Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri Jun 20, 2025 8:06 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 52 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 7:03 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21075
Location: Missing Kouta
TheGame wrote:
I don't know cause we keep doing the same damn thing.

Bad start: Check
Judd inspired comeback: check
Missed chances: Check
Blew our load coming back and lose: Check

Came closer to winning a final without Kreuzer, Thornton, Stevens and Fevola: Check

You will take the post-Fevola and post-Thornton Carlton and like it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 7:05 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 5274
Location: Melbourne
Kouta wrote:
TheGame wrote:
I don't know cause we keep doing the same damn thing.

Bad start: Check
Judd inspired comeback: check
Missed chances: Check
Blew our load coming back and lose: Check

Came closer to winning a final without Kreuzer, Thornton, Stevens and Fevola: Check

You will take the post-Fevola and post-Thornton Carlton and like it.


Blue ice/Kouta stalking TheGame after the match: Check

_________________
"We used to sit around and talk about how bad the game plan was." Anthony Koutoufides


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 7:09 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21075
Location: Missing Kouta
99prelim wrote:
ScottSaunders wrote:
IMO, this year is completly different.

whilst we lost, the way in which we fought back from 4 goals down, played a seriously hard and aggressive game of football for an extended period of time, as compared to leading by 7 goals and losing, there is far more to take out of this game than the last final we lost.

its all a learning curve for the blues, until we have a group that are aged between 24-26 (rather than 20-23) i dont think we have the physical and mental strength to win games like this. IMO, in both finals, that was the difference.

we have three or four players in that age group or beyond it, compare that to the swans who would have had 3 or 4 players not in that age group ... that the difference


Age is almost irrelevant. Its developmet. Look at Sydney's 20-23 y.o players. Gibbs has been in the system 4 years. Gone backwards. Murphy 5 years, stagnating. Bower freefalling. Jamo poor. Betts tradeable. Yarran still unconvinced. Hampson meh. Walker ok today but a wasted top 3 pick despite injuries. Grigg a nothing player. Joseph backwards in 2010..should have spent a few weeks at Cramer st.

LIST DEVELOPMENT IS OUR SINGLE BIGGEST PROBLEM

Russell has improved.
Jacobs has improved.
Armfield has improved.
Garlett has improved.
Yarran has improved.
Hampson has improved.
Betts has kicked more goals.
Davies, Lucas, Warnock and White have debuted.
Made finals without Kreuzer and Mclean.
Gibbs and Murphy are still guns.
Grigg can play.
Walker was one of our best before a broken collarbone.
Bower has struggled with injuries.
Joseph was back to his desperate self today.

It's all over.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 7:14 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
Mark J wrote:
barrel47 wrote:
Well all the nay-sayers can kiss my a$$.
I thought todays was great.
Heart-breaking but great.
The old Carlton would have folded and been done by 60.
We rallied, we worked, we gave them a hell of scare.

We didn't take opportunities, they did.
They had passengers galore, I thought we had contributors everywhere.

Armfield is star - most will only remember the bounce when tackled.
I'll remember the continued efforts after that incident, willing the ball forward and being responsible for creating the Lachie goal.

Yes, we have to learn from this, but we are a better team than last year.

With a pre-season, Murphy will win 2011 Brownlow


+1

What a crock of shit this thread is :banghead:

Can't believe Don is the author :roll:

Believe it.

I'm only asking whether this playing list has the capability to learn from today and fix the problems that IMO played a large part in our defeat today and capitulation last year, to make sure it doesn't happen again. Read into it what you like.

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 7:33 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Mon May 24, 2010 2:00 pm
Posts: 35
barrel47 wrote:
Well all the nay-sayers can kiss my a$$.
I thought todays was great.
Heart-breaking but great.
The old Carlton would have folded and been done by 60.
We rallied, we worked, we gave them a hell of scare.

We didn't take opportunities, they did.
They had passengers galore, I thought we had contributors everywhere.

Armfield is star - most will only remember the bounce when tackled.
I'll remember the continued efforts after that incident, willing the ball forward and being responsible for creating the Lachie goal.

Yes, we have to learn from this, but we are a better team than last year.

