Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Wed Jun 18, 2025 8:35 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 384 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 20  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 11:13 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 3258
Laidler Jamo Duigan
Bower (Lucas) White Yarran
Russell (Bower) Curnow Scotland
Gibbs Henderson Simpson
Garlett Waite Walker

Warnock Judd Murphy

Robinson, Hampson, Carrots (Ellard), Lucas

1) we need more run off HB (to support Yarran's efforts - is a great strength of the Bombers and Pies) ie Bower or Lucas
2) on saturday while our 1st qtr wasnt good, our last was almost as disastorous ie we won 1 out 9 centre clearances). Consider Ellard vs Carrots (although it will be argued he had 142 DT points)
3) need mids and fwds to work harder - Bummers worked a lot harder up and down the ground (while fwds were not good in the 1st qtr, the supply was delivered under alot of pressure). Half FWDS, Wings, Half Backs are all the same these days.

Hamstrung re Hammers resting position ie on review he is doing ok around the ground, however is a liability up fwd. Yet, until Krueze is right we need him. Therefore, he should start on the bench to minimise time up fwd.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 11:17 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
ThePsychologist wrote:
Ins: Ellard (Need his ball winning and strong body at contests)
Thornton (Genune marking option up fwd and p/t back up ruckman)
Armfield (needs to play in defence where his run and carry will be damaging next to Yarran. Not a forward MC!)
Lucas (Class ball user needed in midfield)

Outs: Hampson (if they cant play up forward these days 2 ruckman are a liability)
Collins (good player who just needs some time)
Betts (if you cant go through midfield you struggle. Form has been poor for a while now)
Walker (no where near smart enough for modern football, just too many mistakes for his experience)

B: Armfield Jamison White
HB: Yarran Laidler Duigan
C: Simpson Ellard Lucas
HF: Robinson Henderson Gibbs
F: Garlett Waite Thornton
Foll: Warnock Judd Murphy
Int: Curnow Carrazzo Scotland Sub: Russell

Again Psych, you're destroying our ruck advantage and our speed in the forward 50, to bring zero advantage to the team bar a stopper in defence.

Keep Walker, drop Carrazzo and you're onto something, but I'd really think twice about ditching our second ruck because he's rucking just fine. Russell as a sub is a bit strange; I'd give it to Simmo or Scotland for a rest this week.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 12:26 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 9:02 pm
Posts: 13430
Location: Melbourne
buzzaaaah wrote:
As bad as he was, Hampson probably needs to play. Unless Henderson will have a run in the ruck, what options are there?

Collins and Betts have to go.
Lucas and Ellard/McLean seem the logical choices.


Henderson for Thornton is an option but we may have to persist with an out of touch Hendo for the long term good


Yeah I've calmed down about Hampson but please keep him in the ruck if he starts at FF again :banghead:

Hendo/Tbird is a difficult one, Hendo just looked SO out of sorts on Saturday but he was like that last year and improved a fair bit with each game.

Still think Collins and Betts need to go back to 2s, Lucas and Ellard would be obvious replacements.

Bower for sub? White was much better than anticipated last week.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 12:30 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:36 pm
Posts: 2960
Location: Oak Park
london blue wrote:
1) we need more run off HB (to support Yarran's efforts - is a great strength of the Bombers and Pies) ie Bower or Lucas


Absolutely!
Laidler and Duigan provide support in this area but after White's performance, we should slot Bower in with both him and Jamo and all three 'talls' offer plenty of flexibility with match-ups and rebound

Will be good to see emu back! :smoking:

_________________
C'mon Blueboys!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 12:41 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
missnaut wrote:
Hendo just looked SO out of sorts on Saturday but he was like that last year and improved a fair bit with each game.

Saturday's effort was easily Henderson's worst game in a Carlton jumper, make no mistake. He'll improve, but that's an unfair statement about any of his efforts last year.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 12:46 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 1:44 pm
Posts: 16
Jimmae I have to disagree on this. The advantage we may have in the ruck is outwayed by our lack of options and rotations. Look at Collingwood, they structure up differently when Brown goes on the ball. He also gives them great flexibility. No side is playing 2 PURE ruckman now and being successful. Surely Warnock can handle Maric? Speed in the fwd line is good but if you cant win the ball and generate multiple goal kicking options its no good. Are Collingwood and Geelong or Hawthorn really that quick. We have Garlett & Robbo plus rotating Gibbs, Judd and Murphy through their would help. Watch us against good sides and they have size around the ball and huge rotations through the fwd line and the bench. We seem to be a few steps behind. Poor Judd is being crucified. We also have too many bad kicks/decision makers especially under pressure. Guys such as Carrazzo, Walker, Russell, Hampson need to improve in these areas.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 12:55 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 10:07 pm
Posts: 1984
ThePsychologist wrote:
I
Outs: Walker (no where near smart enough for modern football, just too many mistakes for his experience)


Sorry, I just can't cop this. Did you even watch the game? :eek:

Walker was responsible for the smartest piece of play that Carlton had for the whole game.
Marked well on the HFF, about 60-65 out. Ignored leads, including Warnock's to the pocket, put a perfect kick to where only Warnock could mark, about 15-20 out, about a 20 degree angle. Made Warnock run to the spot. Easy goal.
Also had 100% effectiveness for his few possessions, and was ignored on some good leads.

