Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Jun 21, 2025 12:12 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 9:49 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 9:27 pm
Posts: 5270
We have 10 or so years left of the Gibblet and I will be interested to see where he'll be playing once he's at his peak......I've seen him get 4 clearances in a row sometime last year after the move was made to put him in the centre....so I know where I would like to have him but he's still a baby really and such is his talent he could become a true utility......

_________________
The problem will be made. for the solution to be sold, to your face before your eyes, tolerance is now the new danger


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 9:48 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 8:57 pm
Posts: 6836
strive for 95 wrote:
i suspect the " where to play gibbs " issue is not one we will face in 2011 i am sensing a luke ball - ross lyon type scenario with gibbs and ratten.


i dont see any relevance, ball only left because he was being left out of the team and lyon couldnt guarantee him a spot for the following year. :S

_________________
Last edited by true_blue3 on Mon Sep 26, 1981 5:07 pm; edited 92 times in total


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 10:06 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 1:20 pm
Posts: 589
true_blue3 wrote:
strive for 95 wrote:
i suspect the " where to play gibbs " issue is not one we will face in 2011 i am sensing a luke ball - ross lyon type scenario with gibbs and ratten.


i dont see any relevance, ball only left because he was being left out of the team and lyon couldnt guarantee him a spot for the following year. :S

Luke Ball left St Kilda because the Pies offered him roughly $200 000 more than the Saints.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 7:51 am 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 8:52 am
Posts: 26
septembergurl wrote:
true_blue3 wrote:
strive for 95 wrote:
i suspect the " where to play gibbs " issue is not one we will face in 2011 i am sensing a luke ball - ross lyon type scenario with gibbs and ratten.


i dont see any relevance, ball only left because he was being left out of the team and lyon couldnt guarantee him a spot for the following year. :S

Luke Ball left St Kilda because the Pies offered him roughly $200 000 more than the Saints.


luke ball left st kilda because he had lost the confidence of the senior coach and was unable to overcome the deficiencies in his game that the coach was requiring him too.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 9:41 am 
Offline
John Nicholls
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 9:35 am
Posts: 9076
Location: Melbourne
deano35 wrote:
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
deano35 wrote:


What do you want him to do go in and then we have 2 blokes who would have stuffed up by not using the extra man as an advantage??????????

Davies GOT there first and took far too long to release the pilll, it also happened to him in the 2nd quarter.
First game still adjusting to tempo.

To blame Gibbs is way off the mark


..so, instead you figure a first gamer, adjusting to the tempo shouldn't recieve support from a more senior player..?.. ..the Gibblet didn't even yell to warn him of the bomber chasing.. ..Davies had picked up the ball, the bummer was running in hard from behind.. ..Gibbs neither yelled a warning, nor moved in to at least try and block/sheperd.. ..it happened in the 1st Q.. ..you'd have thought the bake from the coach and media had ALL players on notice for doing not just the contested work, but also the 1%'ers..


I suggest you watch the game again........
Davies was running towards the ball and the bomber player was running front on to Davies then he picked the ball up and turned towards our goal and was too slow to get rid of it pure and simple........

Gibbs was a metre or 2 to the side and IN FRONT of Davies.......

Gibbs had no chance to block/shephard......

Unless you were somehow within a metre of the contest yourself then i don't know how you can say that Gibbs did not yell a warning to him.
I would not have a clue as to whether he did or didn't say anything so i fail to see how you could make that assumption.


Agree. Davies should have been a little more aware of the traffic coming. He was running directly towards the tackler so should have known he was there. It should have beena quick pick up, handball to Gibbs and shephard. But as you say first gamer so it's no big deal. But it's a bit harsh on Gibbs. And besides Davies should know that if your best ball users are free and in a better position then yourself, you generall give it to them.

