Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun Jun 22, 2025 1:38 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 315 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 16  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 8:58 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 10:58 am
Posts: 2131
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Enright was averaging 30 possessions going into that game and sets up a lot of their attack. To halve that output and kick two goals himself is a great effort and exactly what we'd have been hoping for.

Goddard's ability in the air is the only think that would worry me about Houla playing on him, but thats not going to be any better with Yarran and I don't think Waite is ideal to play that defensive forward role. The other options are Carrazzo and Gibbs.



Fair enough- did he play on Enright the whole match? I would need to look at the tape, but these days players rarely play on one player for the whole match, but presuming he did that is better than beige.


So so far he has had two better than beige games out of six where he has been in the top players for the club.


Stats can be used to weight an argument - but only one match has he got best on ground votes from The Age.


I just have different expectations I guess for a player nearing 200 games.


If you look at raw stats he got 25 possessions vs Brisbane (probably half of which were those fiddly ring a ring a rosie passes) no goals, no goal assists. and something similar vs Richmond - as above.

vs Collingwood - back to beige.


Anyway, the main thing is at least he gets selected each week as he is rarely in the bottom 3-4 players in the team. That at the end of the day is all that matters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 9:29 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
Thank the Holy Lord for Main Event.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 9:32 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
tap in 79, I believe he spent the majority of the match on Enright. I can't recaqll his role in the first three rounds, may have been different to the last three.

Good discussion regardless :thumbsup:

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 9:33 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:31 am
Posts: 17893
Teddy Hopkins wrote:
All this talk about Houlihan being able to take on Gooddard. I mentioned earlier that it might be an idea to bring in Robinson to play on Goddard. On paper he would be a better matchup. He is physical (we all love him for that) so Goddard will be looking backwards and sideways, is a good contested mark, and a proven goalkicker.

Its more a matter of who do you drop for Robinson?



There is nothing Goddard would like more than to play on Robinson.

_________________
T E A M


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 9:39 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
I agree buzz

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 10:26 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:51 am
Posts: 4919
I expect Goddard to go into the middle against Judd as per last year. Clubs have come to the realisation that Judd is going to have an impact on the game no matter what so the best way to combat him is hurt him the other way.

In relation to Houlihan when you play on a key playmaker from the opposition the first thing you need to recognise is that Houlihan needs to sacrifice his own game to minimise the impact of players like Enright, Goodwin and Shaw. If you can't grasp this concept then you really have unrealistic expectations of him.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 10:39 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19467
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
If Gram is fit they would like to get him on Judd and expose him the other way, with Jones going to Murphy...if Gram doesn't get up then you'd think Jones will go to Judd.

Shaw had minimal impact on Sunday thanks to the efforts of Houlihan...not sure what more can be asked of him, he played his role very well.

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 11:17 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 10:58 am
Posts: 2131
woof wrote:
I expect Goddard to go into the middle against Judd as per last year. Clubs have come to the realisation that Judd is going to have an impact on the game no matter what so the best way to combat him is hurt him the other way.

In relation to Houlihan when you play on a key playmaker from the opposition the first thing you need to recognise is that Houlihan needs to sacrifice his own game to minimise the impact of players like Enright, Goodwin and Shaw. If you can't grasp this concept then you really have unrealistic expectations of him.


Guilty as charged then. I expect a player with nearly 200 games to emphatically beat his opponent more often than what he does.

eg - vs Adelaide - Houlihan 21 possessions, 6 marks, 3 goals, 3 goal assists. If he did this regularly instead of having 90% beige games I would be happy.

If you believe that he emphatically beat Heath Shaw then good and well. I guess my expectations are too high for a team (placed outside the top eight) and players who have vast experience within it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 11:22 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
If 200 gamers always emphatically beat their opponents then a team comprised of 200+ gamers would be nigh undefeatable. I sense a flaw in your logic.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 11:41 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 10:58 am
Posts: 2131
Wojee wrote:
If 200 gamers always emphatically beat their opponents then a team comprised of 200+ gamers would be nigh undefeatable. I sense a flaw in your logic.


I never said "always" beat his opponent - I expect a two hundred gamer to be inspirational to his teammates. I expect him to have accrued more than 6 Brownlow votes in his career and I expect him to emphatically beat his opponent more than once in a blue moon.

Richard Dennis - who played 57 games for the Blues - accrued 6 Brownlow votes in his career.

But as everyone says, my expectations are too high. As long as he minimises the effectiveness of an attacking defender- quite frankly what else matters?

