Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sun Jun 22, 2025 3:14 am

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 105 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 9:42 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6418
I call it as I see it
If you read what I have written over the years on this website it hasnt been all negative
Some of our recruiting has been excellent particularly with the rookie draft
Betts Jammo Thornton

We have also had some shockers

We really lack a big mother down back that can handle the big power forwards
We have lost Fev
Henderson is unproven
And we pick 4 mids in the draft
You dont kick 41 goals in the TAC whilst not playing as a permanent foward unless you are talented

Recruiters from all clubs have become too obsessed with midfielders
Guys on the radio days before last years draft were saying this kid would be picked up somewhere yet he wasnt

If Kerr, Lucas and Davies become top players then well done to our recruiting staff

But not recruiting Casboult to our list until the rookie draft was dumb because we lack big guys in the key posts and that we turfed out the best power forward in the comp


As for Houlihan I stand by what I think of him
he would have been delisted by many clubs by now


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:18 am 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 9105
Location: Nth Fitzroy
We got him on our list as well as the mobile players we wanted. So it was smart recruiting.
Not "mind blowing" he wasn't picked to play on friday. Young, raw and probably not fit enough ( i am sure the club know more about that than us).
Blokes on radio talked him up yet he was over looked by all clubs countless times.

He looked a nice project player in the intra club.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:22 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17222
keogh wrote:
Dont know
maybe post a humerous attachement
Some cartoon or picture to depict what a tool I am and that I know jack shit.


No need to post an attachment...you summed it up ok for me right there.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:33 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6418
Dr.SHERRIN wrote:
keogh wrote:
Dont know
maybe post a humerous attachement
Some cartoon or picture to depict what a tool I am and that I know jack shit.


No need to post an attachment...you summed it up ok for me right there.






Perhaps we could continue this discussion at socialclubend.com of which you are apparently a member unles someone else uses your name. Perhaps your tunnel vision might improve


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:42 am 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 05, 2007 10:18 am
Posts: 410
Location: The Heatley Stand
Houlihan has been at the club since 2000 and by my reckoning hasn't once finished in the top 3 in the club's best and fairest.

Has he even finished top 5?

I think he is a plodder. He has been in the system long enough for us to demand more than what we have got.

Andrew Walker is another one - he should aim (Barring injuries) for a top 6 spot in the best and fairest this year. Anything less than that and he should be disappointed.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:48 am 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6418
1979 Norm Smith medal wrote:
Houlihan has been at the club since 2000 and by my reckoning hasn't once finished in the top 3 in the club's best and fairest.

Has he even finished top 5?

I think he is a plodder. He has been in the system long enough for us to demand more than what we have got.

Andrew Walker is another one - he should aim (Barring injuries) for a top 6 spot in the best and fairest this year. Anything less than that and he should be disappointed.




Thanks
was starting to think there was something wrong with me and that I might have to go over to socialclubend :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:51 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8214
RickJ wrote:
I have a theory (a generalisation I know) that really big guys and those that are early physical developers often look better playing junior football than they really are. Their physical size allows them to dominate junior football and undeveloped fellow juniors even when their ability is not that great. When they have to play against men and no longer have the advantage of disparate physical strength they no longer stand out.

Of course the very best always will (eg Kreuzer), but the proportionate hit rate for big guys I reckon is less. Tom Hawkins is a good example. He was such a lump that he absolutely dominated junior football and was said to have been the number 1 pick ahead of Mark Murphy if he had not gone to Geelong father son. Who would you rather have now?

I think the idea that big guys just take longer to develop is a croc. Most of them just aren't that good. Or maybe because their game relies on physical strength it takes many years to develop the muscular maturity to compete against the best men so they dont stand out again until significantly later.

The most talented small/mid sized players who dominate at junior level obviously are already attuned to competing against larger and stronger individuals and are not reliant on physical strength to play.

I think recruiting managers see talented small to mid sized midfielders as a better draft option, particularly those with exceptional kicking skills. Exceptional kicking is coming back as a highly rated draft influencer. I suspect this is what got Kerr up.


