Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Wed Jun 18, 2025 8:20 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 252 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 10:17 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16954
Location: Melbourne
jezzarules wrote:
Cazzesman wrote:
I guess the MC got it right with most of there calls.

Regards Cazzesman


them calls.


:grin: Sue me. I'm tired from posting to the Couch Coaches who have it all worked out from the comfort of their lounge room.

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 10:30 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
Yazzamatazz wrote:
molsey wrote:
Yarran was subbed for hamstring tightness Captain Dan, not for form. He was probably the cleanest skilled player out there - there was no way this was a choice. In the pst match presser Ratten talked about Yarran having done a hammy last week and with the slightest bit of tightness they were not going to risk it.



Woohoo, so he hasn't actually done one?! but he did one last week? wtf!

I hope he plays up in sydney, I want to see him live at the SCG for my first ever interstate game!


Yazzamatazz, I am pretty sure Ratts said that Yaz pulled a hammy last year so they didnt want him to do one again so when he sensed tightness they took him off as we had a backpocket as a sub to replace him. I think molsey just made a typo.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Selection Struggles
PostPosted: Sun Apr 24, 2011 10:46 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:10 am
Posts: 4827
Headcutter wrote:
The match committee seems to get it wrong consistently and it nearly cost us.
This weeks decision to leave Betts and Hampson in the side was baffling although Betts achieved almost a pass mark for his forward pressure. Hampson was woeful again and cannot continue to be carried.
The decision to drop Hendo and Collins was good but to bring in 2 similar players in Ellard and Jospeh (both small tough nuts not blessed with speed) was strange given Crows were always going to stretch us down back with Tippett and Walker, surely Bower would have been useful last night.
(Ellard had a great game and he and armfield should remain in the side ahead of Joseph (even though he did some nice things)
Next week will be fascinating given that the swans have plenty of nippy smalls and not too many talls.


Got Elllard right but nearly lost the game by leaving White and Laidler hung out to dry vs Walker and McKernan.......we got lucky through the great efforts of Curnow and Murphy in the last quarter and denied supply to the Crows tall forwards but that was all that saved us.
Not having options for the Crows tall forwards was a mistake that nearly cost us the game.

Walker is not a run of the mill forward and is a very talented unit IMO and will be hot on the GWS recruiting list of targets...towelled up Jamison in a preseason game and we had zero options for him with no plan B.

Bower, Henderson, Santy, Watson and Thornton is a list that should have provided one or two options regardless of form and fitness so we had some options on the bench.
Jamison and Waite as the only two KP players is not good enough for the better teams and the MC have to do better and find some decent structure

_________________
"When you have the attitude of a champion, you see adversity as your
training partner."
- Conor Gillen


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Selection Struggles
PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 6:46 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16954
Location: Melbourne
Elwood Blues1 wrote:


Bower, Henderson, Santy, Watson and Thornton is a list that should have provided one or two options regardless of form and fitness so we had some options on the bench.


Elwood you can't have it both ways. On the 1 hand you are happy to say Taylor Walker is a very good player who is probably in the sights of GWS and then you want to play players on him who are out of form (Hendo), not fit enough (Bower/Santy) or not experienced enough (Watson). That would leave T-Bird as the 1 who could have come in.

White and Laidler did a solid job last week on their respective opponents in Ryder, Hurley and Crameri so obviously the MC wanted to keep them together with a view to having them form some back 6 co-ordination with Duigan, Yazz and Jammo.

In actual fact it was 30 scoring shots to 19 and inside 50's were 54 to their 42 so if the kicking boots had been on and the skill level at a respectible level the 6 pt margin would have been 36 and we wouldn't be having this discussion.

It was the disposal that almost cost us not the team selection.

And now we are back to square 1 again. Hendo really struggled this week, Bower looks to be injured, Setanta struggled to impact, Watson was servicable and T-Bird okay and the best of the 5 in patches.

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 8:25 am 
Offline
formerly Yazzamatazz
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:16 pm
Posts: 7555
Location: NowHere.....
club29 wrote:
Yazzamatazz wrote:
molsey wrote:
Yarran was subbed for hamstring tightness Captain Dan, not for form. He was probably the cleanest skilled player out there - there was no way this was a choice. In the pst match presser Ratten talked about Yarran having done a hammy last week and with the slightest bit of tightness they were not going to risk it.



Woohoo, so he hasn't actually done one?! but he did one last week? wtf!

I hope he plays up in sydney, I want to see him live at the SCG for my first ever interstate game!


