Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Wed May 14, 2025 7:45 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1009 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 51  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 10:51 pm 
Offline
Bert Deacon
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2005 12:28 pm
Posts: 572
ThePsychologist wrote:
And that's another major issue. Look at Voss at Brisbane or Roos at Sydney or Thompson at Geelong or Lyon at St Kilda they ALL appoint the people they want to support them. Even Scott at North and Hardwick at Richmond picked their assistants.

What do we do?? Appoint Teague, Lappin, Riley, Montgomery, Bradley and Harvey. Some real coaching success joining a guy with bugger all coaching background to begin with. Combine that with a very young side and club devoid of success for the last 15 years and we expect to be back into the top 4???

FFS!! :banghead:


Blind Freddy could tell that Ratten needed tactical and experienced help in the coaches box last year. So in the off season, we bring in more inexperience and continue with the muppets (Lappin & Teague), instead of recruiting successful, experienced assistants.

Either Ratten is insecure to bring in more experienced assistants or that these guys do not want to work for him or worse, he does not believe that help is needed in these areas.

_________________
Scott, things aren't as happy as they used to be down here at the unemployment office. Joblessness is no longer just for Philosophy majors - useful people are starting to feel the pinch.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 10:56 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:29 am
Posts: 6418
Location: Casa Da Carlton - The Place to Be
2007 - 4 wins
2008 - 10 wins
2009 - 13 wins and our first final series in years

but yeah, he and the club are showing no improvment what so ever.

ratten out now!!

_________________
Got to love the stare Down by Setanta on Llyod :)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 10:58 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
Kaptain Kouta wrote:
TruBlueBrad wrote:
A bit harsh on McLean? :lol:

He wants to drop Gibbs.

Sums up where he's at right there.


I've got no issue with GIBBS being dropped if he's playing unaccountable footy, or is out of form. For too long unaccountable footballers never paid for it.


Either do I, but he's none of those things and to suggest he should be dropped...and I know thats not what you're doing KK...is ridiculous and shows you have no idea how footy is played these days.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 10:58 pm 
Offline
formerly BlueRob
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 12:45 pm
Posts: 3072
OK ... I don't think Ratten should be sacked or will be sacked. I will admit tho ... patience is wearing thin. I was at the game ... a very porr standard game from both team ... and humiliating to play that badly and let a crap team like Essendon* beat us.

If we do go for a new coach later on ... I reckon you would need to consider Silvani.

_________________
I am as mad as hell and I'm not going to take it any more!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 11:02 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
BlueRob wrote:
OK ... I don't think Ratten should be sacked or will be sacked. I will admit tho ... patience is wearing thin. I was at the game ... a very porr standard game from both team ... and humiliating to play that badly and let a crap team like Essendon* beat us.

If we do go for a new coach later on ... I reckon you would need to consider Silvani.


Or Silvagni.

Well, wouldn't that just continue the boys club people around here hate so much.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 11:29 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
Think of this analogy:

A pilot is piloting a plane to its destination. Part of the way into the flight, severe crosswinds blow the plane off course. Does the pilot turn back to his point of origin, and start again? Or does he correct and make adjustments, and still arrive at his destination?

Now, substitute "Pilot" with "Coach", and "Destination" with "Premiership".

Our coach has a vehicle able to get us to the destination. Turning back and starting again would be a bad move at this stage.

Ratten has to be allowed to make the adjustments without bleating at every move (yes, I know, that bleating will happen here, more shrill each time), and his season can't be judged on one poor show, 3 rounds into 22.

People here really are simpletons, sometimes.

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 11:50 pm 
Offline
formerly Josh Kaplan

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:19 pm
Posts: 2187
KK. The pilot hasn't come close to his required 1000 hours. The plane is in OK shape, but the pilot is completely undecided whether to drop 10,000 feet under the turbulence, or simply stay at 30000 feet and hope it simply 'comes right.'


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 11:59 pm 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 1:14 pm
Posts: 5991
Location: Melbourne
Kaptain Kouta wrote:
Think of this analogy:

A pilot is piloting a plane to its destination. Part of the way into the flight, severe crosswinds blow the plane off course. Does the pilot turn back to his point of origin, and start again? Or does he correct and make adjustments, and still arrive at his destination?

Now, substitute "Pilot" with "Coach", and "Destination" with "Premiership".

Our coach has a vehicle able to get us to the destination. Turning back and starting again would be a bad move at this stage.

Ratten has to be allowed to make the adjustments without bleating at every move (yes, I know, that bleating will happen here, more shrill each time), and his season can't be judged on one poor show, 3 rounds into 22.