You were going very well until you said it was a croc that big guys take longer. Big guys take longer because physical size does matter at AFL level alot for for big guys than the midfielder..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 11:00 am 
Offline
John Nicholls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 3:10 pm
Posts: 9404
Location: Back 50 of the Tiger Den
keogh wrote:
1979 Norm Smith medal wrote:
Houlihan has been at the club since 2000 and by my reckoning hasn't once finished in the top 3 in the club's best and fairest.

Has he even finished top 5?

I think he is a plodder. He has been in the system long enough for us to demand more than what we have got.

Andrew Walker is another one - he should aim (Barring injuries) for a top 6 spot in the best and fairest this year. Anything less than that and he should be disappointed.




Thanks
was starting to think there was something wrong with me and that I might have to go over to socialclubend :wink:


Then go.

:thumbsup:

_________________
Writer for SuperCoach Paige www.scpaige.com.au
Twitter - @johnfeeney24


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 11:02 am 
Offline
Wayne Johnston

Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 9:21 pm
Posts: 8214
keogh wrote:
I call it as I see it
If you read what I have written over the years on this website it hasnt been all negative
Some of our recruiting has been excellent particularly with the rookie draft
Betts Jammo Thornton

We have also had some shockers

We really lack a big mother down back that can handle the big power forwards
We have lost Fev
Henderson is unproven
And we pick 4 mids in the draft
You dont kick 41 goals in the TAC whilst not playing as a permanent foward unless you are talented

Recruiters from all clubs have become too obsessed with midfielders
Guys on the radio days before last years draft were saying this kid would be picked up somewhere yet he wasnt

If Kerr, Lucas and Davies become top players then well done to our recruiting staff

But not recruiting Casboult to our list until the rookie draft was dumb because we lack big guys in the key posts and that we turfed out the best power forward in the comp


As for Houlihan I stand by what I think of him
he would have been delisted by many clubs by now


Couldn't agree with you more. We have an unproven forward line yet we didn't draft a KP tall in the main draft, especially after turfing the Coleman Medalist. I thought that was totally dumb. And Kreuzer seems to be way better rucking than playing forward so that's one option less already. Best available is great most times but at some point you have to fill the needs or you eventually get left with big holes in your side when it matters most. Ask the Bulldogs.

There's always a theory in life "pay cheap, get cheap" and waiting until the rookie draft to get a good tall KP playing give one low odds of probability of getting a decent one. Fortunately for us Casboult was still there, that was more luck than anything, and has so far looked good but we won't know that for a while either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 11:40 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 17222
jim wrote:
We have an unproven forward line yet we didn't draft a KP tall in the main draft, especially after turfing the Coleman Medalist. I thought that was totally dumb.


So you seem to have forgotten about Lachie Henderson. Last time I checked he was a 'KP tall'...what's dumb is how little thought some on here put into list management with all the variables thrown in. What's more amazing is that Levi Casboult has played one intra-club game where his opponent for much of that gave away about 15kg and 15cms...he also wasn't touched by any other club - in fact every club overlooked him about 5 times before Carlton called his name...You'd think the consensus you might take from that is that he needs more development...he now has his chance - his teammates treat him like any other member on the list...his developments course is already set - he'll train with Carlton and he'll play footy in a red jumper with a little Bullant on the front for season 2010. I'm sure he couldn't be happier!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 11:54 am 
Offline
Stephen Kernahan
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 3:08 pm
Posts: 16964
Location: Melbourne
keogh wrote:
Guys on the radio days before last years draft were saying this kid would be picked up somewhere yet he wasnt

But not recruiting Casboult to our list until the rookie draft was dumb because we lack big guys in the key posts and that we turfed out the best power forward in the comp


You're have different views to the real world don't you.

Were the 'guys' on the radio AFL Recruiters or know-it-alls like Kevin Bartlett and Gerard Healey who never saw him play. Next you will be telling us he was highly rated and went early in the phantom draft on BigFooty.

