Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Jun 21, 2025 12:49 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 104 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 1:45 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 11:51 am
Posts: 4601
Location: lygon street
17th Premiership wrote:
Army: if it is a C6, there are apparently many other variables, including ligament damage and possible damage to spinal chord (which I doubt given he played on for a bit..) BUT, if it is C6, my info is minimum 6 months. Maximum never play again. That's the expert advice. My layman optimistic Carlton supporter sitting on the couch opinion: He'll be right 1st half of next season.



Nothing in it according to quarterbrain, Lloydy and Darcy. Just hit his shoulder and Armfield was fine.... I'd suggest he is probably faking the compressed vertebrae and if anything, should probably be fined for diving. :roll:

This is precisely what the rules hve been alluding to for protecting the man with his head over the ball, and given that Hams ran past the ball to hit Army, plus the resulting injury from his action, he should go for a row of shithouses

_________________
Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 2:04 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:05 pm
Posts: 396
Location: Avondale Heights
Cant take much from the game....we played alright for half, shockin for the other......

We will get slaughtered next week if we go in the same way.

Fwd structure still non existant, Ratts needs to work this out ASAP, Waite cant play 5mins at CHB & 5mins at CHF continuously like he did last night. Hammer isnt a FF, not confident from set shots at all, has hard hands, often gets to the ball & gets his hands on it but low percentage stick.
Unfortunately no fwds in the Ants are puttin their hands up.

Ellard comes in after continuously rackin up possies and creatrin play in the ants to become a tagger.....he done a good job on Priddis but why play people in the Ants in one role then when theyve deserved elevation play them in a different one???

Russell was out of sorts last night, was lost on numerous occassions and got frustrated.

Gibbs & Murph butchered it early but played themselves into it. To be honest our midfield got slaughtered in the first half by a younger more inexperienced opponent.

Cant see us beaten the pies next week

_________________
The climbing has alread began


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 2:11 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 11:51 am
Posts: 4601
Location: lygon street
I reckon at half time last night we actually hit rock bottom. Yes we were playing the bottom side and they seemed to drop away in the second half, but we at least showed some heart which most people around her (myself included) have been screaming for for weeks. Confidence has to start somewhere. Let's just hope that the blues turn up to play from the start of the first half next week, because collingwood won't be as forgiving as the eagles were

_________________
Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 2:13 pm 
Offline
Vale 1953-2020
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 1:23 am
Posts: 11671
grrofunger wrote:
....we are a very average football team....


Well actually, we are ever so slightly ABOVE average, and North Melbourne are JUST below average.

_________________
Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience!!!

After Monday and Tuesday, even the calendar says W T F .........
Visit http://fromthemoshpit.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 2:21 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:57 pm
Posts: 4305
Location: Strathmore
jimmae wrote:
bosman wrote:
Ordinary.... bottom team made us look rank in that first half...

2nd half..... only looked good because wet toast dropped off the pressure...

Wrong.

This was very much our game to lose and that's exactly what we did in the first half. West Coast played the whole game the same until half way through the last quarter. We need to lift, but we should have learn from the last two games.

Could not have been more disappointed with the first half. School-boy errors all round. The second half, the midfield lifts and suddenly the whole team looks better. We live and die by the midfield now; that is the state of our team and we'll have to accept that.

Russell did just OK on Le Cras; conceded way too many stupid frees. Bower ran off Kennedy too much and it only worked for him late. Jamison took too much time executing unless he was running the switch. Still did their job when asked of them.

Murphy & Gibbs lifted their attack of the ball, Carrazzo lifted his work-rate and harassment, as did Joseph. The playing surface played a role, but so did good old G&D, along with the associated rise in confidence that comes with decent play.


absolutely no pressure from west coast in the 2nd half, made the midfield and skills look good when able to run free, hence murphy and judd kicked a few goals in that 3rd qrt.

_________________
31-3-2015 - R.I.P AFL, corrupted lying pricks
12-5-2015 - Go WADA
18-8-2015 - Suffer Hird* u lying flower
12-1-2016 - CAS goes bang, happy new year.. Drugcheats forever..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 2:29 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
Elusive Turtle wrote:
Cant take much from the game....we played alright for half, shockin for the other......

We will get slaughtered next week if we go in the same way.

Fwd structure still non existant, Ratts needs to work this out ASAP, Waite cant play 5mins at CHB & 5mins at CHF continuously like he did last night. Hammer isnt a FF, not confident from set shots at all, has hard hands, often gets to the ball & gets his hands on it but low percentage stick.
Unfortunately no fwds in the Ants are puttin their hands up.