_________________
:lol: :-D :) :? :( :x :evil:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 12:15 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
..the way i saw it, Davies had eyes on the ball when he went to pick it up.. ..voice from Gibbs would have made sure he was aware of the incoming tackler.. ..Gibbs waited for the handball, taking it for granted a first gamer, in pretty much their first possession in a crunch, high intensity start to a game would be as composed as a veteran.. ..i like Gibbs, but at times he shows his own inexperience, and i feel he's still a ways off from being captain material.. ..what i find interesting, is that in a piece of play lacking communication.. ..it's the first gamer potted for not being 'aware' and 'reacting too slow'.. ..when in reality Gibbs should have been more aware of the situation.. ..if Gibbs rushed to get the ball instead of hanging back, he would have been alot closer to Davies when Davies gained possession, and would have then been able to block/sheperd.. ..it's the whole 'spectating' problem that our team suffers from..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 1:33 pm 
Offline
Bob Chitty
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 10:02 am
Posts: 885
Location: Where do you think i am??
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..the way i saw it, Davies had eyes on the ball when he went to pick it up.. ..voice from Gibbs would have made sure he was aware of the incoming tackler.. ..Gibbs waited for the handball, taking it for granted a first gamer, in pretty much their first possession in a crunch, high intensity start to a game would be as composed as a veteran.. ..i like Gibbs, but at times he shows his own inexperience, and i feel he's still a ways off from being captain material.. ..what i find interesting, is that in a piece of play lacking communication.. ..it's the first gamer potted for not being 'aware' and 'reacting too slow'.. ..when in reality Gibbs should have been more aware of the situation.. ..if Gibbs rushed to get the ball instead of hanging back, he would have been alot closer to Davies when Davies gained possession, and would have then been able to block/sheperd.. ..it's the whole 'spectating' problem that our team suffers from..


+1

_________________
When you're a Jet you're a Jet all the way!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 1:45 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:50 pm
Posts: 3508
Location: Under Whelmed
-1

_________________
This might sound extreme in the context of alleged sexual assault, drunken violence and a drug trafficking charge...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 1:59 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 35897
Location: Half back flank
0

_________________
#DonTheStash


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 2:57 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:31 am
Posts: 17893
At the ground I thought Gibbs should have warned him the tackle was coming.
On the replay, I think you can see Gibbs yelling something at Davies before he is tackled, so I think Gibbs may have warned him.


+2

_________________
T E A M


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 3:09 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 5:03 pm
Posts: 573
Location: Camberwell
Gibbs got himself into a position where Davies could handball it to him before the tackler got him and Gibbs could then run away and send us forward

_________________
Carlton Premiers '10


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 4:10 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:50 pm
Posts: 3508
Location: Under Whelmed
+1

_________________
This might sound extreme in the context of alleged sexual assault, drunken violence and a drug trafficking charge...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 4:37 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
I dont think Gibbs lack of voice is the sole reason Davies was tackled.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 5:02 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 8:57 pm
Posts: 6836
septembergurl wrote:
true_blue3 wrote:
strive for 95 wrote:
i suspect the " where to play gibbs " issue is not one we will face in 2011 i am sensing a luke ball - ross lyon type scenario with gibbs and ratten.


i dont see any relevance, ball only left because he was being left out of the team and lyon couldnt guarantee him a spot for the following year. :S

Luke Ball left St Kilda because the Pies offered him roughly $200 000 more than the Saints.


do you honestly believe that would have mattered had he been getting a regular game at the saints?

_________________
Last edited by true_blue3 on Mon Sep 26, 1981 5:07 pm; edited 92 times in total


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 8:08 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 1:20 pm
Posts: 589
septembergurl wrote:
true_blue3 wrote:
i dont see any relevance, ball only left because he was being left out of the team and lyon couldnt guarantee him a spot for the following year. :S

Luke Ball left St Kilda because the Pies offered him roughly $200 000 more than the Saints.


Quote:
do you honestly believe that would have mattered had he been getting a regular game at the saints?

Absolutely.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 10, 2010 10:12 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 8:57 pm
Posts: 6836
septembergurl wrote:
septembergurl wrote:
true_blue3 wrote:
i dont see any relevance, ball only left because he was being left out of the team and lyon couldnt guarantee him a spot for the following year. :S

Luke Ball left St Kilda because the Pies offered him roughly $200 000 more than the Saints.


Quote:
do you honestly believe that would have mattered had he been getting a regular game at the saints?

Absolutely.


we'll agree to disagree. but ball strikes me as someone who wouldn't leave his club only for more money unless he was missing out on a regular game and there was some other underlying issue. both problems which gibbs at this stage does not have, not that we know of anyway and a major difference is that gibbs has just signed a new contract whereas ball was out of contract.

_________________
Last edited by true_blue3 on Mon Sep 26, 1981 5:07 pm; edited 92 times in total


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group