Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Fri May 16, 2025 1:57 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 112 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 12:43 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 9:43 pm
Posts: 4745
Wangers wrote:
Cons:
The most pathetic performance by a supposedly talented Carlton team against a B-grade team.
Lack of desire and intensity - even watching it at home.
No counter or defence to their attacking game plan, even after playing them the last 6 times knowing what their game plan is.
Serious ?'s around the football department and many players around their effectiveness after that performance.
We have serious psychological issues when we play this team - ala early 80's.
This team will NOT take us to No.17 - at least half to two thirds of the team won't be there.
Footskills are still a problem - proven teams that are most effective by foot win flags, we don't have the foot skills
Mighty pissed off with Carlton

Pro:
Judd returns :thanks:


Your point about the footskills is spot on. Look at Geelong and Hawthorn....so much skill on every line. They recruited only guys who could kick and got rid of anyone who couldn't. Look at Grigg, Walker, Carrots, Setanta, Anderson, Armfield and the list goes on. Geez we even chose Benjamin a few years back and he had no idea at all !!

Most of the guys we got last year seem to kick ok or at least they're not shockers, so maybe the Penny's dropped for Hughes and co. But it would seem that the 17th remains a long long way off :banghead:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 12:46 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 8:30 pm
Posts: 23911
The Professor wrote:
Can someone explain why betts was put in the middle once ( and he won that clearance)

Can someone explain why walker was used at full back on a much taller gumbleton and the slower Thornton used on the back flank on hocking?

Can someone explain why when the 6 defenders went out before the first bounce they were all pointing around looking confused and not knowing which man was theres?

Can someone explain why we dont try anything different at all throughout the game?

Here are some radical ideas that may not work but will ATLEAST look like we're attempting to do something different:

Russell into the middle: Only guy that is willing to run (bar simmo) So give him a go in the guts!
Walker to full forward: Hes fast, so stick him in the square and let him lead and try catch it!
Gibbs to full forward: Got killed in the middle, smart footballer, so put him in the square and let him lead!!!!!!!

DO SOMETHING DIFFERENT!!!!!!!!!!


Yep...let's just not turn up next time. :thumbsup:
(players and coach inc.)

_________________
That’s not a political statement — it’s a harsh reality, and we must act,” she said. “He is a clear and present danger to the things that keep us strong and free. I support impeachment.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 12:49 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 1:29 pm
Posts: 5913
Location: Melbourne
Pro's:

Lucas looks like he can play at this level.

After watching that garbage, I can now re-adjust my expectations for the year, and will have a lot less angst this season. Don't expect us to go anywhere near 13 wins, so I'm looking ahead to 2011 and beyond. Couldn't give a stuff about win/loss anymore this year... I want to see signs that we have what it takes to go somewhere.


Con's:

Played like headless chooks. What is it: dumb senior players, or substandard coaching? Dunno, but it seriously looked like they didn't know what they were meant to be doing out there. Very worrying.

I expected losses like this in 2010. But jesus guys, did you have to give us one against those pricks? :mad:

I was stupid enough to tip us. Why??? We never beat those black and red #@%&'s


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 1:03 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 6:11 pm
Posts: 14940
Pros

Simpson is a class act.
Lucas was good and looked comfortable at AFL level.
I tipped Essendon*.
Judd's suspension is over

Cons;
where to start.

Persistance at kicking around the boundry (and then kicking it OOF)
No intensity
Fumbles from our better players
Shocking umpiring.
That tool Reimers destroyed us again.
Shocking disposal
Judd is back
Just pathetic, pathetic.
this was Essendon* and they didnt seem to give a stuff


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:54 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:59 am
Posts: 8629
Cons: Mark Wiiliams- Kicks 0.0 v Cats. Kicks 0.0 v Freo.

Then the cauliflower plays against us & kicks 4.0 including one out of his arse from the boundary line that seals the game :banghead:


Reimers had his birtday again

Lovett-Murray also had his birthday again

_________________
Cheats never prosper (except in the AFL)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 3:38 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 9:09 pm
Posts: 6047
For some reason, I'm really troubled by this loss. Really troubled. More than usual after a loss to Essendon*. Perhaps it was because I allowed myself feelings of optimism before the game (a rariety in the last 8 years)? I can't remember feeling more deflated after any loss (and I've seen us lose 3 Grand Finals). I'm still not sure why.

Anyway, I've had over 17 hours to come to grips with it - but I can't shake the feeling that this loss will be significant in some way....

FWIW -

PROS:

Lucas made a few mistakes, but he was involved in the game and looked like he belonged out there. Well done young fella.

Ummmm.....I'm struggling to come up with much else....I suppose losing by only 20 points when we got absolutely flogged is a positive....