Ellard comes in after continuously rackin up possies and creatrin play in the ants to become a tagger.....he done a good job on Priddis but why play people in the Ants in one role then when theyve deserved elevation play them in a different one???

Russell was out of sorts last night, was lost on numerous occassions and got frustrated.

Gibbs & Murph butchered it early but played themselves into it. To be honest our midfield got slaughtered in the first half by a younger more inexperienced opponent.

Cant see us beaten the pies next week


It's a good question.
The only reason I can think of in this situation is that the tempo and speed of AFL is so so much quicker than VFL that it might have been a role that allowed Ellard to adjust accordingly. It makes sense when you think about it.
Like AJ did last year, Ellard will no doubt be asked to gradually become a bit more offensive if he remains playing at this much higher level.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 2:47 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
bosman wrote:
absolutely no pressure from west coast in the 2nd half, made the midfield and skills look good when able to run free, hence murphy and judd kicked a few goals in that 3rd qrt.

We lifted our work rate, backed our skills and team mates for a change and our confidence rose. West Coast couldn't respond.

Our play in the first and the second halves were chalk and cheese; West Coast's was remarkably similar.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 2:50 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48543
Location: Prison Island
moshe25 wrote:
grrofunger wrote:
....we are a very average football team....


Well actually, we are ever so slightly ABOVE average, and North Melbourne are JUST below average.


:lol:

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 2:50 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 9:47 am
Posts: 522
Location: Melbourne
What last re-enforced was that, for the blues to win, the midfield need to dominate. If any team can match our midfield we will loose - we dont have enough class forward or back to compete with the best teams. This pretty much renders us useless against the top 5 teams.

In the first half when the midfield was down, our backmen were exposed for a lack class. We don't have the cattle to execute Ratts game plan and consequently we make too many mistakes. We desperately need another classy user of the ball in the back half. We are ok in competing to stop teams scoring (when we get support from the midfield) but we have too many players who dont have the requisite skills to transition forward. The number of times the ball was kicked over Walkers head when he tried to become the option going forward fustrated me no end.

Midfield need to dominate to also compensate for a lack of geniune KP forward which means we need significantly more inside 50s compared to more efficient opposition teams.

On the game itself ... wow we have recruited an absolutely beauty in Chris Yarran. His ability to hit targets or kick goals off two/three steps through traffic is poetry in motion.

I did enjoy the second half last night. The urgency after half time was fantastic and was by far the best half I have seen from the blues in 2 months.

_________________
The glass is neither half full nor half empty. Rather the glass is twice as big than required.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 5:12 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:57 pm
Posts: 4305
Location: Strathmore
jimmae wrote:
bosman wrote:
absolutely no pressure from west coast in the 2nd half, made the midfield and skills look good when able to run free, hence murphy and judd kicked a few goals in that 3rd qrt.

We lifted our work rate, backed our skills and team mates for a change and our confidence rose. West Coast couldn't respond.

Our play in the first and the second halves were chalk and cheese; West Coast's was remarkably similar.


If the 1st qrt they tried to run the ball from the backline linking with handball but just turned it over time and time again because of the pressure and skills only got better because of the lack of pressure applied by west coast after half time, their midfield just completely shutdown, hence the 23 odd F50 entries in the 3rd. Our midfield skills and run looks like a million dollars when the pressure is not there.

_________________
31-3-2015 - R.I.P AFL, corrupted lying pricks
12-5-2015 - Go WADA
18-8-2015 - Suffer Hird* u lying flower
12-1-2016 - CAS goes bang, happy new year.. Drugcheats forever..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 7:15 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
They also look great when we work harder for each other, which is what happened. West Coast didn't start jogging on the spot.

Do you at least recognise that we weren't concentrating on our patterns, spreads, assignments and basic handling skills in the first half? You couldn't see the difference when suddenly mindless gang tackles transformed into a concerted team effort to shut down any chain of possession West Coast produced?

That's what broke them down.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 7:59 pm 
Offline
formerly King Kenny
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 8:35 pm
Posts: 20076
jimmae wrote:
They also look great when we work harder for each other, which is what happened. West Coast didn't start jogging on the spot.

Do you at least recognise that we weren't concentrating on our patterns, spreads, assignments and basic handling skills in the first half? You couldn't see the difference when suddenly mindless gang tackles transformed into a concerted team effort to shut down any chain of possession West Coast produced?

That's what broke them down.

:thumbsup:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 9:27 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25231
Location: Bondi Beach
bluegirl72 wrote:
stroby1 wrote:
First time on the forum - thanks for having me.

