Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Jun 21, 2025 12:36 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 48 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 8:27 pm 
Offline
Laurie Kerr

Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 5:58 pm
Posts: 133
Fisher is useless and we all know it.

Thornton is one of the few guys on our list that can actually take an overhead mark, is a good kick for goal and knows how to apply defensive pressure.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 8:33 pm 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher

Joined: Thu Oct 09, 2008 12:48 pm
Posts: 76
:donk: :lol: :lol: :lol: :banghead: :banghead:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 8:39 pm 
Offline
Serge Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 3:41 pm
Posts: 952
Location: way, way, way out the Outback
Teddy Hopkins Son wrote:
Fisher is useless and we all know it.

Thornton is one of the few guys on our list that can actually take an overhead mark, is a good kick for goal and knows how to apply defensive pressure.



Why do people insist that so & so is useless and we all know it ?

I for one dont know if Fisher is useless, I have hardly seen him play this year.

AND

what about those who say Thorton is useless, now we gonna play him in the forward line,,,,,,,,,,,,,,


my head hurts !!!!!!,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:

_________________
BRING BACK PERFORMANCE BASE PAYMENTS !!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 8:56 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 12, 2007 12:15 am
Posts: 3175
Location: The Wild West
Fisher shits me, does anyone else not get the hype either?

Thornton shits me, does anyone else not get the hype either?

:donk:

_________________
"If everyone is moving forward together, then success takes care of itself" - Henry Ford


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 9:03 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:11 am
Posts: 456
Location: Denmark
I agree that Fisher should never play another game for Carlton. His second efforts are non-existent and his lack of ability to use his body and keep his feet in the contest set up many, many, many forrays forward for opposition sides. His one asset is his ability to mark. There are not many people that would put their house on fisher kicking a goal from more than 35 meters out. By being out bodied so easily our crumbing forwards have virtually no chance of roving the loose ball.

Not sure thornton would be a better option. Actually, I am not sure we have any better options.

_________________
"our guest is dressed by hand-me-downs, hair designed by pillow"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 9:09 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17219
Teddy Hopkins Son wrote:
Fisher is useless and we all know it.

Thornton is one of the few guys on our list that can actually take an overhead mark, is a good kick for goal and knows how to apply defensive pressure.


Hi Bret. Do you think Dylan Buckley will get the number 32 jumper next year?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 9:12 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 1:53 am
Posts: 1194
Dr.SHERRIN wrote:
Teddy Hopkins Son wrote:
Fisher is useless and we all know it.

Thornton is one of the few guys on our list that can actually take an overhead mark, is a good kick for goal and knows how to apply defensive pressure.


Hi Bret. Do you think Dylan Buckley will get the number 32 jumper next year?


Doesn't all that depend on the grigg rumours ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 10:18 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:39 pm
Posts: 15848
Dr.SHERRIN wrote:
Teddy Hopkins Son wrote:
Fisher is useless and we all know it.

Thornton is one of the few guys on our list that can actually take an overhead mark, is a good kick for goal and knows how to apply defensive pressure.


Hi Bret. Do you think Dylan Buckley will get the number 32 jumper next year?


Papers stamped? :sly:

_________________
"I had to eat"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 10:28 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 3:20 pm
Posts: 7
Firstly I'm not sure why Brad Fisher is still associated with CFC and why he'd even be given a chance to make a topic as he should only be known as "Could have been, Should have been" and now will probably go on to be a 100 game player.. FOR WHAT? Same goes for Bret Thornton who should have been shipped to Hawthorn when he was worth something. Beats me, it really does.

Brad Fisher, 8th season, 99 games, 127 goals, 2002 National AFL Draft 6th round selection (Carlton) No. 72 overall.

Those are the credentials of a passed player.

Play Thornton forward? This sounds like a bandaid solution to the forward line when we've got the players who just aren't used there?

Personally, Thornton back in defense and Waite PERMANENTLY forward is the obvious choice.

Maybe Walker up forward? Not even based on his last quarter efforts against the pies but his ability to make a lead.

What was Match Committee thinking playing Fisher ahead of Robinson?

Thornton cannot be used as a leading forward, he does not have the ability to do so. I'd actually think Houlihan would provide a better target only JUST.

