Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Jun 20, 2025 6:38 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 455 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 23  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 11:55 am 
Offline
Garry Crane

Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 11:08 am
Posts: 265
Location: Melbourne
Smash them.
Smash them.
Smash them.
Smash them.
Smash them.
Smash them.
Smash them.
Smash them.
Smash them.
Smash them.
Smash them.

Fkn Essendon*.

Smash them by 100+ points.

Put a positive 'brave' spin on that you filthy bummer lovin' media.

Smash them.

They're $hit!

_________________
!@#$ off Essendon**** Just !@#$ right off. SCUM.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 11:58 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
ryan2000 wrote:
Gibbs did ok on pendles,.............. The problem is that if you put Gibbs onto a tag, you effectively take out one of our key players from the game. That costs us more goals than Pendlebury would if you left him un-checked.

Gibbs needs to be a full-time midfielder pushing up around the forward line. I don't think we have ever really used him correctly.

:clap:

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 11:58 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 10:07 pm
Posts: 1984
ryan2000 wrote:
Gibbs did ok on pendles,.............. The problem is that if you put Gibbs onto a tag, you effectively take out one of our key players from the game. That costs us more goals than Pendlebury would if you left him un-checked.

Gibbs needs to be a full-time midfielder pushing up around the forward line. I don't think we have ever really used him correctly.


Carrazzo NEEDS to be dropped.................. but wont be. Ratts just loves him too much. But he's been woeful for a good 12 months now and i'm sick-to-death of him! Disgusting that he's even in our leadership group.

Lucas, Henderson, Bower and Armfield.............. i'd like to see all of these players in this week.


Won't make 5 changes this week, but everything else is right.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 12:03 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
Toranasaurus wrote:
Smash them.
Smash them.
Smash them.
Smash them.
Smash them.
Smash them.
Smash them.
Smash them.
Smash them.
Smash them.
Smash them.

Fkn Essendon*.

Smash them by 100+ points.

Put a positive 'brave' spin on that you filthy bummer lovin' media.

Smash them.

They're $hit!


Is that a beat poem?

[youtube]GlkoQ4bUE5k[/youtube]

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 12:03 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko

Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 2:15 pm
Posts: 21544
Location: North of the border
Watched that collingwood game again- notes on our boys - collingwood keep their feet they dont go to ground - 7 times we were pinged for lying accross the ball and dragging it in- need that out of the game - Umps dont protect the guys going for the ball
also 8 deliveries into our forward fifty landed directly into the arms of pies players

the 2nd quarter they really did get some flukey goals - Jamo inch taller he takes the mark and cloke doesnt get his goal - Balls goal was almost touched - Krakours we should have had someone covering the sqaure and the free against Russel to blair was laughable at best

Missed shots on goal - whilst collingwood were kicking them out of there arse - Judd misses set shot as does Hammer - both Murphy and Garlett running into open gaols missed - We need to bury them when we get the chance

It was a hand full of little things that cost us other than that we matched them all over the gorund

we take our chances this week and we should bury the bombers

_________________
If you allow the Government to change the Laws in an emergency
They will create an Emergency to change the Laws


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 12:08 pm 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 3:05 pm
Posts: 162
Captain Dan wrote:
Kyle Reimer should be coming in for the Bombers. Any thoughts, Don?


Just on this I saw the Bendigo vs North Ballarat game on Saturday and Reimers was a class above everyone on the ground, clearly best on ground and pretty much got the bombers over the line. He is one of those players that always seems to cut us up so if he comes in we will have to watch him (or kill him). He played well but is still a massive wanker.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 12:12 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
Dale wrote:
He played well but is still a massive wanker.


There would be very few more massive.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 12:12 pm 
Offline
formerly BlueRob
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 12:45 pm
Posts: 3073
Wish like hell we would beat them ... but have a feeling we will lose this one.

_________________
I am as mad as hell and I'm not going to take it any more!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 12:28 pm 
Offline
Garry Crane

Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 11:08 am
Posts: 265
Location: Melbourne
jimmae wrote:
Toranasaurus wrote:
Smash them.
Smash them.
Smash them.
Smash them.
Smash them.
Smash them.
Smash them.
Smash them.
Smash them.
Smash them.
Smash them.

Fkn Essendon*.

Smash them by 100+ points.

Put a positive 'brave' spin on that you filthy bummer lovin' media.

Smash them.

They're $hit!


Is that a beat poem?

[youtube]GlkoQ4bUE5k[/youtube]


Close.

It's actually a multiplecopyandpaste.

It's called "Get a dog up ya bummers. Smash 'em Blues."

And I quite like it.

