavstar22 wrote:
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/melbourne-defender-matthew-warnock-wants-a-new-home/story-fn69a32t-1226143984302

Warnock's brother any good?
If he can't make melbourne team he can't be too good.


I'm not that keen on Ex-Melbourne.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Sun Sep 25, 2011 10:46 am 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 8:10 pm
Posts: 35
:?: I don't understand. Apparently we need talls. Apparently a very good one left us last year due lack of opportunity (Sam Jacobs). Apparently we have a ruckman who was in our best 22 for the frist half of the season kicking 6 at a time in the Ants. Apparently we have a queue of quality talls competing to be the marking forward. What's the rush???? :?:

Surely Watson can spend 2 years getting physically ready while Hampson/Waite/Warnock/Kreuzer/Henderson/Jamison look after our spine, with Thornton/Setanta/Austin as perfect stand-bys in case of injury?

I don't get the desire to trade for talls - as far as I can see we're flush. :thumbsup:

BTW.. Anyone failing to tip us as top 4 2012 is on drugs.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Tue Sep 27, 2011 12:13 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 4:13 pm
Posts: 2095
Location: handcuffed to a seasoned drinker
Watson needs to be reprogrammed as a footballer. He likes to play loose and deliver the ball with big clearing kicks whenever he gets the chance. The problem is he's never going to play that role with any success at AFL or even VFL level. The good news is he has genuine size, excellent skills, a good level of poise and he reads the play well - which are indications that when he develops a new role and some fitness he could be of use in the AFL.

History shows that with experience players will learn to impose themselves on the contest with more physicallity.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Tue Sep 27, 2011 5:36 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 8:05 pm
Posts: 4581
Location: St Helens
Watson will be fine. Will be a good AFL player once he's finished developing and has got some experience.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Sat Oct 01, 2011 9:32 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21075
Location: Missing Kouta
Sin City wrote:
Watson will be fine. Will be a good AFL player once he's finished developing and has got some experience.

The development of Hawkins, Lonergan and Taylor in the last three seasons shows that you shouldn't write off talls too early. Lonergan and Taylor have developed into quality tall defenders since the 2008 GF. Taylor and Lonergan had poor games in that loss. Lonergan used to be a forward, yet smashed one of the game's in form forwards Cloke after Taylor was moved off the Magpie. Watson ticks more boxes than Lonergan.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:21 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:10 am
Posts: 4827
Watson lacks a bit of attitude and intensity IMO.......Hurley has always had some agro, Darling is another who has some attitude and confidence in himself. Think Watson need some red meat and a bit od SAS training to get the blood and mind flowing and give him a hard edge.

Tom Hawkins was similar when he first arrived in footy...big kid who didnt really work hard because he thought his size and strength would do it for him like in under age footy...didnt work that way but the Cats persisted with him and now have a got a return, hope Watson is similar.

re: Waite...big call to trade a father and son pick but I an understand where Synbad is coming from...very frustrating player who really hasnt changed his method of operation or output....spasmodic brilliance mixed with dumb decision making and injuries. I think he is a 3rd tall forward rather than a KP player and doesnt play the KP spots with much authority or know how as he has been thrown there out of desperation.

Bit late to trade him and I think we have to make better use of his talents by finding some KP talent so he can work with the structure rather than be relied upon to be a main part of the structure.

_________________
"When you have the attitude of a champion, you see adversity as your
training partner."
- Conor Gillen


Last edited by Elwood Blues1 on Mon Oct 03, 2011 1:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 12:28 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:00 pm
Posts: 24634
Location: Kaloyasena
Elwood Blues1 wrote:
re: Waite...big call to trade a father and son pick but I an understand where Synbad is coming from...very frustrating player who really hasnt changed his method of operation or output....spasmodic brilliance mixed with dumb decision making and injuries. I think he is a 3rd tall forward rather than a KP player and doesnt play the KP spots with much authority or know how as he has been thrown there out of desperation.

Bit late to trade him and I think we have to make better use of his talents by finding some KP talent so he can work with the structure rather than be relied upon to be a main part of the structure.



If we can shake out one of GWS's first round picks with Waite I would be inclined to take it, or perhaps engineer a trade with GC for someone like Charlie Dixon (that one unlikely I know).

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 3:39 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8201
Trading Waite would be the last thing one would do. Not sure what some think. Maybe in the case one we'll never understand...lol!

He continues to play good football and when one needs a KP player then giving one up is, well, not a smart move. Actually the amount of roles he plays here makes him one of our more important players on the list.

Window's open, we don't need to be trading for early picks for the future.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: big blokes
PostPosted: Mon Oct 03, 2011 10:08 pm 
Offline
John James

Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 12:48 pm
Posts: 602
Location: Perth
AGRO wrote:
Elwood Blues1 wrote:
re: Waite...big call to trade a father and son pick but I an understand where Synbad is coming from...very frustrating player who really hasnt changed his method of operation or output....spasmodic brilliance mixed with dumb decision making and injuries. I think he is a 3rd tall forward rather than a KP player and doesnt play the KP spots with much authority or know how as he has been thrown there out of desperation.

Bit late to trade him and I think we have to make better use of his talents by finding some KP talent so he can work with the structure rather than be relied upon to be a main part of the structure.



If we can shake out one of GWS's first round picks with Waite I would be inclined to take it, or perhaps engineer a trade with GC for someone like Charlie Dixon (that one unlikely I know).


It's going to be a long off season with crap like this being thrown around.

There is no way we are going to trade Waite. We are pretty close to matching it with the big boys right now. Getting a draft pick for one of our best is not taking us any closer to 17.

_________________
I support the Navy Blues whatever happens!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 128 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group