Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Jun 21, 2025 12:00 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 49 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 8:23 am 
Offline
Serge Silvagni

Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 8:04 pm
Posts: 976
Or the AFL can take some ownership and build a 30k seating stadium at Princes Park ...I am sure Bulldogs, Hawthorn, etc would be interested in leasing out some matches.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 8:29 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:57 pm
Posts: 4305
Location: Strathmore
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/etihad-stadium-flawed-collingwood-president-eddie-mcguire/story-e6frf9jf-1225897168197

Quote:
which is about two torpedoes up the road towards North Melbourne.
"You could even, maybe, go down to where the athletics track is at the Olympic Park


Eddie wants to rip it down and build a new one.

_________________
31-3-2015 - R.I.P AFL, corrupted lying pricks
12-5-2015 - Go WADA
18-8-2015 - Suffer Hird* u lying flower
12-1-2016 - CAS goes bang, happy new year.. Drugcheats forever..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 9:58 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 1:53 am
Posts: 1194
Bluey44 wrote:
It was beyond a joke. They need to call a crisis meeting and sort it out somehow.



Sort what out ?

It's not a cup of coffee that needs a little extra milk.
The surface needs to be protected in the off season so it will be ok for the footy, which in turn reduces stadium revenue.

The ACDC concert caused damage that couldn't be fixed for this year.

The AFL and its lawyers would have been in contact with Collo and his lawyers but there are contracts and a lot of $ involved.

It would be naive to think that nothing has been going on behind the scenes until now.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 10:09 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 1:53 am
Posts: 1194
bosman wrote:
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/etihad-stadium-flawed-collingwood-president-eddie-mcguire/story-e6frf9jf-1225897168197

Quote:
which is about two torpedoes up the road towards North Melbourne.
"You could even, maybe, go down to where the athletics track is at the Olympic Park


Eddie wants to rip it down and build a new one.


Ripping it up is really the only way to go if the AFL wants a natural playing surface of good quality.

It's bizarre that they could get the design/orientation sooooo wrong that half the ground doesn't get direct sunlight. You can't get council or VCAT approval for a 2 unit property development without a report datailing shadow lines :lol: :lol: :lol:
This stadium was designed by amateurs in the field of roofed stadiums and due dilligence wasn't done.

If they rebuild it they could probably keep the current basement carpark and perhaps re-use a redevelopment.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 10:14 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
As groth has said, they got the orientation wrong and the surface is never going to be any good when half of it never sees direct sunlight. The time they allowed fans onto the surface following the Carlton hammering by North a few years ago we wandered down for a look and it was like it was composed of grass clippings pressed into damp soil.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 10:21 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10593
I find it interesting that now we finally acknowledge we have an issue, yet 2 weeks ago, even with Judd raising concerns - again, there was nothing wrong with the surface!

I hate the AFL / ET admins with a passion :evil:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 11:04 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:31 am
Posts: 17893
A soil expert rang 3AW lat night and told Gerard and Dwayne that there are stadiums in northern England and Europe that will get little sun in winter but are still in good nick because they use earthworms which enrich the soil.
He suggested it to the stadium a few years ago and they tried it but because they use artificial fertilizers it killed the worms. They can only exist with natural fertilizers. He was convinced that a successful worming treatment would fix the problem.

_________________
T E A M


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 11:44 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
groth & Woj, it's been stated several times over the years that the way it's oriented is the only way possible on that site. I know because I did a bit of a research.

The worm solution sounds promising, but the biggest problem is that the area laid for the turf simply isn't deep enough. If the structure can handle the additional weight with little or no modification, perhaps they should simply graze the whole thing, increase the soil depth with more dirt (good time to add the worms also) and knock off the inner two rows for the seating arrangement, then put in new fencing to suit.

Better welfare for their players, better spectacle for the fans as they don't slip and slide and injure themselves (plus you're a tiny bit closer to the action), and all at the cost of maybe a few mill and 500 seats.

Knowing the AFL/the stadium management however, they probably did the bare minimum in terms of engineering requirements and none of it would be possible without demolishing the whole thing. If so, they learnt nothing from Waverley except not to rely on the state government and location location location.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 12:01 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
jimmae wrote:
groth & Woj, it's been stated several times over the years that the way it's oriented is the only way possible on that site.


I understand that jim, they committed to the wrong place in the first instance.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 1:13 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 6:11 pm
Posts: 15006
Is it just a coincidence that our form slump began when we had our run of games on Etihad?
I think we play better on the bigger grounds such as the MCG and Subi, luckily we only have one more game on Etihad.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 1:17 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 6:11 pm
Posts: 15006
bosman wrote:
Caroline Wilson made a comment on footy classified last night saying along the lines "a Carlton official were rapt that they got away from Eithad surface and played at Subi and now have a few games at the G"

They can always turn Eithad into the second ice skating rink at Docklands.

I was shocked to see the roof fully open at Eithad this morning at 7am, was it open overnight I'm not too sure, but if it was with the cold night and dew, couldn't be good for the ground, was it left open for some air but cold air doesn't help, would just make it more slippery.

