Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun Jun 15, 2025 4:49 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 58 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 12:12 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
molsey wrote:
Q3 was a great example of this BigKev. Every time we pushed, they responded. We never hit the front even though the midfield and forward line finally hit the front; instead, they could break clear with the 'more open' game on the counterattack. We got close but they're still a level ahead.

We never hit the front because Garlett and Gibbs couldn't kick straight. Had they kicked one of those two goals to put us in front, one of two things would have happened.
1. We would have had some belief that we could win and gone on with it instead of, 'why do we bother doing the hard work if they can't finish it off from 30 metres out', or
2. Collingwood wold have found another gear and beaten us anyway.

Hitting the front after playing crap footy and the other team doing everything they can but not being able to shake us off is an enormous confidence booster. Sloppy finishing is morale sapping downfield.

We could have won.
Simple as that.

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 11:44 am 
Offline
John James

Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 12:48 pm
Posts: 602
Location: Perth
Blue Sombrero wrote:
molsey wrote:
Q3 was a great example of this BigKev. Every time we pushed, they responded. We never hit the front even though the midfield and forward line finally hit the front; instead, they could break clear with the 'more open' game on the counterattack. We got close but they're still a level ahead.

We never hit the front because Garlett and Gibbs couldn't kick straight. Had they kicked one of those two goals to put us in front, one of two things would have happened.
1. We would have had some belief that we could win and gone on with it instead of, 'why do we bother doing the hard work if they can't finish it off from 30 metres out', or
2. Collingwood wold have found another gear and beaten us anyway.

Hitting the front after playing crap footy and the other team doing everything they can but not being able to shake us off is an enormous confidence booster. Sloppy finishing is morale sapping downfield.

We could have won.
Simple as that.


I agree. Warnocks shot (i think on half time should also have been put thru)

But.. If they had have kicked straight it would have been over pretty quickly.

_________________
I support the Navy Blues whatever happens!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 11:54 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 1472
Still not sold on us.

I know its massively negative to say this, but we really haven't beaten ANYONE.
And seeing the Roos knock off the Bulldogs yesterday just solidified that for me.

Should not have lost to West Coast, and definitely should not have lost to the Bulldogs.
We wont finish top 4 now. WCE and Hawks both have more favorable draws.

There was a lot of fluff written about us being contenders about 4 weeks back. Media love was just to sell papers.
We bully the weak teams and then fall short against the challengers. We really need to win the next 4 to believe we have improved significantly. I'd say we'd also lose to the saints now if we had to play them.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 12:18 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:51 am
Posts: 4919
I prefer Duigan's summary for public consumption compared to Mitch and Carrots.
It is not that I disagree with Mitch and Carrots but it gives the perception that near enough is good enough. Internally the club can take a lot out of that game but I would prefer it stayed within the club.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 1:20 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
Fev thinks we can win the flag, and given how relevant he suddenly is again we should take heed.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 1:59 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 1:06 pm
Posts: 3995
Location: Steven Seagal's Martial Arts Academy
Donstuie wrote:
Fev thinks we can win the flag, and given how relevant he suddenly is again we should take heed.


I'm surprise he didn't say he thinks we can win the flag IF we recruit a full forward, like maybe.....Fev ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 5:12 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 5:24 pm
Posts: 1531
Location: Melbourne
SnickerS wrote:
Still not sold on us.

I know its massively negative to say this, but we really haven't beaten ANYONE.
And seeing the Roos knock off the Bulldogs yesterday just solidified that for me.

Should not have lost to West Coast, and definitely should not have lost to the Bulldogs.
We wont finish top 4 now. WCE and Hawks both have more favorable draws.

There was a lot of fluff written about us being contenders about 4 weeks back. Media love was just to sell papers.
We bully the weak teams and then fall short against the challengers. We really need to win the next 4 to believe we have improved significantly. I'd say we'd also lose to the saints now if we had to play them.


