I thought SOS was really good. He may not have crafted the perfect answers to every question but with limited airtime he had to be selective. Most importantly, he showed some of the competitive attitude the whole team needs to show.
If we had drafted Kelly or Stewart, I’ll bet they would not be playing so well without the stronger teams around them and then we’d be bagged for picking up mature age list cloggers. It’s a lot easier in hindsight.
How is Menzel going & Henderson? worth it for McKay, Plowman, Lamb & Phillips? Tuohy is doing well and was a big loss but we ended up with Marchbank & Pickett. Gibbs was a big loss - but we end up with O’Brien and pick 23 or 24 this year. Tom Bell gets us Charlie Curnow. Yarran more or less for Cunningham (we’ll see how Cunners goes but better than Yarran since then...)
So, our drafting has been pretty good. BUT ONLY ENABLED BY THE TRADING TO GET THE EXTRA EARLY PICKS.
Now let’s look at our outs and ins in past few years, excluding ‘natural’ draft picks we got like everyone else.
Outs 2015-2017: Bell, Henderson, Holman, Menzel, Warnock, Watson, Russell, Walsh, Fields, Dick, Everitt, Foster, Gallucci, Gowers, Sheehan, Clem Smith, Tutt, Whitley, DVR, Touhy, Sumner, Jaksch, Smedts, White, Boekhorst, Buckley, Gibbs.
Who of those should we still have on our list - who would be part of our future or lifting our current performance materially? I count two: Touhy & Gibbs (Henderson arguable). Holman is always a fringe player at best and maybe Gowers turns himself into a long term good player. Maybe.
Ins 2015-2017 (incl those enabled specifically by the outs above): Curnow, McKay, Marchbank, Plowman, O’Brien, Pickett, Lamb, Phillips, Kerridge, Sumner, A Silvagni, Palmer, Smedts, Kennedy, Lang, Lobbe, Mullett, O’Shea
Who of these should be part of our future or lifts our current performance materially? I count 7 definitely, 6 of them for the long term (A Silvagni short term only). And one could make a strong case for Lamb and Phillips lifting the team in the short term (I’m not convinced but the argument could be made...). And the jury is still out on Pickett and Lang (& Phillips, longer term).
So we are replacing crap with either good, maybe good or some we probably knew were crap but with a small chance they could be better than those they replaced (or we took them for other reasons e.g. draft points or to help in the reserves).
I think the ledger is thus far clearly in SOS’s favour. I concede that questions remain about our development and, to be fair, our coaching. But I don’t buy into the bag SOS line of thinking. I’m prepared to back Bolton. I think he will be proven to be the right choice but next year will be his final opportunity to do so. I’m not convinced about our development capability and also worried about some of our assistants. And I think the Football Manager appointment needs to be inspired.
|