Not trying to avoid your questions Tyrant- but I do have a day job and you have been throwing them at me pretty fast!
Quote:
in your initial post you're implying that our season really isn't over,
No its not! Are YOU saying it is?
Quote:
not because making predictions are bad, but because the prediction is wrong because we've won a match
They weren't predictions. People were saying our season is over- as if it was a fact. Go read some of them, its not hard to find them.
Nothing wrong with predicting as long as it is canvassed in that way. The posts I was referring to were not making predictions- they were making statements as if they were "fact". Big difference. I dont have a problem with predictions. I do have a problem with reactive statements that demonstrate little patience for our young and developing team nor understanding of what it takes to make the 8.
Quote:
Because, it seems to me that your initial post, given the content and timing of it, is implying that our season is really ON, and not OFF... and so the PREDICTIONS are wrong, not the fact that predictions are being made
Maybe its just me but I would have thought that our season was "on" until proven otherwise. Something that I have had to repeat it seems too many times. Predictions can be wrong(thats why they are predictions) , statements of "fact" are a different story
example of prediction: "Our season is gone unless we can turn it around....."
example of "fact": "Our season is already gone."
Maybe the difference is too subtle for you- but it is there.
Quote:
If that WAS your point, then you COULD AT LEAST SEE that your INITIAL POST, give the TIMING AND CONTENT of it, seems to NOT BE CONSISTENT with the point you are now underlining.
See above- it was not really my point -just your bastardised version of it.If you understand the difference between Predictions and "statement of fact" then you will see that the two are NOT inconsistent.
Quote:
In your initial post, you seem to be predicting that their prediction is wrong, and you're making that prediciton from the hindsight of a scrappy unfashionable victory over the second worst side
I wasnt "Predicting" anything.
"They" were "believing"(statement of "fact") our season was over they were not "predicting"
Quote:
scrappy unfashionable victory over the second worst side.
1.You can only beat your opposition
2. Many Carlton premiership sides played "scrappy unfashionable" football to beat lesser opposition in the past. This happens because they try to bring you down to their level.
3. 4 point is 4 points
Quote:
Nub, I propose that in future, you include some degree of your "point" if there is a point you're' making
My point was (once again) Nah! read it yourself.
Quote:
because when you cover over one point with another, that looks like backpeddling to the naked eye.
Give me an example, one where I was not merely responding to your rants about "Paris" or "% of supporters who want Carlton to lose" etc.