Have you ever, ever, ever heard of the Nominated Rookie system. If Casboult shows enough he can play. We turfed out the best power forward because he was a tool. Surely you can relate to that.

Regards Cazzesman

_________________
Ricky Gervais - “Everyone has the right to hold whatever beliefs they want. And everyone else has the right to find those beliefs f***ing ridiculous.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 12:09 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25309
Location: Bondi Beach
1979 Norm Smith medal wrote:
Houlihan has been at the club since 2000 and by my reckoning hasn't once finished in the top 3 in the club's best and fairest.

Has he even finished top 5?

I think he is a plodder. He has been in the system long enough for us to demand more than what we have got.

Andrew Walker is another one - he should aim (Barring injuries) for a top 6 spot in the best and fairest this year. Anything less than that and he should be disappointed.


Houlihan was pick 50 in the draft.
Was in our 22 in 2000 when we had a very good list with SOS, Kerna, Braddles, Kouta etc etc
Has regularly been in the top 10 in the B&F over the last 5 years. Pipped by a point last year by Joseph.
Recognised by footy critics as one of the most skilled players by hand and foot. Refer top Leigh Matthews.
He was our best player in the last game we played...the Elimination final.
What more do you want?

Andrew Walker was pick to and you expect a top 6 finish, yet you expect a top 3 finish from pick 50.


Go figure that logic....you sound like a Carlton basher.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 12:20 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25309
Location: Bondi Beach
jim wrote:
keogh wrote:
I call it as I see it
If you read what I have written over the years on this website it hasnt been all negative
Some of our recruiting has been excellent particularly with the rookie draft
Betts Jammo Thornton

We have also had some shockers

We really lack a big mother down back that can handle the big power forwards
We have lost Fev
Henderson is unproven
And we pick 4 mids in the draft
You dont kick 41 goals in the TAC whilst not playing as a permanent foward unless you are talented

Recruiters from all clubs have become too obsessed with midfielders
Guys on the radio days before last years draft were saying this kid would be picked up somewhere yet he wasnt

If Kerr, Lucas and Davies become top players then well done to our recruiting staff

But not recruiting Casboult to our list until the rookie draft was dumb because we lack big guys in the key posts and that we turfed out the best power forward in the comp


As for Houlihan I stand by what I think of him
he would have been delisted by many clubs by now


Couldn't agree with you more. We have an unproven forward line yet we didn't draft a KP tall in the main draft, especially after turfing the Coleman Medalist. I thought that was totally dumb. And Kreuzer seems to be way better rucking than playing forward so that's one option less already. Best available is great most times but at some point you have to fill the needs or you eventually get left with big holes in your side when it matters most. Ask the Bulldogs.

There's always a theory in life "pay cheap, get cheap" and waiting until the rookie draft to get a good tall KP playing give one low odds of probability of getting a decent one. Fortunately for us Casboult was still there, that was more luck than anything, and has so far looked good but we won't know that for a while either.


Are you telling us that Kreuzer can't play forward?
Are you telling us that Henderson isn't a KP forward?
Are you telling us that Waite can't play forward?
Are you telling us we haven't got enough talls?
Are you telling us that if I asked the Bulldogs if they had the 3 abovementioned players on their list they would have a KP deficiency?

Sorry jim, but it's about time you faced facts.
You are a negative Nelly who can't see trees for wood.
Same old, same old....no facts you want to consider..that is the norm for you.

Move forward, the club certainly has. There are ample talls on the list.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 12:22 pm 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25309
Location: Bondi Beach
Dr.SHERRIN wrote:
jim wrote:
We have an unproven forward line yet we didn't draft a KP tall in the main draft, especially after turfing the Coleman Medalist. I thought that was totally dumb.


