Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Jun 21, 2025 6:35 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 72 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 11:06 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10400
Location: Coburg
MPH78 wrote:
Pro

Lucas......that's about it.

Cons

AJ - his last 2 games have been terrible. Tries to do too much and gets caught. Some might say he shutdown that little runt but overall he's a liability at the moment for mine.

Carrazzo - tonight he went 'old school'. Turnover king.

Jamo - Been off. That handball to JR, WTF was that?

Walker - skill level inferior tonight.

Hadley - didn't do enough. Judd still getting smashed.

Waite - very little impact.

Eddie - needed you earlier.

Gibbs - did you play tonight?

Yarran - see Gibbs.

Garlett - pick the ball up son.

Decision making.

Skills execution.

Game plan.

Kicking for goal.

Work rate.

Heart.

Having a crak for 10 mins and being really disappointed with the loss.

Kreuz :mad: :banghead: :cry:


I reckon you weren't even there.

pros

Hendo
Simmo
Judd ( I mean @#$%&! me dead just @#$%&! hold him all night)
The attempt to tackle - last week we didn't, this week we did but it wasn't enough


Cons

Kruise - anyone hammering carlton just think we had @#$%&! T-bird having to ruck tonight - gee we lost.
Kicking for goal - should have been 4 goals up at 1/4 time
their easy goals - too many easy ones from our soft turnovers.

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 11:08 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 18030
Pro-
Henderson. It was great to see him get value from his hard work.
Bower. Great to see him back.
Lucas. Fumbles too much below his knees still but love his composure.
Jamo. Just does his job.
Judd. Gives everything he's got against enormous odds.
Kreuzers unfortunate injury creates an opportunity for Hammer. Let's hope he capitalises.
Simmo

Cons-
Some of our experienced players. Zero leadership and failing to get that scumbag McPhee off Judd. It was embarrassing to see a 1st year player (Kane Lucas) stick up for Juddy when no one else did.
Carrazzo. Back to chasing the cheap disposal. To see Judd stream out of the middle and then see Carrazzo run 15 metres ahead, call for the handball and proceed to turn it over. Selfish football. He should have called Juddy through and shepherded. Did the same thing several times. I'd hoped the MC had got that out of his game.
Waite. Undisciplined and stupid football. Again.
Gibbs. Playing well below his best. Doesnt work half as hard as the great man.
AJ. Does a great stopping job but once again playing outside his limitations. He needs to just do his job and forget the frills.

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 11:13 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:52 pm
Posts: 2044
Pro- Bower, Simpson, Lucas

Hendersen great effort but right now Setanta is our best bet at full forward. For all his faults he straightens us up

Cons- Freo were average
An average coaching effort would have won that game
You can not play Yarran, Houlihan, Carrazzo in the same side if they don't tackle
There is barely any point playing Garlett, Yarran, Houlihan if the ball isn't delivered deep front and square to create crumbing opportunities
Armfield was terrible. I like what he brings to the side but when he is dishing off handballs instead of run and risk football, you may as well play another inside player
Generally riskless coaching.
Thornton always let's you down when it is crunch time. We were 8 points down when he gave away that 50 meter penalty. He is wonderful player when we are 10 goals down but I guess that was how he learnt his football
Houlihan great year but it was tough tonight and as usual that when he disappears.

Hendersen has to learn not to lose his feet......


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 11:14 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 10:48 pm
Posts: 4450
Location: Perth
I reckon you weren't even there.

Absolutely right. Live in Perth, it's a bit hard to get there.

Lucky for them I'm not there :grin:

_________________
We are on our way back...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 11:17 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:47 am
Posts: 18288
Location: talkingcarlton.com
Michael Jezz wrote:
Armfield was terrible. I like what he brings to the side but when he is dishing off handballs instead of run and risk football, you may as well play another inside player
......


disagree a little on this one...he was very quiet in the 1st half, but showed up in the second. A number of times he actually repelled a Freo forward thrust and got the ball back to our forward line.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R13: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 11:19 pm 
Offline
Trevor Keogh

Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 9:23 pm
Posts: 715
Pro:
Hendo
Walks and Russell off Half Back.
Beating Pavlich
Thornton did himself and the club proud

Cons:
do i even need to say it :(:(:(:(:(

_________________
#23: Lachlan Henderson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R13: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 11:20 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10400
Location: Coburg
lucky why - you think they'd stop and listen to what you have to say?


