Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Jun 21, 2025 11:07 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 105 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 1:09 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6417
Cazzesman wrote:
keogh wrote:
Guys on the radio days before last years draft were saying this kid would be picked up somewhere yet he wasnt

But not recruiting Casboult to our list until the rookie draft was dumb because we lack big guys in the key posts and that we turfed out the best power forward in the comp


You're have different views to the real world don't you.

Were the 'guys' on the radio AFL Recruiters or know-it-alls like Kevin Bartlett and Gerard Healey who never saw him play. Next you will be telling us he was highly rated and went early in the phantom draft on BigFooty.

Have you ever, ever, ever heard of the Nominated Rookie system. If Casboult shows enough he can play. We turfed out the best power forward because he was a tool. Surely you can relate to that.

Regards Cazzesman





You know Cazzeman your an interseting mix arnt you
Very conserative and touchy about the going ons at CFC

yet you like Porcupine Tree

So Whats your definition of the views of the
'real world'
Because I know I am in it and most people that know me reckon I am a normal bloke
accept Kouta who likes goats too much and is going to flog my plasma.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 1:23 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6417
I am happy we got a kid who has obvious potential and is a decent size who can take a pack mark.

Consider these facts
Not only did we get rid of the tool
We delisted Cloke who was a handy backup as a marking forward
Edwards and Hartlett didnt work
Who is going to be our marking options in attack in 2010 and we need a big body in defence
Not kreuzer
kreuz needs to play to his strengths. His tank is huge he is best around the ground. Kreuzer hasnt the explosive power to be a key forward
Hampson will be a tap ruckman at best.
Simply doesnt have the footy brain to play in attack and is a shit kick.
Henderson may be good
O'Hailpin is handy at best

Waites best position is as a zone off defender. He isnt a hard into packs footballer.

So given all that who is going to be our marking targets in attack for the future

So given all that with our last pick in the draft I was suprised as were many others we picked another mid rather than a potential key position player.

And that is what this thread is all about.


kerr may turn out to be a gun but personally was suprised we picked another mid when we had picked 3 mids and one forward previously.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 1:48 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
keogh wrote:
I am happy we got a kid who has obvious potential and is a decent size who can take a pack mark.

Consider these facts
Not only did we get rid of the tool We delisted Cloke who was a handy backup as a marking forward
Edwards and Hartlett didnt work
Who is going to be our marking options in attack in 2010 and we need a big body in defence
Not kreuzer (maybe Kreuzer at times. Full Forward that we can kick long to if we think that tactic will work on the day)
kreuz needs to play to his strengths. His tank is huge he is best around the ground. Kreuzer hasnt the explosive power to be a key forward
Hampson will be a tap ruckman at best. (In your opinion. I see a lot more in him than that)
Simply doesnt have the footy brain to play in attack and is a shit kick. (I like Casboult but his kicking needs work also.)
Henderson may be good ( Looks pretty good)
O'Hailpin is handy at best (only has to do what Hawkins did last year)
Waites best position is as a zone off defender. He isnt a hard into packs footballer. (Dont think we need another tall defender. Defense is set IMO. Wing or forward. Crashing packs isnt his strength )
So given all that who is going to be our marking targets in attack for the future (Henda and one or two of Satnta /K /waite/Hampson.
So given all that with our last pick in the draft I was suprised as were many others we picked another mid rather than a potential key position player. ( So you are asking why Lucas ahead of Talia or Black?)

And that is what this thread is all about.


kerr may turn out to be a gun but personally was suprised we picked another mid when we had picked 3 mids and one forward previously.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 2:26 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17222
See Keogh - that last post is not bad...not bad at all...we just get a little prickly from time to time because you go 'off the cuff' and admonish the club or players without getting all the facts right or articulating the argument from a commonsense approach.

As is stands, the argument is a little null and void because whether on senior or rookie list - Levi Casboult will be playing for the Bullants in 2010.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 2:39 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6417
Dont have to be condescending doc. Sometimes looking at the other side of the coin is a healthy experience.I stand by everything I said in the previous posts.
If Fevola was thrown out because he was a tool then half the list would go as well.
Just as you get testy with my so over the top posts you guys obviously think you are so smug with your comments. Thats what shits me and thats why we have lost good value posters from this website.
Intuition
perception
two very important words in the English language
Do we have the best choiced captain

NO

Do we have the best choiced coach

NO

Do we have the best choiced support coaching around him

NO

Do we have a president who thinks for himself and is a businessman of the right ilk to be President of the Carlton Football Club

NO



And that is my opinion despite the fact I only watch games and see whats on the box


And that is my opinion

based on my perceptions.


My view is the club should not have recruited 4 mids and one key position forward in the 09 draft.
3 and 2 would be acceptable
And who is to say that Levi might not be ready to play senior footy this year.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 2:54 pm 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17222
keogh wrote:
... you guys obviously think you are so smug with your comments. Thats what shits me and thats why we have lost good value posters from this website.


