Huge overs for a renown vote getter that's moved into the midfield and is dominating. He got my 20 each way to win 25k. Let's all get on and see if we can back him into 50's!!

_________________
You want the flame? Give us the marbles!!

Why would you even bother? He is absolutely no chance to win.

_________________
"In fairness it did seem in the early days of the draft teams would just pick a name totally at random out of a hat. I'm pretty sure we picked James Cook at #2 one year. The mediocre forward, not the explorer" - Me, 12/9/2011

Carlton 2012: Lets remind them why they once feared the Dark.

No chance.. You would have been better off on putting $100 on Barlow at the start of the year..

Disagree. Like I said, has polled votes before with lesser form and this year he's moved into the midfield. We all know the Brownlow is a midfielder's medal. He's in best ever form and picking up 30 plus quality touches a game. The last time his stats were this high he polled 10 votes in the Brownlow in an awful side that barely won any games. I see him as a 50-1 longshot. 1000-1 is way over the odds.

_________________
You want the flame? Give us the marbles!!

Do you mean in the same way that Melbourne will remain on the bottom of the ladder, or that Fremantle completely suck and will never improve?

_________________
That’s not a political statement — it’s a harsh reality, and we must act,” she said. “He is a clear and present danger to the things that keep us strong and free. I support impeachment.”

The bookies have him at a thousand-to-one to win, because... well, he's a thousand-to-one to win.

OK, maybe he's really 200-1. But still very little chance. They're offering juicy odds because they want to take your money (and take it they shall).

Punters can say what they like, but it's the bookies who always win.

Plays in a side that has Judd, Gibbs and Murphy. Three guys that based on last year will hog the votes........ limits his chances.

Ahh bet when you line up their form Scotland has been far superior (Judd aside).

_________________
You want the flame? Give us the marbles!!

Flower the Brownlow.

He's in great form right now, thats all i ask for.

They have blown out his odds to entice you to bet.. I reckon u are throwing your money away

There are better 'risks' out there.....Watson, Goddard, Barlow, Hodge ... Silvia for a smokey.
Scooter is in great touch & 150-1 is a better reflection of his current form.

odds of 1000-1 when there's only 650 players in the comp.... overs! lol

for me big sandilands presents the best value. has been backed in to around $26 or so, is playing dominantly, taking more contested marks and kicking goals.

_________________
i AM CARLTON

Great call Diesel....and my hip pocket sure hpoes youre right too....

Got on at 50/1...... giddy up.

_________________
I wore number 25 on the back of my jumper 40 years ago..... yes, pre Marchesani !!

Lot of fun suckers on here hellas
Great bet because your only wasting 20 bucks if he loses

He gets votes
he is in best form in the midfield
Worth a flutter.

Thankyou Keogh.

_________________
You want the flame? Give us the marbles!!

Judd............

100 squid.........@ 17 bucks........three weeks ago...........!

money for jam*............!

KSSSSSSSSS..........GIVEITTHEWHIP...............!


kindest regards tommi













*any idea..........cos i got nada............!

_________________
that'siti'mnotchangingthistagain......!

But Tommi isn't he now out to 26's?

_________________
You want the flame? Give us the marbles!!

You'd have been better off taking that $20 and throwing it out your car window driving past the commission flats on Hoddle St. It's gone, never to be seen again.

Punters... What an astonishing lot. You're insatiable appetite to "win big against the odds" always leads you to think you're a chance; we're the silly ones for not getting on Heath Scotland at 1000-1, not you for putting $20 on him.

I'm no punter, but a better, more realistic, bet would have been $20 on us to win today. At least then you'd be a chance to win. The whole idea is to place money on realistic things, is it not? It's not a contest to see who can piss away the most money on an exotic bet, or a quirky bet on a dark horse.

You'll probably study Scotland's form until the end of the year and whip out the punters staple of "I'd have won if..." when he polls 4 votes. Ahhh, gamblers... They'd only have won if history unfolded in a completely different way, honest. It wasn't a bad bet, it was bad luck I tell ya!

_________________
"In fairness it did seem in the early days of the draft teams would just pick a name totally at random out of a hat. I'm pretty sure we picked James Cook at #2 one year. The mediocre forward, not the explorer" - Me, 12/9/2011

Carlton 2012: Lets remind them why they once feared the Dark.

Yeah right.

_________________
Premierships: 1869, 1871, 1873, 1874, 1875, 1877, 1887, 1906, 1907, 1908, 1914, 1915, 1938, 1945, 1947, 1968, 1970, 1972, 1979, 1981, 1982, 1987, 1995.

"GIBBS."

Mate you are a tripper. No one's asking you to back him. I'm just pointing out that they are super odds for anyone that might like to have a crack. Simple as that. If you don't like it, look the other way.

_________________
You want the flame? Give us the marbles!!

coo, coo.

You sir are a pigeon.

_________________
"In fairness it did seem in the early days of the draft teams would just pick a name totally at random out of a hat. I'm pretty sure we picked James Cook at #2 one year. The mediocre forward, not the explorer" - Me, 12/9/2011

Carlton 2012: Lets remind them why they once feared the Dark.