And Betts, Yarran & Simmo might have scraped through with pass marks on the night.

CONS:

With Lloyd & Lucas retired, we turned to Williams as the new Ess player we play back into form :mad:

It's hard to really know what else to say.....so I'm just going to list words that come to mind about Carlton last night: insipid, weak, lazy, sloppy, panicky, over-rated & out-coached.

I'm not a Ratten basher, but I think it's appropriate that the blow-torch goes onto him now. That's not to say that the players don't have a lot to answer for....

In fact, EVERYONE connected to the club should be hurting like hell today. I know I am.

_________________
It's never as good as it looks and it's never as bad as it seems.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 3:41 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:28 pm
Posts: 4915
Now that i've settled down a bit....

Pros
- unlikely that Murphy, Gibbs and Kreuzer will all have a downer at the same time anytime soon
- McLean has been very good and we were unlucky to lose him to injury so early in the game
- Judd and Bower to return (hopefully next week for Bower)
- Quality young players like Hampson and Grigg to come back.

_________________
There is no footy god


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:31 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 5:32 pm
Posts: 1392
Location: Hobart
Cazzesman wrote:
Pros
Yarran
Eddie
Hendo (struggled against Mr Gadget but never stopped presenting)

Cons
Insipid, panicked performance by the majority of senior players.

Go your hardest TC.

Regards Cazzesman


anyone know where i can get 30 white feathers ?

_________________
one you knock back is one you never have


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:38 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 5:32 pm
Posts: 1392
Location: Hobart
Rucci15 wrote:
I am a loyal Blues man but i was disgusted last night.

PROS

Simpson - a real leader who has some real guts and desire (wish there was more like him)

Russell - Again seems to be getting better

Yarran - was pretty good, has class and will be very good


CONS

Warnock - needs a week or two in the Ants, Warnock is a better option right now

Walker - got no idea where he should play, go to the ants

Gibbs - needs to stand up in tough games (like simmo) not just get 30 touches against the shit teams. Real concerns here

We are badly missing Bower, because Thornton cant be key position. Plus having Bower frees up Waite

Robinson - really lacks composure


I hate to say it but we are in real strife, we got Crows in Adelaide, Cats, Pies, Saints, Hawks all in the next 6 weeks.

what are the odds on 0-6?

_________________
one you knock back is one you never have


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 9:41 pm 
Offline
John James
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:57 pm
Posts: 636
Location: Hawthorn
Pro:
Yatrix - Wish Carlton got him more involved rather than wasting possessions on Carrots, Walker, Hoops, and so on. Can't wait till he's got Boomer-like fitness, then he can indeed be Boomer-like or dare I say Ablett-like.

Lucas wasted it a bit and ran over the ball too often but even Stevie Wonder can see the potential in this guy.

Cons:

Attitude - Too much running over the ball, kicking out of bounds, letting themselves get beat by B-Graders. Confidence and leadership was just not there.

Backline depth - If we had back up Thornton should be dropped. That's one average game and two awful games. Bugga that, we should drop him anyway, needs to know that free passes are a thing of the past.

EDIT:

Another con is Eddie not getting chaired off for his 100th. Even if he didn't want to after feeling dejected after a loss, you still do it. Someone had to demand he get chaired off and stop feeling sorry for themselves. Lack of leadership once again.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 10:42 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 11:58 pm
Posts: 4058
Location: South Yarra
samblueboy wrote:
Pro:
Yatrix - Wish Carlton got him more involved rather than wasting possessions on Carrots, Walker, Hoops, and so on. Can't wait till he's got Boomer-like fitness, then he can indeed be Boomer-like or dare I say Ablett-like.

Lucas wasted it a bit and ran over the ball too often but even Stevie Wonder can see the potential in this guy.

Cons:

Attitude - Too much running over the ball, kicking out of bounds, letting themselves get beat by B-Graders. Confidence and leadership was just not there.

Backline depth - If we had back up Thornton should be dropped. That's one average game and two awful games. Bugga that, we should drop him anyway, needs to know that free passes are a thing of the past.

EDIT:

Another con is Eddie not getting chaired off for his 100th. Even if he didn't want to after feeling dejected after a loss, you still do it. Someone had to demand he get chaired off and stop feeling sorry for themselves. Lack of leadership once again.


When did players start getting chaired off for their 100th game? It's getting a little silly. 200 /250/300 games should be the benchmark.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 11:51 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 11:58 am
Posts: 315
Pro: Simmo, he tries his guts out as usual and was a winner.


Con:
Walker - I am sick of this fool. We keep him on the list for 3 shoulders, he finally gets over them, mucks up in pre-season and then under performed for 3 weeks. Why could he not be practicing his kicks over the last 3 years. Trade if anyone will take him.

