Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Jun 21, 2025 1:58 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 222 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 12:41 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21075
Location: Missing Kouta
ColourMan wrote:
get rid of the hacks wrote:
Lol have you just noticed :grin: :grin:

But ppl are calling for Davies to be given a game next week.....we used our 2nd ND pick on him.....ppl at Carlton say he has good penetration with his kicking....coz they are too scared to talk about his accuracy.

Don't believe any stories that there weren't better kicks still up for grabs in the draft.

But when you are briefed to draft "toughnuts" you pass on a player with silky footskills like Roberton for a physically mature Davies.

One is already contributing at senior level while we still trying to teach our guy how to hit a target.

Unfortunately the brief to the recruitment seems to change markedly each year, and unfortunately good footskills doesn't seem to be a constant requirement to get drafted.

The recruiters need to work to 3-5 year plan, not a "this is what we want this year" from the footy dept.


Great post! :clap:

We are very reactive... after last year's GF the MC decided we needed more physical types like Rooke, Mclean etc as if putting your body and having silky skills are mutually exclusive! (Rooke can actually kick) :hitcomputer:

I was keen on Roberton primarily because of his skills and where he would be drafted. He put his body on the line every time it was required against the Demons tonite!! In fact, his skills on his non preferred are better than half of our list on their preferred!!

BTW Fyfe is pretty hard at it and skilful at the same time... pretty impressive considering he's a stick! :hitcomputer:

Both of you are doing a good job of kicking players before they've even debuted and settled into senior football.

See the rhetoric posted about Yarran last year.

Or Kennedy when he was at Carlton.

We want skills, but you also want toughness as well. :screwy:

Trade Gibbs for a hardnut and then trade Davies for a skilled player. :roll:

Lucas has been better than Fyfe, but pinged two hamstrings.

Where's the love for Hughes? :thumbsup: :screwy:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 1:50 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 1:53 am
Posts: 1194
Kouta wrote:
ColourMan wrote:
get rid of the hacks wrote:
Lol have you just noticed :grin: :grin:

But ppl are calling for Davies to be given a game next week.....we used our 2nd ND pick on him.....ppl at Carlton say he has good penetration with his kicking....coz they are too scared to talk about his accuracy.

Don't believe any stories that there weren't better kicks still up for grabs in the draft.

But when you are briefed to draft "toughnuts" you pass on a player with silky footskills like Roberton for a physically mature Davies.

One is already contributing at senior level while we still trying to teach our guy how to hit a target.

Unfortunately the brief to the recruitment seems to change markedly each year, and unfortunately good footskills doesn't seem to be a constant requirement to get drafted.

The recruiters need to work to 3-5 year plan, not a "this is what we want this year" from the footy dept.


Great post! :clap:

We are very reactive... after last year's GF the MC decided we needed more physical types like Rooke, Mclean etc as if putting your body and having silky skills are mutually exclusive! (Rooke can actually kick) :hitcomputer:

I was keen on Roberton primarily because of his skills and where he would be drafted. He put his body on the line every time it was required against the Demons tonite!! In fact, his skills on his non preferred are better than half of our list on their preferred!!

BTW Fyfe is pretty hard at it and skilful at the same time... pretty impressive considering he's a stick! :hitcomputer:

Both of you are doing a good job of kicking players before they've even debuted and settled into senior football.

See the rhetoric posted about Yarran last year.

Or Kennedy when he was at Carlton.

We want skills, but you also want toughness as well. :screwy:

Trade Gibbs for a hardnut and then trade Davies for a skilled player. :roll:

Lucas has been better than Fyfe, but pinged two hamstrings.

Where's the love for Hughes? :thumbsup: :screwy:


Im not digging Davies, or even Hughes.
I'm taking a dig at the brief given to the recruiters.
I rate accurate kicking highly on what I want from our recruits, and not many would deny kicking would be Davies' main weakness.
2006 draft Gibbs was the only good kick we picked in the ND and we had 3 inside top 20 in a super draft. 4 years later Gibbs remains the only good kick, and the only one selected in the ND to make a serious impact so far.
I have been a Yarran fan and was a huge JK fan.
I'm not impressed with our trading though.
You might be happy with Brock for #11, but I'm not. Before his injury I saw him in the practice games. Too slow injured or not, considering his skill set. Swans got R. Shaw for next to nothing
Swans paid less for Mummy than we did for Warnock. We are far from league leaders in getting value in our trades.
In recent years what have we given for Saddington, Hadley,Warnock,Judd, Brock?.....too much for the output they have given us. Bullants strong, Carlton list over rated by supporters here, unbalanced with holes and with a fair bit of dead wood still. The Fev trade was our winner and that only happenned bcoz he imploded.