_________________
!@#$ off Essendon**** Just !@#$ right off. SCUM.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 1:08 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 6450
What's the Waite situation? I read it in the paper on Saturday and today and SEN were also talking about a contest near the end of the game being reviewed by the MRP.

But no mention on any forum :?

_________________
"I will rejoice in their anguish, delight in their failure and revel in our success"

We are Carlton, @#$%&! the rest !!!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 1:20 pm 
Offline
Trevor Keogh
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:23 pm
Posts: 745
Location: Melbourne
Yeah I heard a little bit about Waite on the radio too.
Something got to do with whacking Pendlebury's head?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 1:21 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:39 pm
Posts: 15848
Dale wrote:
He played well and will always be a massive wanker.


EFA

_________________
"I had to eat"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 1:24 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
teagueyubeauty wrote:
What's the Waite situation? I read it in the paper on Saturday and today and SEN were also talking about a contest near the end of the game being reviewed by the MRP.

But no mention on any forum :?

Spoil attempt that landed on Pendlebury's head. Nothing intended; nothing in it.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 1:28 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
jimmae wrote:
teagueyubeauty wrote:
What's the Waite situation? I read it in the paper on Saturday and today and SEN were also talking about a contest near the end of the game being reviewed by the MRP.

But no mention on any forum :?

Spoil attempt that landed on Pendlebury's head. Nothing intended; nothing in it.

Jim, we've got Essendon* next week. Ergo, he'll get at least one week.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 1:29 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
jimmae wrote:
teagueyubeauty wrote:
What's the Waite situation? I read it in the paper on Saturday and today and SEN were also talking about a contest near the end of the game being reviewed by the MRP.

But no mention on any forum :?

Spoil attempt that landed on Pendlebury's head. Nothing intended; nothing in it.


It was that innocuous that I'd actually forgotten about it. No case to answer.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 1:35 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 12:30 pm
Posts: 4183
Stamos wrote:
ryan2000 wrote:
Gibbs did ok on pendles,.............. The problem is that if you put Gibbs onto a tag, you effectively take out one of our key players from the game. That costs us more goals than Pendlebury would if you left him un-checked.

Gibbs needs to be a full-time midfielder pushing up around the forward line. I don't think we have ever really used him correctly.


Carrazzo NEEDS to be dropped.................. but wont be. Ratts just loves him too much. But he's been woeful for a good 12 months now and i'm sick-to-death of him! Disgusting that he's even in our leadership group. Lucas, Henderson, Bower and Armfield.............. i'd like to see all of these players in this week.


Won't make 5 changes this week, but everything else is right.


That's a poor comment from someone sitting in the stands.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 1:40 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 9:02 pm
Posts: 13431
Location: Melbourne
jimmae wrote:
teagueyubeauty wrote:
What's the Waite situation? I read it in the paper on Saturday and today and SEN were also talking about a contest near the end of the game being reviewed by the MRP.

But no mention on any forum :?

Spoil attempt that landed on Pendlebury's head. Nothing intended; nothing in it.




But it's Jarrad Waite who's a dirty nut kicking sniper! Of course there's something in it!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 1:46 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2006 2:01 pm
Posts: 2099
ryan2000 wrote:
Carrazzo NEEDS to be dropped.................. but wont be. Ratts just loves him too much. But he's been woeful for a good 12 months now and i'm sick-to-death of him! Disgusting that he's even in our leadership group.



You did see the Swans final last year, Yes? "Woeful" for a "good 12 months"? :donk:

"Disgusting" a former B&F winner and top 5 finisher last year in our leadership group. :screwy:

"Disgusting" going a little too far, Ryan, he's been a great foot soldier and role model for many on our list over the years, the guy deserves some respect mate, disappointing stuff.


Last edited by jimmae on Mon Apr 11, 2011 1:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Fixed quotes


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 2:59 pm 
Offline
Vale 1953-2020
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 11671
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Players that get a game because Ratts loves them

Gibbs
Carrazzo

Anyone else?


Judd.

_________________
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!!!

After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says W T F .........
Visit http://fromthemoshpit.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 11, 2011 3:09 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21075
Location: Missing Kouta
Dale wrote:
Captain Dan wrote:
Kyle Reimer should be coming in for the Bombers. Any thoughts, Don?


Just on this I saw the Bendigo vs North Ballarat game on Saturday and Reimers was a class above everyone on the ground, clearly best on ground and pretty much got the bombers over the line. He is one of those players that always seems to cut us up so if he comes in we will have to watch him (or kill him). He played well but is still a massive wanker.

[youtube]3EljyBmyu28[/youtube]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3EljyBmyu28


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 455 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 23  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: DesEnglish and 27 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group