Cazzesman, I agree that bad luck plays a part. Obviously, I don't have all the details, but the circumsatnces surrounding some of these injuries do not reek of professionalism.
Cazzesman wrote:
Walker - Maybe he had already sat out the extra week the week before. DOA would know but Walks rehab has been extensive. The incident was just one of those things. It was big play, big tackle, arm outstretched and a big landing. Correct me if I'm wrong DOA but I think it was just plain badluck. Prior to the incident he looked fine and was working his way into the game nicely.
When you see the incident, there's no way this injury was 'plain bad luck'. A non-pathological glenohumeral joint would not have been injured by the impact that Walker's sustained in that clash. It was surely related to his recent injury. I'm not saying he wasn't ready - but the questions need to be asked. The suspect management of Walker's shoulder goes all the way back to last season.
Cazzesman wrote:
Hampson - Trained okay and was apparently fine - He had some lose stuff floating in his knee that just aggravated him and prevented him from jumping properly. There was no indication it would require any op prior to him coming off the ground. No big deal.
Again, I don't buy it. If the injury was 'chronic', playing in the first 5 minutes would not have revealed anything that was not present at training. Why was he played to the point of surgery being required? And once required, why was the scope delayed? And 'no big deal'? I know that nobody is excited by endoscopic surgery anymore, but it still poses risks. A general anaesthetic alone has a 1 in 10000 risk of death (or so they told us back in med school - admittedly the figure would be lower in a patient of Hammo's age and cardiovascular condition). And then a trochar is introduced into the joint capsule with subsequent risks of introducing infection or causing haemorrhage. It is 'minor surgery' but it's not 'no big deal'.
Quote:
Setanta - Looks to have picked up a virus of sorts during the off season. Hardly the clubs fault.
If we are to believe the version of events that was posted on here, why was he sent back to Ireland for Mumma's cooking (great idea) instead of being actively managed by one of Melbourne's world class ID consultants.
Quote:
As for the rest I don't know but that I suspect it is purely a piece of maybe, could be, should be to add to your argument. Players get injections for all sorts of reasons and not all of them have an injection to play with a broken arm. Some might get an injection for blisters to numb mild pain. It's all relative
Sorry Cazz - we all saw Gibbs roll his ankle. And we found out he played on LA injections the next week. It wasn't for blister for god's sake. That was a disgrace.
Cazzesman - I love the inside info you bring. But sometimes in your enthusiasm to douse any criticism of the club, you miss opportunities to identify areas in which we can improve.
Look, I'm not saying that we're unprofessional. What I'm saying is that the Carlton I grew up with aimed to be the BEST. Best premiership tally, best players (Judd), best management (Swann), best off-field team etc etc.
We should be aiming to have the BEST injury management. We don't accept 'okay' at our footy club, we innovate.
Why not be the first club to have a full time sports physician? Every English soccer club and American footy team has a full time physician, but no AFL clubs do. Maybe we should be the first?
We may be managing our injuries adequately, but adequate is not enough. We should aim to be the best sporting club in Australia at managing injuries. It will aid our future chances of premiership glory - and that's what it all comes down to.