Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Mon Jun 16, 2025 3:31 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 203 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 2:37 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:20 pm
Posts: 6923
Mickstar wrote:
Very interesting comments RE Watson by Rhino.If true then Austin should get the gig.Amazing info on Watson.Its hard to believe a young guy given an oppurtunity of a lifetime is not putting in...........CAZZ,please tell me its not true.


I wouldn't say "not putting in". McCarthy is eclipsing him in this regard though, which is fairly understandable given he's coming from a fair way back.

_________________
BLUES 2010: PAV AND JUDD = FLAGS. DOING IT FOR THE LOVE OF DICK PRATT.

HAVE YOU SIGNED UP FOR TALKINGCARLTON SUPERCOACH 2009 YET?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 2:43 pm 
Offline
Laurie Kerr
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 10:06 pm
Posts: 100
Location: Brisbane
missnaut wrote:
Juzzy wrote:
I agree with the general feeling we were terrible. Worst match of the year bar NONE. but also the weakest team we've had out there so no surprise really.


We were bad yesterday but not as bad as against the Dogs last week.


I agree with this. Our showing against the Dogs left me flat and very depressed all week. I did not expect us to beat the raining premiers yesterday. It was a pleasant surprise to see us have a crack and I was quite proud of the effort. Especially Walker who had a very big game against a top team.

Last time we played Collingwood we were rushed and looked a bit shell shocked. This time we looked a lot more composed and if it were not for a whole heap of posters we may have stolen the lollies. When we do beat these guys it will be particularly sweet.

Go Blues.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 2:45 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 10:26 am
Posts: 934
I only watched on TV but here are my obesevations:

Watson had not been playing well for the Bullants - so why was he picked against the best team in the comp. ? Not good fot the kid or us.
Curnow was underdone and should have had more Bullant time. Hasn't been the same payer since hurting his shoulder.
The use or non use of Bower is baffling. He clearly showed in the last quarter where and why he should be playing. Stop messing him & the team around. He was our best player in the last quarter - in my opinion. He is a key defender and nothing else. It is not as if we have an over abundance of them !
Twomey did OK and didn't look out of his depth, but didn't get enough of it. Not sure how much time he got in the middle though.
Walker needs to be told to play in front of the defender, not behind him - waiting to take the mark of the year. It was so obvious all day - what game was the forward assistant coaches watching ? His ball handling skills at ground level were terrible.
Tuhoy should have played. Can't understand why he was dropped.
Laidler & Duigan did well & have been great pick ups this year.
Need to persist with Henderson as a defender, at least until Jammo comes back. He is doing OK - not great - but OK.
Bombing long balls to Eddie Betts as a marking target was idiotic.
Thornton will never be a key forward. He cannot take a contested mark where body contact is involved, because he is a stick man. He has never done it as a defender so what makes anyone think that he will do it as a forward. What our small forwards need is someone who will create a contest, sometimes in a pack, where the ball may come to ground for them to take advantage of. Thornton will never be that player. Dumb, dumb, bumb !
All in all I thought that we did OK. Five or six posters - if four of those had been goals ??????


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 3:08 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2010 12:29 am
Posts: 1
3 major outs for us, Jamo, Waite and Carrots. Put them in our side in September and we are a much better side.
Add Didak, Shaw, Dawes, Beams and McCaffer into scums side and they are still way better than us. :mad: :mad:
Anyone thinking otherwise is delusional.Maybe next year :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 3:16 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
I don't think Didak will get back in.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 3:22 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
cimm1979 wrote:
I don't think Didak will get back in.


and Shaw will be underdone for the finals

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 3:31 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 3:49 pm
Posts: 27793
Location: Southbank.
I can't really see a weakness in that Collingwood side; and IMO, they're better than last year.

Picking up Dawes, Jolly and Leigh Brown has been inspired recruiting; and with the strength of Cloke; they're a marking powerhouse front and back.

_________________
No ones listening till you make a mistake.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 3:34 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21075
Location: Missing Kouta
Mickstar wrote:
cant understand the talk of Hendo going forward as he has proved hopeless up there.He is finding his feet in the backline and gaining confidence.Why move him forward and undoe all that good work.I cant see anyone on our list at the moment to fill CHF so i would be persisting with Thornton.Just provide a contest and let the littlies swoop...........

