budzy wrote:
Cazzesman wrote:
We would have come close to closing the door no matter whether Sticks or Fitzpatrick were President and that would have been down to the Elliot years. Lets not bend the truth to suit your arguments. The facts now are where the Club is at financially and Sticks has been President since Dick paased on. Sure Visy is a sponsor but we also have plenty of new ones come on board under Sticks and Swanny.
Regards Cazzesman
You're clutching...
Sticks begrudgingly comes out from the bunker to talk to Mike trying to save his skin using numbers created by RP, Swann and the magnificent supporter base who created the interest to attract media/sponsorship during the worst period of the clubs history which's rivaled anything St.Kilda have dished up.
Is sticks under a bit of pressure I wonder...?
Why am I clutching?
Lets look at the Facts that you continue to bypass.
Sticks has been President for about 2 years from memory. During that time the financial figures and membership growth speak for themselves.
The onfield efforts have gone from 4, 10 to 13 wins and a final that was lost in 15 minutes of footy.
If Sticks has to be the fall guy as Pres when things are crap then surely he get the kudos as Pres when things are on the way up.
And if you think Sticks is under any pressure from posters like your good self then he will surely rule for the next 25 years.
Regards CazzesmanThats the point of these demonising arguments Cazz. The Demon depending on which thread, insert Sticks or Ratts or Legion of them ( insert 95 premiership team if you want a larger conspiracy) is always to blame for anything negative, but anything positive is due to someone else
The argument that if you are blaming someone as head of an organisation for everything bad does not compute when it comes to credit with anything good. A simple way of arguing for those who don't like to get confused
Login
Register
FAQ
