dannyboy wrote:
and if we are a 6th to 8th - I'd say 6th - 10th - then should we develop a deeper list and if so then we play kids and kids tire (and I'd say its a mental/physical thing, not something to isolate as one or the other - we are always both) so rotate them - Kruiser is a kid yet some here are questioning him - he's 21 and been rucking now for just over 2 years, he is not a seasoned veteran. Why not rest him and play Hammer or Warnock and rest Jacobs at a later point. It happens anyway so why not control it instead if it controlling us - which is what I think is happening to this club at the moment.
as for the old set - form, pushing for selection, etc - they hark back to days when you developed in the reserves and played later in years or came in as a kid with lots of old bodies around you - and even then in your first couple of years you went back and forth to the reserves - developing, not necessarily dropped on form. We now have much younger lists, I mean compared to Nth's list last night our was about what a year older and about 20 or so more games of experience. We were the old side!
We have 2 years before our core really are veterans, until then we need to develop these kids and part of that (I think) is controlling their loads rather than have their loads control us.
db. all I'm saying is, if the medical staff/mc believe a young player needs a break, I'll defer to their wise judgement. Artificially created rests may be beneficial, I don't think they are....but they can also be a vehicle for flirting with form. If Kruezer had had a blinding final qtr that got us over the line, would we want to rest him next week if his rest period was pre-determined weeks ago