I agree wholeheartedly with Conundrum. Huge concerns over our defence - Walker and Jamieson particularly poor. Jamieson just doesnt seem to have any INTENT in his game. The really good defenders relish roughing their opponenets up a little, Jamo has absolutely none of that in his game and we need him to BADLY. He's a big lad, kicks it nicely but.....it must be the coaching!

I think the same can be said of the Blues accross the board - we have so little mongrel in the team. Judd, Waite, Russell being the exeptions, when it gets tough, we simply don't have the grunt. I'm resigned to Murphy always being soft, but I'm sure Gibbs could be coached to be harder. We miss Kreuz more than I thought in this area. I really do put this down to coaching.

Sigh, I don't know. Maybe we're better off missing the finals if it means giving Ratts the boot. I just don't see a team knowing what they're meant to be doing out there. Since the success we had with our 'move it on at all costs' type of Kamikaze game, we have been found out as horribly one dimensional. Our 'tempo' game they spoke so much about is just kicking it sideways on the halfback line when the oppo has kicked a few goals against us. We do that until it's turned over.

I'm just a punter and dont pretend to have the answers. But the other thing about Ratten is that he doesn't SEEM intelligent. I know its surface level but all of the Premiership coaches I remember conduct themselves in a way that makes you think - he's a smart dude. I DO NOT get that impression with Ratts. He comes to press conferences with 2 meaningless statistics about the game and tries to sound like Mark Thompson or some kind of sports scientist. Unconvincingly.


Hi stroby..I think Ratts is most likely a very intelligent person..maybe what he says at times is just the way he re-acts under stress.
ie..he strikes me as an introverted nature, so when the lights and camera come on, he probably wants to hide, and covers himself with stats,and other deflective clothing. :grin:
I like him very much, because I know how much he loves Carlton, and I can see that he is entirely earnest.
After watching Mathew Knights and his vindictive 'I know who you are now' alienating speech, and his stupid death stares, I would hate for us to have someone like MK. no integrity...that to me is unintelligent.


Good Post B72.

Didn't even have to think about your post. I like what you had to say as I read it and agree.

There's a few positives for Ratten in that.

So BR 5 vs MK 0

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 9:32 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25231
Location: Bondi Beach
jimmae wrote:
They also look great when we work harder for each other, which is what happened. West Coast didn't start jogging on the spot.

Do you at least recognise that we weren't concentrating on our patterns, spreads, assignments and basic handling skills in the first half? You couldn't see the difference when suddenly mindless gang tackles transformed into a concerted team effort to shut down any chain of possession West Coast produced?

That's what broke them down.


I agree jimmae.

I thought we played well under immense pressure in the 2nd half.
We became fast and slick in the clinches and it was coming off, unlike the 1st half and last half dozen games.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 9:34 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
bosman wrote:
jimmae wrote:
bosman wrote:
absolutely no pressure from west coast in the 2nd half, made the midfield and skills look good when able to run free, hence murphy and judd kicked a few goals in that 3rd qrt.

We lifted our work rate, backed our skills and team mates for a change and our confidence rose. West Coast couldn't respond.

Our play in the first and the second halves were chalk and cheese; West Coast's was remarkably similar.


If the 1st qrt they tried to run the ball from the backline linking with handball but just turned it over time and time again because of the pressure and skills only got better because of the lack of pressure applied by west coast after half time, their midfield just completely shutdown, hence the 23 odd F50 entries in the 3rd. Our midfield skills and run looks like a million dollars when the pressure is not there.


You must be devastated that Judd played well.

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 25, 2010 10:59 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 23921
bondiblue wrote:
bluegirl72 wrote:
stroby1 wrote:
First time on the forum - thanks for having me.

I agree wholeheartedly with Conundrum. Huge concerns over our defence - Walker and Jamieson particularly poor. Jamieson just doesnt seem to have any INTENT in his game. The really good defenders relish roughing their opponenets up a little, Jamo has absolutely none of that in his game and we need him to BADLY. He's a big lad, kicks it nicely but.....it must be the coaching!

I think the same can be said of the Blues accross the board - we have so little mongrel in the team. Judd, Waite, Russell being the exeptions, when it gets tough, we simply don't have the grunt. I'm resigned to Murphy always being soft, but I'm sure Gibbs could be coached to be harder. We miss Kreuz more than I thought in this area. I really do put this down to coaching.

Sigh, I don't know. Maybe we're better off missing the finals if it means giving Ratts the boot. I just don't see a team knowing what they're meant to be doing out there. Since the success we had with our 'move it on at all costs' type of Kamikaze game, we have been found out as horribly one dimensional. Our 'tempo' game they spoke so much about is just kicking it sideways on the halfback line when the oppo has kicked a few goals against us. We do that until it's turned over.