Where's the love for Hughes ?......he was appointed when we were broke wasn't he?....there is talk about the process for Ratt's appointment, who did we interview for the rec. mgr position out of curiosity ? Did Pratt's philosophy of targeting best not "best available" apply when a broke Carlton offered WH the job?
His ND record outside of 1st rounders is pretty poor with only Bower having total team security and Armfield close.
If you think he is the best recruiter out there you are entitled to your opinion, but I reckon there are blokes out there most clubs would rate a little higher.
Anyway with Army,Hammer,Jamison,Walks,AJ,Grigg, Carrots all in the 22 ATM I reckon we have enough players already that struggle to hit targets consistantly. Then Setant turns it over a bit when he plays also. MK and Sauce not above avge with their kicking either.

Dream on if you think Hughes has compiled us a list with the talent to take us top 4.
Anyway I think he is dilligent, hard working and has done his best so I am grateful for his effort and commitment.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 10:06 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:43 pm
Posts: 1341
Not sure about how others feel, but to me it looked like none of our players wanted to be there. For the most part this team is consistently showing lack of heart, lack of accountability, lack of passion, lack of support for teammates.

One effort where Joseph run about 50 metres to put a block on so Garlett (I think it was him) could continue an attacking run down the wing exemplified the type of support that ALL of our players need to be showing. There maybe one or two other examples of this type of "teamwork" but the simple fact of the matter is, there is not enough of it.

I am also sick and tired of the consistent unaccountability of players. Numerous times our players let there man run off them and create. It seems most try to play some kind of mickey mouse zone, which ineveitably allows a good 15 metres space for their direct opponent.

Tackling is another skill this team struggles with. How many times did we see limp attempts at tackling? Funnily enough if all you have got is a little love tap on someones arm as they are running with the ball, they are going to break your meek attempt at a tackle. Happens far too often. These players need to HTFU plain and simple.

Overall, I found this effort insipid, heartless, spineless, pasionless, hopeless. A devastingly dissapointing effort, which really made my heart sink.

_________________
Cripps is the man


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 10:21 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2010 4:49 pm
Posts: 1170
Ah Jeeze, thrashed in the first quarter again! How long now since we've won a first quarter? Weren't even in front at the first break against the Brisbane Bruins, and if they'd kicked straighter.... A lot of the problem is obviously between the ears and at whose feet do you lay that issue?

I wonder how much longer Judd can stand up, we just lack hard, inside players to help him. We recruit Hadley and Mclean for this reason (shrug) maybe in the end they'll deliver, but right now it's hard to see it happening.

Rats says to the media "well none of you guys even thought we'd make the finals". I suppose what else could he say, but he's fooling no one. He makes the eight and wins a final or he's gone and he knows it.

Before the Geelong game on 774 I heard Sticks say that Brittain (Is that how you spell his name? How quickly we forget) had wanted to get rid of Fev. I can't help thinking that would have been a good move. Players with his attitude can be a cancer in a club, it would have set the agenda for the future, no one is bigger than the club, do the wrong thing and you're out etc. And as was seen prior to the start of the season with the "booze cruise" we are still plagued with lack of discipline off field, which can/will flow on to effect on field performance. Incidentally in the same interview, when asked how Carlton would go against Geelong Sticks said it would be "boys against men" way to go Prez!

But as has been said elsewhere including by me, if you can't get the fundementals right, all the well thought out plans in the world will be for nought. Oh God I'm sick of complaining year after year about our lamentable kicking skills!

Well I feel better now having got that off my chest. I would suspect like most here I was born a Blues supporter and I'll die one, there's nothing that will ever change that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 12:22 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 9:02 pm
Posts: 13435
Location: Melbourne
As far as I can recall none of our players have done anything stupid off-field since the start of the season, so that's an improvement!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 12:23 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 9:37 pm
Posts: 1362
Waite didn't get reported :thumbsup:

_________________
NG
S M C , S F L


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 12:30 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:31 am
Posts: 17893
I don't want to hear "We need to support Judd more" again.
He is as responsible for our malaise as anyone.
He needs to stop playing like someone who thinks he's not getting any support and see himself as 1 of 22 players.

