Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Jun 20, 2025 4:24 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 90 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 2:28 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:28 pm
Posts: 4943
Pros
- Garlett
- Yarran
- Watson will be a good player
- Kreuzer, Hendo, Bower, McLean and Lucas still to come into the side
- Robbo and Curnow toiled hard

Cons
- "fumbles" Duigan
- Betts
- Carazzo
- Walker

_________________
There is no footy god


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 3:12 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 9:49 pm
Posts: 1508
I made a couple of pre season calls and got slated. Tonight everyone seems to have seen the light. Betts should have been shipped to eagles last year, Murphy is a possession winner not a match winner and curnow is his replacement in the guts because he has some.

_________________
We are eternal, all this pain is an illusion.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 4:43 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6413
Same as all of the above
the game was fantastic until the pies kicked away in the second after which Carlton played defensive footy and Collingwood seemed to go through the motions

the last quarter and half was shit

If Ratten wants to keep his job he needs to get rid of
Walker
Scotland
Hampson
Carrazzo
Thornton
Russell


These guys arnt part of the premiership team of the future for reasons stated. Its when will they bit out of the mix

Gibbs and Murphy will never be stars

Gibbs is too soft. His kick off the ground in the third was pathetic

Murphy is just a good player. Wont be anything sensational

Betts to stay in the team must become a midfielder. Dont know if he has the capacity to become one


I would bring in Lucas for Walker

Hendo for Hammer
Bower for Thornton
Ellard, Kerr,Daviesand hopefully Mitchell all get runs. Ratts better be introducing new blood otherwise we wont advance


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 6:04 am 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
Pros: we are improving.

Learning some guys aren't up to it. Betts, Russell, Carrazzo, Thornton, Walker gave big question marks over them in big games.

Kruezer, Henderson, Ellard, Lucas, Bower, Touhy will all come into our best 22 by years end.

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 7:07 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:55 pm
Posts: 2952
Location: Balwyn
Pros

Watson great game for an 18 year old in his second AFL game. This kid will keep on learning.
Garlett
Yarran
Judd as always
Murphy
Gibbs
New structures and personnel will take a while to build then a lot of players will look better.

Cons

Hammer tantalises, needs Senior game time. By the time Kreuzer comes back we'll know if Hammer is steadily improving. Watching on TV it's hard to see what he actually does. Raises expectations pretty high when he marks and goals at the start.

_________________
Bawditawaba


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 7:34 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18030
The biggest con? The channel 7 telecast.
Showing meaningless shots while play is unfolding, failing to show stoppages until after the ball is bounced.
High and long range shots which demonstrate nothing. If their idea of innovation is to stick a camera up a cherry picker, they're a bigger laughing stock than I suspected.

Absolutely embarrassing.

Love Simmo but he is off the boil at the moment.
The basic defensive skills of our small defenders/mids at defensive stoppages.
Players who consistently overcommit at the player in posssession as the 2nd/3rd player in. It's laziness falsely wrapped up as some form of aggression. (Hi Jarrad)
Our hesitation to hit up a short option in favour of a wide option. It's a lot more effective to pierce the zone and then kick over it than to go around it. Watch how Collingwood counter the press.

Pros.
Jamo. Great to have him back.
Robbos attack on the ball and man. Should act as an inspiration to others.
Jeffy. :thumbsup: This kid is never beaten.
Murph is improving.
Juddys defensive game.
Yarrans ball use when in space.
I thought Laidler worked well when he had the right match ups.
Curnow. Love his attitude and workrate.
I'm still very positive about the Warnock/Hammer combination.
Juddys workrate
Our tackle pressure.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 7:47 am 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 8:04 pm
Posts: 976
Bottom 6

Hampson - Kreuzer
Thornton - Henderson [Austin feel free to step up, been a long time]
Duigan - Armfield/ Davies [not convinced on Bower]
Walker - Kerr/Lucas
Carrazzo - Ellard [enough is enough]
Collins [willing to give him three games] - Houlihan
Betts [kick up the asz]


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 8:27 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:59 am
Posts: 8631
jimmae wrote:
simonverbeek wrote:
2. Hammer forward – don’t mind him in the ruck, but he simply fails to make an impact in too many marking contests. If he’s not gonna catch it, he must bring it to ground, but tonight when we used Hammer as our go to inside 50 they just whisked it out. Need Hendo and Kreuz back so badly.

Disagree with this point. Hammer was fine, the distinct lack of crumbers around him was not. Should have had two goals to his name.