I'm just a punter and dont pretend to have the answers. But the other thing about Ratten is that he doesn't SEEM intelligent. I know its surface level but all of the Premiership coaches I remember conduct themselves in a way that makes you think - he's a smart dude. I DO NOT get that impression with Ratts. He comes to press conferences with 2 meaningless statistics about the game and tries to sound like Mark Thompson or some kind of sports scientist. Unconvincingly.


Hi stroby..I think Ratts is most likely a very intelligent person..maybe what he says at times is just the way he re-acts under stress.
ie..he strikes me as an introverted nature, so when the lights and camera come on, he probably wants to hide, and covers himself with stats,and other deflective clothing. :grin:
I like him very much, because I know how much he loves Carlton, and I can see that he is entirely earnest.
After watching Mathew Knights and his vindictive 'I know who you are now' alienating speech, and his stupid death stares, I would hate for us to have someone like MK. no integrity...that to me is unintelligent.


Good Post B72.

Didn't even have to think about your post. I like what you had to say as I read it and agree.

There's a few positives for Ratten in that.

So BR 5 vs MK 0


:smile: cheers Bondi...hopin' your positive posts will rub off on me this week.I have to be ready to face the G on Sat. in my best party dress.

_________________
That’s not a political statement — it’s a harsh reality, and we must act,” she said. “He is a clear and present danger to the things that keep us strong and free. I support impeachment.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 8:49 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:57 pm
Posts: 4305
Location: Strathmore
cimm1979 wrote:
You must be devastated that Judd played well.


In the first half when the pressure was on or second half when the pressure was off?

_________________
31-3-2015 - R.I.P AFL, corrupted lying pricks
12-5-2015 - Go WADA
18-8-2015 - Suffer Hird* u lying flower
12-1-2016 - CAS goes bang, happy new year.. Drugcheats forever..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 8:57 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:57 pm
Posts: 4305
Location: Strathmore
jimmae wrote:
They also look great when we work harder for each other, which is what happened. West Coast didn't start jogging on the spot.

Do you at least recognise that we weren't concentrating on our patterns, spreads, assignments and basic handling skills in the first half? You couldn't see the difference when suddenly mindless gang tackles transformed into a concerted team effort to shut down any chain of possession West Coast produced?

That's what broke them down.


Wrong.

West coast dropped off their intensity and pressure and let us get to the ball first and hence we won contested footy. West coast are sitting on the bottom of the ladder for a reason, they cannot maintain 4 qrt of pressure footy, when they drop off the opposition run all over them. Nothing to do with us lifting our intensity.

----

Edit, West coast are like us from the past 2 weeks against dogs and swans, no pressure and we looked like the red witches hats out there jogging on the spot.

_________________
31-3-2015 - R.I.P AFL, corrupted lying pricks
12-5-2015 - Go WADA
18-8-2015 - Suffer Hird* u lying flower
12-1-2016 - CAS goes bang, happy new year.. Drugcheats forever..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 9:02 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34527
Location: The Brown Wedge
I agree bos, we were pitiful for most of the day. If Ratten and the MC think they can take that team to the G and compete with the Magpoos, they are seriously ill.

The lack of structure and gameplan was staggering. Our defensive pressure was non-existant and skill level was deplorable. If we play like that for the remaining games, we'll lose almost all games and suffer some major losses.

Thank God for Yarran and Judd.

_________________
end of message


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 26, 2010 9:16 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:57 pm
Posts: 4305
Location: Strathmore
The Duke wrote:
I agree bos, we were pitiful for most of the day. If Ratten and the MC think they can take that team to the G and compete with the Magpoos, they are seriously ill.

The lack of structure and gameplan was staggering. Our defensive pressure was non-existant and skill level was deplorable. If we play like that for the remaining games, we'll lose almost all games and suffer some major losses.

Thank God for Yarran and Judd.


Not looking forward to this weekend either... Mate of mine is an assistant coach at the pies and while he cannot say anything to me before the game, some of the tactics after the game make for an interesting chat. The pressure this weekend would blow the roof off the MCG if it had one. I hope they are ready..

_________________
31-3-2015 - R.I.P AFL, corrupted lying pricks
12-5-2015 - Go WADA
18-8-2015 - Suffer Hird* u lying flower
12-1-2016 - CAS goes bang, happy new year.. Drugcheats forever..


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 104 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MPH78 and 29 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group