Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Jun 21, 2025 6:42 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 61 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Apr 03, 2010 6:49 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
Blue Blood Believer wrote:
jimmae wrote:
Last year he dominated our stats in terms of setting up chains of possession that led to a goal, which would be the definition of a playmaker.

This season we're two weeks in. Wait a little bit.

+1

Also whoever thinks Gibbsy is overrated should have another think about it!

He is a freak!


If a cross section (albeit small sample) of Carlton supporters are expressing concern with a #1 draft pick, and you label him a 'freak', then the comment I made about how he is overrated is even more justified.

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 04, 2010 12:41 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
..a very good player, but i just wish he played with a bit more hustle..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 04, 2010 7:36 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
jimmae wrote:
Plays deep in midfield in a play-making role without truly dropping back into defence. The La Liga fans amongst us would call him a 'volante' or I guess 'steering wheel' is the relevant translation.

Personally I've seen him play up the corridor as much as anyone this pre-season and season, but he can only go where the ball is. Had 10 or 12 touches to half time and was one of our few prime movers getting more kicks away than handballs, which means he was either being released or finding space.

I have zero problems with a barely 21 year-old midfielder pulling the strings in our midfield seemingly unnoticed.


Spot on jim.

I just finished watching the game again and it seemed to me when he's on the ground he starts most centre bounces either in the middle or off the wing and then either follows the ball or he settles between the centreline and half-back.

The role he's playing ahs absolutely zero to do with his contract status and it makes sense to have someone with his poise and ball use floating around the defensive side when he's not following the ball.

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 04, 2010 7:37 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:27 am
Posts: 28528
Location: Free Beer!!
99prelim wrote:
Right now, he is that far behind Kruezer and Murph its not funny....in fact it's worrying. We did not pick him at #1 to be flowering tagger. He is a Nathan Buckley type and is being played as a Matthew Hogg type. He should be the midfield architect, pinpointing passes to the forwards, then slipping into the forward line to kick 1-1.5 goals a game. Right now, he is the most overrated player on our list!


Not sure if you're serious or not with this post. If you are, you're miles off understanding the game Gibbs is playing.

Who was he tagging against the Lions?

_________________
"The ability to speak doesn't make you intelligent." Qui-Gon Jinn 15-05-2005

"there’s more chance of me becoming the full forward for the [Western Bulldogs] than there is of any change in the Labor Party." Julia Gillard 18-05-2010


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 04, 2010 8:19 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:32 pm
Posts: 3021
If he is playing so well then why isn't he in the top 3 every week, this year and that inc pre-season?

Has been handy, but by no means is racking up the Brownlow votes many of us expected he would

Murphy in contrast missed a lot of the pre-season but hit his straps last week and was our Best.

_________________
It's a small world, but I wouldn't want to paint it


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 04, 2010 11:04 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25309
Location: Bondi Beach
I thought Gibbs' game on Thursday against the Lions was another good game from him.

Doesn't have to be a top 3 to earn his stripes.

You have to remember that the coach gives Gibbs his position and instructions for the game not the other way around.

Nice goal from 55m too.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 04, 2010 11:20 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
..seems to definately be playing under coaches instruction.. ..personally i'd rather he played forward of center but can see the neccessity of him playing behind the ball..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:35 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..seems to definately be playing under coaches instruction.. ..personally i'd rather he played forward of center but can see the neccessity of him playing behind the ball..

There's nothing necessary about it. He is a very good long kick of the ball and it's the perfect place to deliver from. The closer you get to the F50, the more they can see where your eyes are looking, what you're facing towards, the more difficult the angle is to kick over any loose players, etc.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 04, 2010 11:37 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
TruBlueBrad wrote:
99prelim wrote:
Right now, he is that far behind Kruezer and Murph its not funny....in fact it's worrying. We did not pick him at #1 to be flowering tagger. He is a Nathan Buckley type and is being played as a Matthew Hogg type. He should be the midfield architect, pinpointing passes to the forwards, then slipping into the forward line to kick 1-1.5 goals a game. Right now, he is the most overrated player on our list!


Not sure if you're serious or not with this post. If you are, you're miles off understanding the game Gibbs is playing.

Who was he tagging against the Lions?


Firstly, I was merely responding to general discussion related to the fact that Ratts often gives him a run with role. Secondly, if he wasn't tagging anyone last Thursday, his impact was even less effective. Take the blinkers off and accept that we are not getting value for money from him. If it's b/c of Ratts instructions, then he needs to take the blame as well. This blind faith that some people show toward him is embarrassing. He may well become the superstar that we hope he will be, but right now he is far off it.

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 04, 2010 11:48 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
99prelim wrote:
TruBlueBrad wrote:
99prelim wrote:
Right now, he is that far behind Kruezer and Murph its not funny....in fact it's worrying. We did not pick him at #1 to be flowering tagger. He is a Nathan Buckley type and is being played as a Matthew Hogg type. He should be the midfield architect, pinpointing passes to the forwards, then slipping into the forward line to kick 1-1.5 goals a game. Right now, he is the most overrated player on our list!


Not sure if you're serious or not with this post. If you are, you're miles off understanding the game Gibbs is playing.