_________________
T E A M


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 12:59 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 5:04 pm
Posts: 1685
buzzaaaah wrote:
I don't want to hear "We need to support Judd more" again.
He is as responsible for our malaise as anyone.
He needs to stop playing like someone who thinks he's not getting any support and see himself as 1 of 22 players.


+1

_________________
STURDYISM!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 1:08 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:06 pm
Posts: 35897
Location: Half back flank
BluesRockMyWorld wrote:
Tackling is another skill this team struggles with. How many times did we see limp attempts at tackling? Funnily enough if all you have got is a little love tap on someones arm as they are running with the ball, they are going to break your meek attempt at a tackle. Happens far too often. These players need to HTFU plain and simple.


I agree (someone started a thread about tackling last night, shame it got merged). Let's face it tackling has been an issue at this club for almost a decade. When we appointed Libba I though we were on our way to fixing it (that went well :lol: ).

We seem to be indecisive when 2 of our players go to the opposition ball carrier. Too often one goes to tackle (misses) while the other hangs back between the opponent & the opponent's target, and time after time they still get the ball away!!!

The good sides like the Hawks know how to swarm the ball carrier & give him no room...it's something we've only shown in patches, & very little the last 6 weeks.

_________________
#DonTheStash


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 1:40 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 5274
Location: Melbourne
CK95 wrote:
BluesRockMyWorld wrote:
Tackling is another skill this team struggles with. How many times did we see limp attempts at tackling? Funnily enough if all you have got is a little love tap on someones arm as they are running with the ball, they are going to break your meek attempt at a tackle. Happens far too often. These players need to HTFU plain and simple.


I agree (someone started a thread about tackling last night, shame it got merged). Let's face it tackling has been an issue at this club for almost a decade. When we appointed Libba I though we were on our way to fixing it (that went well :lol: ).

We seem to be indecisive when 2 of our players go to the opposition ball carrier. Too often one goes to tackle (misses) while the other hangs back between the opponent & the opponent's target, and time after time they still get the ball away!!!

The good sides like the Hawks know how to swarm the ball carrier & give him no room...it's something we've only shown in patches, & very little the last 6 weeks.



Hawks and Saints play that rolling zone, we play the twilight zone.

_________________
"We used to sit around and talk about how bad the game plan was." Anthony Koutoufides


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 1:44 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
CK95 wrote:
BluesRockMyWorld wrote:
Tackling is another skill this team struggles with. How many times did we see limp attempts at tackling? Funnily enough if all you have got is a little love tap on someones arm as they are running with the ball, they are going to break your meek attempt at a tackle. Happens far too often. These players need to HTFU plain and simple.


I agree (someone started a thread about tackling last night, shame it got merged). Let's face it tackling has been an issue at this club for almost a decade. When we appointed Libba I though we were on our way to fixing it (that went well :lol: ).

We seem to be indecisive when 2 of our players go to the opposition ball carrier. Too often one goes to tackle (misses) while the other hangs back between the opponent & the opponent's target, and time after time they still get the ball away!!!

The good sides like the Hawks know how to swarm the ball carrier & give him no room...it's something we've only shown in patches, & very little the last 6 weeks.


Really noticed how the Hawks go about that pressuring by one guy going for the tackle and at the same time another guy reading where the handball might go and pressuring the intended receiver.
It creates a total breakdown of play in which they quickly regain possession. Smart team football.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 3:21 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sun May 27, 2007 1:48 pm
Posts: 1556
Location: Under the Earth`s Sun...now.
BluesRockMyWorld wrote:
Tackling is another skill this team struggles with. How many times did we see limp attempts at tackling? Funnily enough if all you have got is a little love tap on someones arm as they are running with the ball, they are going to break your meek attempt at a tackle. Happens far too often. These players need to HTFU plain and simple.

Overall, I found this effort insipid, heartless, spineless, pasionless, hopeless. A devastingly dissapointing effort, which really made my heart sink.
And keeping their feet. How many times do we go to ground just way too easily in contests? I realise the surface is crapp but i didn`t notice too many Sydney players going down.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 3:26 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:59 am
Posts: 8631
Blues players take the blame

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/ ... fault.aspx

_________________
Cheats never prosper (except in the AFL)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 3:30 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:31 am
Posts: 17893
chubbyruss wrote:



Lucky, for a while there, I thought I was to blame.