I agree with BV on Carrots - gee I was pissed off with him tonight

I disagree with BV on Jammo - doesn't bring enough to the table for mine.

for those bagging white 0- funny how the run has dried up since he's gone... He went down the guts

Lucas is a ripper but - I do not think he fumbles below his knees, rather he is aware when contact is coming and just doesn't want it to come - fair enough - new kid - will be a @#$%&! ripper.

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R13: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 11:31 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:35 am
Posts: 2125
PROS
After sitting thru last weeks debacle I couldn't go this week
Hendo, has a way to go, but a really smart hard worker. May not be tall enough for a key forward but will play a lot of games for Carlton
Didn't get Voss as coach

CONS
Judd getting mauled and no-one helping him
Losing Big K
Carazzo is a fave of mine, but his disposal was awful tonight
The last two weeks should have cemented our finals spot but instead we have negated the great wins against Geelong and Saints
Not enough heart, not enough leadership, too much bickering
Waite too laconic up forward, might be time to use him in defence. I would have used him as the 2nd ruckman tonight. He would have got away from Bradley and maybe been able to create something
Too many selfish footballers
Thornton hasn't matured, after almost ten years he still looks to blame his team mates or the umpires when things don't go his way. Why blame Simmo when you get outmarked by Sandilands
Coaching panel doesn't seem to operate well when we are the hunted
Big test for the rest of the season. We have to start beating sides we are expected to beat
We will find plenty of excuses but we were just not good enough when it really counted, had too many passengers, too little cohesion, the scoreboard flattered us
Gibbs was okay but he is our second best player. He needs to start taking games by the scruff of the neck when Judd is down.
Dannyboy wrote:
I disagree with BV on Jammo - doesn't bring enough to the table for mine.

Agree with that. He is a good spoiler, but he needs to start getting more of the ball. Against the Sts he was fantastic and gave us run, but he has gone back into his shell. Needs to back himself more


Last edited by gerry atric on Sat Jun 19, 2010 11:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R13: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 11:35 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10400
Location: Coburg
on Gibbs


I hate to say it but I fear Keogh may be right - he reminded me of Houla tonight (no, not Keogh). So we may get 200 odd games but

I think if he plays his career like tonight I will always be a tad disappointed (not that that means damn thing.

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Last edited by dannyboy on Sun Jun 20, 2010 12:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R13: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 11:49 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:38 pm
Posts: 7640
Pro

Hendo must play every week

Lucas betts garlett
Russell

Judd

Cons
Special K -get well soon Matthew
Lack of scoreboard pressure 0 7 first quarter game almost gone
2.12 at half time game gone
Murphy
Handball happy to player in worse position
Refuse to go down corridor
No leadership except for Judd
Immature unprofessional in the last 2 weeks
Mentally weak
A really poor last month -3 losses where we got poor starts
A bad month from the coaching staff
In danger of missing the finals
Supporters deserve better


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R13: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 11:52 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:44 am
Posts: 3136
Cons - fickle reactionary supporters

Ignoring the result of the game - if someone had said to you earlier in the week that murphy wasnt playing and kreuzer would do a knee in the first quarter against freo/saandilands, would you really be expecting a win?

As soon as kreuzer went down we were gone for the night


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R13: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 11:56 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:13 pm
Posts: 1161
Location: Narre Warren VIC
I think Thornton should play forward permanently. He is no match winner but i noticed everytime he is there, he has a presence. He is composed and a good mark for his Size. He is also kicked multiple Goals everytime he had a cameo there for few minutes...



Cons:


Playing Wide and kicking the ball inside 50's to Wide areas that limit our chances to Score Goals and makes it easier for the defenders to spoil. Its so frustrating to see Carlton's refusal to Kick direct and in front of Goals. I believe this is one major reason why we have fallen off and are struggling to find goals and kick more than 12 goals a game.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R13: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Sat Jun 19, 2010 11:58 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 9:02 pm
Posts: 13435
Location: Melbourne
Dodo27 wrote:
I think Thornton should play forward permanently. He is no match winner but i noticed everytime he is there, he has a presence. He is composed and a good mark for his Size. He is also kicked multiple Goals everytime he had a cameo there for few minutes...




He kicks more accurately for goal than out of defence! I would consider leaving him up there for a quarter to see what happens in these sort of situations.

