Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Jun 21, 2025 11:34 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 10:17 am 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:17 am
Posts: 35135
Following on from the Pros and Cons thread.

Mitch for PM wrote:
Wojee wrote:

It's been mentioned a couple of times.
I don't think Waite should be suspended for it, a reprimand would even be over the top IMO.


Oh ok, I’ll get back in my box now. But clenched fist + direct contact to the face = gone imo. But hey I was wrong about it not being raised as a con previously so hopefully im wrong again!


Clenched fist to the face yes, but it was incidental contact given that Waite was grappling with another Richmond player and couldn't even see the bloke he whacked.

_________________
"One of my favorite philosophical tenets is that people will agree with you only if they already agree with you. You do not change people's minds." - Frank Zappa


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 10:23 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 1:29 pm
Posts: 1566
Location: Melbourne
My defence would be: "I was throwing my arms about in an effort to break free as I was struggling to breathe from the headlock I was put in"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 10:24 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 6450
Wojee wrote:
Clenched fist to the face yes, but it was incidental contact given that Waite was grappling with another Richmond player and couldn't even see the bloke he whacked.
Exactly. He had absolutely no idea he was there. However, the points system has me worried and this case will be another point where it doesn't work for all offences.

I'm tipping he'll get carry over points because it was high and low impact. Does unintentional lesson the crime? who knows.

_________________
"I will rejoice in their anguish, delight in their failure and revel in our success"

We are Carlton, @#$%&! the rest !!!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 10:24 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:47 am
Posts: 18288
Location: talkingcarlton.com
My defence would be: "But it was a Richmond player".


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 10:29 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 12:22 pm
Posts: 6272
Location: Lurking
I reckon it'll either be:

Conduct - Negligent
Impact - Low
Contact - High
= Level 1
Which for striking means 80 points; thus a reprimand.

Or:

Conduct - Reckless
Impact - Low
Contact - High
= Level 2
Which for striking means 125 points; thus a 1 match suspension.

I don't know if Waite will get any discount for good behaviour.

Taking into account a 25% discount for an early guilty plea, and he'd only get a reprimand.

_________________
I AM DISENFRANCHISED


Last edited by Lurker Blue on Fri Mar 26, 2010 10:31 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 10:30 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 1:29 pm
Posts: 1566
Location: Melbourne
Mrs Caz wrote:
My defence would be: "But it was a Richmond player".


Panel: All charges dismissed!

:lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 10:35 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 6:29 am
Posts: 13689
One of those "who the @#$%&! knows" cases IMHO. Could go either way.

_________________
The measure of a life is a measure of love and respect
So hard to earn, so easily burned
In the fullness of time
A garden to nurture and protect

#DopeThenStash


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 12:47 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Sat Oct 14, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 6450
Does he have any carry over points.

_________________
"I will rejoice in their anguish, delight in their failure and revel in our success"

We are Carlton, @#$%&! the rest !!!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 12:50 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:37 pm
Posts: 19467
Location: afl.virtualsports.com.au
70 IIRC

It'll be Wheel of Fortune

_________________
"You are being watched. The government has a secret system. A machine that spies on you every hour of every day. I know because I built it." - Finch


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 1:03 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 12:22 pm
Posts: 6272
Location: Lurking
Anyone know how many matches Waite has been suspended for over the last three years?

Because that could add a loading of anywhere between 10% - 50%.

_________________
I AM DISENFRANCHISED


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 1:11 pm 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8214
If one gets done for that there is something extremely wrong with the system.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 2:05 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 6:42 pm
Posts: 2833
IIRC Waite got suspended 2 years ago against Freo (the game where Pfiefer kicked the winning goal).

There was no intent to hit and you can see by his reaction (with his hand) that he actually hit someone.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 4:13 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 6:10 pm
Posts: 33618
Location: COMFORTABLY DISSATISFIED
bluechucky wrote:
One of those "who the !@#$%& knows" cases IMHO. Could go either way.

Like every other case that goes before the MRP

_________________
WADA medical director Dr Alan Vernec describes Essendon* FC drug case as biggest scandal in team sport the world of sport has seen. #WC2WB

#GUILTY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 9:06 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 11:05 am
Posts: 1475
Location: Melbourne
Going by Fanfooty he will have a loading of 10% on any penalty but his 73.75 carryover points were from Round 9 2008, and they expire after a year don't they? So he should only have the 10% loading


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 9:23 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 4:04 pm
Posts: 7669
Location: Bendigo
Lurker Blue wrote:
Conduct - Reckless

He would've known that throwing one was likely to connect but, with his head down, it could just as easily been Warnock's chest instead of the Richmond player's chin.

He won't miss a game, but he should have the points carry over.... An excellent result if nothing comes of it.

_________________
"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter" - Winston Churchill.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 9:25 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 11:48 am
Posts: 2891
I think common sense will be applied.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 10:29 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:26 am
Posts: 14731
Location: Comparing orange boners with Hirdy
nightcrawler wrote:
I think common sense will be applied.

:lol:

_________________
Greg Swann wrote:
Essendon* cheated, simple as that


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 10:39 pm 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 2:57 pm
Posts: 373
Location: Albury
nightcrawler wrote:
I think common sense will be applied.


Somehow i get the feeling it wont be applied


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 7:17 am 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 10:32 am
Posts: 1077
Location: east coast
I have that funny feeling too Yarsii . Buggar !!! :banghead:


Here's hoping though .

_________________
Get the facts first.
Then you can distort them at your leisure.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 8:13 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 12:22 pm
Posts: 6272
Location: Lurking
nck wrote:
Going by Fanfooty he will have a loading of 10% on any penalty but his 73.75 carryover points were from Round 9 2008, and they expire after a year don't they? So he should only have the 10% loading

This is correct.

So if negligent 80 points + 10% loading for previous suspension (80+8=88) - 25% for early guilty plea (88-22=66) = reprimand with 66 carryover points.

If reckless 125 points + 10% loading for previous suspension (125+12.5=137.5) - 25% for early guilty plea (137.5-34.375=103.125) = 1 match suspension with 3.125 carryover points.

_________________
I AM DISENFRANCHISED


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: bender, ByteDanceSpider, Google [Bot], grrofunger, Humpers, keogh, Majestic-12 [Bot] and 65 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group