Our expectations are to finish 8th-12th..what more could one ask for?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 11:50 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 9:51 am
Posts: 4919
tap in 79 wrote:

If you believe that he emphatically beat Heath Shaw then good and well. I guess my expectations are too high for a team (placed outside the top eight) and players who have vast experience within it.


Do you think Houlihan playing on Shaw may have had an impact on Setanta's game?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 12:49 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2006 11:05 am
Posts: 599
Location: Dandenong
You guys are under estimating what Houla brings to the team. He makes those running half back flankers think about when they can take off up the ground. he is one of our best shots for goal and has kicked goals this season. Im happy with how he is playing. And he must stay in the team providing another option and making those dashing half back flankers pay when he gets a chance to score

_________________
Matty Kruzer you star!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 1:00 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 1:29 pm
Posts: 3844
Location: Canberra Town!
verbs wrote:
Thank the Holy Lord for Main Event.


+1


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 1:09 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:43 pm
Posts: 1341
hollywood43 wrote:
You guys are under estimating what Houla brings to the team. He makes those running half back flankers think about when they can take off up the ground. he is one of our best shots for goal and has kicked goals this season. Im happy with how he is playing. And he must stay in the team providing another option and making those dashing half back flankers pay when he gets a chance to score


QFT

He is also (I believe, but happy to be corrected) no. 3 in the comp for goal assists.

I have said it before and I will say it again IF houla had of been properly developed and played the majority of his games in a HFF role and not in roles which did not suit him (Thanks alot DP.... NOT) then his overall "value" to the team would be far more respected by supporters. Simple fact is that he is playing in his best role finally. The key is to give him that role consistently unlike he has experienced in the past, and maybe some supporters will actually respect and understand just how good a player Hoops really is.

_________________
Cripps is the man


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 1:11 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 7:03 pm
Posts: 4251
Location: Around the Corner
buzzaaaah wrote:
Teddy Hopkins wrote:
All this talk about Houlihan being able to take on Gooddard. I mentioned earlier that it might be an idea to bring in Robinson to play on Goddard. On paper he would be a better matchup. He is physical (we all love him for that) so Goddard will be looking backwards and sideways, is a good contested mark, and a proven goalkicker.

Its more a matter of who do you drop for Robinson?



There is nothing Goddard would like more than to play on Robinson.


Absolutely. Goddard would eat him for breakfast. Hoops is the match up there.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 1:22 pm 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
bit of a mute point really. watch this years games and both sides will zone all over the ground (especially at etihad) and rotate heavily through the bench. at any stage there will be match ups varying dependent upon ball position and the ability to create and extract from stoppages.

the key will be our ability to get our hands on the ball at stoppages and then run and create by breaking the lines and being efficient with our disposal.

as we did with geelong and adelaide we need to keep the pressure up for the entire game. if we do that I believe we can beat anyone. :wink:

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 2:03 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19467
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
Ratten expects Saints to be more attacking

Quote:
Ratten forecast some tinkering with his line-up following the loss to the Magpies with Jarrad Waite, Bret Thornton and Mitch Robinson the leading candidates to earn a recall.

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 2:20 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
Saints average 135 against us in the past 11 games. :oops:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 2:29 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 1:53 am
Posts: 1194
verbs wrote:
Saints average 135 against us in the past 11 games. :oops:


Does anything pre even 2 years ago have any relevance as an indicator to Mon ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 05, 2010 2:32 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 1:53 am
Posts: 1194
MIL wrote:
Teddy Hopkins wrote:
Ditto its an idiotic time but i'll be there. Can't miss an opportunity to see the boys smash the saints.

And I was right behind White's kick for goal. He meant it. It never looked like missing, an absolutely fantastic kick right from the boot. That kick alone should give him another game.

If McLean is fit, give him a final chance. On the smaller ground and against an opponent whose style of play should suit him down to the ground. Its now or never for him, otherwise regain form in the VFL.

I think we should bring in Robinson to run with Goddard. Robbo is a proven goalkicker as well. If White stays, its only Garlett that can be dropped not that I want to.

And Henderson goes for Waite as everyone is saying.


Got mail today from a bloke who is fairly reliable that McLean has been struggling with an injury since the Bummers game. Hope he's right, as it would explain why he was so bad/slow last week. But on the flipside, why the flower did we play him ?

As Hadley and Grigg are not available, that makes this week's changes pretty easy:

IN: Waite, 206, Robbo
OUT: McLean, Sauce, Hendo


If he isn't right to go he should put his hand up.....its all bad form


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 315 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 16  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ByteDanceSpider, Google [Bot] and 40 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group