Talking Carlton Index Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington Lochie O'Brien Kerryn Harrington CFC Home CFC Membership CFC Shop CFC Fixture Blueseum
It is currently Sat Jun 21, 2025 5:38 pm

All times are UTC + 10 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 72 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Judd Trade
PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 8:54 am 
Offline
Horrie Clover

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 7:58 am
Posts: 356
Location: Melbourne
We all know that we acquired Judd from West Coast for Pick 3 (Chris Masten), Pick 20 (Tony Notte) & Josh Kennedy.
Why is it that everyone forgets that we also got Pick 46 (Denis Armfield) in the deal?

Every time JK or Masten plays a game full of promise, everyone harks back to 'The Deal', yet when Armfield quietly goes about his business with aplomb, why do we not hear every commentator stating how well Carlton has performed in this negotiation?

Let's hope they pick up on it soon, as we notonly landed the best player in the competition, but a young guy with speed and a penchant for taking the game on, who will be a major contributor with us for the better part of a decade.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Judd Trade
PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 8:56 am 
Offline
Stephen Silvagni

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 11:03 am
Posts: 25302
Location: Bondi Beach
Great post barrel.

So true.

Thanks for the reminder.

I'm an Armfield fan. :thumbsup:

_________________
Everyone looks good in Navy Blue


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Judd Trade
PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 9:07 am 
Offline
Rod Ashman
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 4:13 pm
Posts: 2095
Location: handcuffed to a seasoned drinker
I think people seem to forget we got Judd in the trade. The amount of times you hear 'how handy would JK be right now?' - probably not as handy as Judd you'd think


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Judd Trade
PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 9:59 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:41 pm
Posts: 4627
blu944 wrote:
I think people seem to forget we got Judd in the trade. The amount of times you hear 'how handy would JK be right now?' - probably not as handy as Judd you'd think



:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:

Simply ask anyone if they would reverse the deal :wink:

_________________
“Every single element of the Club has to be the best in the league, meticulously and methodically, and only by doing this will we be elite and challenge for number 17.”
Greg Lee


Last edited by billc3 on Wed Feb 17, 2010 3:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Judd Trade
PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 10:29 am 
Offline
Mike Fitzpatrick
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 2:39 pm
Posts: 4684
Location: In a Venetian Palazzo
If you asked me before the deal I would have given my left nut to see Judd in Navy Blue.....never loved an opposition player as much as Juddy














in a non gay way


But Barrell, you make a good point. The other failure in logic, is that it is a good chance we wouldn't have taken Masten and Notte anyway


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Judd Trade
PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 10:52 am 
Offline
Bert Deacon

Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 9:20 am
Posts: 548
I'd like to think of it as one of those win win situations.

I must admit that I watch the Eagles with a tinge of sadness as I really rated JK, but I also think that moving to the Eagles has helped his development.

It hasn't been easy developing as a tall forward during the Fev era. The Weagles have been developing and using him as the go to Tall, but he wouldn't have been that for us until this season. For all that I would really have loved to have kept him, I'm not sure he would be the player he is now, and looks like becoming, if he had stayed with us. He had so many fans on his back before he left as well and confidence is such a big thing in football.

Wins all round in the end IMO :thumbsup:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Judd Trade
PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 11:01 am 
Offline
Geoff Southby

Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 7:24 pm
Posts: 5537
Location: Bridge, Starship Enterprise
Win, win, especially with Armfield who is now a regular senior player. Love the way he throws himself into the play. :thumbsup:

_________________
"Get ready, Teddy - you're on": Ron Barassi half time 1970 Grand Final


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Judd Trade
PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 11:19 am 
Offline
Ken Hunter

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 6:54 pm
Posts: 14686
Location: The Vodka Train
..it's simple.. ..Army isn't included much cos he's a BP/HBF which don't rate as mich as prime mids or KPP's.. ..also, even Notte was a pick 20, Army in the 40's by memory..??.. ..but often it's not so much the star power, but what the players give to their club, and what said clubs need.. ..i think it was a fair trade, as fair as it could be..

_________________
..if you can't be good, be good at it..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Judd Trade
PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 2:32 pm 
Offline
Bruce Doull
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 48684
Location: Canberra
Yeah, Richmond must be rapted they had Armfield hiding under that box seat.

_________________
Click here to follow TalkingCarlton on twitter
TalkingCarlton Posting Rules


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Judd Trade
PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 3:00 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 5:18 pm
Posts: 3411
Location: East Perth, WA
If only we had got Notte...... think of the Borat jokes!

