Molly wrote:
I said to a few people the other day that I remain almost perplexed by the communications at the club. It's almost like they are still trying to be in the 1970's.
The club is reactive in terms of communications, and that is not the way it should be in this day and age. I don't use twitter, but that's not the point. I am a 34 year old married man. What about if I am a 16 year old kid and my mate is getting tweeted by Melbourne and I get stuff all from Carlton? Many of these communications in the new age are low cost and need to be systematically explored. Likewise, I believe very strongly that the club should be looking at creating a national brand (a la Hawthorn). Yet we let our interstate supporter groups atrophy and almost waste away with neglect.
Finally, the club should have looked to turn the booze cruise into a plus. Go on the offensive. A game for an alcohol and drug abuse charity against a club like St Kilda would have immediately turned a minus into a plus. Hell, even create a responsible drinking ambassador in the club as a path to a leadership role for one of our young players.
Anyway, I won't say anymore... but both in terms of technology and message we are just so reactive. I remain bemused given the marketing experience of some on the board that nothing has been done to overhaul the area.
Agree entirely with Molly, and Doc.
The Club is eons behind in communications.
Many years ago, Peter Jackson from Essendon* was on Talking Footy on Seven - I'm thinking that was probably 2002-3. He stated that it was Essendon*'s intent that the Web was the first point of contact for many many interstate and overseas fans, and as such, they wanted to have the official website reach out to the fans, rather than the fans have to go hunting for information about the club. That was the reason behind their decision to be the only club to break from the hideous Telstra/official AFL website deal.
The Telstra based website has been one of Carlton's stumbling blocks in communications. It was bewildering to me that a company sponsored by Optus would willingly be tied into a Telstra website. I believe the Club went along with the Telstra deal as a path of least resistance, ie: it was the easy and cheap thing to do. Well, we got what we paid for.
Add to that, the utter lack of ideas coming from the club to contact long distance/interstate members, let alone supporters, and try and convert them to members. Not to mention the 'communications' department's unwillingness to even entertain thoughts of supporter/member input when it is offered, even at cost, by professionals in their fields (photographers, designers, etc).
I would go on, but I know you've heard this from me before. So I'll shut up for now.