Who was he tagging against the Lions?


Firstly, I was merely responding to general discussion related to the fact that Ratts often gives him a run with role. Secondly, if he wasn't tagging anyone last Thursday, his impact was even less effective. Take the blinkers off and accept that we are not getting value for money from him. If it's b/c of Ratts instructions, then he needs to take the blame as well. This blind faith that some people show toward him is embarrassing. He may well become the superstar that we hope he will be, but right now he is far off it.

Exactly how many touches do you want him to have? 50?

Define what value for money would be...

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 04, 2010 11:50 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
If 28 disposals and a set shot goal from 50 isn't value for money, I gather you trade with Zimbabwean currency?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 05, 2010 12:06 am 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 11:01 pm
Posts: 3561
verbs wrote:
If 28 disposals and a set shot goal from 50 isn't value for money, I gather you trade with Zimbabwean currency?


And Lachie Henderson got 8 disposals and beat Maguire
And Jamo got 5 disposals and probably just shaded Fev
And Kruse got 15 disposals and was a ripper

You obviously overrate stats as much as you overrate Gibbs.

PS. Wish you well with your health issues

_________________
If I want your opinion, I'll give it to you!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 05, 2010 12:10 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:04 am
Posts: 28377
Location: *Currently banned*
Regardless of stats, Kreuzer was incredible.

If Jamo keeps Fev to 3 goals a game then great.

Three goals a week to Henderson will be most welcome.

And thanks.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 05, 2010 2:19 am 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 12:25 am
Posts: 356
For an ineffective tagger he sure gained a lot of ground for us with his kicking. 8 clearances and 8 inside 50's too. Far from his best game but to say we're not getting value for money from him is ridiculous.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 05, 2010 3:39 am 
Offline
Rod McGregor

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 12:40 pm
Posts: 168
Location: India
didn't get value for money in the first half, that's for sure. came out looking like he actually wanted it after half-time, had a couple of great clearances, got into the game, was good.

_________________
Dut, de dut, de daaa!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 05, 2010 9:54 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
singindablues wrote:
didn't get value for money in the first half, that's for sure. came out looking like he actually wanted it after half-time, had a couple of great clearances, got into the game, was good.

Steadily earned possessions and clearances in the first half. Just like Murphy & Simpson, became even more influential when his team mates spread from the contests better and opened up the game a little.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 05, 2010 9:57 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
jimmae wrote:
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
..seems to definately be playing under coaches instruction.. ..personally i'd rather he played forward of center but can see the neccessity of him playing behind the ball..

There's nothing necessary about it. He is a very good long kick of the ball and it's the perfect place to deliver from. The closer you get to the F50, the more they can see where your eyes are looking, what you're facing towards, the more difficult the angle is to kick over any loose players, etc.


..this is why i think his role there is more a neccessity.. ..the exact reason of him being an accurate kick, with poise and good decision making/great vision means he's better for our team gettin' time and space behind the center square.. ..especially with teams zoning.. ..every team needs a couple of players to be capable of this skill/tactic.. ..our best in this role would be Gibbs, so he's required there.. ..i'd rather he was released a little more forward, where his good kicking and smart decisions could spot up our leading forwards, or he can push forward to be a goal scoring threat [like he has so far]..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 05, 2010 10:00 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
I'm talking about where best to position him to hit leads. He's pushing forward when there's an option, but you'll notice he'll spot F50 targets a bit easier from a bit deeper in midfield, for the reasons I've mentioned.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 05, 2010 10:07 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
jimmae wrote:
I'm talking about where best to position him to hit leads. He's pushing forward when there's an option, but you'll notice he'll spot F50 targets a bit easier from a bit deeper in midfield, for the reasons I've mentioned.


..i agree whole heartedly, i just wish we had another player able to do the same thing so he, or Gibbs, could push forward more often.. ..i reckon Gibbs off a HFF would be dangerous.. ..but we can't afford to lose his setting up from further back..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 05, 2010 11:52 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:32 pm
Posts: 33043
Location: Back in reality
Big Kahuna Boot wrote:
jimmae wrote:
I'm talking about where best to position him to hit leads. He's pushing forward when there's an option, but you'll notice he'll spot F50 targets a bit easier from a bit deeper in midfield, for the reasons I've mentioned.


..i agree whole heartedly, i just wish we had another player able to do the same thing so he, or Gibbs, could push forward more often.. ..i reckon Gibbs off a HFF would be dangerous.. ..but we can't afford to lose his setting up from further back..

Gibbs on the flank would be a simple leading target. I'd rather Houlihan or Walker in such a role, as they have the tricks or athleticism to do a bit more damage on the deck. Bryce is exactly where his game is best suited, not just in our team but generally. He'd be a tiny bit more attacking without Murphy in the side.

Best way to think of it is in world game terms. Murphy is the advanced playmaker, Gibbs is in the deeper playmaking role. Together, they dominate the middle of the park when in possession.

_________________
29 different attributes,
And only 7 that you like;
20 ways to see the world,
Or 20 ways to start a fight.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 61 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: bender, Blue4ever, dadadadada, Google Adsense [Bot], keogh, Maxwell Smart and 34 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group