_________________
T E A M


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 3:38 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 5274
Location: Melbourne
chubbyruss wrote:


Yeah right they didn't hear the boos. :lol:

Worst part of the match for me was Lucas doing a hammy while trying to take the game on.

2nd worst part: why do we try to kill the clock late in the first quarter every week when the game is over? Why not do it when we're two goals down and have no momentum? That's the idea of tempo footy right?

_________________
"We used to sit around and talk about how bad the game plan was." Anthony Koutoufides


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 3:40 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
Princes Park Whistler wrote:
BluesRockMyWorld wrote:
Tackling is another skill this team struggles with. How many times did we see limp attempts at tackling? Funnily enough if all you have got is a little love tap on someones arm as they are running with the ball, they are going to break your meek attempt at a tackle. Happens far too often. These players need to HTFU plain and simple.

Overall, I found this effort insipid, heartless, spineless, pasionless, hopeless. A devastingly dissapointing effort, which really made my heart sink.
And keeping their feet. How many times do we go to ground just way too easily in contests? I realise the surface is crapp but i didn`t notice too many Sydney players going down.


That's right and the doggies didn't really have an issue last week either.
It's a clear indication of unsuitable footwear which needs to be addressed with NIKE as a matter of urgency.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 3:42 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:12 pm
Posts: 15582
Location: Upper Swan.
fraser murphy wrote:
buzzaaaah wrote:
I don't want to hear "We need to support Judd more" again.
He is as responsible for our malaise as anyone.
He needs to stop playing like someone who thinks he's not getting any support and see himself as 1 of 22 players.


+1



Yeah, its Judds fault. The sooner he starts playing like the other 21 the better off we'll be. Yeah, all that, getting his own contested possessions is a disgrace, who does that guy think he is?, Wayne Johnstone. Boo hoo, so he gets tagged by the best tagger every week for 7 years, and still win club B&F, Brownlows and Norm Smiths.

What we need are more Carrazzo's , guys who can get 47 stats a game without a tag. Now theres a dangerous footballer.

Dear oh dear.


And just for the record, he had 9 tackles. HMMMMMMmm

_________________
I hope Essendon* folds.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 3:44 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 3:49 pm
Posts: 27793
Location: Southbank.
missnaut wrote:
I would love to know the amount of times we kicked it straight to a Swans player.


About the same as we kicked to a Bulldog player last week..........unbelievable for so called Senior players.

_________________
No ones listening till you make a mistake.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 4:00 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
Rexy wrote:
Princes Park Whistler wrote:
BluesRockMyWorld wrote:
Tackling is another skill this team struggles with. How many times did we see limp attempts at tackling? Funnily enough if all you have got is a little love tap on someones arm as they are running with the ball, they are going to break your meek attempt at a tackle. Happens far too often. These players need to HTFU plain and simple.

Overall, I found this effort insipid, heartless, spineless, pasionless, hopeless. A devastingly dissapointing effort, which really made my heart sink.
And keeping their feet. How many times do we go to ground just way too easily in contests? I realise the surface is crapp but i didn`t notice too many Sydney players going down.


That's right and the doggies didn't really have an issue last week either.
It's a clear indication of unsuitable footwear which needs to be addressed with NIKE as a matter of urgency.

While we definitely fell over more, both teams took their share of tumbles. If the club have been trying to use long stops to address the issue of shifting turf, that would go a long way to explaining our form. :lol:

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 4:01 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
cimm1979 wrote:
fraser murphy wrote:
buzzaaaah wrote:
I don't want to hear "We need to support Judd more" again.
He is as responsible for our malaise as anyone.
He needs to stop playing like someone who thinks he's not getting any support and see himself as 1 of 22 players.


+1



Yeah, its Judds fault. The sooner he starts playing like the other 21 the better off we'll be. Yeah, all that, getting his own contested possessions is a disgrace, who does that guy think he is?, Wayne Johnstone. Boo hoo, so he gets tagged by the best tagger every week for 7 years, and still win club B&F, Brownlows and Norm Smiths.

What we need are more Carrazzo's , guys who can get 47 stats a game without a tag. Now theres a dangerous footballer.

Dear oh dear.


And just for the record, he had 9 tackles. HMMMMMMmm


He needed to shepherd for Yarran in the 1st qtr? :donk:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 222 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 31 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group