With a pre-season, Murphy will win 2011 Brownlow




I love your optimism. :clap: :clap: :clap:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 7:35 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 9:52 pm
Posts: 1497
Location: THE BEACH
Donstuie wrote:
Mark J wrote:
barrel47 wrote:
Well all the nay-sayers can kiss my a$$.
I thought todays was great.
Heart-breaking but great.
The old Carlton would have folded and been done by 60.
We rallied, we worked, we gave them a hell of scare.

We didn't take opportunities, they did.
They had passengers galore, I thought we had contributors everywhere.

Armfield is star - most will only remember the bounce when tackled.
I'll remember the continued efforts after that incident, willing the ball forward and being responsible for creating the Lachie goal.

Yes, we have to learn from this, but we are a better team than last year.

With a pre-season, Murphy will win 2011 Brownlow


+1

What a crock of shit this thread is :banghead:

Can't believe Don is the author :roll:

Believe it.

I'm only asking whether this playing list has the capability to learn from today and fix the problems that IMO played a large part in our defeat today and capitulation last year, to make sure it doesn't happen again. Read into it what you like.


Yes we do
Yes we will
No it won't
:thumbsup:

_________________
I see you watching me watching you.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 7:38 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
barrel47 wrote:
Well all the nay-sayers can kiss my a$$.
I thought todays was great.
Heart-breaking but great.
The old Carlton would have folded and been done by 60.
We rallied, we worked, we gave them a hell of scare.

We didn't take opportunities, they did.
They had passengers galore, I thought we had contributors everywhere.

Armfield is star - most will only remember the bounce when tackled.
I'll remember the continued efforts after that incident, willing the ball forward and being responsible for creating the Lachie goal.

Yes, we have to learn from this, but we are a better team than last year.

With a pre-season, Murphy will win 2011 Brownlow


and Carlton will win the next 5 flags

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 7:43 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
Kouta wrote:
99prelim wrote:
ScottSaunders wrote:
IMO, this year is completly different.

whilst we lost, the way in which we fought back from 4 goals down, played a seriously hard and aggressive game of football for an extended period of time, as compared to leading by 7 goals and losing, there is far more to take out of this game than the last final we lost.

its all a learning curve for the blues, until we have a group that are aged between 24-26 (rather than 20-23) i dont think we have the physical and mental strength to win games like this. IMO, in both finals, that was the difference.

we have three or four players in that age group or beyond it, compare that to the swans who would have had 3 or 4 players not in that age group ... that the difference


Age is almost irrelevant. Its developmet. Look at Sydney's 20-23 y.o players. Gibbs has been in the system 4 years. Gone backwards. Murphy 5 years, stagnating. Bower freefalling. Jamo poor. Betts tradeable. Yarran still unconvinced. Hampson meh. Walker ok today but a wasted top 3 pick despite injuries. Grigg a nothing player. Joseph backwards in 2010..should have spent a few weeks at Cramer st.

LIST DEVELOPMENT IS OUR SINGLE BIGGEST PROBLEM

Russell has improved.
Jacobs has improved.
Armfield has improved.
Garlett has improved.
Yarran has improved.
Hampson has improved.
Betts has kicked more goals.
Davies, Lucas, Warnock and White have debuted.
Made finals without Kreuzer and Mclean.
Gibbs and Murphy are still guns.
Grigg can play.
Walker was one of our best before a broken collarbone.
Bower has struggled with injuries.
Joseph was back to his desperate self today.

It's all over.


It certainly is!!!!!!

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 7:48 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18030
99prelim wrote:
Donstuie wrote:
"We'll use the pain of today to motivate us for next year"

"We've learned a lot from experiencing finals pressure"

"This is a crucial step in the development of this young list"

"With more gametime and experiences, some of these rookie mistakes will iron themselves out"


I can go on. These were words spoken last year by all and sundry after Brisbane overran us, and will no doubt be spouted again in light of today.

It looked to me as if we learned very !@#$%& little from that night at the Gabba last year. Yes, we weren't expected to make the finals without Fev, and yes we showed in spurts we can compete with and beat the best. But today, the same mistakes and stupid decisions reared their heads again. The circumstances were different, but today was almost a carbon copy of that Brisbane game.

So I put it to you, do these players truly have the ability or intelligence to actually learn from today's experience? Do they actually have the nous to say "Shit, this is looking like Sydney in 2010, better not let that happen again" next time? Do they have the mental strength to take advantage of simple opportunities to bury their opposition when they arise?