:lol: :lol: :lol: Is that a fact? Name ONE quality poster who has left due to this? I think you'll find they've left for other reasons...like the quality of your 'choiced' posts perhaps? We may have got rid of some nuff-nuffs...and that can only be a good thing!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 3:30 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6417
Just see who is over on the other websites Doc

They didnt fit the TC mould


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 4:43 pm 
Online
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16964
Location: Melbourne
Image

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 5:08 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
I think a few of you should pull your heads in.

No-one owns this site, this is a fans site for all types of opinion.

For the record, Levi AND Kerr AND Lucas will all be guns! :razz:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 5:15 pm 
Online
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16964
Location: Melbourne
Rexy wrote:
I think a few of you should pull your heads in.

No-one owns this site, this is a fans site for all types of opinion.



Yes it is. So I guess no-one needs to pull their heads in because all opinions are excepted. Keogh's and Mine on Keogh's :wink:

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 5:31 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 6:46 am
Posts: 28227
Cazzesman wrote:
Rexy wrote:
I think a few of you should pull your heads in.

No-one owns this site, this is a fans site for all types of opinion.



Yes it is. So I guess no-one needs to pull their heads in because all opinions are excepted. Keogh's and Mine on Keogh's :wink:

Regards Cazzesman


You shouldn't criticize posters so much. You're nearly as bad as Dane. :yikes:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 6:19 pm 
Offline
Rod Ashman

Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2008 12:55 pm
Posts: 2952
Location: Balwyn
Quote:
Hampson will be a tap ruckman at best.
Simply doesnt have the footy brain to play in attack and is a shit kick.

Quote:
O'Hailpin is handy at best

Putting the boots into young men who are working their butts off.

Quote:
We delisted Cloke who was a handy backup as a marking forward
Sticking up for an older player who misses training and takes two young players with him.

WH read the play very well and got us an apparently "cheap" draft pick. Plus a player who reminds some of Bradley :thumbsup:

You complaining about it Keo? :hitcomputer:

_________________
Bawditawaba


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 6:56 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
Rexy wrote:
Cazzesman wrote:
Rexy wrote:
I think a few of you should pull your heads in.

No-one owns this site, this is a fans site for all types of opinion.



Yes it is. So I guess no-one needs to pull their heads in because all opinions are excepted. Keogh's and Mine on Keogh's :wink:

Regards Cazzesman


You shouldn't criticize posters so much. You're nearly as bad as Dane. :yikes:


Surely not!

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 7:36 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6417
Nuh

Dane beats the Cazzeman hands down


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 8:08 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 10:14 am
Posts: 22357
keogh wrote:
Nuh

Dane beats the Cazzeman hands down


i don't know what I would do without you.

_________________
dane's trolling again


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 8:25 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:04 pm
Posts: 48548
Location: Prison Island
...........anyway......................................


Kerr, Casboult, Draft

yep


:garthp:

_________________
*(grow - fun - gah) :fight:

Yeah but whatabout your whataboutism.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 9:28 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25309
Location: Bondi Beach
This thread has been hijacked.

It's now an attack on posters, site, generation, inuendo, whispers, voices in heads....@#$%&! me swinging.

It's now about anything but our opinion.

Keogh, don't worry about my facts 70, 73 or rookie....you made my point, but it was not you I was baiting.

I too have had an opinion about TC and I took it off line. When I sought to undrstand, I found that not much changed, but I understood that at the bottom line you see we are all in the same boat with our loyalty to CFC, we just express it and value it differently.

For some it is life and death, such is the pasion in the sport (any sport...remember....Harding...ice skating)

I aint putting any plug on you keogh, but FFS, whilst you have an audience to put your opinion about the club forward, you are respected, and you aint the hunted, so give up the victum stuff. I'm on your side, if that's for the right of an opinion.

When there is on line tension within the thread and it has no relevance to the thread, that's wrong.

@#$%&! I'm guilty of doing the same thing. FFS, even Moderators do.

I am just understanding TC after it's turned 5, to know it's phyche, personality politics, people, personalities.... it's all innocent; we're on the same side; as long as you're 'allowed' to voice our opinion, then it's a privelege; as long as there is a forum for differeing opinions then that's cool too. There's no need or point in getting angry.

It's still preseason, people are still sensitive of the finals loss of 2009, the suspension of Judd, the loss of Fev, the Booze Cruise media hype...and in general, a lot of attacks on our clubs' efforts, such as interstate promotion (especially from me recently), draft selections (mids vs KP's) etc, but there's no doubt we all agree we, the CFC is in a better place come 2010 than where we were at anytime since 2002, with or without Fev.