I was shocked a couple of weeks ago when watching a foxtel game on a Saturday night. After the game the commentators were giving a summary of the match and in the background the sprinklers were on. We played the Swans the next day, in an early start. It is any wonder the ground is slippery.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 1:58 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 1:53 am
Posts: 1194
jimmae wrote:
groth & Woj, it's been stated several times over the years that the way it's oriented is the only way possible on that site. I know because I did a bit of a research.

The worm solution sounds promising, but the biggest problem is that the area laid for the turf simply isn't deep enough. If the structure can handle the additional weight with little or no modification, perhaps they should simply graze the whole thing, increase the soil depth with more dirt (good time to add the worms also) and knock off the inner two rows for the seating arrangement, then put in new fencing to suit.

Better welfare for their players, better spectacle for the fans as they don't slip and slide and injure themselves (plus you're a tiny bit closer to the action), and all at the cost of maybe a few mill and 500 seats.

Knowing the AFL/the stadium management however, they probably did the bare minimum in terms of engineering requirements and none of it would be possible without demolishing the whole thing. If so, they learnt nothing from Waverley except not to rely on the state government and location location location.


There is meant to be 300mm of soil but how much depth do grass roots need ?

You mention worms but clearly a major issue is the surface getting trashed by other events, and re-laid grass not having enough stress free time to root properly.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 2:07 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 23921
Dunno why more people aren't calling for a new stadium.
wasn't there talk of one quite near docklands a while ago?
I reckon it's a great idea to rip it down,and rebuild it..upgrade it, make it as eco friendly as possible..maybe a ittle bigger...state of the art...etc.
The locattion is fantastic..so if they can't solve it....
6 million dollar man it.

_________________
That’s not a political statement — it’s a harsh reality, and we must act,” she said. “He is a clear and present danger to the things that keep us strong and free. I support impeachment.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 2:50 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 10:24 am
Posts: 40291
Location: seaside
Coldest..............

frostiest.........

dampnestest..........Melbourne winter in over ten years...........!

coe-inky-dinky..........?

me thinks not........!


kindest regards tommi

_________________
that'siti'mnotchangingthistagain......!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 3:58 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:31 am
Posts: 17893
Rumours are that Collo is sourcing cheap grass.

Know anything about that Tommi??

_________________
T E A M


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 4:21 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
get rid of the hacks wrote:
jimmae wrote:
groth & Woj, it's been stated several times over the years that the way it's oriented is the only way possible on that site. I know because I did a bit of a research.

The worm solution sounds promising, but the biggest problem is that the area laid for the turf simply isn't deep enough. If the structure can handle the additional weight with little or no modification, perhaps they should simply graze the whole thing, increase the soil depth with more dirt (good time to add the worms also) and knock off the inner two rows for the seating arrangement, then put in new fencing to suit.

Better welfare for their players, better spectacle for the fans as they don't slip and slide and injure themselves (plus you're a tiny bit closer to the action), and all at the cost of maybe a few mill and 500 seats.

Knowing the AFL/the stadium management however, they probably did the bare minimum in terms of engineering requirements and none of it would be possible without demolishing the whole thing. If so, they learnt nothing from Waverley except not to rely on the state government and location location location.


There is meant to be 300mm of soil but how much depth do grass roots need ?

You mention worms but clearly a major issue is the surface getting trashed by other events, and re-laid grass not having enough stress free time to root properly.

Top soil alone needs 150 mm of depth.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 4:51 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 10:42 am
Posts: 2920
Location: at the Bay Oval....
According to Les Burdett when asked he said it needs underground heating (just about in use at all good Soccer club grounds where it's cold), and the UV lights which they currently use.

The heating would work and encourage good root depth (something I lack)

_________________
Go to http://www.snoutslouts.org/ for a look at the mighty GFC...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 5:45 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 10:24 am
Posts: 40291
Location: seaside
buzzaaaah wrote:
Rumours are that Collo is sourcing cheap grass.

Know anything about that Tommi??






CHEAP.............

good luck with THAT...........!


kindest regards tommi

_________________
that'siti'mnotchangingthistagain......!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 5:50 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
I dont really buy into the goals running the wrong way being a cause of the surface issues....I mean some of it gets sun and those bits are still rooted.

I can't believe in this day and age there isn't an easy solution, something from overseas they're already doing.

The problem is there are too many people doing this

Image

and refusing to consider opinions from people who know what they're talking about.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 6:00 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25231
Location: Bondi Beach
TruBlueBrad wrote:
I dont really buy into the goals running the wrong way being a cause of the surface issues....I mean some of it gets sun and those bits are still rooted.

I can't believe in this day and age there isn't an easy solution, something from overseas they're already doing.

The problem is there are too many people doing this



and refusing to consider opinions from people who know what they're talking about.


I think you're probably right TBB.

The fact the 2 major stakeholders (AFL & Stadiums Aust) are in denial of such a costly exercise.
That's because the shareholders (super funds) expect a good ROI, not requests for more funding.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 49 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 21 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group