_________________
when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth

Feelgood Hit of the Winter - GHRP-2, GHRP-6, CJC-1295, AOD-9604, Humanofort and Hexarelin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Judd Trade
PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 3:11 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 5:11 pm
Posts: 1226
Just imagine if we knew what was coming and was able to use Fev in the Judd deal instead of JK !!!!!!!!!!!! It would have been close to a fair swap of players, with probably an improvement of the WCE's 2nd rd pick. Something like

Eagles. Judd + #35.
Carlton. Fev + #20.

Remember Fev would have been what, 26 yrs old (about the prime for a KPF), won the Coleman in 2006, the WCE would have still had a quality list having just played finals (despite losing x2 elite midfielders) and having Fev would have meant no fall down the ladder. A star KPF for a star Midfielder who nominated Carlton would have been a pretty even deal.

It would have meant that we kept Kennedy (who would become our focal point), probably picked up Palmer with #3 (although the fact we just got Judd into the midfield and lost Fev may have meant we would have gone for the best KPF with #3, ala HENDERSON) and someone with #35 (not sure who here .......). We probably would have also had a slightly better positioning in the 2008 draft (may have gone for Hurley but the club has said they prefered Yarran anyway) and NitNat wouldn't have done to the Eagles (prob be at the Dockers instead)


Oh it's fun to speculate !!!!!!!!! lol


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Judd Trade
PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 3:54 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:44 am
Posts: 3136
Its a win win trade as far as I'm concerned based on the picks used.

Had the trade not gone through though I wouldnt have used pick 3 on masten and 20 on notte - particularly with the benefit of hindsight (rioli+otten)

rioli+otten+kennedy would cancel out judd+armfield imo


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Judd Trade
PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 4:49 pm 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21075
Location: Missing Kouta
West Coast didn't get pick one.

Carlton wins.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Judd Trade
PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 5:07 pm 
Offline
Robert Walls

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:44 am
Posts: 3136
coryne wrote:
Just imagine if we knew what was coming and was able to use Fev in the Judd deal instead of JK !!!!!!!!!!!! It would have been close to a fair swap of players, with probably an improvement of the WCE's 2nd rd pick. Something like

Eagles. Judd + #35.
Carlton. Fev + #20.

Remember Fev would have been what, 26 yrs old (about the prime for a KPF), won the Coleman in 2006, the WCE would have still had a quality list having just played finals (despite losing x2 elite midfielders) and having Fev would have meant no fall down the ladder. A star KPF for a star Midfielder who nominated Carlton would have been a pretty even deal.

It would have meant that we kept Kennedy (who would become our focal point), probably picked up Palmer with #3 (although the fact we just got Judd into the midfield and lost Fev may have meant we would have gone for the best KPF with #3, ala HENDERSON) and someone with #35 (not sure who here .......). We probably would have also had a slightly better positioning in the 2008 draft (may have gone for Hurley but the club has said they prefered Yarran anyway) and NitNat wouldn't have done to the Eagles (prob be at the Dockers instead)


Oh it's fun to speculate !!!!!!!!! lol



WC wouldnt have accepted a Judd/Fev trade.

If talking hypotheticals...
we could have not done the trade and picked up kreuzer+rioli+otten for that draft whilst keeping kennedy

When Fev stuffed up we'd still have henderson+mclean

And given that we'd have rioli, we might have passed on yarran and picked up rich.

End result we'd have
kennedy+henderson+kreuzer+rioli+otten+mclean+rich to go with murphy, gibbs etc

otten+rich+mclean+murphy+gibbs+others would cover our midfield needs

rioli+betts+garlett would cover our small forwards

kennedy+kreuzer+henderson would cover our keyforward needs (and potentially keybacks if henderson was played back)

all theoretical fun and games - we've got judd so thats all that needs to be worried about :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Judd Trade
PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 7:01 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 5:11 pm
Posts: 1226
4thchicken wrote:
coryne wrote:
Just imagine if we knew what was coming and was able to use Fev in the Judd deal instead of JK !!!!!!!!!!!! It would have been close to a fair swap of players, with probably an improvement of the WCE's 2nd rd pick. Something like

Eagles. Judd + #35.
Carlton. Fev + #20.

Remember Fev would have been what, 26 yrs old (about the prime for a KPF), won the Coleman in 2006, the WCE would have still had a quality list having just played finals (despite losing x2 elite midfielders) and having Fev would have meant no fall down the ladder. A star KPF for a star Midfielder who nominated Carlton would have been a pretty even deal.

It would have meant that we kept Kennedy (who would become our focal point), probably picked up Palmer with #3 (although the fact we just got Judd into the midfield and lost Fev may have meant we would have gone for the best KPF with #3, ala HENDERSON) and someone with #35 (not sure who here .......). We probably would have also had a slightly better positioning in the 2008 draft (may have gone for Hurley but the club has said they prefered Yarran anyway) and NitNat wouldn't have done to the Eagles (prob be at the Dockers instead)


Oh it's fun to speculate !!!!!!!!! lol



WC wouldnt have accepted a Judd/Fev trade.