Hammer was fine :roll: - Couldn't kick over a cherry bob

Throw in the Richmond game as well

_________________
Cheats never prosper (except in the AFL)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 8:54 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
BIG CON:
- You just know Monfries was watching Blair's little performance on JR

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 9:33 am 
Offline
Trevor Keogh

Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 1:38 pm
Posts: 762
Blue Vain wrote:
Players who consistently overcommit at the player in posssession as the 2nd/3rd player in. It's laziness falsely wrapped up as some form of aggression. (Hi Jarrad)


Great call, insightful call.

It's these little things that determine the culture of a team, and whether it can challenge for a flag, and where we fall behind against the well disciplined sides.

The question is - How do you instill that discipline? And why haven't we instilled that discipline into our team?

_________________
They will know that they've been playing against the famous old dark blues


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 9:37 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
Pro:

By and large we held our own against a team which was expected to wallop us, save for some crap umpiring, and 10-15 minutes in the second.

Con:

The douchebags, naysayers, and whingers are out unseasonably early this year.

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 9:38 am 
Offline
Trevor Keogh

Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 1:38 pm
Posts: 762
jimmae wrote:
simonverbeek wrote:
2. Hammer forward – don’t mind him in the ruck, but he simply fails to make an impact in too many marking contests. If he’s not gonna catch it, he must bring it to ground, but tonight when we used Hammer as our go to inside 50 they just whisked it out. Need Hendo and Kreuz back so badly.

Disagree with this point. Hammer was fine, the distinct lack of crumbers around him was not. Should have had two goals to his name.


Yeah, I can see the upside with Hammer forward. But when you break it down to the basics, 1 of 3 outcomes are possible when you kick long to KP forward:

1) They mark it
2) They get hands on it, crash the pack, and bring it to ground
3) They fail to impact the contest

I reckon Hammer had too much of option 3 last night.

He misread it, mistimed his leap, the ball went behind the pack, and the defense ran it out.

Needs to turn the 3's into 2's.

_________________
They will know that they've been playing against the famous old dark blues


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 9:50 am 
Offline
Bob Chitty
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 2:21 pm
Posts: 817
Blue Vain wrote:
The biggest con? The channel 7 telecast.
Showing meaningless shots while play is unfolding, failing to show stoppages until after the ball is bounced.
High and long range shots which demonstrate nothing. If their idea of innovation is to stick a camera up a cherry picker, they're a bigger laughing stock than I suspected.

Absolutely embarrassing.

Love Simmo but he is off the boil at the moment.
The basic defensive skills of our small defenders/mids at defensive stoppages.
Players who consistently overcommit at the player in posssession as the 2nd/3rd player in. It's laziness falsely wrapped up as some form of aggression. (Hi Jarrad)
Our hesitation to hit up a short option in favour of a wide option. It's a lot more effective to pierce the zone and then kick over it than to go around it. Watch how Collingwood counter the press.

Pros.
Jamo. Great to have him back.
Robbos attack on the ball and man. Should act as an inspiration to others.
Jeffy. :thumbsup: This kid is never beaten.
Murph is improving.
Juddys defensive game.
Yarrans ball use when in space.
I thought Laidler worked well when he had the right match ups.
Curnow. Love his attitude and workrate.
I'm still very positive about the Warnock/Hammer combination.
Juddys workrate
Our tackle pressure.


Agree with everything there except I'm losing patience with the ruckmen. Both of them consistently get outmarked in packs and get knocked around far too easily. It was funny/sad that shot of Waite taking the big speccy 20m out, with Hammer attempting to mark the same ball 3 metres in front of Waite, just nowhere near it at all. He seems to have no idea at all about the flight of the ball. He does have amazing potential but my goodness me...
I'm not writing them off but they're just frustrating me at the moment.

I don't know that Duigan will make it. Too fumbly, poor lateral movement and poor awareness. I hope he improves but it will surprise me if he does.

JR wasn't at his best, but for someone to suggest that he's played 3 poor games now, they are absolutely kidding themselves. He was very good in round 1 and 2. Have a look at the replays.

_________________
Don't blame it on the sunshine, don't blame it on the moonlight, don't blame it on the good times, blame it on the WIGGINS!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 10:09 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 9:26 pm
Posts: 4719
Location: Parliament House, Canberra
keogh wrote:

If Ratten wants to keep his job he needs to get rid of
Walker
Scotland
Hampson
Carrazzo
Thornton
Russell


These guys arnt part of the premiership team of the future for reasons stated. Its when will they bit out of the mix



Where was this comment when Russell was having a decent year and placing well in our B&F?

He's had a few poor games yes but it doesn't help when he gets crucified by the umpires feeling sorry for little man Blair.

Some of our kicking into the forward line put the Pies defenders under real pressure with the height we had if we kicked it deep. Too often we'd be kicking it long about 45m out which meant there was not real pressure on the Pies defence.

To be honest, neither side looked at their best, still ironing out the pre-season rust. The re-match will be a better indication of where we are at.

