Will Eddie get NAB Rising star - Rd 1?

bluegirldanielle · **Posted:** Mon Mar 28, 2005 5:29 pm

St Fidelius wrote:

bluegirldanielle wrote:

St Fidelius wrote:

bluegirldanielle wrote:

Is Carrazzo eligible? I would pick him over Eddie Betts.

he has played 3 games

Yeah I know, but just not sure how old he is that's all.

Sorry

DOB 15/12/1983

That's cool - thanks!

The Tyrant · **Posted:** Mon Mar 28, 2005 5:29 pm

Carrazzo would be awesome if he could kick

Deano Supremo · **Posted:** Mon Mar 28, 2005 9:48 pm

Adam Cooney ripped the pies a new arsehole today - if he's eligible he'd go close.

phoenix johnson · **Posted:** Mon Mar 28, 2005 9:53 pm

Deano Supremo wrote:

Adam Cooney ripped the pies a new arsehole today - if he's eligible he'd go close.

Played too many games last year.
Not eligible.

Blokes in our team at the moment who are eligible are...

Betts, Blackwell, Russell, Hartlett, Raso, Bentick, Carrazzo and all the rookies except Setanta.

Zippy · **Posted:** Mon Mar 28, 2005 9:54 pm

Deano Supremo wrote:

Adam Cooney ripped the pies a new arsehole today - if he's eligible he'd go close.

He's not eligible. Cooney was great for the Cork Dragons in a pretty miserable week.

Deano Supremo · **Posted:** Mon Mar 28, 2005 9:57 pm

phoenix johnson wrote:

Deano Supremo wrote:

Adam Cooney ripped the pies a new arsehole today - if he's eligible he'd go close.

Played too many games last year.
Not eligible.

Blokes in our team at the moment who are eligible are...

Betts, Blackwell, Russell, Hartlett, Raso and all the rookies except Setanta.

cool, thanks PJ. While we're on the topic are the eligibility requirements to difficult? Would we be better of changing it to, let's say the first two years a player spend on a senior list rather than the games requirement?

Quite a few of us seemed doubtful as to the eligibility of certain players.

phoenix johnson · **Posted:** Mon Mar 28, 2005 9:58 pm

IIRC, the eligibility is as follows...

Must be under 21 and must have played less than 10 or 15 games.

Pretty rough I know, but I think that is the general gist of it all.

Deano Supremo · **Posted:** Mon Mar 28, 2005 10:03 pm

phoenix johnson wrote:

IIRC, the eligibility is as follows...

Must be under 21 and must have played less than 10 or 15 games.

Pretty rough I know, but I think that is the general gist of it all.

It's not the fact that the rules are tough, they're just a bastard to remember. I reckon if it was something simple like being on a senior list for less than two years would make it heaps easier for the average moron (such as myself)

phoenix johnson · **Posted:** Mon Mar 28, 2005 10:06 pm

I'd add in the under 21 rule to your method of thinking, Deano.

Under 21 and must have been on a list for 2 years or less.

Takes into account all blokes who were drafted in the ND bar the recycled blokes.

Which leads me to my next question...

Has one bloke ever got a nomination at two clubs?

AGRO · **Posted:** Mon Mar 28, 2005 10:07 pm

Eddie wont get a Rising Star - but I reckon he is a monty for "Goal of the Year". :wink:

phoenix johnson · **Posted:** Mon Mar 28, 2005 10:08 pm

He'll get one or the other.
He's just too exciting and in your face to ignore.

Zippy · **Posted:** Mon Mar 28, 2005 10:10 pm

phoenix johnson wrote:

I'd add in the under 21 rule to your method of thinking, Deano.

Under 21 and must have been on a list for 2 years or less.

Takes into account all blokes who were drafted in the ND bar the recycled blokes.

Which leads me to my next question...

Has one bloke ever got a nomination at two clubs?

I thought once you got a nomination you weren't eligible anymore?

phoenix johnson · **Posted:** Mon Mar 28, 2005 10:13 pm

Zippy wrote:

phoenix johnson wrote:

I'd add in the under 21 rule to your method of thinking, Deano.

Under 21 and must have been on a list for 2 years or less.

Takes into account all blokes who were drafted in the ND bar the recycled blokes.

Which leads me to my next question...

Has one bloke ever got a nomination at two clubs?

I thought once you got a nomination you weren't eligible anymore?

i think you may be right, Zip.

Blues2005 · **Joined:** Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:50 pm **Posts:** 2123

No, you can be nominated more than once. An example of this is Michael Braun who was nominated in Round 14, 1997 and then again in Round 1, 1998. As far as I know, the rule hasn't changed since? It might have happened again too....

Zippy · **Posted:** Mon Mar 28, 2005 10:37 pm

Blues2005 wrote:

No, you can be nominated more than once. An example of this is Michael Braun who was nominated in Round 14, 1997 and then again in Round 1, 1998. As far as I know, the rule hasn't changed since? It might have happened again too....

I tihkn you may be right. It doesn't say anything about not being able to be nominated twice on the afl site.

http://afl.com.au/default.asp?pg=risingstar

Quote:

The winner must be under the age of 21 at January 1 of that year, must not have played more than 10 games to the start of that season and must not have been suspended by the AFL or State League tribunals during the season

Heavs · **Posted:** Tue Mar 29, 2005 1:28 pm

Kepler Bradley got it from all accounts. Good one :roll:

camel · **Posted:** Tue Mar 29, 2005 3:58 pm

Heavs is right.

http://afl.com.au/default.asp?pg=news&s ... eid=192565

Heavs · **Posted:** Tue Mar 29, 2005 4:40 pm

camelboy wrote:

Heavs is right.

Well derrrrr!!!! :wink:

BlueBoys · **Joined:** Mon Feb 28, 2005 8:48 am **Posts:** 44

Rnd 2 for Betts :wink:

Andain · **Posted:** Wed Mar 30, 2005 12:08 pm

10 marks and 25 possesions isn't a bad game in a losing side. A deserving winner this week.

Will Eddie get NAB Rising star - Rd 1?

Who is online