Conclusion, Brad Fisher brings disgrace to the CFC jumper, harsh? Well it's reality, he clearly showed no promise in his junior days, hence pick 72, and not to mention 8 long years on the list. Just another VFL gun, AFL dud.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 7:33 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10400
Location: Coburg
aredee wrote:
Firstly I'm not sure why Brad Fisher is still associated with CFC and why he'd even be given a chance to make a topic as he should only be known as "Could have been, Should have been" and now will probably go on to be a 100 game player.. FOR WHAT? Same goes for Bret Thornton who should have been shipped to Hawthorn when he was worth something. Beats me, it really does.

Brad Fisher, 8th season, 99 games, 127 goals, 2002 National AFL Draft 6th round selection (Carlton) No. 72 overall.

Those are the credentials of a passed player.

Play Thornton forward? This sounds like a bandaid solution to the forward line when we've got the players who just aren't used there?

Personally, Thornton back in defense and Waite PERMANENTLY forward is the obvious choice.

Maybe Walker up forward? Not even based on his last quarter efforts against the pies but his ability to make a lead.

What was Match Committee thinking playing Fisher ahead of Robinson?


disgrace :grin: :grin: :grin: no he brings himself to the club - how the club chooses to use him is the issue.
Thornton cannot be used as a leading forward, he does not have the ability to do so. I'd actually think Houlihan would provide a better target only JUST.

Conclusion, Brad Fisher brings disgrace to the CFC jumper, harsh? Well it's reality, he clearly showed no promise in his junior days, hence pick 72, and not to mention 8 long years on the list. Just another VFL gun, AFL dud.

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 8:24 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:51 am
Posts: 4919
aredee wrote:
Conclusion, Brad Fisher brings disgrace to the CFC jumper, harsh? Well it's reality, he clearly showed no promise in his junior days, hence pick 72, and not to mention 8 long years on the list. Just another VFL gun, AFL dud.


Conclusion; Opinions are like aresholes, everyone has got one.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 8:41 am 
Offline
Laurie Kerr

Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 9:30 pm
Posts: 120
There were many ordinary efforts and players v Collingwood, and of the bottom 5 players - Fisher wasn't one of them.
(dunno who the bottom 5 really were - far to hard to fit 20 players into it, but I thought that it would add credibility to my post)

He took a couple of grabs (we don't take many in the F50) and did more than others, give Fish his game to 100 and pick him for 101 if he is the best player left on our list for the role that we need.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 8:42 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 10:24 am
Posts: 40291
Location: seaside
GET THORNTON..............!


kindest regards tommi

_________________
that'siti'mnotchangingthistagain......!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 9:16 am 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 8:27 pm
Posts: 184
I hereby apologize for all past indiscretions committed against this site and its members.

Not having access to the ignore function has surely been punishment enough..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 1:20 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 8:15 pm
Posts: 4842
Ignore buttons are only used by d****.

_________________
Just because I'm offended, doesn't mean I'm wrong.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 1:30 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: Perth
woof wrote:
aredee wrote:
Conclusion, Brad Fisher brings disgrace to the CFC jumper, harsh? Well it's reality, he clearly showed no promise in his junior days, hence pick 72, and not to mention 8 long years on the list. Just another VFL gun, AFL dud.


Conclusion; Opinions are like aresholes, everyone has got one.


Except that some stink worse than others.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 1:32 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:52 pm
Posts: 2044
Thornton for Fisher is shifting the deck chairs on the the Titanic. Fisher for Casboult, Jacobs or Ohailpin makes more sense


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 2:33 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 1:29 pm
Posts: 5913
Location: Melbourne
Fish is a good looking rooster who'll probably have at least two sons.

And you want to leave him stranded on 99 games??

Well, don't come bitching to me in 2030 when Max Fisher is AA U18 CHF, and his younger brother is starring at CHB in the U16s.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 2:38 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:35 am
Posts: 20235
Location: 父 父 父 父 父 父
I'd rather Carrie Fisher in the forward line frankly.

_________________
Congratulations CK95


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 03, 2010 3:17 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:50 pm
Posts: 3508
Location: Under Whelmed
Play Fisher one more time, get him a nice banner and then retire him to stud.

With Eloise Southby.

_________________
This might sound extreme in the context of alleged sexual assault, drunken violence and a drug trafficking charge...


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 48 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group