In short, when all the above sentences (or excuses) are spoken, I ask you, will you believe them?


I don't believe them because I have no faith in the coach.


Yes, we all got the point the first 1000 times you said it.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 8:08 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17219
99prelim wrote:
Gibbs has been in the system 4 years. Gone backwards.

Battled groin soreness in the second half of the season. Can play the Hodge role if we get our structures right. I like his role with just a touch more time in the middle.
99prelim wrote:
Murphy 5 years, stagnating.

Little pre-season to speak of with OP...really got going in the business end of the year and again was outstanding today...gone forward.
99prelim wrote:
Bower freefalling.

Two bad quad strains...over his time at club has bulked up, then streamlined weight...struggles against bigger bodies.
99prelim wrote:
Jamo poor.

Up and down with form. Pretty good today I thought.
99prelim wrote:
Betts tradeable.

Not likely...but we can't really criticize Leon Davis when we have our small forward go missing in big games as well.
99prelim wrote:
Yarran still unconvinced.

19 year old. I would have played him today. Unbelievable talent - will do pre-season with the midfield group with the aim of playing spurts in the guts in 2011 and onwards. Knows what to expect of a full summer now and will make the most of it.
99prelim wrote:
Hampson meh.

Jacobs has gone passed him. Now number 4. Contracted for 2011...patience won't be extended after that.
99prelim wrote:
Walker ok today but a wasted top 3 pick despite injuries.

Correct pick at the time. Would shop around, but unlikely to leave.
99prelim wrote:
Grigg a nothing player.

Probably should have played 3 or 4 more games this year. Doesn't quite 'get it' yet.
99prelim wrote:
Joseph backwards in 2010..should have spent a few weeks at Cramer st.

Another full year of development into a tagger/back pocket. That can only be a good thing.
99prelim wrote:
LIST DEVELOPMENT IS OUR SINGLE BIGGEST PROBLEM


Every club's major concern I would have thought. There is a need to recruit skillful, smart footballers who can be coached and love footy. We have a few blokes who are missing a couple of these vital ingredients.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 8:14 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
Dr.SHERRIN wrote:
99prelim wrote:
Gibbs has been in the system 4 years. Gone backwards.

Battled groin soreness in the second half of the season. Can play the Hodge role if we get our structures right. I like his role with just a touch more time in the middle.
99prelim wrote:
Murphy 5 years, stagnating.

Little pre-season to speak of with OP...really got going in the business end of the year and again was outstanding today...gone forward.
99prelim wrote:
Bower freefalling.

Two bad quad strains...over his time at club has bulked up, then streamlined weight...struggles against bigger bodies.
99prelim wrote:
Jamo poor.

Up and down with form. Pretty good today I thought.
99prelim wrote:
Betts tradeable.

Not likely...but we can't really criticize Leon Davis when we have our small forward go missing in big games as well.
99prelim wrote:
Yarran still unconvinced.

19 year old. I would have played him today. Unbelievable talent - will do pre-season with the midfield group with the aim of playing spurts in the guts in 2011 and onwards. Knows what to expect of a full summer now and will make the most of it.
99prelim wrote:
Hampson meh.

Jacobs has gone passed him. Now number 4. Contracted for 2011...patience won't be extended after that.
99prelim wrote:
Walker ok today but a wasted top 3 pick despite injuries.

Correct pick at the time. Would shop around, but unlikely to leave.
99prelim wrote:
Grigg a nothing player.

Probably should have played 3 or 4 more games this year. Doesn't quite 'get it' yet.
99prelim wrote:
Joseph backwards in 2010..should have spent a few weeks at Cramer st.

Another full year of development into a tagger/back pocket. That can only be a good thing.
99prelim wrote:
LIST DEVELOPMENT IS OUR SINGLE BIGGEST PROBLEM


Every club's major concern I would have thought. There is a need to recruit skillful, smart footballers who can be coached and love footy. We have a few blokes who are missing a couple of these vital ingredients.


Thoughtful response Doctor

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 8:15 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
Blue Vain wrote:
99prelim wrote:
Donstuie wrote:
"We'll use the pain of today to motivate us for next year"

"We've learned a lot from experiencing finals pressure"

"This is a crucial step in the development of this young list"

"With more gametime and experiences, some of these rookie mistakes will iron themselves out"


I can go on. These were words spoken last year by all and sundry after Brisbane overran us, and will no doubt be spouted again in light of today.

