Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Thu May 15, 2025 11:31 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1009 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 ... 51  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Apr 28, 2010 6:59 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 12:28 pm
Posts: 572
Rexy wrote:
I see the childishness of this debate has affected carltonfc.com

http://www.carltonfc.com.au/news/newsar ... fault.aspx

Quote:
However it is the lack of credit and respect given to the Brett Ratten and the coaching panel that is amazing, but hardly surprising. After all senior coaches are an easy target.


There's been universal praise for Ratts and the MC the last fortnight. How old was the author of this article?

Fair dinkum it's like the childish political debates that go on on this site. Rediculous one-eyed agendas from either side. :roll:

GROW UP!


FFS this has got to be joke !
Keep winning games, smash Essendon* the next time round, that will shut up people.
Articles on back of one good win are a bit rich.
The amateur hour at club continues...

_________________
Scott, things aren't as happy as they used to be down here at the unemployment office. Joblessness is no longer just for Philosophy majors - useful people are starting to feel the pinch.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 28, 2010 7:00 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16823
Location: Melbourne
Juddy&theKruezers wrote:
Again Cazz I think you make some valid points but then what would the difference be between one coach and another if for the most part its the players who are responsible for getting the job done...please try to be diplomatic this time and do not take my question to heart or think i'm being sarcastic....what i am trying to understand is this...if what you are saying is true then it is quite possible Hawthorn nicked a flag with a very average coach...and that so can any side if they have a decent group of players...which in effect means coaches are earning big dollars for what exactly???


I think even the Hawks say that success came earlier than they hoped. But before the success there was the pain. And the supporters at the time didn't like the pain and the game plan and many wanted the Coaches head on a stick.

Likewise Thompson was on the chopping block in the eyes of many supporters before he finally got it right and the players got stuck in. I have read Harley saying about the turn around, that it was the players who did the soul searching and finally got their heads right.

The year the Hawks won it they had a fabulous year in many, many aspects. Roughy, Buddy and Williams were unstoppable. Mitchell, Sewell and Hodge brilliant leaders. Many stood up and they got the results. Their game plan threw most for a loop. Now it doens't.

No doubt good players can make Coaches look good. We have already discussed that Judd makes Ratts look good as does the Roo for his Coach, Ablett for his and Brown for his. Every successful Coach needs his A graders to make his plan work the full 120 minutes. Every success ful Coach needs his players to be able to physically play the game plan for a 120 minutes. That means many years of building up small bodies to take the punishment and to run the miles required at the intensity required.

Coaches are earning big dollars to make it all work over a 5 year period with many ups and downs along the way.

Ratts is no different to anyone else that has come before.

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 28, 2010 7:11 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
kingkerna wrote:
FFS JUST CHANGE THE BLOODY THREAD TITLE

FOR GOD'S SAKE, GET THE BLOODY THING AND KICK IT LONG TO FEVOLA!

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 28, 2010 10:59 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
Rexy wrote:
IMO, the last 2 weeks have shown Ratts is willing to adapt and make strong decisions to set high standards. But the jury still remains out for the time being.


Funny that the jury remains out, after 2 decent wins, yet one loss would seal his fate for some.

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 7:20 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17959
ryan2000 wrote:
Sorry but i have to disagree.

The game style has indeed changed. We go wide a lot less now and we choose to run and carry it out of the backline - the Gibbs move on the weekend was clear indication of this.



Sorry Ryan, you've lost me there. What was the "Gibbs move"?

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:06 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10378
Location: Coburg
you put your left hand in....

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:23 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34429
Location: The Brown Wedge
Don't shut this thread down yet - I just got involved :thumbsup: .

C'sman - I don't get why you're so upset about people getting fired up about footy. Sure they go over the top and ring SEN and start threads like this - but so what? Footy's a passionate game and the passion is all part of the fun.

If you can't handle being an AFL coach and being criticised, go and work in the commentary box at channel 10.

_________________
end of message


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:32 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:12 am
Posts: 10378
Location: Coburg
The Duke wrote:
Don't shut this thread down yet - I just got involved :thumbsup: .

C'sman - I don't get why you're so upset about people getting fired up about footy. Sure they go over the top and ring SEN and start threads like this - but so what? Footy's a passionate game and the passion is all part of the fun.

If you can't handle being an AFL coach and being criticised, go and work in the commentary box at channel 10.



um, so isn't Caz showing his passion? Or is there only negative passion at the coach allowed?

_________________
This type of slight is alien in the more cultured part of the world - Walsh. Its up there with mad dogs, Englishmen and the midday sun!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 8:59 am 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 9:20 am
Posts: 548
Blue Vain wrote:
ryan2000 wrote:
Sorry but i have to disagree.

The game style has indeed changed. We go wide a lot less now and we choose to run and carry it out of the backline - the Gibbs move on the weekend was clear indication of this.



Sorry Ryan, you've lost me there. What was the "Gibbs move"?


That would be the move that has been used many times before and has been used by some just as many times to prove that Ratts can't coach :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 10:05 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16823
Location: Melbourne
The Duke wrote:
Don't shut this thread down yet - I just got involved :thumbsup: .

C'sman - I don't get why you're so upset about people getting fired up about footy. Sure they go over the top and ring SEN and start threads like this - but so what? Footy's a passionate game and the passion is all part of the fun.

If you can't handle being an AFL coach and being criticised, go and work in the commentary box at channel 10.


Very true I guess.

