Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Thu May 15, 2025 7:31 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 53 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 12:04 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
He's hardly a sacred cow around here.

And yes I can see him on the premiership dias accepting the premiership cup.

Ask yourself this, will you be willing to admit you're wrong when it happens?

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 12:06 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 9:52 pm
Posts: 1497
Location: THE BEACH
Our game plan was to kick it around the boundary, then to kick it to a contest involving D Fletcher. When that didn't work, it was to let the Bummers run free through the middle of the ground.

How could anyone not see that? :screwy:

_________________
I see you watching me watching you.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 12:09 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
The game plan tonight was to fumble at all times, provide very little run through the middle of the ground and when under little pressure kick out of bounds on the full.

How can you people blame Ratts for the crap the players served up tonight? Its the same kind of effort they gave in the second game last year and two very senior players were dropped after that. Hopefully we're considering the same again this year.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 12:09 am 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2009 8:41 pm
Posts: 9
TruBlueBrad wrote:
He's hardly a sacred cow around here.

And yes I can see him on the premiership dias accepting the premiership cup.

Ask yourself this, will you be willing to admit you're wrong when it happens?



Yes I will but it won't happen.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 12:22 am 
Offline
Bert Deacon
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2006 9:20 am
Posts: 504
Location: A Fevola punt from TEAC oval.
TruBlueBrad wrote:
The game plan tonight was to fumble at all times, provide very little run through the middle of the ground and when under little pressure kick out of bounds on the full.

How can you people blame Ratts for the crap the players served up tonight? Its the same kind of effort they gave in the second game last year and two very senior players were dropped after that. Hopefully we're considering the same again this year.


Agree that the players need to share a large share of the responsibility for what happened tonight. They're not robots and you'll even hear Malthouse admit that they're largely out of the coaches control once they walk on the field.

I'm not a Ratts hater, I'll give him time. But he didn't have the best night tonight. I don't think he'd say this was his best game both in the planning/strategy in the lead up or from the coaching box. Let's face it ... we went up against a weaker team and instead of playing to our strength, we played like they were going to beat us, and they did. Several unfortunate knocks were received by key players early on but Ratts did little to try and work around it.

All round disappointing effort by the Blues in all departments.

_________________
"It was like calling your ex girlfriend after a night on the booze, just a really bad decision".


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 12:35 am 
Offline
Garry Crane

Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2005 12:27 am
Posts: 244
Location: Pasture
TruBlueBrad wrote:
in8 wrote:
Being unable to recognise the gameplan doesn't mean we don't have one. It simply means you don't know as much about football as you think you do.


:lol:

Spot on.

I was going to merge this thread into the post match discussion....this post saved it!!



in8 I never claimed to be our coaching solution I am the first to admit the coaches know way more than me but 6 guys with over 30 years of football watching couldnt see any real gameplan what does that say to u?? Also the commentators on the radio agreed
If we do have a game plan its clearly not being executed coorectly.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 12:55 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:55 pm
Posts: 2952
Location: Balwyn
Was kicking out of bounds on the full nine times part of the game plan?

_________________
Bawditawaba


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 5:56 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2007 9:12 pm
Posts: 4426
TruBlueBrad wrote:
He's hardly a sacred cow around here.

And yes I can see him on the premiership dias accepting the premiership cup.

Ask yourself this, will you be willing to admit you're wrong when it happens?


Yes I would and I would do this strolling down Lygon st in the nud.....don't worry.....aint ever gonna happen :lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
"Truth, for the tyrants, is the most terrible and cruel of all bindings; it is like an incandescent iron falling across their chests. And it is even more agonizing than hot iron, for that only burns the flesh, while truth burns its way into the soul"     — Lauro Aguirre


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:01 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 6:23 am
Posts: 1689
Location: Smorgyland Village North Carlton
I'm no Caroline Wilson but:
The Bombers zoned up tight to stop our half backs to stop us switching quickly and thier pace seems to create pressure (even when it's not there) and doubt in our players minds to run with the footy through the zone and link up.
Our decision making, lack of run to help the player in possession, and general disposal by foot and hand, meant they could go russian roulette and just charge forward once the ball turned over (often they just expect our turnover and got one!).
Knights again made good use of ordinary players and a team effort. The luck went with them but we should be getting more honesty in the performance from some of our guys and still should have won.
Geez I miss having anyone who can take a contested mark inside 50 or any mid/HBF who can run through a zone and then actually hit a target.

_________________
Green Shooter


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:08 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
Juddy&theKruezers wrote:
TruBlueBrad wrote:
He's hardly a sacred cow around here.

And yes I can see him on the premiership dias accepting the premiership cup.

Ask yourself this, will you be willing to admit you're wrong when it happens?


Yes I would and I would do this strolling down Lygon st in the nud.....don't worry.....aint ever gonna happen :lol: :lol: :lol:


:roll:

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 9:55 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
TruBlueBrad wrote:
He's hardly a sacred cow around here.

And yes I can see him on the premiership dias accepting the premiership cup.

Ask yourself this, will you be willing to admit you're wrong when it happens?



Maybe for the Boronia Falcons. I have heard it all. Blind, slave like faith.