If talking hypotheticals...
we could have not done the trade and picked up kreuzer+rioli+otten for that draft whilst keeping kennedy

When Fev stuffed up we'd still have henderson+mclean

And given that we'd have rioli, we might have passed on yarran and picked up rich.

End result we'd have
kennedy+henderson+kreuzer+rioli+otten+mclean+rich to go with murphy, gibbs etc

otten+rich+mclean+murphy+gibbs+others would cover our midfield needs

rioli+betts+garlett would cover our small forwards

kennedy+kreuzer+henderson would cover our keyforward needs (and potentially keybacks if henderson was played back)

all theoretical fun and games - we've got judd so thats all that needs to be worried about :)



Atleast we still kept Judd in my hypothetical :P


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Judd Trade
PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 7:20 pm 
Offline
Ken Hunter
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:32 am
Posts: 10594
As good as Juddy is, we gave up too much for him.
The fact that Worsfold nearly destroyed his career by playing him injured and knowing too well he was on the move, was a disgrace as well, but no-one mentions this at all. Caroline Wilson is too busy with other "exclusives". :hitcomputer:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Judd Trade
PostPosted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 7:43 pm 
Offline
Bruce Comben

Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 5:57 pm
Posts: 1
Gee I thought we had made a big trade to get Armfield and Judd was a sweetener. :razz:
Truely though...hi hopes for army this year. Walked past him before the intraclub and he looked really annoyed that he wasn't out there. Great competitor who throws everything into the contest!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Judd Trade
PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 3:50 pm 
Offline
Harry Vallence

Joined: Sat Apr 22, 2006 5:24 pm
Posts: 1531
Location: Melbourne
Blah blah blah, coulda woulda shoulda

If only l put money on shocking at the melbourne cup l would of won :P

Even if Kennedy and Masten turn out to be great players, l still would of wanted the judd deal to happen. he has helped the development of the young players a lot more quickly and his onfield leadership is secound to none. To date Kennedy/Masten haven't done anything and even if they do, l wouldn't change a thing. Can't beat bringing the best player to your team and leadership.

Deals done, move on, don't look back.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Judd Trade
PostPosted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 9:30 pm 
Offline
Craig Bradley
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 9:29 am
Posts: 6418
Location: Casa Da Carlton - The Place to Be
coryne wrote:
Just imagine if we knew what was coming and was able to use Fev in the Judd deal instead of JK !!!!!!!!!!!! It would have been close to a fair swap of players, with probably an improvement of the WCE's 2nd rd pick. Something like

Eagles. Judd + #35.
Carlton. Fev + #20.

Remember Fev would have been what, 26 yrs old (about the prime for a KPF), won the Coleman in 2006, the WCE would have still had a quality list having just played finals (despite losing x2 elite midfielders) and having Fev would have meant no fall down the ladder. A star KPF for a star Midfielder who nominated Carlton would have been a pretty even deal.

It would have meant that we kept Kennedy (who would become our focal point), probably picked up Palmer with #3 (although the fact we just got Judd into the midfield and lost Fev may have meant we would have gone for the best KPF with #3, ala HENDERSON) and someone with #35 (not sure who here .......). We probably would have also had a slightly better positioning in the 2008 draft (may have gone for Hurley but the club has said they prefered Yarran anyway) and NitNat wouldn't have done to the Eagles (prob be at the Dockers instead)


Oh it's fun to speculate !!!!!!!!! lol


bullshit speculate, i know one bloke who said we should have traded fev, and kept kennedy!!

_________________
Got to love the stare Down by Setanta on Llyod :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Judd Trade
PostPosted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 12:01 am 
Offline
Alex Jesaulenko
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 7:13 pm
Posts: 21075
Location: Missing Kouta
*bump*

Judd's loss has given the Eagles wings, says Worsfold
Michael Gleeson wrote:
Was Judd the right man for Carlton at the stage of its cycle?

Did he help the Blues advance too rapidly?

That is doubtful for Carlton had endured several bottoming-out years before Judd arrived.

The difficulty in comparing the two clubs' experiences and timing was that Carlton's list was so poor and depleted its process of regeneration has taken longer. It has improved but is still pot-holed.

Now, of course, matters are complicated by the Fevola trade - which could well be the deal Carlton reflects on in two years as having been the critical exchange with long-term benefit.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 72 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC + 10 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Arnhem blues, ByteDanceSpider, dannyboy, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], GWS, Hamster, Heavs, kezza, killpies, Morb, Nick, Nitrille, tasboy and 39 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group