It looked to me as if we learned very !@#$%& little from that night at the Gabba last year. Yes, we weren't expected to make the finals without Fev, and yes we showed in spurts we can compete with and beat the best. But today, the same mistakes and stupid decisions reared their heads again. The circumstances were different, but today was almost a carbon copy of that Brisbane game.

So I put it to you, do these players truly have the ability or intelligence to actually learn from today's experience? Do they actually have the nous to say "Shit, this is looking like Sydney in 2010, better not let that happen again" next time? Do they have the mental strength to take advantage of simple opportunities to bury their opposition when they arise?

In short, when all the above sentences (or excuses) are spoken, I ask you, will you believe them?


I don't believe them because I have no faith in the coach.


Yes, we all got the point the first 1000 times you said it.


If I've told you once I've told you a million times, don't exaggerate

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 8:20 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:50 pm
Posts: 3508
Location: Under Whelmed
well said Barrel.

I reckon that moment will be the making of Armfield. (amongst other things)

_________________
This might sound extreme in the context of alleged sexual assault, drunken violence and a drug trafficking charge...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 8:20 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 11:58 pm
Posts: 4058
Location: South Yarra
West Coast lost 3 Elimination Finals in a row before playing in 2 GFs.

I'm hanging my hat on that tonight


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 8:23 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Mon May 24, 2010 2:00 pm
Posts: 35
I truly believe we lost this game at the selection table. In the first half our backline was under intense pressure, and the likes of Jamieson, Bower, Joseph, and Davies just didn't stand up. I find it incomprehensible that they retained an inexperienced 4 gamer in Davies in the backline, when we had two experienced defenders in Thornton & Johnson, who were both showing good form in the Bullants over the last 3 or 4 weeks. Davies had about 8 touches for the match, did not contribute much at all, and looked overawed & lost much of the time. I know he is a young player, and needs game time to improve, but in an Elimination final?

Roos matchups all worked to perfection, shutting down all our playmakers, especially Simmo & Murph in the early stages of the match. As soon as the Swans got 4 goals up, it was then "catch up football". The Swans showed more intensity, and cohesion in their play, and deserved to have a good lead at 1/2 time. Were they playing for their coach,? Why couldn't our players put their bodies on the line like the Swans did in that first half? Not playing to the coache's instructions, or just not playing for the coach? The jury is still out for me with Ratten.

I'm also extremely disappointed at the following players who hardly contributed anything to our winning prospects in this match,...
Joseph ... Has lost his pace & touch, maybe needs another position to play next year.
Armfield .... up until 1/2 time only had 1 single touch, did better in the 2nd half, but gave away a crucial goal when he handballed when tackled.
Betts .. What's happened to Eddie? Is/was he playing injured the last few weeks. Couldn't get near it.
Scotland.. Down on form and his running/sweeping out of defence was sorely missed. Is it the end?
Robbo, ...With natural improvement, this year I thought this guy was going to be a worldbeater, but the last few weeks he has let me down, with his fumbling and inability to do any damage with his disposals. This is his 2nd year on the list, he is a little inexperienced I know, and I am hoping for improvement next year.
Bower... Is he playing injured, or has his quad problem interfered with his jumping (and running) ability? I know he is taking the CHB position, and playing as the main tall, but I thought Thornton could have come in and released him to a lesser defence position.
Jamo ... Not playing well, being outmarked and lost his pace. Continually plays from behind, and doesn't have the pace or body strength to beat his opponent.

Congrats to Judd, Carrazzo, Russell, Murph, and Sam Jacobs (who had 44 hitouts). Without their input, we would not have got close. It is just not feasible that they would consider letting him go in a trade with the form he has shown for the 2nd half of the year.

So, there you are, I have had my say, that's why they call me ....
Mr Grump


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 8:40 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:29 am
Posts: 6418
Location: Casa Da Carlton - The Place to Be
nytdog wrote:

Wait kicks the goal or Judd kicks the goal and its all a different story.