And you dare to say that Greg Swann doesn't have any footy knowledge.

Move on from Fevola being shunted.

Henderson kicked 25 goals before he had turned 20, yet some still think he's a backman. :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 3:35 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21075
Location: Missing Kouta
Warby wrote:
I can't really see a weakness in that Collingwood side; and IMO, they're better than last year.

Picking up Dawes, Jolly and Leigh Brown has been inspired recruiting; and with the strength of Cloke; they're a marking powerhouse front and back.

Leigh Brown is an absolute spud playing a role.

I'd rather have Koschitzke.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 3:41 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 10:26 am
Posts: 934
cimm1979 wrote:
I don't think Didak will get back in.

Want a bet ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 3:44 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 3:49 pm
Posts: 27793
Location: Southbank.
Kouta wrote:
Warby wrote:
I can't really see a weakness in that Collingwood side; and IMO, they're better than last year.

Picking up Dawes, Jolly and Leigh Brown has been inspired recruiting; and with the strength of Cloke; they're a marking powerhouse front and back.

Leigh Brown is an absolute spud playing a role.

I'd rather have Koschitzke.


But you wouldn't pick him up at Pick 73 in the 2008 Draft, like they did with Brown.

We could've done with Brown yesterday.

_________________
No ones listening till you make a mistake.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 3:48 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21075
Location: Missing Kouta
Warby wrote:
Kouta wrote:
Warby wrote:
I can't really see a weakness in that Collingwood side; and IMO, they're better than last year.

Picking up Dawes, Jolly and Leigh Brown has been inspired recruiting; and with the strength of Cloke; they're a marking powerhouse front and back.

Leigh Brown is an absolute spud playing a role.

I'd rather have Koschitzke.


But you wouldn't pick him up at Pick 73 in the 2008 Draft, like they did with Brown.

We could've done with Brown yesterday.

We could have done with Setanta yesterday, but that doesn't make him a good footballer.

Carlton had Fevola plus four young rucks to develop.

Collingwood had Wood and Fraser supporting Cloke, Dawes and Anthony.

Brown drafted that late is a comment on the quality of 2008 draft and clubs not looking to top up.

North let Brown go like Essendon* let Bradley go.

Bradley has performed a similar role for Freo behind Sandilands.

Meh.

A 200 gamer shouldn't be outmarked by Laidler and spoiled by Watson.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 3:58 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:44 am
Posts: 3136
Wasnt too unhappy with the game yesterday. Some might argue that the final 19 point margin flattered us slightly given the pies inaccurate kicking, but lets not forget that we hit the post 6 times.

We matched it with the pies for most of the game but structurally we are shot.

Bring in jamison and waite and its a whole different ball game. Jamison would tighten up the backline significantly (less opposition marks) and allow us to shift Henderson up forward/thornton back. Along with waite, suddenly we've 2 tall targets to kick to that will lead up and present to the mids/backline (thornton doesnt lead up/present)

Players that could also return by finals and be key contributors include hampson, carazzo, houlihan, touhy and possibly mclean (given ineffectiveness of ellard/curnow atm)

We've gone from a 23 pt margin to a 19 pt one. Imo, the next time we meet the pies (likely to be in the finals), the margin will close up again :)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 4:06 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 3:49 pm
Posts: 27793
Location: Southbank.
Kouta wrote:
We could have done with Setanta yesterday, but that doesn't make him a good footballer.

Carlton had Fevola plus four young rucks to develop.

Collingwood had Wood and Fraser supporting Cloke, Dawes and Anthony.

Brown drafted that late is a comment on the quality of 2008 draft and clubs not looking to top up.

North let Brown go like Essendon* let Bradley go.

Bradley has performed a similar role for Freo behind Sandilands.

Meh.

A 200 gamer shouldn't be outmarked by Laidler and spoiled by Watson.


Where did I say that Brown is ''a good footballer''?......he is a marking ruckman/forward who is doing a job for them; and we have no comparative player; proved by yesterday's direction of our attacking thrusts to packs containing little Eddie Betts.

_________________
No ones listening till you make a mistake.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 4:22 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
4thchicken wrote:
Wasnt too unhappy with the game yesterday. Some might argue that the final 19 point margin flattered us slightly given the pies inaccurate kicking, but lets not forget that we hit the post 6 times.