If Walker started in the 21 instead of sub, we would have won.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 12:56 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 8:13 pm
Posts: 487
http://spiritofcarlton.com/blog/2011/04 ... ound-five/

Tickets for the Round 5 Carlton V Adelaide match at Docklands will be on sale from 9.00 am Monday and will sell fast. The cost is $50.00 per ticket which includes entry to the ground a reserved seat and finger food in the Spirit of Carlton room. Your MC will be none other than Jimmy Buckley, there will be past player interviews, auctions and raffles on the day. Tickets will be sold on a first in best dressed basis. To book tickets call Justine Wratten on 0438271948, between the hours of 9am-5pm.

Please note : These tickets are only available to paid up Spirit Of Carlton members. If you have not yet joined and would like to take advantage of these wonderful tickets, please ring Justine to get your membership ASAP.

_________________
The Spirit of Carlton compels you!


Last edited by Spirit of Carlton on Mon Apr 18, 2011 1:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 1:06 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 5:52 pm
Posts: 2289
Location: Geelong
Stamos wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
I
Outs: Walker (no where near smart enough for modern football, just too many mistakes for his experience)


Sorry, I just can't cop this. Did you even watch the game? :eek:

Walker was responsible for the smartest piece of play that Carlton had for the whole game.
Marked well on the HFF, about 60-65 out. Ignored leads, including Warnock's to the pocket, put a perfect kick to where only Warnock could mark, about 15-20 out, about a 20 degree angle. Made Warnock run to the spot. Easy goal.
Also had 100% effectiveness for his few possessions, and was ignored on some good leads.

If Walker started in the 21 instead of sub, we would have won.


Stamos, not sure I agree about Walker in the team and we would've won, but I whole-heartedly agree
with the quality of that possession. It was really smart football.

I wish he was always that smart.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 1:10 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 5:52 pm
Posts: 2289
Location: Geelong
missnaut wrote:
buzzaaaah wrote:
As bad as he was, Hampson probably needs to play. Unless Henderson will have a run in the ruck, what options are there?

Collins and Betts have to go.
Lucas and Ellard/McLean seem the logical choices.


Henderson for Thornton is an option but we may have to persist with an out of touch Hendo for the long term good


Yeah I've calmed down about Hampson but please keep him in the ruck if he starts at FF again :banghead:

Hendo/Tbird is a difficult one, Hendo just looked SO out of sorts on Saturday but he was like that last year and improved a fair bit with each game.

Still think Collins and Betts need to go back to 2s, Lucas and Ellard would be obvious replacements.

Bower for sub? White was much better than anticipated last week.


I wonder if we could work out a strategy to use Hampson in the back line when he was resting?
I can't see it off the top of my head, but maybe ....
I don't think you could give him a direct opponent - too risky, but maybe as a spoiling third man up?
Hmm ... that requires a good reading of the game though. :sad:
I don't know ... maybe we can just hope he turns it around next week.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 1:15 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:22 pm
Posts: 4678
Location: Melbourne
Serious Question.....................

Do we drop Eddie?

I reckon he could do with a few weeks in the 2's.

_________________
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit"
- Aristotle


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 1:18 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 10:07 pm
Posts: 1984
ryan2000 wrote:
Serious Question.....................

Do we drop Eddie?

I reckon he could do with a few weeks in the 2's.


I think this depends on how good Prawn Kerr has been in the Ants. I don't know the answer.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 1:19 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 1:44 pm
Posts: 16
BigKev wrote:
Stamos wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
I
Outs: Walker (no where near smart enough for modern football, just too many mistakes for his experience)


Sorry, I just can't cop this. Did you even watch the game? :eek:

Walker was responsible for the smartest piece of play that Carlton had for the whole game.
Marked well on the HFF, about 60-65 out. Ignored leads, including Warnock's to the pocket, put a perfect kick to where only Warnock could mark, about 15-20 out, about a 20 degree angle. Made Warnock run to the spot. Easy goal.
Also had 100% effectiveness for his few possessions, and was ignored on some good leads.

