mikeychook wrote:
Mitch for PM wrote:
I'm on my phone.....plus I'm lazy....so I haven't checked the previous 14 pages to see if this has been mentioned already.....but who thinks Ratten accidentally let the cat out of the bag in his presser that we will play Watson on Saturday night?
Rattan said "when you consider last time we played them Jamison went off, laidler didn't play, duigan didn't play, Watson didn't play, there's a fair difference to the team".
Cat and mouse at it's finest I'd say.
The more I look into it, the more I realise we are playing mind games. Doubt we are playing Watson, but putting his name up just throws some confusion into WC's minds.
As for Gibbs, I think he will play. Doc Larkins keeps saying it is minor and he will be fine. Gibbs said his shoulder was 'alright' on twitter on Sunday, and then tweeted to Hughesy the day after 'what r u talking about, who's got a sore shoulder'?
IT MAKES SENSE to play these mind games. Gibbs is our most versatile player. He is our Brendon Goddard. He can play forward, mid, back. He creates headaches. This is a cut-throat finals match and it is just as much a mental game as a physical one.
Maybe WC's coaches can detect possible lies, maybe they can't.
But come 5pm tomorrow when the squads are announced, they may be a little surprised to see Gibbs named.
Then you have to consider, West Coast could be lying about Cox. They may want to give us the impression that Cox is playing when he isn't, so that we name Hampson and could be exploited for being too top-heavy.
I may be looking into it a bit too much, but I can see why both sides would play mental games.
Fingers crossed I am right and that Gibbs is alright
