Rexy wrote:
Actually, thinking more about where responsibility lies, it's a bit confusing.
Here we have Swann, in no uncertain terms, laying it on the line for Ratts, but then listening to Alan Richardson on the other hand when he was appointed talking about his increased responsibilities that includes tactics and playing styles amongst other things, it seems a bit unfair IMO on Ratts for him to cop full responsibilty if things go a pear-shaped.
Yes Ratts is senior coach, but who exactly is responsible for what?
The senior coach takes full responsibility and rightfully so. It is his role to extract the best out of his people. Richardson and co. have been offered positions because they are highly skilled individuals who can accelerate the development of the list and complement Ratten.
Ratten needs to view it in that context. If he views their appointment as a threat or as an opportunity for the club to undermine him, he may as well give it away now.
From what I'm hearing, the club are not entirely happy with how the coaching department has functioned. Richardson, Brown and the others have come in to help strip things back and help Ratts steer our program in a different direction. Hopefully Ratten sees this as an opportunity, which IMO it is.
Having the best people around you gives you a great opportunity to succeed and that should be how it is viewed.
As for Greg Swann. I'm rapt to have an administrator who doesnt accept mediocrity. That's why is up near the top of the tree of AFL administrators. As I said earlier in the year, Ratten has shown a ruthless approach with the players. It would be a bit weak and hypocritical of him to expect less for himself.