_________________
"A good composer does not initiate. He steals."

- Igor Stravinsky


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 10:54 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:26 am
Posts: 14730
Location: Comparing orange boners with Hirdy
Con: we lost so the usual suspects have logged in for their first visit for the season.

_________________
Greg Swann wrote:
Essendon* cheated, simple as that


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 10:58 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
Megaman wrote:
Con: we lost so the usual suspects have logged in for their first visit for the season.


:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :thanks: :thanks: :thanks: :thanks: :thanks:

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 11:05 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
Must resist dirty dirty trolls.

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 11:15 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
Blue Vain wrote:
Players who consistently overcommit at the player in posssession as the 2nd/3rd player in. It's laziness falsely wrapped up as some form of aggression. (Hi Jarrad)

Agree, but not sure if Jarrad should be the one staying down? Or are you referring to the moment in the fourth where both he and Garlett stood on the mark telling the other to drop into the play, resulting in a cheap kick over the top?

He should be flying into packs. Walker should be staying down a little more often, as should Duigan, Laidler and quite a few others.

chubbyruss wrote:
jimmae wrote:
simonverbeek wrote:
2. Hammer forward – don’t mind him in the ruck, but he simply fails to make an impact in too many marking contests. If he’s not gonna catch it, he must bring it to ground, but tonight when we used Hammer as our go to inside 50 they just whisked it out. Need Hendo and Kreuz back so badly.

Disagree with this point. Hammer was fine, the distinct lack of crumbers around him was not. Should have had two goals to his name.



Hammer was fine :roll: - Couldn't kick over a cherry bob

Throw in the Richmond game as well

One kick in the whole game and he's now rubbish. One kick. You have got to be joking.

simonverbeek wrote:
Needs to turn the 3's into 2's.

Like I said, I thought there were plenty of 2's, just no one to capitalise. The root cause of a '3' is generally the ball carrier misjudging the kick or being under pressure, which happened plenty last night.

dane wrote:
Must resist dirty dirty trolls.

Nonsense; argue their BS with logic. Everyone wins.

blue4 wrote:
Bottom 6

Hampson - Kreuzer
Thornton - Henderson [Austin feel free to step up, been a long time]
Duigan - Armfield/ Davies [not convinced on Bower]
Walker - Kerr/Lucas
Carrazzo - Ellard [enough is enough]
Collins [willing to give him three games] - Houlihan
Betts [kick up the asz]

IMO, our bottom six last night was Walker, Duigan, Betts, Carrazzo, Simpson & Laidler. You can excuse Laidler as inexperienced, but the rest have to take something from that, and at least two need to be dropped.

mikeychook wrote:
I made a couple of pre season calls and got slated. Tonight everyone seems to have seen the light. Betts should have been shipped to eagles last year, Murphy is a possession winner not a match winner and curnow is his replacement in the guts because he has some.

Rubbish mate, absolute rubbish and you were rightly howled down for it last time. Murphy won virtually all of his ball in the thick of it. Check the stats and watch it again if you don't believe me. He had mates letting him down when he ran for the receive after doing the hard yards with Judd.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 11:20 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
jimmae wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Players who consistently overcommit at the player in posssession as the 2nd/3rd player in. It's laziness falsely wrapped up as some form of aggression. (Hi Jarrad)

Agree, but not sure if Jarrad should be the one staying down? Or are you referring to the moment in the fourth where both he and Garlett stood on the mark telling the other to drop into the play, resulting in a cheap kick over the top?

He should be flying into packs. Walker should be staying down a little more often, as should Duigan, Laidler and quite a few others.


I noticed numerous times that 2 or 3 of our blokes would rush at the Collingwood player in possession and he would simply handball over the top of them to a waiting team mate who would scamper off with the ball.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 11:24 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
Rexy wrote:
jimmae wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Players who consistently overcommit at the player in posssession as the 2nd/3rd player in. It's laziness falsely wrapped up as some form of aggression. (Hi Jarrad)

Agree, but not sure if Jarrad should be the one staying down? Or are you referring to the moment in the fourth where both he and Garlett stood on the mark telling the other to drop into the play, resulting in a cheap kick over the top?

He should be flying into packs. Walker should be staying down a little more often, as should Duigan, Laidler and quite a few others.


I noticed numerous times that 2 or 3 of our blokes would rush at the Collingwood player in possession and he would simply handball over the top of them to a waiting team mate who would scamper off with the ball.

Yeah that's mindless (and something I've been banging on about for years), but you can't expect Jarrad to do all the running. That's something that can be ironed out with a simple discussion between players and coach.

It just keeps creeping back into our game when we're under the pump. Duigan is also bringing it back in a big way.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 90 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group