Probably much the same as posting on TC. Sadly many passionate arguments on here are often based on anger and frustration and not on the actual facts of the matter. If those angry and frustrated people don't want to have the facts explained to them well...........................

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 10:10 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 4:22 pm
Posts: 4678
Location: Melbourne
Belisarius wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
ryan2000 wrote:
Sorry but i have to disagree.

The game style has indeed changed. We go wide a lot less now and we choose to run and carry it out of the backline - the Gibbs move on the weekend was clear indication of this.



Sorry Ryan, you've lost me there. What was the "Gibbs move"?


That would be the move that has been used many times before and has been used by some just as many times to prove that Ratts can't coach :lol:



Ratts moving Gibbs across Half Back in the Geelong game.

_________________
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit"
- Aristotle


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 10:47 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 1:14 pm
Posts: 5991
Location: Melbourne
Anyone got an idea of what clauses are in Ratts contract at the end of 2010?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 11:06 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 12:01 pm
Posts: 34429
Location: The Brown Wedge
Ummm....Setanta Clauses?

_________________
end of message


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 11:19 am 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 9:20 am
Posts: 548
ryan2000 wrote:
Belisarius wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
Sorry Ryan, you've lost me there. What was the "Gibbs move"?


That would be the move that has been used many times before and has been used by some just as many times to prove that Ratts can't coach :lol:



Ratts moving Gibbs across Half Back in the Geelong game.


If only Ratts had thought of that before, we might have won more games :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 11:49 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:35 am
Posts: 17959
ryan2000 wrote:
Blue Vain wrote:
ryan2000 wrote:
Sorry but i have to disagree.

The game style has indeed changed. We go wide a lot less now and we choose to run and carry it out of the backline - the Gibbs move on the weekend was clear indication of this.



Sorry Ryan, you've lost me there. What was the "Gibbs move"?



Ratts moving Gibbs across Half Back in the Geelong game.


Gibbs has played half back several times this season.
In fact, several posters were complaining about Gibbs playing half back earlier this season and blaming Ratten for his stupidity! :wink:

_________________
Looking forward to seeing our potential realised.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 1:02 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9099
Location: Nth Fitzroy
my two cents wrote:
Rexy wrote:
I see the childishness of this debate has affected carltonfc.com

http://www.carltonfc.com.au/news/newsar ... fault.aspx

Quote:
However it is the lack of credit and respect given to the Brett Ratten and the coaching panel that is amazing, but hardly surprising. After all senior coaches are an easy target.


There's been universal praise for Ratts and the MC the last fortnight. How old was the author of this article?

Fair dinkum it's like the childish political debates that go on on this site. Rediculous one-eyed agendas from either side. :roll:

GROW UP!


FFS this has got to be joke !
Keep winning games, smash Essendon* the next time round, that will shut up people.
Articles on back of one good win are a bit rich.
The amateur hour at club continues...


I agree.
I can see why the club would be frustrated with those that don’t know how to deal with a loss and go and throw tantrums on radio and on here as they go about throwing their ridiculous theories around about the coaching but I don’t think writing articles like this is the answer.

Would be better off keeping their heads down and bums up letting results do the talking. The sooks will soon catch on .those that say the coach isn't good enough because the club didn’t appoint him in a way they liked will soon pull their heads in and say " always said I would be happy to eat humble pie" to try and make themselves feel better for embarrassing themselves after losses over the years.

I am sure Ratts isnt happy with the article.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 1:13 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
Wasn't Gibbs on one of Chapman or Bartel?

He's been playing deep in midfield all season.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 1:14 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 1:29 pm
Posts: 1566
Location: Melbourne
dannyboy wrote:
um, so isn't Caz showing his passion? Or is there only negative passion at the coach allowed?


Nail on the head.

Some posters harp on about Hughesy and the crew for their recruiting. Some harp on about the coach not being able to coach. When other posters defend Ratts and Co, they get accused of being too precious and protective of the club.

Seems the negative posters don't understand that it works both ways.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 1:21 pm 
Offline
Adrian Gallagher

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:05 pm
Posts: 54
Cazzasman, I was one of those incensed supporters after the Dons game and although I was perplexed as to the game plan I was exasperated as to Rats seemingly total lack of accountability for his part on the loss - go back to his presser they are the facts.

The buck needs to stop at the boss but Rats avoided responsibility and blamed his tools (the players) – and what about that latest ridiculous CarltonFC article after two wins?

Our Presidents appalling handling of the media, the Fev incidents and the booze cruise fracas shows me that maybe ‘lack of responsibility’ is endemic throughout our club.

Our supporters are very excited about the obvious abundant talent within the playing group – I understand you played a significant part in that so take a bow - but I worry that the management group from the top down seems mediocre and may well squander this list before it gets a chance to shine.

It is all very ‘un-Carlton’.

I guess one question I wonder hopefully about is : has/are Leading Teams making any impact?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 29, 2010 1:32 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9099
Location: Nth Fitzroy
LC wrote:
Cazzasman, I was one of those incensed supporters after the Dons game and although I was perplexed as to the game plan I was exasperated as to Rats seemingly total lack of accountability for his part on the loss - go back to his presser they are the facts.

Do you really think anything gets said at an after game press conference that means anything. The coaches just do what it takes to get it done. No coach will sit there and talk about the things they did wrong. Who would expect them to?

Watch the cats game and watch the dons game again. If you cant see the difference between the players efforts then you have lost the plot.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1009 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31 ... 51  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: MPH78, sticksaftersiren87 and 142 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group