_________________
dane's trolling again

Channel 7 news Perth tonight - Mark Harvey said we were the best midfield they have come across this year

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah)

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.

Tell that flower to shut up and send his praises elsewhere....Can't stand him.

_________________
Go to http://www.snoutslouts.org/ for a look at the mighty GFC...

he was clearly deflecting from his own teams shitness

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah)

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.

Correct, Gieschen says it's his natural arc.

What he fails to recognize because he's a deadset dufus is that there is not one footballer out there that doesn't use that step as the natural arc for kicking at goal from that position.

He's a walking contradiction

_________________
"I will rejoice in their anguish, delight in their failure and revel in our success"

We are Carlton, @#$%&! the rest !!!!!!

The question before Giesh took over was; Could the umpiring go anymore backwards? The answer now is a definite YES.

_________________
"I had to eat"

If Buddy was taking the shot that Gibbs had on Saturday I wonder what would have happened to his natural arc? His natural arc would have mean't that he would have kicked the ball from the front row seats of the ground. It is a natural arc when it suits him.

From what Chester Anderson said on the subject there is NO room in the rule for a "natural arc" - Gieschen is seriously flowered with "his natural arc interpretation" of this rule.

As I have said previously Chester Anderson only allows Gieschen in the job because it makes him look good.

_________________
"Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks"?

Winston Churchill

I think someone from Carlton should ask for an official interpretation in writing, including the exceptions that are made for natural arc and on what basis those exceptions are made. Because it sounds like it is all coming from Jeff Geischen's quite sizeable posterior.

We are lead to believe that Buddy will explode if he is forced to run in a straight line when kicking for goal. The "natural arc" gives him an unfair advantage because of the extra distance one can kick after running outside of the line. The fact that he has done that forever only means he has been cheating or playing on the whole time. He can still be forced to do what 99.9% of footballers have to do. If that affects his accuracy, stiff shit. Rules aren't created to allow Buddy to win the Coleman.

_________________
T E A M

Need a big "play on" call from the masses as Buddy runs in. Similar to that 'no ball' call for the Sri lankan chucker in the cricket.

If Gibbs kick was play on then so are 90% of set shots at goal.

The thing that gets me is that Gibbs asked the ump if he can take a step and the ump goes yeah no worries.

The players don't know, the umpires don't know and the supporters don't know.

I think the players and the umpires know and they called it fairly, as did all the commentators and several players on Sunday footy panels who were asked whether it was play on - all said "NO".

The problem is Gieschen is a @#$%&! idiot and one of the reasons the umpiring is such a disgrace nowadays and is at opposite polar ends to the rest of the human world. I mean look at this rubbish...

- The decision to play on is now in the hands of the players. This has ruined some AFL games this year.
- Players should no longer be demonstrative, show any emotion or look at an umpire, even if the decision is absolutely questionable.


Not even Richmond want this nob.

The Geisch makes it up as he goes along.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa

& don’t get me started on Doug Hawkins’ natural arksk

_________________
#DonTheStash

Whenever I see the guy, the Benny Hill theme starts in my head
How much would they be paying this buffoon to help ruin the game?

_________________