Yazzamatazz, I am pretty sure Ratts said that Yaz pulled a hammy last year so they didnt want him to do one again so when he sensed tightness they took him off as we had a backpocket as a sub to replace him. I think molsey just made a typo.


That makes a bit more sense....thanks.


How is he looking for the swannies cazz??

_________________
Circumstance has no value. It is how one relates to a situation that has value. All true meaning resides in the personal relationship to a phenomenon, what it means to you.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 9:57 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 9:02 pm
Posts: 13429
Location: Melbourne
According to The Age he is "in doubt"

Yarran's hamstring worry ahead of Sydney clash
http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/y ... 1dt13.html

Reports Bower injured his quad (again...)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 10:05 am 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
isdonis.george wrote:
It was noticeable that there was little celebration after goals last night. Just get on with the job. None of the self congratulatory grins and fist pumping. Not even from one player who is on notice.
I like it.


Yeah its good. No point wasting energy running around like a mad man after a goal. Its too important to have that energy for later in the game.
Sure a celebration can help spark the team but it is more a one off type thing. Better to get a "lets get back to business" attitude and encourage the players to feed off that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 10:09 am 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
99prelim wrote:


Cazz, you make valid points but our forward line has been an issue for years.
Our defenders are doing their job.
If Coll struggled with flooding, why didn't StK flood them to the heavens in the GF? And if they did, Coll found a way.
Our mids need to start spreading opp defences which will leave our regular forwards with more opportunities. anyway off to Easter lunch
Happy Easter to all TC'ers


Simple really. The flooding teams dont seem to win. They just get close to winning. Like the Crows against us. We found a way.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Selection Struggles
PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 10:41 am 
Offline
Laurie Kerr
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 10:06 pm
Posts: 100
Location: Brisbane
Cazzesman wrote:
Elwood Blues1 wrote:


Bower, Henderson, Santy, Watson and Thornton is a list that should have provided one or two options regardless of form and fitness so we had some options on the bench.


Elwood you can't have it both ways. On the 1 hand you are happy to say Taylor Walker is a very good player who is probably in the sights of GWS and then you want to play players on him who are out of form (Hendo), not fit enough (Bower/Santy) or not experienced enough (Watson). That would leave T-Bird as the 1 who could have come in.

White and Laidler did a solid job last week on their respective opponents in Ryder, Hurley and Crameri so obviously the MC wanted to keep them together with a view to having them form some back 6 co-ordination with Duigan, Yazz and Jammo.

In actual fact it was 30 scoring shots to 19 and inside 50's were 54 to their 42 so if the kicking boots had been on and the skill level at a respectible level the 6 pt margin would have been 36 and we wouldn't be having this discussion.

It was the disposal that almost cost us not the team selection.

And now we are back to square 1 again. Hendo really struggled this week, Bower looks to be injured, Setanta struggled to impact, Watson was servicable and T-Bird okay and the best of the 5 in patches.

Regards Cazzesman


Good post Cazzesman :wink: I agree the MC are getting most of the calls right. I think the MC are trying to get some stability in the back half so we can develop some cohesion. I too think we won the game hands down, it was just our disposal and shots on goal that let us down really badly. Hopefully tight games like this one will help us become a more composed and confident team.

I also agree with your informed comments on Gibbs, previous page. He is not our wrecking ball. That is the role of others. He has turned into an outside mid and a pretty darn good one. He is not a super star yet but he is a fine user of the ball and provides an outside option for the likes of Judd, Murph and others. There is a place for these sort of players in the modern game as our hard ball getters need to feed the ball out of congestion to someone. If that someone is Bryce Gibbs, who has silky skills, then that is fine by me. All these 'experts' calling for his head, who takes his spot? I will take the 'Pepsi Challenge' that his skills will pants anyone who comes in for the outside mid position. Roll on Gibber!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 6:03 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:30 pm
Posts: 2897
I wasn't at this game but I was at the first four (including Gold Coast). A few points of note:

- Loved him as a player, but if Brett Ratten is coaching this team to a premiership, I will be staggered. I am happy to eat my words, my hat and some humble pie, but I cannot see this man being in charge of Premiership 17. Am I being too harsh? I just think his gameplan only works because we've got such a brilliant midfield. We smashed them in the first quarter because we allowed the game to be open to our liking. Craig countered Ratten in quarters, 2, 3 and 4. What did Ratten do? Go about the game the exact same way. We did almost kick ourselves out of it, but we also allowed ourselves to be exposed defensively. That's right, allowed it to happen. Also, why doesn't he wear a head set and receive advice during the game? Is he worried about his hair being ruined? Is he arrogant? Is it Brett's way or the highway?