We matched it with the pies for most of the game but structurally we are shot.

Bring in jamison and waite and its a whole different ball game. Jamison would tighten up the backline significantly (less opposition marks) and allow us to shift Henderson up forward/thornton back. Along with waite, suddenly we've 2 tall targets to kick to that will lead up and present to the mids/backline (thornton doesnt lead up/present)

Players that could also return by finals and be key contributors include hampson, carazzo, houlihan, touhy and possibly mclean (given ineffectiveness of ellard/curnow atm)

We've gone from a 23 pt margin to a 19 pt one. Imo, the next time we meet the pies (likely to be in the finals), the margin will close up again :)



Also the belief that, because a side kicks inaccurately (a point) , they would have gone back to the centre and then kicked another goal is a misnomer.

I yesterdays game i believe our stoppage work was good and we actually had one more clearance. In fact, when you consider just how awful our kick in's where you could make a case that each time the ball went back to the centre our odds of kicking a goal improved.

The effect of the Pies kicking points just meant that instead of getting 6 points, sometimes they got 7 points( the miss + the resultant turnover from the kick in ) or even 8 points.


Just win the next three and hope cheer like hell for Freo next week.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 4:27 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16950
Location: Melbourne
Mickstar wrote:

Very interesting comments RE Watson by Rhino.If true then Austin should get the gig.Amazing info on Watson.Its hard to believe a young guy given an oppurtunity of a lifetime is not putting in...........CAZZ,please tell me its not true.


Mickstar unless I have missed something in the post, none of that was INFO it was all just opinion. Not one thing I read had any corroborative fact attached to it.

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 4:30 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16950
Location: Melbourne
Asp wrote:
I only watched on TV but here are my obesevations:

Watson had not been playing well for the Bullants - so why was he picked against the best team in the comp. ? Not good fot the kid or us.


What was wrong with Watson's last game against Sandringham? Perhaps playing a kid against the best lets him know how hard he has to work to reach that lofty level.

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 4:39 pm 
Offline
formerly Virgin Blue

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 10:40 am
Posts: 1628
Austin had a chance recently and blew it. He hasn't fired a shot since coming to the club. Watson came in and played on a second gamer which makes sense. And he played well he week before in the Bullants
The Rhino wrote:
I'm normally not only a glass half full type, but a glass overflowing type when it comes to supporting the club on its decisions relating to list management, selection, matchday, etc, but I firmly believe that the way the club is going about handling Matthew Watson's development needs to be looked at.

It's almost insane to contemplate, but I tend to wonder whether his development would have actually been better handled had he come along five years earlier under Pagan, in the sense that Pagan wouldn't have given him games he didn't deserve, and made him work for what he was given.

Having said this since the Geelong pre-season game, I firmly believe that as it stands, Matt has all the tools physically to be an elite defender. These same tools suggest to me that he has what it takes to have a fast-tracked development rather than a slowly slowly entrance to AFL that you would see with Ben Reid, Jack Watts, Jackson Trengove, etc. At the moment, these assets are being overridden by what I believe is simply not working hard enough off the field.

The usual metamorphosis that you see in young players from being drafted to halfway through their first season in the system just isn't appearing with Matt, by comparison you're starting to see some difference in Paddy McCarthy and even Luke Mitchell all things considered.

At the moment, there'd be a fair argument to say he's been lucky to keep his place in the Bullants ones, but has been persevered with. To be given a game ahead of Austin wasn't right, nor fair to Mark. Matty could easily become a cornerstone of our backline next year. What needs to happen between now and then is to develop the necessary intensity that AFL level requires, which currently is way off. He can be prone to ball watching, the second efforts are lackadaisical, third efforts non-existant. This can be rectified with time and hard work.

In short, I think he needs a rocket put up him. Something that isn't consistent with Ratts and Darren Harris' respective coaching styles, who certainly seem big on the softly, softly approach and full of encouragement, deserved or otherwise. This approach certainly has its positives for a bloke like Noof, who early on, needed to have it constantly instilled in him that he is capable of being an elite AFL player and capable of taking the game on. I don't think Watto needs to be told of his obvious natural talent. Reading Shane Crawford's article in today's Sun about his memories of Allan Jeans had similar sentiments. I'd like to see a Fraser Brown or a Dominator come down and tell him in no uncertain terms that he is currently in danger of becoming a wasted talent. First year player or otherwise. SOS may not be a list manager or an assistant coach's rear end, but what he does know is how to mentor young defenders to play the game. I wish we had that resource still available.

