gerry atric wrote:
CRanium has hit the nail on the cranium. I really like Ratts he is a sincere passionate bloke but I don't think he is consistently able to get the best out of the side. The players seem to be confused and unsure and you wonder how well Ratts communicates what he wants, and how much respect he has from all players when we get efforts like last week / Essendon* / Hawthorn / North. We had a great and better than expected start which has made the last 5 weeks even more disappointing.
The way we went about appointing the coach was ludicrous and while that doesn't mean Ratts wouldn't have got it anyway, why not actually amke a genuine assessment of who is around. Apparently the job was there for Voss if he wanted it. Why! Who would make such a ludicrous decision? And Ratts presumably had a strong say in recruiting Warnock, Johnson and McLean. We got Johnson for nothing but we gave up way too much for the other two.
I also don't think our list will be good enough for a flag. We have had a dream run with draft choices and have done okay but not brilliantly. The #1s were always going to be stars. But are Murphy and Giobbs intesne enough, do they have enough of the Joel Selwoods about them to be great rather than very good? Our drafting when things get hard has been okay. 2004 JR is the only player we got. The next year our 3 in the top 20 were good as you would expect. But 2006 Hammo (who I am a Fan of) seems to have stagnated and you wonder how much confidence the MC have in him when they moved heaven and earth to get Warnock, and Grigg has been a real disappointment and has gone backwards. Be good to get some gold occasionally late in the draft. Apart from Army not sure if that has happened. We have really snagged very little from 20-40 with Bower the only tsandout at this stage. We have done well with the rookies (as have most clubs). At the end we have had our big go at the draft and may not have got enough talent to get us out of 7-10th. We have a very inexperienced coach who has surrounded himself with inexperience. We haven't looked far or hard enough for the most important jobs in the footy dept - The coach and his assistants.
Ratts should see out his contract. I am sick of us extending contracts then breaking them. Then though there is the issue of whether we have the amount of talent. A new better coach would do better, but Bulldogs better or HAwks better?
I like this post.
It's strange, on the one hand, there are the posters who think that there is some indiscriminate gutless virus that has come from nowhere and gone rampant. There is no such thing as cause and effect with this mob. Others seem to think that time will one day suddenly stand still just for Carlton - the "we are not 'there' yet but will be" brigade - why will we? The moral of the story is that something (plus some other things) is/are not quite right and have to change. We can't escape that. Just because we might think our list is good does not mean it will be
good enough, and just because we have come to the realisation that we are a bunch of girlie-men does not mean that we have the means at our disposal to suddenly change that around.
This part's not important because I never was a details type person and are it's words at the moment but we need a change of attitude and to become proactive instead of reactive. I like Ratten too, we was a champion player and seems a decent bloke as far as ex-footballers go but I have my doubts about an introverted coach leading a bunch of introverts. And, at the risk of setting kouta off, there needs to be a change in this 'utilitarian' outlook towards list management. Just admit it folks, it's very 1980s and it has been found wanting. We are not Geelong, and they are more subtle at it than us anyway.