- Jamison appears to have gone up a notch this year. Great player. Also love Duigan and Laidler.

- Has Russell been moved to a different role for Yarran or have opposition coaches worked him out? I figured that Russell was outstanding as a rebounding defender last year. Now Yarran has been moved into this position, but, like Collingwood has with O'Brien and Shaw (ie. multiple rebounders), I feel that Russell could still have a purpose, and that has suffered a bit as a result.

- Gibbs. What's going on with the boy? He is playing worse than when Tony Romo was dating Jessica Simpson.

- The talent is there to put these teams away. Happy with 6 points, but I'm sensing a worrying trend for the last two weeks. Unless this is a blip, Sydney will put us to the sword next week.

- With Bower gone, White has to be the man now. He still has the jitters big time out there.

- Got to love Kade Simpson's response to last week.

- More so, got to love the way the midfield took the game into their hands when behind in the last. That character is what the whole team needs for four quarters. It's what made Geelong, Collingwood and Hawthorn the premiers of the last half-decade. They CAN beat pretty much everyone out there. They just need to keep at it.

- Finally, as a staunch critic and non supporter of Andrew Walker, he delivered last night. If he becomes Mr. Consistent, then I'll need to STFU.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 6:23 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
teknodeejay wrote:
I wasn't at this game but I was at the first four (including Gold Coast). A few points of note:

- Loved him as a player, but if Brett Ratten is coaching this team to a premiership, I will be staggered. I am happy to eat my words, my hat and some humble pie, but I cannot see this man being in charge of Premiership 17. Am I being too harsh? I just think his gameplan only works because we've got such a brilliant midfield. We smashed them in the first quarter because we allowed the game to be open to our liking. Craig countered Ratten in quarters, 2, 3 and 4. What did Ratten do? Go about the game the exact same way. We did almost kick ourselves out of it, but we also allowed ourselves to be exposed defensively. That's right, allowed it to happen. Also, why doesn't he wear a head set and receive advice during the game? Is he worried about his hair being ruined? Is he arrogant? Is it Brett's way or the highway?
- Jamison appears to have gone up a notch this year. Great player. Also love Duigan and Laidler.

- Has Russell been moved to a different role for Yarran or have opposition coaches worked him out? I figured that Russell was outstanding as a rebounding defender last year. Now Yarran has been moved into this position, but, like Collingwood has with O'Brien and Shaw (ie. multiple rebounders), I feel that Russell could still have a purpose, and that has suffered a bit as a result.

- Gibbs. What's going on with the boy? He is playing worse than when Tony Romo was dating Jessica Simpson.

- The talent is there to put these teams away. Happy with 6 points, but I'm sensing a worrying trend for the last two weeks. Unless this is a blip, Sydney will put us to the sword next week.

- With Bower gone, White has to be the man now. He still has the jitters big time out there.

- Got to love Kade Simpson's response to last week.

- More so, got to love the way the midfield took the game into their hands when behind in the last. That character is what the whole team needs for four quarters. It's what made Geelong, Collingwood and Hawthorn the premiers of the last half-decade. They CAN beat pretty much everyone out there. They just need to keep at it.

- Finally, as a staunch critic and non supporter of Andrew Walker, he delivered last night. If he becomes Mr. Consistent, then I'll need to STFU.


HEadphones are in his hands most times the camera goes on Ratts and he talks to upstairs regularly it just not shown on telly.
He made changes as the game went on and i believe your observations are off and with the amount of chances we were creating and fluffing Ratts was well within his rights to stick with the plan. The other option would be to go the uber flood ourselves and cause a stalemate but in the long run that would not get us anywere. We need to learn to work through our difficulties and in the end we did and walked off with the points.

One thing Ratts is 100% right on is the swings in momentum in games is much much greater with this new interchange and sub rule.
He mentioned it in round one and so far in each game i have seen it has been true.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 6:28 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 8:34 pm
Posts: 1223
Location: East Coburg
Navy Blue Horse wrote:
Watched the last qtr again tonight. Curnow's last 10 mins were just brilliant.


Was just going to post the exact same thing, word for word (except "this morning" instead of "tonight", but's that just being pedantic).

_________________
"You can't polish a James Hird"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 8:08 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:59 am
Posts: 8631
Crows still lack key area speed and strength

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/cro ... 6044219834

Intersting read from the other side of the fence

_________________
Cheats never prosper (except in the AFL)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 8:15 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18026
I was happy with our structures.
If you focus more on the statistics of the game than the scoreboard to get a sense of our performance and improvement, you'll see we were all over them in all areas apart from the goal conversion. The same as the Richmond game who we should have beat by 100 points.