Gibbs - he is worrying, maybe his heart is not in it and he is waiting for the GC.

Everyone else - should be ashamed of themselves for failing once again

Finally, Judd - should be embarrassed that he is not playing and he owes us big.

_________________
I will miss you Kouta - thanks for the memories. ps. Kouta > * for ∞


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 11:52 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:36 am
Posts: 8131
Pros:

I didn't go to the game (or take one of my kids), even though I had the chance. Saw a bit of the Bullants instead.

Cons:

Adelaide lost today, and what was already a hard game just got a whole lot harder! 2nd time in a row having to come up against a decent team that's just had an awful loss. Of course you could say the same about us as well, but we've struggled to beat the Crows for years. What's the odds of Tippett and Porplyzia turning around their poor form against us?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 12:05 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:36 pm
Posts: 2960
Location: Oak Park
Stefchook wrote:
What's the odds of Tippett and Porplyzia turning around their poor form against us?


Odds on - its what we do best! :roll:

_________________
C'mon Blueboys!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 8:26 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 19501
Location: Progreso, Yucatan, MEXICO
My pros:
Yarran showed a bit.
Lucas wanted the footy even though nobody wanted to give it to him when he tried to run and carry in the last.
Judd back next week

Con:
On paper, apart from Judd and Bower, that was the best team Carlton can put on the park according to the MC.

_________________
Let slip the Blues of war (with apologies to William Shakespeare) (and Sir Francis Bacon, just in case)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 8:45 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 9:37 pm
Posts: 1362
PRO

The kids
The hatred of losing to Essendon*

CONS

Except Scotland, the older ones who should have known better
The punch up in the Carlton members area near the end of the match

_________________
NG
S M C , S F L


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 9:34 am 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:50 pm
Posts: 3508
Location: Under Whelmed
I've waited till Monday to post because I was furious with the complete lack of interest/intensity from the whole team.

Pros:
Lucas showed he can play.

Cons:

Simple thing Aussie Rules: get the effing ball!!!
Most of our blokes stood motionless and watched.
Warnock is rubbish.
Why didn't Ratten see fit to give the biggest spray of all time at 3/4 time. Stick all this new age coaching groups, forward coach, ruck coach shite etc etc splits at the breaks up your arse and call them together and give it to them Parkin style.
Ratten is as soft as the players.
This game destroyed my faith in the club actually rebuilding/going anywhere.
I'm done.

_________________
This might sound extreme in the context of alleged sexual assault, drunken violence and a drug trafficking charge...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 10:15 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 8:50 am
Posts: 1223
Probably the worst performance by the blues since we were tanking in 2007.

Pros

Simpson - By far our best player
Yarran - every time he went near it something happened
Betts - reasonable game
Hendo - At least he tries hard

Ok it's hard now......

Only 42 inside 50s so midfield was spanked. To get 25 shots away from those was pretty good, showing that our best players (as mentioned above) all played in the front half.

Cons
Midfield terrible
No run from the back half
Never seen Krueze play worse
No leadership at all
Lack of intensiy
our kicking at goals is not reliable.
Walker - I said it after round one, disposal not up to afl standard.
Field kicking no where near the best teams
We would lead the league in OOBOOF. The crowd in the Southern stand should have been paid danger money
Just appaling

_________________
Go Blues


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 10:19 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:43 pm
Posts: 1331
Furious is an understatement....

* How is it Ratten was not prepared for Essendons only strategy to "own" the corridor. They have done it the last five times and yet he still has no tactic to cover it!

* How can you let a 34 year old grandpa in Fletcher be close to BOG?

* Essendon* put a C Grade team out on the Park and made the Blues look like Auskick Players.

* That game was probably as ordinary game I have seen this team play including the many during the "dark years"

* Given next few games or so I cannot see us being any better than 1 win and 9 losses after ten rounds - thank god we played Richmond first round.......

_________________
Cripps is the man


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 10:25 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 9:37 pm
Posts: 1362
Wild Blue Yonder wrote:
I've waited till Monday to post because I was furious with the complete lack of interest/intensity from the whole team.

Pros:
Lucas showed he can play.

Cons:

Simple thing Aussie Rules: get the effing ball!!!
Most of our blokes stood motionless and watched.
Warnock is rubbish.
Why didn't Ratten see fit to give the biggest spray of all time at 3/4 time. Stick all this new age coaching groups, forward coach, ruck coach shite etc etc splits at the breaks up your arse and call them together and give it to them Parkin style.
Ratten is as soft as the players.
This game destroyed my faith in the club actually rebuilding/going anywhere.
I'm done.



WBY .... this too will pass ...

_________________
NG
S M C , S F L


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 112 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 114 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group