2011 Membership tally: 43,813

Jez1966 · **Joined:** Mon Feb 28, 2005 6:42 pm **Posts:** 2843

missnaut wrote:

Access v non-access members

Only Carlton, Melbourne and St Kilda do not sell non-access memberships.

Westcoast have 10K non-access members, basically on a waiting list as they cannot take anymore access members due to the ground's crowd capacity.

missnaut · **Posted:** Wed Jul 20, 2011 4:25 pm

Jez1966 wrote:

missnaut wrote:

Access v non-access members

Only Carlton, Melbourne and St Kilda do not sell non-access memberships.

Westcoast have 10K non-access members, basically on a waiting list as they cannot take anymore access members due to the ground's crowd capacity.

Yeah I didn't include WC and Freo (who only have about 2K) because of the Subiaco capacity constraints. (and I had my Victorian glasses on)

Jez1966 · **Joined:** Mon Feb 28, 2005 6:42 pm **Posts:** 2843

missnaut wrote:

Jez1966 wrote:

missnaut wrote:

Access v non-access members

Only Carlton, Melbourne and St Kilda do not sell non-access memberships.

Westcoast have 10K non-access members, basically on a waiting list as they cannot take anymore access members due to the ground's crowd capacity.

Yeah I didn't include WC and Freo (who only have about 2K) because of the Subiaco capacity constraints. (and I had my Victorian glasses on)

That's fine, I was just making a comment about WC. I sat next to a WC fan at the game the other week and he mentioned the waiting list and how our members can just buy a reserved seat.

Wojee · **Joined:** Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am **Posts:** 35399

It's a shame they haven't included membership revenue totals which is a more important figure IMO.

camel · **Posted:** Fri Sep 09, 2011 11:16 pm

Can we crack 50K in 2012?

aramari · **Posted:** Sat Sep 10, 2011 1:55 am

Wojee wrote:

It's a shame they haven't included membership revenue totals which is a more important figure IMO.

YES

If we're supposed to give a toss about membership tallies, give us some meaningful data

Captain Dan · **Posted:** Sat Sep 10, 2011 8:59 am

camelboy wrote:

Can we crack 50K in 2012?

Win on Sunday and it's highly likely.

Count pets in our tally and it's even more likely.

AGRO · **Posted:** Sat Feb 04, 2012 2:54 pm

Spirit of Carlton wrote:

AGRO wrote:

The Victorian Government should have stuck with the original plan of redeveloping Princes Park for the Main Olympic Stadium for the 1956 Melbourne Olympics and Carlton would have had a 100,000 seat stadium since 1956 - damn that John Cain Snr. :mad:

I understand where you are coming from AGRO, the Blues did get treated very poorly.

However I see it as a blessing in disguise. Not sure whether you saw any of the plans for the stadium, but it was a monstrosity. It made Waverly look beautiful. It was typical 50s architecture. It looked like something out of an early David Lynch film, all uniform and industrial.

It would have been bulldozed within 25 years of being built.

http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/showthrea ... 218&page=4

Doesn't look all that bad. :razz:

Hornet · **Joined:** Sat May 21, 2005 5:15 pm **Posts:** 7741

AGRO wrote:

Spirit of Carlton wrote:

AGRO wrote:

The Victorian Government should have stuck with the original plan of redeveloping Princes Park for the Main Olympic Stadium for the 1956 Melbourne Olympics and Carlton would have had a 100,000 seat stadium since 1956 - damn that John Cain Snr. :mad:

I understand where you are coming from AGRO, the Blues did get treated very poorly.

However I see it as a blessing in disguise. Not sure whether you saw any of the plans for the stadium, but it was a monstrosity. It made Waverly look beautiful. It was typical 50s architecture. It looked like something out of an early David Lynch film, all uniform and industrial.

It would have been bulldozed within 25 years of being built.

http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/showthrea ... 218&page=4

Doesn't look all that bad. :razz:

^^

Looks good to me...

2011 Membership tally: 43,813

Who is online