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 11:23 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
WA Blue wrote:
What game plan can you have with skills like that.
The players are to blame for tonights lose



Exactly, we could've had the faniciest gameplan in the history of the VFL/AFL and it wouldn't have mattered a jot with several players putting it out on the full while under zero pressure, with several players missing very gettable shots on goal, with several players dropping kicks short or handballs at teammates' feet and with several players forgetting that when the opposition have the ball you need to stick to your opponent.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:13 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 5:32 pm
Posts: 1392
Location: Hobart
dadadadada wrote:
Headcutter wrote:
club29 wrote:
Watch the last 10 minutes of the third. CLose your eyes and imagine Henderson kicking straight and eddie betts going back and taking a shot. That was the gameplan. For it to work it had involve a bunch of players caring enough for it to work.
Unfortunately tonight we were lucky to have half a dozen who gave a shit.


You have a point Club 29
BUT
A good coach makes it work or at least has an option when its not working - 2 plays that went according to plan out of 60 inside 50s is evidence that the plan is not a good plan.


Not disagreeing with you but you can plan, plan , plan BUT when you assemble a list that has poor disposal, lack of running instict, poor first point of contact with the ball and lack of footy smarts the best laid plan might not work either.

We have some seriously sloppy footballers.

So who is responsible for our sloppy play - recruiters, coaches, ratten?

But what i really logged on to ask - all forwgoing comments presuppose we have a game plan - have seen no evidence of one for years. Pathetic really

_________________
one you knock back is one you never have


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:19 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2007 5:32 pm
Posts: 1392
Location: Hobart
TruBlueBrad wrote:
The game plan tonight was to fumble at all times, provide very little run through the middle of the ground and when under little pressure kick out of bounds on the full.

How can you people blame Ratts for the crap the players served up tonight? Its the same kind of effort they gave in the second game last year and two very senior players were dropped after that. Hopefully we're considering the same again this year.


Up to six need to go - we will never achieve an attacking game while the likes of thornton and scotland are allowed to fart around with the ball playing "rack-up-stats" kicking it to themselves. and sorry, but as i said elsewhere, walker, houlahan, warnock and armfield should go with them. get us some kids (like Essendon* did last week with six changes) who want to play with passion like robbo and ..... do and play like their bloody lives depended on it rather than the half rat-power efforts of the aforementioned whom the game has passed by.

_________________
one you knock back is one you never have


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 8:32 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17211
I honestly think that the game has changed so much in such a short period that people can't identify game styles (plans) anymore. Where footy used to be very simple, and still is when it's one on one - it's now difficult to ascertain what role certain players are being asked to perform. Despite perceived lack of noticeable gameplan emulating from Visy Park - there is one - it's just not very pretty and has no chance of survival if the players don't execute basic skills properly. Ratts can implement training sessions with his coaches that mirror those at Geelong, drill after drill after drill over summer with players - but unless they perform the very basics of what they are paid to do - no gameplan works.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 9:27 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 10:13 pm
Posts: 1138
Location: Narre Warren VIC
We Are Ranked 16th in the league for playing Wide and going round circles , instead of going direct and through the middle.


it then becomes no surprise that a team like Essendon* who are ranked number 1, will easily kill us on any given day and regardless of who is playing for them.



Ratts needs to get some Coaching himself. He is either naive and clueless or Simply the players are not playing according to his plans.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 9:56 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
Dr.SHERRIN wrote:
I honestly think that the game has changed so much in such a short period that people can't identify game styles (plans) anymore. Where footy used to be very simple, and still is when it's one on one - it's now difficult to ascertain what role certain players are being asked to perform. Despite perceived lack of noticeable gameplan emulating from Visy Park - there is one - it's just not very pretty and has no chance of survival if the players don't execute basic skills properly. Ratts can implement training sessions with his coaches that mirror those at Geelong, drill after drill after drill over summer with players - but unless they perform the very basics of what they are paid to do - no gameplan works.


:thumbsup:

in8 said it well last night. Not his exact words, but just because you can't recognise a game plan it doesn't mean there isn't one in existence.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 10:35 pm 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick

Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 10:48 pm
Posts: 4413
Location: Perth
TruBlueBrad wrote:
Dr.SHERRIN wrote:
I honestly think that the game has changed so much in such a short period that people can't identify game styles (plans) anymore. Where footy used to be very simple, and still is when it's one on one - it's now difficult to ascertain what role certain players are being asked to perform. Despite perceived lack of noticeable gameplan emulating from Visy Park - there is one - it's just not very pretty and has no chance of survival if the players don't execute basic skills properly. Ratts can implement training sessions with his coaches that mirror those at Geelong, drill after drill after drill over summer with players - but unless they perform the very basics of what they are paid to do - no gameplan works.


:thumbsup:

in8 said it well last night. Not his exact words, but just because you can't recognise a game plan it doesn't mean there isn't one in existence.


So Ratten's defence to the Board when we are 1-8 will be along the lines of 'my game plan is awesome, the players just can't execute basic skills'?

The board will probably accept that and the skills coach will get the chop :grin:

_________________
We are on our way back...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 10:37 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:47 am
Posts: 18288
Location: talkingcarlton.com
I guess we'll find out if we end up 1-8... who else is a glass 3/4 empty guy?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 11, 2010 10:40 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19231
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
Dr.SHERRIN wrote:
Have a look at the contested possession. Yet again, we win by a fair margin in this stat. .


The Age stats indicate the scum won this stat 139 to 126.

It indicates that no matter the talent on your list if you aren't prepared to go in harder than the opposition and commit you will struggle. This was against a WEAK team.

There was no excuse for the little desperation shown by the players.

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 53 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 124 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group