Yet another con:
Leadership. Been thinking it all season, but we just seem to leave it up to Judd to step up.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R13: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 12:05 am 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 11:15 pm
Posts: 40
Location: carlton
pros...

henderson 'clunked' a couple.
bower makes good decisions and runs staight.
lucus belongs.
simpson tries from start to finish.

cons...

obviously kreuz.
hadley makes bad decisions.
scotland is turning into a crab again.
walker, russel and carrazzo's disposal under pressure is woeful.

observations...

gibbs' decisions and execution, especially under pressure, are required in defence.
waite needs to work with his fellow forwards to create space if he is going to play as our '!st option big man'.
why wasn't carrazzo responsible for barlow?
i'm getting sick of coaches answer questions with statistics... we can look at those too mate! tell us something we don't know.

_________________
If it was a watermelon it would've drowned him!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R13: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 12:09 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 11:55 pm
Posts: 12544
Location: Brisbane
Pros:

Garlett's 2 goals.

And his chasing.

_________________
THEY LIKE TO SEND UP!!!!!!!!

Until each team plays each other the same number of times, the AFL, as a fair dinkum competition, cannot be taken seriously.

He (Mr Swann) said the honour and pride associated with the club's traditional navy blue jumper was priceless.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R13: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 12:18 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 6:11 pm
Posts: 15006
Pros
Henderson tried all night and showed abit
Lucas
I also give a bit wrap to the guy in the crowd who had a go at the umpires, got the message across even though they did pull away the microphone :thumbsup:
Russell

cons
terrible kicking for goal :banghead:
Kreuzer's injury :banghead:
Carrazzo
Armfield's turnovers
Umpires, when did the advantage rule not apply when near goal?
AJ


just a pathetic effort.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R13: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 12:22 am 
Offline
Trevor Keogh
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:07 pm
Posts: 760
Location: Noble Park, Vic
4thchicken wrote:
Cons - fickle reactionary supporters

Ignoring the result of the game - if someone had said to you earlier in the week that murphy wasnt playing and kreuzer would do a knee in the first quarter against freo/saandilands, would you really be expecting a win?

As soon as kreuzer went down we were gone for the night


Agree

_________________
Losing an illusion makes you wiser than finding a truth. ~Ludwig Börne


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R13: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 1:10 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 10:48 pm
Posts: 4450
Location: Perth
uncle john wrote:
4thchicken wrote:
Cons - fickle reactionary supporters

Ignoring the result of the game - if someone had said to you earlier in the week that murphy wasnt playing and kreuzer would do a knee in the first quarter against freo/saandilands, would you really be expecting a win?

As soon as kreuzer went down we were gone for the night


Agree


To me that's a cop out. Doesn't excuse poor decision making, even poorer skill execution, lack of leadership and general footy smarts. I mean FFS, could not one team mate knock McPhee on his arse? It's a small example but that no one even bothered to do that speaks volumes to me.

I'm absolutely livid at our last 2 weeks. If that makes me a 'reactionary supporter' then so be it. I will not put up with those pathetic displays. We should be a helluva lot better than that.

_________________
We are on our way back...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 2:17 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
Slyuss wrote:
Pro: The day gets closer when carlton supporters realise what a useless coach Ratten is 'snip'. 2 good games doesn't make a great coach.

Con: Kreuzer's injury (hopefully Hampson really takes this opportunity to shine)
Where did this Murphy injury come from!?!??! Rumblings are his hips are gone for his career. If the management staff had any brains at all give him surgery NOW because this season is a TOTAL loss.


In summary: Why the hell do we keep supporting this hack you call an AFL coach. The guy was assistant coach of the worst team in the AFL at the time and now he's coaching a team of up and coming stars. Ratten has single handedly butchered the Carlton team for this season. PLEASE!!!! *snip* him off now!


you are a grade a idiot.

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: R13: Pros & Cons
PostPosted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 2:17 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
MPH78 wrote:
uncle john wrote:
4thchicken wrote:
Cons - fickle reactionary supporters

Ignoring the result of the game - if someone had said to you earlier in the week that murphy wasnt playing and kreuzer would do a knee in the first quarter against freo/saandilands, would you really be expecting a win?

As soon as kreuzer went down we were gone for the night


Agree


To me that's a cop out. Doesn't excuse poor decision making, even poorer skill execution, lack of leadership and general footy smarts. I mean FFS, could not one team mate knock McPhee on his arse? It's a small example but that no one even bothered to do that speaks volumes to me.

I'm absolutely livid at our last 2 weeks. If that makes me a 'reactionary supporter' then so be it. I will not put up with those pathetic displays. We should be a helluva lot better than that.


as above.

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 72 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group