Headplant wrote:
Her agenda is to be a good journalist. This she does very well.
Any venom or other agendas exist mainly in the biased heads of unobjective readers.
I've never bought into the great Caro debate, but I will now. I disagree with the above statement entirely.
Caro is nothing better than a gossip columnist for football. She writes some good stories and a lot of tripe. She is very readable, no matter what she writes, because she likes the "sexy" stories. She gets some good info, but extrapolates a lot for the sake of a headline. She effectively creates tabloid journalism for the broadsheet paper.
Whilst I agree that Carlton has been a ready made and easy target over the past few years, I have two major problems with her:
1. Her anti-Carlton agenda was never more apparent than when she was the beneficiary of the numerous leaks from one particular female former board member of the Blues - when she was outed (at least in the general populace, if not the paper), Caro came out with the big fluff piece on this person being the "brave person of the Carlton football club", without actually revealing she was just the leaker of a lot of damaging stories. It was prejudiced, self-serving and outright crap;
2. Richmond - with the exception of her anti-Greg Miller stance and anti-Wayne Johnston campaign, Caroline never has a disparaging word about her poor excuse for a football club.
Caro is worse than most journos that support football. She actually denies that her allegiance to Richmond clouds her judgment. Most other journos at least would acknowledge their prejudices.