If we can gain some confidence with our goalkicking, we'll see a big increase in our winning ratio/margins.

With regard to Hampson, I've been a positive advocate of his but his second efforts have gone out the window of late. He taps the ball and stands back and spectates the play. He needs to get his hands and knees dirty again to be of value.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 10:33 pm 
Offline
Bob Chitty

Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 8:08 pm
Posts: 813
i have watched last 1/4 twice and we have def improved this year in a very important area and thats the one on ones in a contest, we seem to be getting the hard balls out to our aqdvantage and maintaining better pressure , i guess that comes with experience and another pre season under their belts


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 10:38 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
I watched the game on TV and have since watched the last quarter again. I was very impressed with our guts to come back from almost two goals down with not too long to go.

I actually thought Gibbs did some really good work in the last but before now was to hesitant to say so given the number of critics on TC. Did you notice that also?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 25, 2011 10:45 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21541
Location: North of the border
teknodeejay wrote:
I wasn't at this game but I was at the first four (including Gold Coast). A few points of note:

- Loved him as a player, but if Brett Ratten is coaching this team to a premiership, I will be staggered. I am happy to eat my words, my hat and some humble pie, but I cannot see this man being in charge of Premiership 17. Am I being too harsh? I just think his gameplan only works because we've got such a brilliant midfield. We smashed them in the first quarter because we allowed the game to be open to our liking. Craig countered Ratten in quarters, 2, 3 and 4. What did Ratten do? Go about the game the exact same way. We did almost kick ourselves out of it, but we also allowed ourselves to be exposed defensively. That's right, allowed it to happen. Also, why doesn't he wear a head set and receive advice during the game? Is he worried about his hair being ruined? Is he arrogant? Is it Brett's way or the highway?

- Jamison appears to have gone up a notch this year. Great player. Also love Duigan and Laidler.

- Has Russell been moved to a different role for Yarran or have opposition coaches worked him out? I figured that Russell was outstanding as a rebounding defender last year. Now Yarran has been moved into this position, but, like Collingwood has with O'Brien and Shaw (ie. multiple rebounders), I feel that Russell could still have a purpose, and that has suffered a bit as a result.

- Gibbs. What's going on with the boy? He is playing worse than when Tony Romo was dating Jessica Simpson.

- The talent is there to put these teams away. Happy with 6 points, but I'm sensing a worrying trend for the last two weeks. Unless this is a blip, Sydney will put us to the sword next week.

- With Bower gone, White has to be the man now. He still has the jitters big time out there.

- Got to love Kade Simpson's response to last week.

- More so, got to love the way the midfield took the game into their hands when behind in the last. That character is what the whole team needs for four quarters. It's what made Geelong, Collingwood and Hawthorn the premiers of the last half-decade. They CAN beat pretty much everyone out there. They just need to keep at it.

- Finally, as a staunch critic and non supporter of Andrew Walker, he delivered last night. If he becomes Mr. Consistent, then I'll need to STFU.



Have you ever thought to think that Ratten may not be the match day coach


He doesn't appear to be calling the shots to me - he appears to be mentoring and barracking from the box

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 26, 2011 1:39 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:36 am
Posts: 8163
Rafalution wrote:
Seriously that guy playing second ruck is rewarded with selection on the basis of what? Is winning a few more hit outs more beneficial than having a contest in the forward line? I really believe Carlos at least would add pressure and creativity inside 50, even if he is under done. We have to stop picking players who have no influence on the game.......ever.


I like Carlos and he would certainly add more pressure at ground level. But not sure he'd add a whole lot more in the aerial contests. He's tall, but he plays like a small crumbing forward. And his ruckwork is pretty poor.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 26, 2011 1:46 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:36 am
Posts: 8163
Captain Dan wrote:
for mine Warnock and Hampson haven't offered as much, so the next few weeks for both of them before big K's return could shape their seasons.


And for mine Warnock has been outstanding (other than his goalkicking the last couple of weeks). One of the in-form ruckmen of the competition.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 26, 2011 10:37 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
When I was watching the game I turned to MW in the last and said "I bet Judd gets 3 Brownlow votes for this game, but I reckon he's been pretty ordinary. Half his possessions have gone straight to the opposition."

Will be interesting to see what happens Brownlow night.


If we kick that badly for goal against the Swans we'll be done by 5-6 goals. We were on top everywhere apart from the scoreboard.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 252 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group