wasthesonofapreacherman wrote:
I'm with Camelboy. I'm genuinely surprised the majority here are praising our efforts? I haven't yet had the opportunity to watch it on tv, but from my perspective at the ground the effort in the first half was diabolical.
There was no intensity, we were second to the ball, we were stagnant, we had no run, we would either chip it short to the wrong option or just bomb it long to the wrong contests. On a few occasions, the midfielders quite literally stopped when the ball went the other way. When the ball was in dispute, especially in the first quarter, there would be Collingwood players hunting in packs and ours were a metre off the contest. It was shocking football. But for some errant kicking, they would have taken an unassailable lead going into the half time break.
Again, for all his sublime skills, I saw Yarran shirk a contest in the first quarter that resulted in a goal and then again later in the match, he fumbled the ball when he saw what lay ahead. When it's your time to go, you go. It shits me to tears.
So whilst we have room to improve, don't kid yourself that Collingwood were anywhere near their best. They did enough to win the game, after barely changing out of third gear in the first half.
I sort of agree but not fully. I reckon we were diabolic for the first quarter and for half the second, but we lifted from about 15minutes into the second quarter. Up til then, Collingwood were miles better than us and should have led by 5-6 goals, not just 2. Once we lifted, Collingwood became less effective, were scrappy with their kicks and panicked a little bit at times, and generally in the second half I think we matched them. In fact, in that third quarter I think we were a bit unlucky, they were kicking flukey goals and we were hitting the post. Somehow they won that third quarter by a goal, I have no idea how because in general play it felt like a quarter we won by 2-3 goals.