People here really are simpletons, sometimes.


Getting a new coach doesn't mean you have to return back to your original starting point. I know Ross Lyon wasn't an instant hit, but St Kilda weren't transported back to 2001 when he came in.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 12:01 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:36 pm
Posts: 2960
Location: Oak Park
I reckon some of you are as deluded as coach and senior staff at the club! :banghead:

Why the @#$%&! do we need to simply put Silvagni in Ratten's place?!!? WTF is our club? A country club for ex-players?

Find the best, get the best! Simple

Sorry but this is the one of sad legacy of Pratt's tenureship. Not following due process with the coaching appointment post-Pagan.

FFS, time to follow best practice not stick with early 1900's philosophy! :hitcomputer:

We are on the precipice of turning into Richmond folks. A mediocre culture satisfied with mid table results, making half-arsed decision sanctified by distant past glories of when we were once great. Quite sickening actually...

_________________
C'mon Blueboys!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 12:04 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 1:14 pm
Posts: 5991
Location: Melbourne
ScottSaunders wrote:
2007 - 4 wins
2008 - 10 wins
2009 - 13 wins and our first final series in years

but yeah, he and the club are showing no improvment what so ever.

ratten out now!!


That is the most simple argument for the pro-Ratts camp.

What constitutes a pass mark this year? 10 wins?

Ratts has taken us from a bottom side, to a mid-range side. Thing is we want to go further, and to do that you need more than what he has shown so far. I don't think hes got it, I could be wrong, but I have seen no improvements from his as a coach from when he first took over to now.

He was average to begin with, taking us out of the Pagan dark ages, but he hasn't improved at all. If he has improved in any area, from say 2008, I would be curious to what it is.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 6:02 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6328
Mrs Caz wrote:
keogh wrote:
What Ratten must do first is make a statement that half arsed efforts by players are not acceptable.
You dont wait till after the Adelaide you do it now and make a statement.
Players have got away with it too long


I thought he did that...


7 definately out..with 4 more possibles?

11 changes...what are you going for...the Guiness Book of Records?




Essendon* made six with 2 first gamers
If you want success you have to lift the bar
As I said after sat night winning isnt as important as changing the mindset of some of our players who are lazy and obviously up themselves.
I wouldnt drop McLean if he wasnt injured by the way


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 7:29 am 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
keogh wrote:
Mrs Caz wrote:
keogh wrote:
What Ratten must do first is make a statement that half arsed efforts by players are not acceptable.
You dont wait till after the Adelaide you do it now and make a statement.
Players have got away with it too long


I thought he did that...


7 definately out..with 4 more possibles?

11 changes...what are you going for...the Guiness Book of Records?



Essendon* made six with 2 first gamers
If you want success you have to lift the bar
As I said after sat night winning isnt as important as changing the mindset of some of our players who are lazy and obviously up themselves.
I wouldnt drop McLean if he wasnt injured by the way


The problem is at the moment I don't think its really the players although several need a kick up the arse.

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 7:35 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:12 pm
Posts: 4426
Kaptain Kouta wrote:
Think of this analogy:

A pilot is piloting a plane to its destination. Part of the way into the flight, severe crosswinds blow the plane off course. Does the pilot turn back to his point of origin, and start again? Or does he correct and make adjustments, and still arrive at his destination?

Now, substitute "Pilot" with "Coach", and "Destination" with "Premiership".

Our coach has a vehicle able to get us to the destination. Turning back and starting again would be a bad move at this stage.

Ratten has to be allowed to make the adjustments without bleating at every move (yes, I know, that bleating will happen here, more shrill each time), and his season can't be judged on one poor show, 3 rounds into 22.

People here really are simpletons, sometimes.


Pilots fly to a flight plan...Ratts does not have one so when things get a little foggy he will end up flying us into a cliff face....

_________________
"Truth, for the tyrants, is the most terrible and cruel of all bindings; it is like an incandescent iron falling across their chests. And it is even more agonizing than hot iron, for that only burns the flesh, while truth burns its way into the soul"     — Lauro Aguirre


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 8:27 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17211
my two cents wrote:
Either Ratten is insecure to bring in more experienced assistants or that these guys do not want to work for him or worse, he does not believe that help is needed in these areas.