However to go into this game without a back line and do as well as we did says we have improved. We need an Austin or another tall defender to come on pretty quickly or we will get left behind by other teams. I think our mids and forwards did pretty well and our small backs did ok too.

In addition... our key forward is 20. His crumbing off sider is 20. Our half back flanker is 20. Our rucks are really young and have a lot of improvement in them. Everyone is being too emotional. We are still a few years away from being a real contender. Perspective please.


spot on.

i have said it many times, and may sound like a broken player, but we are now paying the price for our salary cap breaches. people will laugh, but the stark reality is, the gap we have between the likes of murphy/gibbs etc.. and judd is testiment to that.

we simply have very few players older than 24 years of age. Of the players that played today i can think of Judd, Waite, Scotland, Simpson, Carazzo?

please correct me if im wrong, but they are the only players beyond 24?

That is why we lost today. We need to have our core of players between 23-26 (around 2-3 years away) with a sprinke of older and younger players (dare i say it, like collingwood at the moment) not the other way around. Until we have a core of 23-26 we will continue to struggle, in tough, hard games like this one, but there is a hell of alot to take out of it, for the club and the players.

We are in desperate need of a CHB, and should do everything in our power to get one to the club, whilst some of the potenitals develop, but until the core of our group is that age, we will struggle in games like this. I think our forward line of Waite, Henderson, two of the three amigos and even Walker (after todays display) combine with what will be an elite ruck division, as well as an elite midfield division, is well on the way to winning that next flag, but that wont happen until, you guessed it, 23-26 year old players form the bulk of our squad!!

_________________
Got to love the stare Down by Setanta on Llyod :)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 8:49 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
ScottSaunders wrote:
nytdog wrote:

Wait kicks the goal or Judd kicks the goal and its all a different story.

However to go into this game without a back line and do as well as we did says we have improved. We need an Austin or another tall defender to come on pretty quickly or we will get left behind by other teams. I think our mids and forwards did pretty well and our small backs did ok too.

In addition... our key forward is 20. His crumbing off sider is 20. Our half back flanker is 20. Our rucks are really young and have a lot of improvement in them. Everyone is being too emotional. We are still a few years away from being a real contender. Perspective please.


spot on.

i have said it many times, and may sound like a broken player, but we are now paying the price for our salary cap breaches. people will laugh, but the stark reality is, the gap we have between the likes of murphy/gibbs etc.. and judd is testiment to that.

we simply have very few players older than 24 years of age. Of the players that played today i can think of Judd, Waite, Scotland, Simpson, Carazzo?

please correct me if im wrong, but they are the only players beyond 24?

That is why we lost today. We need to have our core of players between 23-26 (around 2-3 years away) with a sprinke of older and younger players (dare i say it, like collingwood at the moment) not the other way around. Until we have a core of 23-26 we will continue to struggle, in tough, hard games like this one, but there is a hell of alot to take out of it, for the club and the players.

We are in desperate need of a CHB, and should do everything in our power to get one to the club, whilst some of the potenitals develop, but until the core of our group is that age, we will struggle in games like this. I think our forward line of Waite, Henderson, two of the three amigos and even Walker (after todays display) combine with what will be an elite ruck division, as well as an elite midfield division, is well on the way to winning that next flag, but that wont happen until, you guessed it, 23-26 year old players form the bulk of our squad!!


Spot on !


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 9:00 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10593
barrel47 wrote:
Well all the nay-sayers can kiss my a$$.
I thought todays was great.
Heart-breaking but great.
The old Carlton would have folded and been done by 60.
We rallied, we worked, we gave them a hell of scare.

We didn't take opportunities, they did.
They had passengers galore, I thought we had contributors everywhere.

Armfield is star - most will only remember the bounce when tackled.
I'll remember the continued efforts after that incident, willing the ball forward and being responsible for creating the Lachie goal.

Yes, we have to learn from this, but we are a better team than last year.

With a pre-season, Murphy will win 2011 Brownlow


Bitterely disappointed with the loss but this is said beautifully.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 9:20 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25231
Location: Bondi Beach
aramari wrote:
West Coast lost 3 Elimination Finals in a row before playing in 2 GFs.

I'm hanging my hat on that tonight


onya aramari....something to be said about history.

We have no girls in our team so it is all about HIStory

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2010 9:44 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10400
Location: Coburg
thats yourstory

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 52 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group