So you seem to have forgotten about Lachie Henderson. Last time I checked he was a 'KP tall'...what's dumb is how little thought some on here put into list management with all the variables thrown in. What's more amazing is that Levi Casboult has played one intra-club game where his opponent for much of that gave away about 15kg and 15cms...he also wasn't touched by any other club - in fact every club overlooked him about 5 times before Carlton called his name...You'd think the consensus you might take from that is that he needs more development...he now has his chance - his teammates treat him like any other member on the list...his developments course is already set - he'll train with Carlton and he'll play footy in a red jumper with a little Bullant on the front for season 2010. I'm sure he couldn't be happier!


Bulldogs didn't even touch him. Isn't that the crux of Jims argument?
What happens to the Bulldogs if Hall gets injured.
Casboult would win them a GF. Guaranteed by jim.

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 12:36 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21075
Location: Missing Kouta
keogh wrote:
I call it as I see it
If you read what I have written over the years on this website it hasnt been all negative
Some of our recruiting has been excellent particularly with the rookie draft
Betts Jammo Thornton

We have also had some shockers

We really lack a big mother down back that can handle the big power forwards
We have lost Fev
Henderson is unproven
And we pick 4 mids in the draft
You dont kick 41 goals in the TAC whilst not playing as a permanent foward unless you are talented

Recruiters from all clubs have become too obsessed with midfielders
Guys on the radio days before last years draft were saying this kid would be picked up somewhere yet he wasnt

If Kerr, Lucas and Davies become top players then well done to our recruiting staff

But not recruiting Casboult to our list until the rookie draft was dumb because we lack big guys in the key posts and that we turfed out the best power forward in the comp


As for Houlihan I stand by what I think of him
he would have been delisted by many clubs by now

Guys on the radio. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 12:53 pm 
Offline
Ken Hands
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 05, 2007 10:18 am
Posts: 410
Location: The Heatley Stand
bondiblue wrote:
1979 Norm Smith medal wrote:
Houlihan has been at the club since 2000 and by my reckoning hasn't once finished in the top 3 in the club's best and fairest.

Has he even finished top 5?

I think he is a plodder. He has been in the system long enough for us to demand more than what we have got.

Andrew Walker is another one - he should aim (Barring injuries) for a top 6 spot in the best and fairest this year. Anything less than that and he should be disappointed.


Houlihan was pick 50 in the draft.
Was in our 22 in 2000 when we had a very good list with SOS, Kerna, Braddles, Kouta etc etc
Has regularly been in the top 10 in the B&F over the last 5 years. Pipped by a point last year by Joseph.
Recognised by footy critics as one of the most skilled players by hand and foot. Refer top Leigh Matthews.
He was our best player in the last game we played...the Elimination final.
What more do you want?

Andrew Walker was pick to and you expect a top 6 finish, yet you expect a top 3 finish from pick 50.


Go figure that logic....you sound like a Carlton basher.



Re: Houlihan - for a "senior" player one would have expected more.
His best placing from what I gather is a fourth placing in 2007. It wasn't as if there was a plethora of multi-talented players 2003-2007..


A "senior" player is one that has a bigger impact on matches. The bar has to be set higher for him, as I agree his skill base is good. Near enough in terms of quality of output is not good enough anymore.
We need leaders. He should be a leader, but instead is 11th best at the club.


What do I expect from Houlihan in 2010 barring injury? top 6 as well, but I don't think he has it in him. (would be pleased to be corrected though). He is happier plodding along as a mid range player.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 12:53 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6418
The guy on the radio wasnt fossil Bartlett or Healy
Hang me if I dont know his name but it was a guy talking to Mark Fine on SEN one weeknight around 11
So he wasnt a media personality. He was a guy in the know and he reckoned Casboult was defintely worth a punt

Secondly Cazzeman Fev was given the arse because he was a tool as you put it
Of course its against TC rules to spread rumours but since you are obviously in the know you probably know the particular incident on Brownlow night that was the reason he was moved on. Because I know and it comes from a reliable source.