If Walker started in the 21 instead of sub, we would have won.


I don't look at one instance I look at a career and IMO he has been a disappointment and just isnt up to it, wish we traded him when we had the opportunity.

Stamos, not sure I agree about Walker in the team and we would've won, but I whole-heartedly agree
with the quality of that possession. It was really smart football.

I wish he was always that smart.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 1:21 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 1:44 pm
Posts: 16
ryan2000 wrote:
Serious Question.....................

Do we drop Eddie?

I reckon he could do with a few weeks in the 2's.


Definitely, has been poor for a while. Prefer Ellard or Lucas. Garlett can fill small fwd role better anyway.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 1:29 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 10:07 pm
Posts: 1984
MoodyBlue wrote:

I don't look at one instance I look at a career and IMO he has been a disappointment and just isnt up to it, wish we traded him when we had the opportunity.


Well we didn't trade him, he's still on the list.
And he's in our best 21, so he should be in the team.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 1:42 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 1:44 pm
Posts: 16
Stamos wrote:
MoodyBlue wrote:

I don't look at one instance I look at a career and IMO he has been a disappointment and just isnt up to it, wish we traded him when we had the opportunity.


Well we didn't trade him, he's still on the list.
And he's in our best 21, so he should be in the team.


I dont believe he is in our best 21 and if he is its a sad indictment on our list. Just my opinion.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 1:49 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:20 pm
Posts: 6923
:roll: Going well this...

_________________
BLUES 2010: PAV AND JUDD = FLAGS. DOING IT FOR THE LOVE OF DICK PRATT.

HAVE YOU SIGNED UP FOR TALKINGCARLTON SUPERCOACH 2009 YET?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 2:02 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 5:52 pm
Posts: 2289
Location: Geelong
Stamos wrote:
MoodyBlue wrote:

I don't look at one instance I look at a career and IMO he has been a disappointment and just isnt up to it, wish we traded him when we had the opportunity.


Well we didn't trade him, he's still on the list.
And he's in our best 21, so he should be in the team.


Again I half agree.

With due respect to the coaching staff, (realistically I have no idea what they say to him), it seems to me that he
lacks certainty with how he's meant to play. If, say, Waite and Hampson are going up in a pack, I don't think it's his
role to climb up there with them. Even worse to spoil them. Maybe he's gotten carried away with all this "X Factor"
talk.

He's apparently got a big tank - I'd like to see him run and run and run and blow up his opponent/s. If he gets
a chance to leap on his opponents shoulders go for it, but if we've already got >=2 blokes going up then he should
look for the crumb or hang around the 50 or whatever.


Last edited by BigKev on Mon Apr 18, 2011 2:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 2:03 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
MoodyBlue

a) I saw your first attempt to post

b) I'd long before scrutinised this account; not sure what you think you're doing exactly.

Moving on from that, Essendon* are playing two ruckman, as evidenced by Ryder's horrible performance up forward on the weekend. Collingwood don't have a choice and the obsession with Leigh Brown is bizarre; he is neither a good ruckman or a good forward. In fact he's just someone to smash into players to open up the run for Collingwood's mids.

Fremantle - similar issue to Collingwood
Geelong - similar issue again
Gold Coast - two rucks
Hawthorn - two rucks
Melbourne - two rucks
Port - restricted at selection table, have played Stewart 3 games out of 4 despite having Westhoff & Trengrove
Adelaide - play Maric & McKernan and will look at Moran & Jacobs in the coming weeks despite having an athletic type in Walker and a 203 cm forward in Tippet
West Coast - Lynch, Cox & NicNat
Richmond - two rucks at the expense of a forward (albiet through lack of talent after Jack)
Sydney - lack talent at the position but have some top shelf pinch hitters in Goodes & White, hence signing Mumford on awful money
North - injuries and thus hamstrung; Petrie barely able to impact ruck contests.
Bulldogs - two rucks
Lions - two rucks; possibly three if Charman wasn't injured
Saints - two rucks

So that's 11 clubs that play 2 rucks (and I challenge you to tell me which of those isn't a 'pure' ruck), and probably another 5 that would if they could.

Can we please call that myth busted?

Hampson & Russell are not bad kicks or decision makers; Hampson is just a nervous kick at goal. Walker isn't a bad decision maker unless you count flying for marks when outnumbered or when the ball is kicked over his head but he is a wonky field kick.

Carrazzo I agree with, yet you sign off on Walker first.

Armfield's the stopper, BTW.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 2:06 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19420
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
Carlton 1.30
Adelaide 3.50

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 384 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ... 20  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], sticksaftersiren87 and 23 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group