Ideally I'd like to see him not considered for senior selection for the rest of the year, barring a dire situation, and given games in the Ants seniors on merit only. Justin Cordy, John Donehue and Tim Smith are elite assets, perhaps the envy of 16 other clubs. But they can only do so much if you're not willing to put in the extra yards. To say Watto isn't doing that at the moment, is an understatement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 4:41 pm 
Offline
formerly Virgin Blue

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 10:40 am
Posts: 1628
Austin had a chance recently and blew it. He hasn't fired a shot since coming to the club. Watson came in and played on a second gamer which makes sense. And he played well he week before in the Bullants
The Rhino wrote:
I'm normally not only a glass half full type, but a glass overflowing type when it comes to supporting the club on its decisions relating to list management, selection, matchday, etc, but I firmly believe that the way the club is going about handling Matthew Watson's development needs to be looked at.

It's almost insane to contemplate, but I tend to wonder whether his development would have actually been better handled had he come along five years earlier under Pagan, in the sense that Pagan wouldn't have given him games he didn't deserve, and made him work for what he was given.

Having said this since the Geelong pre-season game, I firmly believe that as it stands, Matt has all the tools physically to be an elite defender. These same tools suggest to me that he has what it takes to have a fast-tracked development rather than a slowly slowly entrance to AFL that you would see with Ben Reid, Jack Watts, Jackson Trengove, etc. At the moment, these assets are being overridden by what I believe is simply not working hard enough off the field.

The usual metamorphosis that you see in young players from being drafted to halfway through their first season in the system just isn't appearing with Matt, by comparison you're starting to see some difference in Paddy McCarthy and even Luke Mitchell all things considered.

At the moment, there'd be a fair argument to say he's been lucky to keep his place in the Bullants ones, but has been persevered with. To be given a game ahead of Austin wasn't right, nor fair to Mark. Matty could easily become a cornerstone of our backline next year. What needs to happen between now and then is to develop the necessary intensity that AFL level requires, which currently is way off. He can be prone to ball watching, the second efforts are lackadaisical, third efforts non-existant. This can be rectified with time and hard work.

In short, I think he needs a rocket put up him. Something that isn't consistent with Ratts and Darren Harris' respective coaching styles, who certainly seem big on the softly, softly approach and full of encouragement, deserved or otherwise. This approach certainly has its positives for a bloke like Noof, who early on, needed to have it constantly instilled in him that he is capable of being an elite AFL player and capable of taking the game on. I don't think Watto needs to be told of his obvious natural talent. Reading Shane Crawford's article in today's Sun about his memories of Allan Jeans had similar sentiments. I'd like to see a Fraser Brown or a Dominator come down and tell him in no uncertain terms that he is currently in danger of becoming a wasted talent. First year player or otherwise. SOS may not be a list manager or an assistant coach's rear end, but what he does know is how to mentor young defenders to play the game. I wish we had that resource still available.

Ideally I'd like to see him not considered for senior selection for the rest of the year, barring a dire situation, and given games in the Ants seniors on merit only. Justin Cordy, John Donehue and Tim Smith are elite assets, perhaps the envy of 16 other clubs. But they can only do so much if you're not willing to put in the extra yards. To say Watto isn't doing that at the moment, is an understatement.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 17, 2011 4:41 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:49 am
Posts: 1650
Cazzesman wrote:
Jonosc wrote:
Guess that's the question cazz., why did they play Watson then?


Obviously they expected him to kick better. Such is life. Last week in the VFL his kicking was brilliant so he was in form in that area. You'll never never, never know if you never, never give him a go. Down the track this one experience alone will be worth it's weight.

Regards Cazzesman


I hope so Cazzesman.....but i do recall giving a young KPP many opportunities/experiences not so long ago and now he is playing for Maribyrnong Park in the EDFL.

I know he is young but his technique and positioning when going for a mark or punch is deplorable. I may be harsh but i would of thought that he'd have this aspect down pat.

More than happy to be proven wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 203 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ByteDanceSpider, Google [Bot] and 54 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group