Houlihan is a tool
Cant say I have only been in my reg grundys in the foyer of a 5 star hotel
And this is a guy with a particular history.
So he is a tool half the footballer of fev so lets get rid of him as well based on what you think.
attacking me personally I couldnt give a brown shit but it doesnt help your argument does it.


And finally I will stay on here to keep the arguments balanced. :razz:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 1:01 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6418
1979 Norm Smith medal wrote:
bondiblue wrote:
1979 Norm Smith medal wrote:
Houlihan has been at the club since 2000 and by my reckoning hasn't once finished in the top 3 in the club's best and fairest.

Has he even finished top 5?

I think he is a plodder. He has been in the system long enough for us to demand more than what we have got.

Andrew Walker is another one - he should aim (Barring injuries) for a top 6 spot in the best and fairest this year. Anything less than that and he should be disappointed.


Houlihan was pick 50 in the draft.
Was in our 22 in 2000 when we had a very good list with SOS, Kerna, Braddles, Kouta etc etc
Has regularly been in the top 10 in the B&F over the last 5 years. Pipped by a point last year by Joseph.
Recognised by footy critics as one of the most skilled players by hand and foot. Refer top Leigh Matthews.
He was our best player in the last game we played...the Elimination final.
What more do you want?

Andrew Walker was pick to and you expect a top 6 finish, yet you expect a top 3 finish from pick 50.


Go figure that logic....you sound like a Carlton basher.



Re: Houlihan - for a "senior" player one would have expected more.
His best placing from what I gather is a fourth placing in 2007. It wasn't as if there was a plethora of multi-talented players 2003-2007..


A "senior" player is one that has a bigger impact on matches. The bar has to be set higher for him, as I agree his skill base is good. Near enough in terms of quality of output is not good enough anymore.
We need leaders. He should be a leader, but instead is 11th best at the club.


What do I expect from Houlihan in 2010 barring injury? top 6 as well, but I don't think he has it in him. (would be pleased to be corrected though). He is happier plodding along as a mid range player.





Houlihan is the best of the Houlihan brothers

But there all lazy and dont work hard enough

His excuse that he was in the wrong place at the wrong time in relation to the foyer incident is worse than the incident itself.

Deep down he doesnt give a shit just likehow he plays his footy.

We could have cut him Wiggo and Fisher last year but chose not to.
And put Casboult or young upand comers onto our list.

But yeah
Cazzeman
Kouta
Doc
Just keep attacking me because I love it


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 1:03 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 6:36 am
Posts: 6418
bondiblue wrote:
1979 Norm Smith medal wrote:
Houlihan has been at the club since 2000 and by my reckoning hasn't once finished in the top 3 in the club's best and fairest.

Has he even finished top 5?

I think he is a plodder. He has been in the system long enough for us to demand more than what we have got.

Andrew Walker is another one - he should aim (Barring injuries) for a top 6 spot in the best and fairest this year. Anything less than that and he should be disappointed.


Houlihan was pick 50 in the draft.
Was in our 22 in 2000 when we had a very good list with SOS, Kerna, Braddles, Kouta etc etc
Has regularly been in the top 10 in the B&F over the last 5 years. Pipped by a point last year by Joseph.
Recognised by footy critics as one of the most skilled players by hand and foot. Refer top Leigh Matthews.
He was our best player in the last game we played...the Elimination final.
What more do you want?

Andrew Walker was pick to and you expect a top 6 finish, yet you expect a top 3 finish from pick 50.


Go figure that logic....you sound like a Carlton basher.




Houlihan was pick 73
Get your facts right


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 1:05 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 7:01 pm
Posts: 1030
So we could save ourselves a whole lot of money, get rid of our recruiting department and just tune in to SEN one weeknight to choose our draftees. What a pisser.

And you do realise that we did actually draft Casboult? Shouldn't you be happy that we snagged him so cheaply - rather than complaining that we should have drafted him earlier? I'm really unsure what your point is here.

As for the argument that Henderson is unproven so therefore we should have taken an unproven KP forward in the draft - all I can say is :screwy:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 105 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ByteDanceSpider and 61 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group