You forgot one option. The correct one. Ratten asked for a particular experienced strategist. His request was refused. The experienced strategist had 2 offers on the table. He liked the look of Carlton. He didn't get an offer. He's very happy at his new club.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 9:16 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:32 pm
Posts: 3021
Let's face it - Fevola made Ratten look good

_________________
It's a small world, but I wouldn't want to paint it


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 9:19 am 
Offline
formerly cj69

Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:52 am
Posts: 7893
Virgin Blue wrote:
Let's face it - Fevola made Ratten look good



Don't forget Judd!

IMO the ability of Judd as a player and as an on field leader has masked a lot of the problems we have. Last year we won a lot of games by less than a kick based on Judd's ability to win the ball, make the correct decisions under pressure and bring other players into the game.

The last three weeks has shown how he has made Ratten and the MC look good.

_________________
#NewBlues beginning 25th August 2015


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 9:25 am 
Offline
Bob Chitty

Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 10:10 am
Posts: 881
Location: Netherlands
My biggest concern with Ratten is the way he speaks. Too much 'yeah'; 'we sort of thought'. I hope he doesn't speak to the players like that. The other concern for me was the 3/4 time huddle. Ratten didn't speak to the players when they first came together....in fact he had his back to them. Then he only spoke to them for say a couple of mins....and that involved talking to the bloody whiteboard....nothing beyond that. The occasion required a lot more....disappointing.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 9:27 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16812
Location: Melbourne
ThePsychologist wrote:
Virgin Blue wrote:
Let's face it - Fevola made Ratten look good



Don't forget Judd!

IMO the ability of Judd as a player and as an on field leader has masked a lot of the problems we have. Last year we won a lot of games by less than a kick based on Judd's ability to win the ball, make the correct decisions under pressure and bring other players into the game.

The last three weeks has shown how he has made Ratten and the MC look good.


Every other team is the same. How many times has Ablett or Selwood or J.Brown or Roo or (Insert name here) dragged their team over the line. Good players do that. So what.

In Rd 2 we had the Lions beat but the players not the Coach lost it with poor disposal at crucial times under no pressure and poor conversion. This week was similar. Blame Ratts as much as you like, but blind freddie could see many senior players were well down on workrate, intensity and smarts. That may be Ratts fault but the seniors players have to take pride in the performance. The senior players have to throw themselves in like Robbo at every contest. Going through the motions for $300,000+ per year is not exceptable.

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 9:31 am 
Offline
John Nicholls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 9603
Location: Beijing
Cazzesman wrote:
ThePsychologist wrote:
Virgin Blue wrote:
Let's face it - Fevola made Ratten look good



Don't forget Judd!

IMO the ability of Judd as a player and as an on field leader has masked a lot of the problems we have. Last year we won a lot of games by less than a kick based on Judd's ability to win the ball, make the correct decisions under pressure and bring other players into the game.

The last three weeks has shown how he has made Ratten and the MC look good.


Every other team is the same. How many times has Ablett or Selwood or J.Brown or Roo or (Insert name here) dragged their team over the line. Good players do that. So what.

In Rd 2 we had the Lions beat but the players not the Coach lost it with poor disposal at crucial times under no pressure and poor conversion. This week was similar. Blame Ratts as much as you like, but blind freddie could see many senior players were well down on workrate, intensity and smarts. That may be Ratts fault but the seniors players have to take pride in the performance. The senior players have to throw themselves in like Robbo at every contest. Going through the motions for $300,000+ per year is not exceptable.

Regards Cazzesman


One would hope then that these players are taken to task and held accountable. Their response this coming weekend will be interesting to say the least!

_________________
"our electorate seeks less to be informed and more to be validated." Sad times.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 9:32 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:41 pm
Posts: 63509
Juddy&theKruezers wrote:
Kaptain Kouta wrote:
Think of this analogy:

A pilot is piloting a plane to its destination. Part of the way into the flight, severe crosswinds blow the plane off course. Does the pilot turn back to his point of origin, and start again? Or does he correct and make adjustments, and still arrive at his destination?

Now, substitute "Pilot" with "Coach", and "Destination" with "Premiership".

Our coach has a vehicle able to get us to the destination. Turning back and starting again would be a bad move at this stage.

Ratten has to be allowed to make the adjustments without bleating at every move (yes, I know, that bleating will happen here, more shrill each time), and his season can't be judged on one poor show, 3 rounds into 22.

People here really are simpletons, sometimes.


Pilots fly to a flight plan...Ratts does not have one so when things get a little foggy he will end up flying us into a cliff face....


:clap: :clap:

Touché!

_________________
And so while others miserably pledge themselves to the pursuit of ambition and brief power, I will be stretched out in the shade, singing.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1009 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 51  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 65 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group