Really nothing has changed. If anything, at least for the long term, CFC is a better place in 2010 than it was in 2009. Just do the sums. Remember there are no gurantees with Flags. You either compete for one, or you're out of the race.

IMO, We are getting closer to a GF than not.

I'm a Carlton supporter who expects success. That's natural since I've been to 8 premierships after 12 GF's and 20 finals series. But I've learned that the system has changed. I'm now kicking back and enjoying the next assault, but in a differnet space. I am no longer a teenager (even though I act and feel like one).

No doubt, we are closer to a flag now, than we were ever between 2009-2002 regardless of whatever anyone says on internet forums against this premise.

Our list is fantastic. There's no doubt about it. It's our team, and we are off the bottom, for a long time (regardless of what the likes of DOA, Robbo of the HUN and some TC posters have suggested).

With regards to our 17th Flag, our window is open. If it's not Rattens fault, or Kernahans, or Houla's or Fev's that we don't win a GF in the next 3-4 years, then it has to be something or somebody's fault. We have a 10 year old list as it stands. We are ahead of most team including the GC17 and GWS and their concessions.

At the end of the day. we all know it, if you put a group of 22 from your list of 44, and they are good enough to win a Flag, then they are probably good enough to win a flag regardless of the coach.

I just want to get in a GF every year as a minimum expectation. I did tell you I was Carlton.

Ask Parkin with his last 2 attempts to win a flag, who was 'really' coaching. It just happens, one of his disciples who offered coaching assistance to Parko back then (not Diesel, Kerna, Braddles, McKay, Dean, SOS...and the list goes on from the 1995-1999 era) who is Ratten is coaching this era.

Now it's his turn. Anything can happen and I believe in the list regardless of who is coach.

We have to give him our support, and stop the mudslinging amongst our CFC brethren.

It's a young list. Experience is scarce, so we need to cherish the 5 older statesmen, because that's it.. We have what we have. You can't change that in 2010.

Each year since we took Walker there has been an improvement at CFC. FFS, it is now 7 years since then. Whether success comes with or without Fev that is not the answer. It's about our group and where the group collectively is at. Fev was ahead of his time for a flag at Carlton, despite his 12 goal teaser in the mellinium game on the last day of 1999.

We've moved on since then.

Lets focus on the team we have in 2010. It's a great list which Imo can weather a 26 week premiership period. It's game on.

The last thing I need right now is to find on top of the HUN, Caro and Patrick Smut, I have to hear Carlton supporters bashing Carlton.

It's game on. I want a flag. What is ...well is.
All the power in the world is in Ratten's hand, so I'm backing Ratten, not his detractors.

Lets all get behind him now, because there aint going to be a coup for at least the next 3 months. If things turn out positive, we'll be knocking on the door of a flag, and the doomsdayers will all come back (as they should) to back our club till the death!

Now why doesn't everyone get behind the club and let go of the Carlton bashing.

We have a Flag to win and anything can happen in a 'no offside' game (remember)...if you've got the right stuff of course.

I believe we have. Whether it's 2010, 2011 or 2012 and thereafter, I know its going to happen.

Such is the state of affairs in footy. You either see it and take advantage of it or miss out, or, you spot the defeciencies in the team and don't risk your money. Any deficiencies (perceived or real)should not stop you from supporting CFC, and on this site too remember, we're all on the same side.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 9:39 pm 
Offline
John Nicholls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:22 pm
Posts: 9603
Location: Beijing
Quote:
we're all on the same side.



A timely reminder - thanks Bondi :thanks:

_________________
"our electorate seeks less to be informed and more to be validated." Sad times.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:27 pm 
Online
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16964
Location: Melbourne
bondiblue wrote:
This thread has been hijacked. etc etc etc etc etec.



How was the red wine with dinner tonight BB :smoking:

Rexy............Keogh can have all the opinions he likes. And every time he posts something that is just plain ill-informed I will respond. If he can have an opinion then so can I. I only respond to what he posts and most of the time IMHO what he posts is absolute dribble.

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 01, 2010 12:03 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 2:39 pm
Posts: 4684
Location: In a Venetian Palazzo
There's some people putting forward some pretty strong opinions.

What I want to know is do the "we should have picked another tall in the ND proper" brigade know who, or at what number, and why, and what chance are they to make the grade:?? More than Kerr?

Cause they don't fill in the blanks........but WH and Cazz are crazy....we should have picked one......any one, at any pick....for the 3:4 ration or something....cause it seemed like a good idea to us.

Who did we pass on?? What are the relative gains over the developing rookies at the expense of passing on a Kerr with sublime footskills??

Where's the logic?? I see vitriol and bravado....but not one concrete argument.

But we should have picked one........it's the vibe...

A mabo tall.

Clazy.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 105 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ByteDanceSpider, Fenwick Snap and 62 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group