Aren't you full of negatives. we should give up supporting for the year l guess. We need more carlton supporters like you. So we beaten Saints, Lost to Geelong after siren, lost to Pies by 28 and 19pts, but we shit? ok. It doesn't really matter what we do in H&A, its what we do in finals that counts.

By the way can't judge each game the same. Bulldogs were up for our game, got a big head and werent pumped for North and lose. Same with WCE. WCE lost aswell. In finals, both teams are up for the game generally.

We played the all mighty Pies, just about full strength with out Dawes.out of form didak and Heath Shaw who won't play again this season, unless they risk him in finals, which l doubt. We had Jamo, Waite, Carrazzo and the talking carlton player of the decade Jordan Russell out. That is 4 of our top 12 players out..

With those players in, Cloke wouldn't be able to push Jamo around, Henderson would be playing CHB. Watson wouldn't of played and committed a couple costly turnovers. Waite would be up forward and our key forwards wouldn't be Eddie Betts or Bret Thornton. Carrazo would of tagged Daisy or Leon in backline and Jordan Russell would of done his thing.

Collingwood aren't that great, they should of lost to Saints with extra time in the grand final, they got lucky having a replay final, but to sit there during the first game they played against the blues this year and the game on Saturday and think we can't beat them in finals, then you obviously have no faith. If you listen to the media, Pies are unbeatable. But, they are not!!!

There will be nothing better than beating them in finals.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 5:46 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:02 am
Posts: 1770
Until we can beat a good side like Cats, Pies, Hawks etc then we are no better than a North Melbourne i.e. We are just making up the numbers.

_________________
It is not as bad as you are lead to believe.......it is %$#^& worse!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 5:50 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 3:41 pm
Posts: 952
Location: way, way, way out the Outback
Clayman wrote:
Until we can beat a good side like Cats, Pies, Hawks etc then we are no better than a North Melbourne i.e. We are just making up the numbers.



Seriously, besides the Cats and the Pies, the remaining 15 Teams are just making up numbers !!!

_________________
BRING BACK PERFORMANCE BASE PAYMENTS !!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 6:00 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 23921
Clayman wrote:
Until we can beat a good side like Cats, Pies, Hawks etc then we are no better than a North Melbourne i.e. We are just making up the numbers.


You've got your north melbourne's, your fremantles, your tigers...your demons...

_________________
That’s not a political statement — it’s a harsh reality, and we must act,” she said. “He is a clear and present danger to the things that keep us strong and free. I support impeachment.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 9:20 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 5:24 pm
Posts: 1531
Location: Melbourne
Outback Blue wrote:
Clayman wrote:
Until we can beat a good side like Cats, Pies, Hawks etc then we are no better than a North Melbourne i.e. We are just making up the numbers.



Seriously, besides the Cats and the Pies, the remaining 15 Teams are just making up numbers !!!


So if Warnock wasn't seriously concussed and missed that goal 10m out, we would of beaten Cats!!!!!!!!!!!! So if he kicks it, we are up there with the best, he misses, we lose by two points and we not up there with the best. Logical thinking guys.

We lost to Pies by 28 and 19pts.

They are the two best teams in the comp and you still talk down Carlton as a crap team. Its 2011, a new year.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 9:43 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:14 pm
Posts: 1109
Location: Not Telling
Check our success against the current top 8. It is not that good. Clayman is right we need to start beating, yes winning, not just getting close before we can say we are contenders.

_________________
Delulio is a member of TISM


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 11:34 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 1:14 pm
Posts: 5991
Location: Melbourne
I wouldn't compare us to North, its not like we lose by 15 goals every time we play a top side.

We hang a lot tougher in games now, we made the 2nd quarter a scrap on Saturday and worked our way back into it.

We aren't a premiership side yet, unless we have everything going our way, we haven't learnt to cope with adversity and be the best. We are better now, but we aren't as advanced as we hoped we were a month ago.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 11:42 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:43 am
Posts: 5175
Location: Corner of Queen and Collins
I think its pretty clear that Collingwood had more 'coulda woulda shoulda' in the match - yes we missed a few but they missed more. We pushed but weren't good enough. I dont think you can say 2 missed shots on goal was relevant at the end of the day.

In more important news I've welcomed my third kiddy to the world today! GO ZOE!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 18, 2011 11:49 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 35876
Location: Half back flank
:clap:

_________________
#DonTheStash


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 1:51 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:34 pm
Posts: 1223
Location: East Coburg
Congratulations Molsey!

And may Zoe see, oh, 40 Carlton flags in her life.

Actually many, many more; we all want her to be around til maybe 2100.

_________________
"You can't polish a James Hird"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 6:39 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2007 4:43 pm
Posts: 1323
cimm1979 wrote:

True BG. I felt his reaction to that 2nd quarter mini comeback and the fact he had to move Neon to the forward line showed that, for probably only a couple of times this year, the grey moustachioed hypocrite felt the game was getting away from him. And didn't he handle it well?, he's a fair dinkum squeezer and I hope we never think of hiring this creep as coach.

I believe the 'Pies are a fragile bunch mentally and it stems from the coach who, IMO, has a severe personality disorder.

They are clearly, clearly the best side in the comp, but i still think the Saints had them in that first GF and i believe their dominance this year is the competition going backwards at a rate of knots, not so much their own improvement.



HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA


BEST LAUGH I HAVE HAD FOR WEEKS


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 8:18 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
Congrats molsey :thumbsup:

SnickerS wrote:
Still not sold on us.

I know its massively negative to say this, but we really haven't beaten ANYONE.
And seeing the Roos knock off the Bulldogs yester :sad: day just solidified that for me.

Should not have lost to West Coast, and definitely should not have lost to the Bulldogs.
We wont finish top 4 now. WCE and Hawks both have more favorable draws.

There was a lot of fluff written about us being contenders about 4 weeks back. Media love was just to sell papers.
We bully the weak teams and then fall short against the challengers. We really need to win the next 4 to believe we have improved significantly. I'd say we'd also lose to the saints now if we had to play them.


Are you the same guy that came into the Collingwood match thread, all doom and gloom, predicting a 70 point loss?

How'd that work out?

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 8:39 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2006 8:35 pm
Posts: 1472
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Congrats molsey :thumbsup:

SnickerS wrote:
Still not sold on us.

I know its massively negative to say this, but we really haven't beaten ANYONE.
And seeing the Roos knock off the Bulldogs yester :sad: day just solidified that for me.

Should not have lost to West Coast, and definitely should not have lost to the Bulldogs.
We wont finish top 4 now. WCE and Hawks both have more favorable draws.

There was a lot of fluff written about us being contenders about 4 weeks back. Media love was just to sell papers.
We bully the weak teams and then fall short against the challengers. We really need to win the next 4 to believe we have improved significantly. I'd say we'd also lose to the saints now if we had to play them.


Are you the same guy that came into the Collingwood match thread, all doom and gloom, predicting a 70 point loss?

How'd that work out?


Look I agree that i'm being over negative.
And if the pies took their early chances it could easily have been 70 points.
We had our misses, not not half as many as they did. Don't let the score line fool you.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2011 8:59 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:35 pm
Posts: 2432
molsey wrote:
I think its pretty clear that Collingwood had more 'coulda woulda shoulda' in the match - yes we missed a few but they missed more. We pushed but weren't good enough. I dont think you can say 2 missed shots on goal was relevant at the end of the day.

In more important news I've welcomed my third kiddy to the world today! GO ZOE!


:clap:

Well done Molsey! Another Blue :smile:

_________________
I just want my old club back ... (edit) maybe I have!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 58 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ByteDanceSpider, Google [Bot] and 32 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group